{"id":49673,"date":"2009-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009"},"modified":"2016-06-17T06:50:44","modified_gmt":"2016-06-17T01:20:44","slug":"fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009","title":{"rendered":"Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure<\/div>\n
EN THE agga CGUR? 93 ;gKx\u00e9$A\u00a7gw >:\"5f\"\n\nciagngr BENCH AT GULB\u00e9R\u00a7& gV'H\n\nBATES THIS THE 1$\"'\u00a7AY gr ?\u00a7\u00a7R\u00a7a\u00a7?'2\u00e9e9,_=; \n\nyxgggmwz'\n\n \n\nT\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01QN'ELE MR. 3US:gCE_v.G;-\u00e9aa\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01ir\n\u00e9\u00a7pf='\n\nTEE BG\u00a7'BLE MR.-Jusi\u00e9cs Agg\ufb01j\u00e9gsaagpu\ufb01g\n\n \n\nw;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;;a\u00a7E@\u00a7Z\n\n8\u00a3T@EEN:\n\nL. Yakeerap\u00e9a, .\nS\/0. Durugagga,  \n\ufb01gez \u00a73vy@ars;\"\"\n\n5, Ea\u00a73\ufb01ma;\"A &\n' %fQ;aF&k\u00e9era\u00a7pa,\n\n\u00a3g\u00e9g.\u00e9S_yg3rs,_\u00bb\n\nGc$:=Hou3eh3\u00a7\u00e9g\n\nV\ufb02 3..Chan@amma,'\"\n\n.u'@fe. late Bheemagga,\n'%g@: 30 gaazg,\n\n\"'.\"QC:: Hau\ufb01ehaid,\n\n.\u00a7\u00e9H\"SrL\u00a7evi,\n\n *\u00a7f\u00a7$ Eheemapga,\n\"u%ge: 13 yaara,\n\nV \"\u00a7. Durgappa,\n\nS50. Eheemappa,\nAg&: :1 yaazsg\n\nAPE\u00a7\u00e9L=\u00a7qg:a29z 9? 29%? AMVL\n\n\n\n \n\n\u00e9. Z Saiinqamma,\n. Bheamap\u00a7a,\n9 years,\n\n7. \ufb01handru, ,~w-\nSEQ. Eheamappa, j _ V\nAge: ? ycar\ufb01, \". [T*;\n\n \n\nRppekiant NQ3.4 tg ? are the r'QGr3;Hrep. _\nby nazt friend and aaturai \"guar\u00a7ia\u00e9<_E\nmother i.e., aypgiiant $9.3. *_.li are.\n556. Jangamarahaii: vr.\u00a7ii$a\u00a7\u00e9; " "\ufb01gstt '\n\ufb01aiapuz, Tq: Manvi, Dist; * V'\n\n1..\n\nI\n\n \n\nSr Basavaxaj R.Ma:b iQr_ b V _\nS: ChandrashekarjP.?a:;;{g\ufb01dv;};'\n\n\u00a7By 1.\n1.\n\n:. Venkoba,\n\nSis. Haaumappa,\n\nAge: 33 yaars,'\n\nDrive: cf Tract-r \u00a7\n'iv\n\nRf\u00a7."\u00a7ad\u00a73iadinni Vi\nr~.:\n\n?q:=\ufb01a\ufb01vi, Q$3t? aa'\n\nF\n('.3\n:7.'\n\nE; Shara\ufb01egQg\u00a7\u00a7} " V\n\n:L3fo. Han3maa$g\u00a2\u00a7\u00a3a Mai; ?atii,\n\nf\ufb02wner of T5a\u00a7i0:"&n\ufb01\n4T:a:iez No.Kag35x?, 25? &\n\u00a7f\u00a7} 3a\ufb01\u00a7&marah&lli viigaa\n7?\u00aest: \ufb01ai&pu:, Tq: Mamvi,\n\n",b:3t;'R3ia\ufb01ur.\n\n*g_\u00a7. T\ufb01\u00e9v\ufb01a\u00e9\u00e9ger,\n\n1'=Umit@d Endia En\ufb01urance C0\u00bb, Ltd.\u00a7\nLgSidhanu:, Di5t: Raichug. M \u00a333?\n\n1%? Sri. \u00a7u:uraj Seghi, id?" for RE & E53\n\nE51. R.V.Nadagcuda, Rdv. for R3.\u00a7\n\n\n\n \n\nThe petitionerg are the father, mother, wiie and cniiaxen\nof deceased Eheemayga. it is averrea 3n the c%\u00e9;& petition\nthat on 82.12.2802 a{ anon: "$.50 p.m. a@Q3\u00e9$\u00a7@ E\ufb01\u00e9emappa\nwas going by walk 0n the Left side 9% th@mf\u00a7\u00a7a \ufb01\u00e9@%'\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9%pga\nstan\u00e9 at Masai, at that tima Xek\ufb01bhue\ufb01\ufb01 %o;i\u00ab\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7h\u00a7\u00a3:\u00a7;n@\nth% Tractor with Traiiar in Q gagb \ufb01n? ne\ufb01g\ufb01qenz \ufb01\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9g \ufb01gd\n\ndas\ufb01ed tg Bheemagpa reSuit:n\u00a7,:he fatal inju\u00a7i\u00e9\u00e9"t0 him and\n\nsuccumbed :0 the injuries at t\u00a7e\u00b03\ufb01@:. Tag ciaimants baiaq\n\ndependants upon the inc\u00e9me-e\ufb01_\ufb01he'c\u00e9G\u00a7a3ed figed the ciaim\n\n..\\\n\ngetitian, "\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9Kihg' \u00e9\u00e9\ufb01g\u00e9m\ufb01aticwi of Rs.6,\u00a7\u00a7,SS\ufb02--G\ufb01 Exam the\nraspandent\u00e9,\n\ufb01uti;eT was 'i3s\u00a7ea ta the saspenaeats. Raapsndeai\n\ni\ufb01ofi hag fii&\ufb01,cQun:er avarring that the accidgat accurred\n\ndu\u00e9,\u00a7Q tn3 \u00a7egLiggnce an th\u00e9 part or i\ufb01\u00e9 decaased \ufb01imseii.\n\n"wf\ufb01e de\u00a2easa\ufb01L\u00a7uddeaiy came and cantactea the v\u00e9hici\u00e9 and\n\nTFthe,occ1dunt GCC\u00a7\u00a3X@d aad t\u00e9e acaidant was get due ta the\n\n'":a3\ufb01Va\ufb01d.2@gi:qe\u00a7i Qrivimq ai tha Tractax and Eragier 33\n\n }\u00a7li&q\u00a7d i\ufb01 E\u00e9e ciazm \u00a7@tiiiG\u00a7 aa\ufb02 tha Eegice have fiiad a\n\nV'=, fais@ c\ufb01azga ghee: 3g3:nsi raspandext \u00a7o,z. Respsnaent\n\n*N\u00a7.1 a\u00e9agtea the ahj\u00e9ctisn stateman: Eii\u00e9\ufb01, by respondent\n\nR@.2. Respan\ufb01ent M@.3~\u00a7nss:a2ca Cempany iii\u00e9d cauntaz,\n\n\\9\ufb01%\n\n\n\nSenying tha avermen: made in the petiuien regarding the\n\nmanner of the accidant and Eartha: averted that T  7%uantum\n\n \n\n0: Compensation awarded4 :3 excessive and; fespdsde\ufb01t  N0.1\n\nwas not hoiding a valid driving license at the iime7Qi't\ufb01g\n\naccident. It is aiso ave::@d that the claim p\u00e9tition is\n\niilea wiih sale inteaticn to \ufb01a;n s\u00a7mpathy,of"th&*C0u:t and\n\nts achieve cemgensatian thsuqh aha Tractor and the Trailer\n\n0: the 3m respandant W33 \ufb02otLinv9Eved in the accidant.\n\n3. The Eribu\ufb01a; \u00e9gam\u00e9dgtn\u00e9\ufb02iaiiowinq issueat\n\n1} W\u00a7,th$r th\u00a7%pet;t;\u00a7\ufb01e\u00a7s prove that the death\n\n0: Ehs\u00e9magpa has Qccurred in \ufb01\ufb02 accident which\ngteet p\u00a7ace"5n G2.l2.2GGZ at absut ?.5Q a.m. an\n'"S\u00a7n\u00a7naaur4Ei\ufb02\u00a7asugur raa\ufb01, 3&5: old \ufb01gswgtand\n\n*\u00bb_a: \ufb01a$ki_\u00a7ue is the rash and nagizqent driving\n\n \n\n\u00a2i ?;aCt\u00a2r and ?:a1ier Ns.K%.36.T.2'? aad Z58\n\n%y_ii3;dri\u00a5er\/resgondent No.1?\n\n?} Ehether i\ufb01e petitisners are antitiad ta\n\nu*$empea3atian? if 33, how mgch an\u00e9 ifem w\ufb01am?\n\n'\u00a7. On behagi o\ufb01 the siaimanta, t\ufb01e 2\u00a7Q\u00a7\ufb01@E' 0: tg\u00e9\n\n"~_ \u00e9eceased as ?.\ufb01al :n\u00e9 an ayawit\ufb01ags as ?.\ufb01.2 weze examined\n\n*an\u00a7 got mazked i\ufb01e decumeats Exs.P1 to E. \ufb01n Sakai: ai the\n\n\\5Q%\n\n\n\nraspendents, no orai evidence was ad\u00a7uced.{  H\u00e9w@\ufb01\u00e9:;,cGpy\nQf the Enauzaace Paiicy amd Qzivinq iic@n\u00a7e.di':@3p\u00e9nd\u00e93t\nNo.1 was marked. The Tribu\ufb01ai waiter  densiQe\u00a7inq {ha\n\nmateriai on recerd and assessing evidenc\u00e9~aaau$ed b\u00a7;tne\n\u00a7ar:i9s, angwered both the is\u00a7u\u00e9s ix \u00e9aq\u00e9zjve and dismigsed\n\nthe claim petitiom an\u00a7.haid \ufb01ha%=:\u00a7ough t\ufb01e claimants wouid\n\nhave en\ufb01itied for compensati\u00e9n bf &s;s;\u00a74,a33~a@, in View\n6f the \u00a7indingT_cg 3iSSQe':\ufb01\u00a7.\u00a7_ \ufb01@i\ufb01i\ufb01Q that the Ciaimantg\n\n\ufb01ave faiied to \ufb01ro\ufb01e the ra@h'ah\ufb01.negiiqent driving of t\u00e9e\n\nTractar abd Wfi\u00e9iiefi by ,it3 _drivar, dismissed the claim\np@titiQm.  B\u00e9i\u00a7\u00a7.aQqri\u00e9%\u00e9& by th@ Judgment and Award gated\nG3.}G.2\ufb01\u00a7@, dismgssing. \u00e9he claim petitian the ciaimantg\n\n\ufb01ave p:&E%rfe@ thi\u00a7'am\ufb01\u20aca;.\n\nA\u00a2S,g 'E6 he?\u00a7 heard the Learned csun\ufb01eg ag\ufb01earinq fez\n\n'vtha ap\u00a7@iian:s a\ufb01d far the raspandenta.\n\n', 6\u00bb, H\u00a7%imq regard ta the conteniio\ufb02s urae\ufb01, the points\n\n" t:hai'a:1se :9: Cu! determinaticn in this ag\ufb01aai ar\u00e9g\n\ngm;\n\nwhether t\ufb01a J\ufb01dgment and Awaz\ufb01 of the\nTribasai {\ufb02at {\ufb01e ciaimamts have faiied to\n\ngrave that the accident occurred \ufb02ue to i\ufb01e\n\nVix.\/FL'\n\n\n\nhis \u00e9vidence bafore the Tribu\ufb01ai that Bheemagpg was qeinq\nby walk and the Tractor and ifalier came \u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 pan1nd in\nrash and negligent manner and dashed Bheem\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7gg\u00a7\u00e9;%*;esuit\nBheemappa sustained bieedinq in\ufb01ur:es. wH\u00a7 \ufb01#$:a;$\u00a7-sgagad\n\nthat the Pciice have recorded his 3t$tem\u00e9n\ufb01;;\u00a7ogy or the\n\n \n\nc\ufb01arqe sheet is at Ex.P3. \u00bb?,%.24\ufb01yyanqon\ufb01; \u00e9it\u00e9\ufb01 av Q.W.;\u00a2\nin t\ufb01e Charge sheet. Nat\ufb01in\u00a7~ has ~b\u00e9em7 eggcitad in the\n\ncroa$~examination 0: ?;%.2Ito'dis\ufb01eiieve E13 avidence that\n\n\ufb01e is an eyewitness t5 the \u00a2nbi\u00a7\u00e9n\u00a7 a5 his statement hag\n\nbeen recbr\u00e9e\u00e9 {in 7th@ u\u00a2rimi\ufb01\u00e9i' C&S@. On behalf of the\n\nEesponde\ufb01ts} the dfiver or the Tzactor and Trailer has 50:\n\nbean ex3min\u00e9\u00a7, -The Qw\ufb01af has mat baen examined an\u00e9 no era;\n\nxayg\u00e9e\ufb01f\ufb01vi\ufb01 addgcad gm behalf of Eng z\u00e9spon\ufb01emts. Hswever,\n\n'::'is_\u00a7on\u20acen\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7 by \ufb01h\u00e9 ieaz\ufb01ed QOU\ufb02S@i appeazi\ufb01g far the\n\nrespe\ufb01dentsf\ufb01hat the reqistratien gumber 03 the ?ra$tGz and\n\nTraiiei' \u00a33 "\u00a30: mentiened by' \u00a7.w.z aad. in ta% abgence of\n\n"Amgntignimg GE the registratian numE@:' GE" iha Tractar and\n\n3:31:95, the evi\u00e9anae 0: P.%.2 15 net tzmthfui and\n\n r@iiabi\u20ac. There 15 EM} merit ix: 53$ coateatzsn as ii; :5\n\n""\u00a3@ii sattied t\u00e9at 33 ?.W.Z was examiaed bgicze the C0urt an\n\n1b.@J.\u00a3@G\u00a7, w\ufb01ereas the acc;$e\u00a7t Qccgrre\ufb01 on $\u00a3.15.\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7Z and\n\n\n\n\n\n \n\n16\n\nthe quastion as ta whether the charq@3"s$\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 \ufb01a3 be@&\npropeziy iiied and as to whether it is \u00a7\u00a7;;@La@d d\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9y if\nanyT in tiling tha compgaini \u00a7\u00a7;\u00e9_";Q _b\u00e9A \u00a7@\ufb01@i \u00a7\u00a7 ?pYi_i@@\nCrimi\ufb01ai Ceurt fer considegi\ufb01q Engigase Q5 the gr\ufb02\u00e9agut\ufb01on\nbefsra it and it is not spam gb th\u00e9 ?\u00a7ih\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9i\ufb02\u00a3\u00e9 go i\ufb01t\u00e9 tha\nqaestion as to whethgg :\ufb01\u00e9 c$\u00e9:ge \ufb02\u00e9heet} is filed in\naccordance with law  a\u00a7d  w\u00a7%g\ufb02\u00e9#f \ufb01t' hag i\ufb02S\u00a7if@d t\ufb01\u00e9\ncomfidance of $\u00a7\u00e9.\ufb01ri\u00a7\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9;\u00a7 i\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 \u00a7G%\ufb01$\u00e9nts praduced befere\nthe T:ibuna;~%\u00a7\u00a7i%\ufb01i$ \u00a7@_\u00a2Qr\ufb01Q$\u00a7f$%e the evidence of the\n\neyewitnes'\u00e9}"T":\ufb01ii 3L\u00bb\u00e97'3\"G2<'\u00e9::mi:2Qd"b\u00e9rom we 'Z{r:j_i3u!1a.i zeqaraina\n\nthe \ufb01act, thai'"\u20acEe .$Cg\u00a3\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01t Qccurred due to ragh and\n\nneq:iqam:"gf:\u00a7inqV=3: "$59" genicia and when ih\u00e9 reasons\n\nasaig\ufb01ed by ih\u00e9.$:ibqn3i is no: at aii cengzstenz and im\n\nu\ufb01iew Q\u00a3.:%e evi\ufb01enQ\u00a7_of P.%.2 and the dscum\u00e9nts got marked\n\n*i.a;,3 cogy  \u00e9\u00a3_ tha FIR ;nx.P:}, copy 95 t\ufb01e Complaint\n\nW"'\n\ni\n\n6\n\nX.725[v,\u00a7Q\u00a7\u00a7 TQf tha charg\u00e9 gheet {Ex.?3\u00a7, copyT of ihe\n\nvV\u00a7an\u00a2h\u00a7\ufb01amaH {g;;?\u00e9} an\ufb01 cop' of EM?" xegort iEx.P5} it is\n\nclear th\u00e9\ufb01x th\u00e9 evi\ufb01@nce 9% ?.%.2 is Cazrcbcrazed by the\n\nuV\u00a7a;d:30cQ&ent3 and iurihez ragpondamt \ufb01G3.1 and E &&v% \ufb01at\n\n_\u00a7i\u00a7@\ufb01tQd taat {ha accidaai O\ufb02cufi\u00e9d dag \ufb01e the rash anv\n\n'"aa\u00a7iigent \ufb01$i\u00a51nq. Thaugh according to t\u00e9\u00e9m t\ufb01a accideaa\n\n<'\n\n\\J}%\n'fix'?\n\n\n\n \n\n12\n\nthe age 0: {ha daceage\ufb02 Bheemappa at 45 y\u00a7a:\u00a7L\u00a7$\u00a7 come ts\naha conCiu3ion that t\ufb01e Loss '?\ufb01V\u00a2.a\u00a7@%#d\u00a7#\u00a7%a  at\nRs.3;6\u00a7\u00a2GGG-GS and has awarded:\u00a7$Li\ufb01;$\ufb01$~$Q %Q\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01@\u00a7 kegs \u00a7f\nestate, R3.f:_{},SOi'J-GU towgyds - \u00e9nd\naffestion, Rs.lQ,U0O~G0 to\ufb01agds c\u00a7\ufb01sQr:1\u00a7m %5\ufb01'%s.\u00a7;G@G~G@\ntowards iunerai eXP\u00ae$S\ufb01$ an\ufb01"h$\u00a7-\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01ess\u00e9dvthat the ciaimant\nwould Ema entitled ix: i\u00a7\u00a7ai,\u00a7@\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01i\ufb01n <\ufb01? Rs.3,94,DQG~Q0\n\nwith interest at_.6%u' ;ag f\ufb01om 3the' date 0f the claim\n\n    \n\npetitiea tiii'~:;Q ;\u00a7ate'ppfg'Qayment and apportianed th@\n\u00a20mpen3ati\u00e9\ufb01*a$Qum5f' \ufb02;\u00a7:ma\ufb01\u20acW\u00a7o.j being the wiie woui\ufb01 be\nentitled {@'thG C\u00e9&p\u00e9f3&\u00a3iU\ufb01 awarded t$wards canaerzium and\n3\u00a7% cf the Mc\u00e9mp\u00e9asa\ufb01gan awarded ander other headg.\n\nCiaimanL\u00bb$o3.\u00e9\u00bb\u00a7O"7 b\u00e9ing tha ahiiaren of the \u00e9eceased ara\n\n,"\u00e9\u00a7titie\u00e9;\u00a7o'\u00a7@% ea\u00a2\ufb01"Gi ihe tatai compensation awarded aha\n\nCiaxm\u00e9\ufb01t \ufb01\u00e9sfi and 2 being t\ufb01e \ufb01arents are entitied to the\n\nbal3nc\u00a77 am@\ufb01nt3Vaf 15% \u00e9aah. The amomnt payable ta the\n\n\ufb01iaima\u00e9tsw 4' is "? shag}. be deposited in any Natianaiiz\u00e9d\n\n* \u00a7a\ufb01k gie\ufb01g with accrue\u00e9 interest tawazds t\ufb01e minar s\ufb01ildren\n\n*iI@,;_ \u00e9iaimant N\u00e9s.\u00e9 ta "? with iibarty' ts ciaima\ufb01t %0.3\n\n'*_i\u00a7e.g tme methgz to v\ufb01th\ufb01raw the iaterast accrued an tha\n\n"5aid depsgit g@:i0d:C&iiy. Gut 3f the cam\ufb01ensation \u00a7ayabi@\n\n\n\n \n\n34\n\nameu\ufb01t 0: CG\ufb02\u00a7\u20ac\ufb018&ElG\ufb01 shaii be aepcsgtea by :he i\ufb01surance\n\nCamgamy, within 2 msnths from taday.\n\ns\u00a7,\/%-3'   SI %  \n\n1\n\n\n\n-    \n<\/pre>\n
KSm*<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009 Author: V.G.Sabhahit & A.S.Pachhapure EN THE agga CGUR? 93 ;gKx\u00e9$A\u00a7gw >:”5f” ciagngr BENCH AT GULB\u00e9R\u00a7& gV’H BATES THIS THE 1$”‘\u00a7AY gr ?\u00a7\u00a7R\u00a7a\u00a7?’2\u00e9e9,_=; yxgggmwz’ T\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01QN’ELE MR. 3US:gCE_v.G;-\u00e9aa\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01ir \u00e9\u00a7pf=’ TEE BG\u00a7’BLE MR.-Jusi\u00e9cs Agg\ufb01j\u00e9gsaagpu\ufb01g w;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;;a\u00a7E@\u00a7Z 8\u00a3T@EEN: L. Yakeerap\u00e9a, . S\/0. Durugagga, \ufb01gez \u00a73vy@ars;”” […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49673","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nFakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-17T01:20:44+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Fakeerappa S\\\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\\\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-17T01:20:44+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009\"},\"wordCount\":34,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009\",\"name\":\"Fakeerappa S\\\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\\\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-17T01:20:44+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fakeerappa S\\\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\\\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-17T01:20:44+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009","datePublished":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-17T01:20:44+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009"},"wordCount":34,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009","name":"Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-17T01:20:44+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/fakeerappa-so-durugappa-vs-venkoba-so-hanumappa-on-10-february-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fakeerappa S\/O Durugappa vs Venkoba S\/O Hanumappa on 10 February, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49673","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49673"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49673\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49673"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49673"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49673"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}