{"id":49622,"date":"2009-04-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-04-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009"},"modified":"2014-07-06T20:38:45","modified_gmt":"2014-07-06T15:08:45","slug":"manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009","title":{"rendered":"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public … on 24 April, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public … on 24 April, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy Gowda<\/div>\n
BETWEEN?' \"\n\n1.\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA..._'4 :  ~\n(.1iRCUI'I' BENCH AT GULBARGA--;   \" \"\n\nDATEJIZ) THIS THE 24TH D.AY\"0FQAI$f\u00a7i\u00a7;\u00a7;\u00a7{)\u00a7V'   \n?REsENT  \"\" \"  '  \nTHE HOWBLE MR. JLIs\ufb01 C:E.:V_ A1\u00a7'Arsi::a. B\u00a5R\u00a5\u00a7 P\u00a7'E'B'\ufb02E\";\nA  ' _ ..  \nTI-IE H\u20ac)N'BLE MR. .,Jt;\u00a7'1C}\u00e9_Aa;_:~i;: ir\"5:,:\u00a7\u00a7IaQ?ALA GOWDA\n\n '-- \n\nw.r.Nos\u00a7xss,g_aeee&5; '1394'g~.:a9e\u00a7_'_--.3_1_gn '11092[200'7[8\u00bbKA'I'1\n\nIN W.P.NO.26551\/2005\n\nSR1 MANAPPA $3\/<1: HANLIMANTHAWA\n\ngem) LABOUT 3i\u00a2YEAI?S\n\nPf\u00a7'ESEi\\E'I'LY W{)f?J}{__E__I$_I(} AS TEACHER\n('\u00a7{)V"E?;'*!LO"\u20ac3IER PRIMARY SCHOOL, SUNAKAL\n\n,A 1 -T;-;;1_,i,n\u00ab;w :,irqGASuGUR, RAECHUR DI'S'I'R\u00a3C'I'.\n\n ._ ':;t:\u00bb1.EsI\u00e9\u00a3':~3}<3'.}::S'HwARAPPA\nATE;I&CHE'R.,'j_\u20ac?;{3V'F. I-HC}HER PRIMARY SCHOOL\n\nGQREBAE ;,\u00bb"LI NGASGUR\n\nRAi!:f',HUR DISTRICT  PETITIONERS\n\n ' "  :}::y"s22;,_s.1\u00a7i.<:HAN::2pzAsHEKHAR, ADVOCATE}\n\n:1-Ha mzpwv DIRESTOR\n\nOF' PUBLIC INSTRUCTEONS\n\nRAECHUR'  RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
(BY SR3 GANGADHAR $AI’\u00a5CiOLLi, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE}<\/p>\n
W<\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION FELED UNDER ARTICLE  THE
\nCONSTETUTEON SF INDIA PRAYHVIG TO QUASH  ‘ \u00bbO’R’D;E}?’ V. EYE’.
\ni’?.1I.20OE3 PASSED BY THE KARNATAKA \ufb01;DMINISTPn$T1VE’f\u00a7TI?1E\u20ac3Jl’*\u00a5AL
\nIN APPLICATION NO. 686′?-68 OF 200i, A CER’\u00a3’IF’IE3″;)7.CGF=Y_ C3? WHICH<\/p>\n
was BEEN PRGDUSED AS ANXW A, AS THE sA:::\u00bb..Q’:2,mR \u00abSU.\u00a5f’Ff:iRS*.._
\nmom ERRORS wz-uca ARE Ai9PARv\u00a5;ZN*f’—-ON–_4THVE ‘m;c:sv._Lt>p%’V.,THg
\nRECORD AND AS THE KAT FAILED TO} comsxtaag “1’;~\u00abm_ c-.exs_g (\u00a7_)Ff1″‘HE~.._ _j<\/p>\n
PETITEONERS IN ITS PROPER PERsPEc’iWE_._ T  _ V _ .
\n‘ % ‘ % T:.::;-:_v\u00bb_rs,c2…._.z..:ssA
\nBETWEEN V ‘ ‘<\/p>\n
1.. CHANNABASAIAH S\/Q ‘\\’.\ufb023*,E;.2AIAH” \u00bb  <\/p>\n
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS  * __  1   *
\nocc: ASSiS’l’ANTTEACHER_ 5 1   _
\nWORKWG AT: GOV’F.:L'()’WE;i?_ PRIMARY SC’\u00a7~lO{3L
\nH1RE:B13:RA(;r,”;tAwK=;s1NDA:Nu.r2   x
\nRaicaurz  = . p  , <\/p>\n
MA’;,LEss:~1 S}’?\u20acu;’3_I~{~:3L!xJ??1i*ia__ —<\/p>\n
AGE?) AE3_OUT 45 ‘x’.EAR\u00a7=.\n<\/p>\n
occ: A.ss:%sTam’ “‘\u00a3’\u00a7;A_(3’HEli<<\/p>\n
WORIGNG AT: Govif LOWER PRIMARY SCHOOL
\nP\u00a5.\u00a7~3MBERAL.,, RAiCIr1U'R<\/p>\n
.1\u00bb)<\/p>\n
._ VTAYMDPA A. ….. <4
\n. '-.,s;'0_ AYmmPPA
\n _AGE3_&AZ3(ZZ'1.}T-36 YEARS
\n_  .<;u::<:; AsSr,_%:ACHER
\nA Wmr3\\I;;s:J<3:}R RAICHUR  PETETIONERS<\/p>\n
 '  .  iafz SR1." 9~.,_.r\u00a72:.c:HANnRAsHEKAR, ADVOCATE)<\/p>\n
   THE QEPUTY mmEc::'r\u00a7i;\u00a7’f5V\u00a7’;3’J<\/p>\n
Wir-\n<\/p>\n
‘:3
\n{Z<\/p>\n
TH E ‘z:>E’rm”.’   ”  h
\n05* ;:>I.a’r:,2.,;;,\u00a7a:’._1;-1s*,I.f\u00a7::u;;:’1″_1<;'zs:s<
\nRAICHURV A V.\n<\/p>\n
‘f’\u00abE\u00a7E mas MASTER .\n<\/p>\n
_ ‘GC}’\\f’i\u00a7’~.,LGWER PRIMARY SCHOOL
\n‘ ‘ ‘g’IDYA!$\u00a5\u00a3:.{}AR, SZRWAF3,\n<\/p>\n
– ‘:*:;”s’1’RIc*1’ RAICE-{UR  RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
* . \u20ac233? Q91.-‘V%3A\u00e9:\u20ac;Am;AR SANGOLLI, GOVT ADVOCATE}<\/p>\n
‘f’I:F1iSt FILED UNDER ARTECLES 226 AND 22?’ OF’ THE<\/p>\n
:,” “.__C’ONSITU’FEUN OF ENIDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE EMPUGNEU ORDER
\n ‘  ‘i’-?’4_.i1.2″{3O5 PASSED IN APPLIC:AT3DN NQ10704\/’B001 BY THE
\n H-\u00b0{‘>I’*\u00a7’ BE.\u00a7E KARNATAKA ADMINISTRATIVE TREBUPIAL AS PER ANXC
\n  DERECT THE RESPONDENT NO’? TO TERMINATE THE SERVECES
\n  {)F”J?’HE PETITEONERS ES PRIMARY SCLHOOLTEACHER.<\/p>\n
    5 2C{U6 <\/p>\n
IN WP.N0.11(}\u00a72\/2007<\/p>\n
BETWEEN<\/p>\n
14 BASAVARAJ AIGALIMATH<\/p>\n
S10 CHANDRASHEKHARAEAH<\/p>\n
AGED man? 43 YEARS<\/p>\n
ASST. TEACHER _. ~  .\n<\/p>\n
{NOW UNQER ORDERS 01? DISMiSSAL)—-. A –_
\nR,fA’I’ AND POST HONWAD I   ‘
\nBiJAPi}}2 ‘I’A1..Ui{ AND DIS’I’RIC’I’<\/p>\n
{VJ<\/p>\n
SIDDARAMAYYA mm<\/p>\n
szo LATE ERAIAH<\/p>\n
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS<\/p>\n
ASSISTANT TEACHER  _ .. -.  <\/p>\n
\n{NOW UNDER ORDERSOF D%5SM\u00a7S$AL;._ <\/p>\n
R\/AT DEVARA-H1PPARAc;:T – ‘–       _
\nS1NDC}ITALU\u00a7<,BIJAPUR DES'i'\u00a3T.~21C'"i'   _   PE'I'i'I'I(")NERS<\/p>\n
ts'hf.ii". BY ETS SECR$'I'ARY "PG U\ufb01}ATEf)N DEPA’E*”fi%e\u00a7EP?T,
\nV ~ .1\u00a7.c3.s’,M_,s:;guzLn1NG,
\n BAP\u00e9i;~5xL{“}RE4}.\n<\/p>\n
2\u00bb ”   VZEIVQECTOR (3? PUBLIC INSTRN,
\n BIVISKEN, GULBARGA.\n<\/p>\n
 . ,3; THE E3F;PU’I’Y meacmg op’ PUBLEC EP\u00e9’SR”I’N,,<\/p>\n
A. RAECHUR DISTRICF, RAICHUR.\n<\/p>\n
   ‘:–‘:\u00ab:5E CHAIRMAN,
\n ‘E MEDICAL BOARD,<\/p>\n
 VECTOREA HOSPFFAL,
\nBANGALORE.  RESPGNDEZNTS<\/p>\n
  {BY SEE. GANGAQHAR SAN’G\u20aci)LLI, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE)<\/p>\n
THIS WP FILED UNIDER AWFECLE 226 OF THE
\nOF INBXA PRAYING ‘TO QUASH ‘THE ORDER D1′. 1′?.-i’i.2E3;05L.’\u20ac>F””?H’E<\/p>\n
KARNATAKA ADMN. TRIBUNAL, BANGALORE IN,’ ‘–A’PPLN;NO’S.”*’_._<\/p>\n
7492×2001 ARE} 7554\/2001 IN mg BA’1*?LN’,-.TN:>s;68a7 =ANi”)<\/p>\n
6868\/2001 AND CONNECTED APPLICATIONE3,’ $\u00a7_O7,FA;R .As4_;2g;1-Ec\ufb01moi’. V
\nmg APPLiCA’.{‘IO1\\IS OF THE PET1*r*1or=qEr2s-*sAL;s c.{>r\\:cEI:em-L2} WIDE ”<\/p>\n
ANNEXURE1 C) AND ALLOW THE SAM”) “APPLECA’.\u00a3’lC’NS ‘OF.,’i’}:{E
\nPE*r:’r;oNERs WITH A FURTHER EJERECFION “PO ‘I’3::is:- jE2ESPOf;~ID\u00a7;NTE}
\nTO REiNS’1’A’I’E THEM {mo SERVICE wm1,_;aL:, ‘CO’NSEQL”JEN”{‘I\u00a3iL
\nBENEFITS.  *   <\/p>\n
THESE WRIT PETITEQNS,HA*;:i’:\u00a7 Ar~i:\u00a7”‘RE”sERvE9 ON<\/p>\n
19.3.2009, COMING ON FOR F’R{)13\u00a5C)\u00a5.;\u00a7NCE*3~\u00a7’EANT–,,OF’ ORDERS TODAY,
\nVENUGOPALA GGWDA, J MADE]TI-*II3}vi+’fZ)LLs\u00a7)\ufb01.’,I_i}.1{}:”‘__<\/p>\n
In t?\u00a32es.&. \u00a7r;*;jy.1i  “ps\ufb01\u00a7oncm have qumtioned the
\norder da\ufb01td ” 2?; in Application N:_::2, 10304\/200:, 7492\/2001 ma<\/p>\n
_.. ?554] by “Ka,:_na:aka Administrative Tribunai, Bangalore<\/p>\n
  with a \ufb01uther pzayer to grant the relief prayed<\/p>\n
{of 521:1 ii:$\u00a7j;3g::;:t\u00a7j\u00a7f<iV..a;)131icatior1s \ufb01led by them before the Tribunal.<\/p>\n
V Since  thf\u00e9\u00e9\ufb01v\u00e9xit petitions arise out of the: czammon order passed<\/p>\n
" E:23V{."'t\u00a7'1\u00a2:L and since common question of facts and law are<\/p>\n
 they are being disposed of by '\u00a3_'m'.s common order.<\/p>\n
T 2. The two pe\ufb01tioners iu w.:D.25s51\/2005 had \ufb01led<\/p>\n
"Appiica\ufb01ma Ns.686’?~=68\/2001, Umer Section 19 of the<\/p>\n
Adminis\ufb01a\ufb01ve Tribunal Act 1985 before Karnataka<\/p>\n
dire-cied \u00a30 undergo medical examination by tr;-:.\u00bb:”~::\u00e9t\u00a7:%._;=,_f ‘Vl’n\u00a7ed_;ca1<\/p>\n
Board an\u00e9 ii} the event of failure to appear bcfei\ufb01 ”<\/p>\n
services will be terminated. b i j 3 [\u00bb A.  p<\/p>\n
4. The: petitioner in % w.;p…1\u00a7\u00a2%.._i394jV*2A;>7Q%5 ‘ }:%\u00a7;:i%V”:’a;\u00a2d
\nApplication No. 10’?’04\/ 20G].   that; ‘he
\nwas recniited to the pr.’iS\u00a3  of *.’}feac’:}\u00abi\u00e9Vf’ ujcgmder physica}
\nhandicapped quota and $’,E_1 a:.s”   a Teacher in the
\nschoel As he_wa$     examined to confirm
\nabout his   ,gj{\u00e9f ci::*’.j:o.V_3ubmit the report, having<\/p>\n
recteivcatijnotfic\u00e9\u00a79;tc:x:i ‘}.\ufb01wom the Recruitment Committee
\nanci D\u20ac’p{1f.’}T,V_]:\u00a7\u00a7JfEi{3’1;\u20ac’),i” ‘Eiistxilctions, Raichur and thereafter,<\/p>\n
he mc.*gz:ivr::_:i    22.12.2001 {mm the Head Master,<\/p>\n
  y\u00e9:z*{m{i’t1t  Vi\u00e9yanagar, Sirawara, Taluk: Manvi,<\/p>\n
.’VI?i\ufb01i3$}’.i\u00a3I.g   12.2001, he \ufb01led the sai\u00e9 appiication.<\/p>\n
  {W0 peiti\ufb01sners in: writ petition No.1I092\/2087<\/p>\n
sapp\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9 in response to the Noti\ufb01cation dated 12.04.1999<\/p>\n
 _ &~_iss\u00e9;1i1cidj’A’inviti}:1g applications {(3}: filiing up of the posts of Primary<\/p>\n
VT  Teachers and the selection having been made and the list<\/p>\n
x  published amt they having been declared as selected under<\/p>\n
physically handicapped quota, I’\u20ac\u00a70?\u00a3”T\u00a3?\ufb01 far dt1\u00a5:}>’\\.\\\/ Accoxtiixzg ta<\/p>\n
them, despite they having furnished the requisite ‘were<\/p>\n
directed ti) undergo further medical egxam,i13.atio3: –in  <\/p>\n
Hospital. Allcging that the said diIt(;_\u00a33L:>r1_is a1*1\u00e9gar <\/p>\n
the same, \u00a311637 \ufb01led Application Nos.:”:.?4′.\u00a7i2,’:20{}.1 ‘a\ufb01d  ‘A<\/p>\n
to quash the notice issuad  ‘ihgm  to  sjthemu 1:13<\/p>\n
Primary School Teacher] As$istani\u00a7’_L:’i”\u00a3\u00ab\u00a7;<;h\u00a7:r. .<\/p>\n
6. The mspm\u00e9\u00a2i;\u00a3s” ziauii\ufb01g ‘\u00a7\u00a7c\u00a7\u00a2gi7″n\u00abpt:\ufb01cd of the said
\napplicatimzs, hav\ufb02\ufb01led ‘_–st:\u00a7t\u00e9’:\ufb01\u00a7nt, additional reply<\/p>\n
statement    Vmicvaat records before the
\nT’I’i1f3’11I1a3i,: in  \u00bbfi}:\u00a5,{f: action taken by them.<\/p>\n
‘7. v’l’h_\u00e9 TI*i\u00a7)t3.}’g1a13g;’ V1:1’\u00a7<:ivi11g considered the app\ufb01cation \ufb01led<\/p>\n
 _1:)y t11c.\u00a7p<;;tii\u00a7&on\u20ac:;\u00e9":md:___qther similarly placed pemons, has passed<\/p>\n
 '\u00a3z1:;p?u3gn\u20ac:{i.<V:t\u00a7t21;1mon curler. Reitcra\ufb01xxg the facts and grounds<\/p>\n
 __ rigs\ufb01cc\ufb01ve applications and also contending that<\/p>\n
V .the oiiicr  by the Tribunai is erroneous, these writ petitions<\/p>\n
" 4.44"',1r3;V:\u00e91e*eVTL__'ner:V1\u00a7;"  The respondents have \ufb01led thc: statement of<\/p>\n
C1<\/p>\n
 gbggcm\u00e9n in M\u00bb. No. 26551} 2005, opposing these; Wrf\\:petitions.<\/p>\n
 ; 2.\n<\/p>\n
ix’
\n4″\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
8. We have heard’ the learned counsel for t}:1_e* ifneti\ufb01pnem<\/p>\n
and the iearined Government Advocate fer the <\/p>\n
peruseti the records.\n<\/p>\n
9. Learned counsel \u00b0fi*’~.    I<\/p>\n
ccmtended that, the Tribunal
\n\ufb01led by petitioners wi\ufb01boui  K eee.$’i:ie1:’;\ufb01aAfii\u00a7:\u00a7Vv1;\u00a7.; that the
\npetiiionere had subjected  examination and
\nthat the competent at;  them as physically<\/p>\n
handicapped] ‘ Visstted cer\ufb01\ufb01cates, which<\/p>\n
were   _ appointing authority and on
\ne0nsidez”at.Aie1;,”\ufb011e’a\u00a7p%\u00a7i2)e&;:e\u00a7it”erders were issued and hence, it is<\/p>\n
not opeeto the :1esp0.:1dente”.to direct the petitioners once again to<\/p>\n
  \ufb01??”&ee.i3eib1*e”\u00e9fhe Ceii.i’1’*\u00e9ivMedicai Beal\ufb01. According to the learned<\/p>\n
\u00a3;Qt.i;’:;;ee1,–  ;$eti:t.ig)ners being the permanent employees of the<\/p>\n
resg\ufb01eg\u00e9\ufb02eni\ufb01,’ e\u00a7\\3}:er;ti<t}ed te protection under Art:ic1e-31 1 (2) of the<\/p>\n
 T"'.,..44_'\u20ac'\u00a7};n::s1:it11b';ieii: 0f India, which has not been considered by the<\/p>\n
   and hence, the impuged order is illegal.<\/p>\n
10. Per eentm, learned Government Advocaie contended<\/p>\n
” several cemplaints were received against the recnzitment<\/p>\n
 \ufb01procees and selection of the eandkiates, W210 _ have obtaine\u00e9<\/p>\n
X<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
appoinmeni orders under physicaiiy handi(:ap;;;e(1′<"' ._The<\/p>\n
tiepaztment, to ascertain the truthfulness  hf _ <\/p>\n
matters stated in the eompiaints,  it  <\/p>\n
subject 45 eandidaies inclizding \ufb01le    '.\u00a7'a$\u00a7%\u00a2t;:ca1
\nExamitxatien by the    aefion
\nimpugned in the app1ica=L9\u00e9l3t u1\u00a7eler.p}13;\u00a7?\u00bbiea]1y handicapped quota is net genuine<\/p>\n
 =__ar1d\u00ab .tj_[;;e .eeiie.e”0f the respondents, 1:0 subject the petitioners and<\/p>\n
  examination by the Central Me\ufb01i-cal Board,<\/p>\n
V .e0u}d:”net l:1a\u00a7e been challenged and therefmie, the Tribunal is<\/p>\n
 jezs\ufb01g\ufb01ed i\ufb01nega\ufb01ng the claim of the petitioners. It was \ufb01nisher<\/p>\n
 e.;e<33;i\u00a5ie11ti\u00ab1ed that, the "i'I'ib1ma3(, on considemtien of the material<\/p>\n
 of the case has \u00a7'}aSS\u20ac\u20ac\u00a7 the impugned order and<\/p>\n
" Veonseqguently, the writ petiticms are liable to be dismissed.<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
that, certain appiicarzts includitzg the  in<\/p>\n
Appiicatien. Nos.7492\/2901 and 7554\/2001, ap;g.\u00e9amd:’V’ 12::-;_:;.<\/p>\n
Medical Board, which, after dam ;uid cimumstanccs of the case, we are of the c-:m$ideree:i Vi\u20acW<\/p>\n
 the ‘I’rib’una,} has not crrommitted any error and it is justified in<\/p>\n
A A 3  ‘tejectixxg Application NOS.6867\/ 2001, 6858] 208 1 , 15’}’~ 159\/ 2002,<\/p>\n
1970412091, 7492\/2091 and 7534\/2001 \ufb01led by the petiticners<\/p>\n
Vat<\/p>\n
herein. No good gnunds are made out for interfez”e1:1c;%;:.’W\u00a7\u00a3i1 the
\nsaid {xzdings of the Tribuna} and Consequen\ufb02y,  \ufb01trti\ufb01gns<\/p>\n
are Iiabie to be (1iSI}Il.iS$(‘:(i.\n<\/p>\n
Accordingly, these Writ petition\ufb01  Astasilci  Nc:  AV <\/p>\n
costs,<\/p>\n
VR<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public … on 24 April, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy Gowda BETWEEN?’ ” 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA…_’4 : ~ (.1iRCUI’I’ BENCH AT GULBARGA–; ” ” DATEJIZ) THIS THE 24TH D.AY”0FQAI$f\u00a7i\u00a7;\u00a7;\u00a7{)\u00a7V’ ?REsENT “” ” ‘ THE HOWBLE MR. JLIs\ufb01 C:E.:V_ A1\u00a7’Arsi::a. B\u00a5R\u00a5\u00a7 P\u00a7’E’B’\ufb02E”; A ‘ […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49622","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nManappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public ... on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public ... on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-06T15:08:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public … on 24 April, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-06T15:08:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1616,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009\",\"name\":\"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public ... on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-06T15:08:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public … on 24 April, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public ... on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public ... on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-06T15:08:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public … on 24 April, 2009","datePublished":"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-06T15:08:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009"},"wordCount":1616,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009","name":"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public ... on 24 April, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-04-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-06T15:08:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/manappa-vs-the-deputy-director-of-public-on-24-april-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Manappa vs The Deputy Director Of Public … on 24 April, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49622","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49622"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49622\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}