{"id":49846,"date":"2008-06-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008"},"modified":"2018-08-02T14:14:23","modified_gmt":"2018-08-02T08:44:23","slug":"bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O &#8230; vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar &#8230; on 17 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O &#8230; vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar &#8230; on 17 June, 2008<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n<pre>rm THE HIGH coumj' OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE j\n\nDATED THIS THE 17th DAY 0:2 JUNE , 20:15\" ' '    \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE s.ABD:1L...feAz$g\u00e9'-  \n\nW.P.No 50215 OF 2m4_(L-KSRTC) V  *\n\n1 BHEEMANNA EX-CONDUCTQ_F?'~    \" -.\nS\/0 SHAp;KRAppA,_;\\\u00ab{pf_ '- 49    \nR\/O JANATA COLONY'   -  '\nBIDAR  \"    \n\n  PETITIONER\n\n(53: 3:3 . '5.a,sAjV:AR'A;}vvKAR'EDDY--ADv. )\n\n  - f:fH'E&amp;DEiig1.\u00ab \"cQNTRO'I.1.ER NEKRTC\n \u00bb ;3IDAR\u00bb_!_)I~'ff'a'..  \n BJ_DA R-,  \n\n RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n<p>..  : KALEEMULLAH SHARIFF -ADV. J<\/p>\n<p> IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227<\/p>\n<p> CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH<br \/>\n IMPUGNEE ORDER 01:&#8217; LABOUR comm&#8217; DT. 19.4.2904<\/p>\n<p>V}.DE&#8221;ANN!f}X.I:3. AND ALSO &#8216;I&#8217;fi!:.3 ORDER OF &#8216;l&#8217;Hi!}<\/p>\n<p>5 RESPONDENT DT. 6. .1 1.2001 VIBE ANNEXA.<\/p>\n<p>V This pcizi\ufb01on coming on for hearing this day, the<br \/>\ncourt manic the fallcswingz<\/p>\n<p>2. I have heard the learned counsei for the parties-\n<\/p>\n<p>3. Learned counsel for the pe\ufb01tioner would contegfid,  ~  <\/p>\n<p>that the Labour Court was not justi\ufb01ed in  &#8216;dd <\/p>\n<p>the petitioner has not issued ticksts&lt;&#8211;.tp ass&quot;   <\/p>\n<p>It is further submitted  svssdd[dos;\u00ab:sssss1g A<br \/>\nCorporation petitioner has V  not<br \/>\ncollected {are from   it is<br \/>\nnot the case of    V\ufb01ed\ufb01oner has<br \/>\npilferaged the  s A&#039; eizfe\ufb01\u00e9rnstances, the<br \/>\ndismissal   e service is highly<br \/>\ndispropo:1:ionateV&#039;to_V {he \u00aboiisconduct.<\/p>\n<p>  On other  learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>res;\u00a7o__nd.er1t, evorpors\u00e9tion has justi\ufb01ed the impugned<\/p>\n<p> it h is  that the Labour court on<\/p>\n<p>_ _e.p_p1&#039;eeiatioo Afzhe materiai on record has recorded the<\/p>\n<p>   &#039;jhat the_peti.t_;ioz1.e_r has aliowed \ufb01ve _ _<\/p>\n<p>  \u00a75;{ass$ehgers to IIELVCI  the bus: withoot  tiekcts<\/p>\n<p>;g,nd_4dwith0ut coiieoting fare from them causing fmancial<\/p>\n<p>&#039;dices to the Corporatio:&#039;1.\\NThis is a case of either gross<\/p>\n<p>negligence or dishonesty. Therefore, the court beiow <\/p>\n<p>right in rejecting the application of the peI:i.tior1er,.u&#8211;&#039;  it  .   <\/p>\n<p>5. I have carefuliy considered  is<\/p>\n<p>made at the Bar and perused rgiatefials  <\/p>\n<p>record.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. As noticed   the<br \/>\npetitioner is that itta:s.:&gt;&#8217;ctiecked at stage<br \/>\n26 \/ S, five   &#8216;Were; travelling in the<br \/>\nbus from   &#8216;2&#8217;\/&#8217; \/ S and that the<br \/>\nresporzdetity   fare from them. The<br \/>\npetitione\u00e9  V..1x1oth  &#8220;examined himself but also<\/p>\n<p>exa:e1ii1ed&#8217;a:&#8217;w%it12es.s  support of his case. It is the ease<\/p>\n<p> the &#8216;petitionejf? the checking Inspector has forced<\/p>\n<p>~ .ifb.iri:i&#8217;~\u00bbto receiye the o\ufb01ence memo and sigzature on the<\/p>\n<p>   receipt. It is not the case of the petitioner<\/p>\n<p> Inspector was enimieally disposed towards<\/p>\n<p> The stand of the respondent did not inspire<\/p>\n<p>confidence of the Labour Court. Taking into account the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of the checking Inspector as also the other<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;%<\/p>\n<p>mate\ufb02al such as penaity receipts and un&#8211;pm&#8217;2chce:1\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>tickets, the court below has held that the petitiorteifi\u00e9-afgai\ufb01-?;&#8217;\u00bbV:.A4<\/p>\n<p>guilty of a11owir1g 5 passengers to travel in  <\/p>\n<p>without issuing tickets and without;&#8217;ce1Iectjng   <\/p>\n<p>them resulting in loss of eevenue to the icorporat.;iO}.&#8221;I. &#8216; It <\/p>\n<p>is also evident that the   13<br \/>\ncases of misconduct,    matter of<br \/>\ncharge No.3. Theteply this charge<br \/>\nwas that past ~ vcohsideted at the time<br \/>\nof considetihg&#8217;   ii\ufb01bther words, there is<br \/>\nno disputes}  of the petitioner in<br \/>\n13 cases &#8216;of  feiating to the period from<\/p>\n<p>I_V&#8221;&#8216;2&#8217;V&#8217;v:i&#8217;\u00a2&#8221;&#8216;K},&#8217;0-1&#8242;:-.g.:&#8221;:98,.&#8217;.&#8221;&#8216;-|.&#8217;\u00ab:O s:s.260{).&#8217;*&#8217; &#8216;<\/p>\n<p> stii-yiiiission of the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>-4 .. _;&#8217;:v.pet1t1oner  the rule 1ssue and start is not mandatcry<\/p>\n<p> accepted. The said circular issued by the<\/p>\n<p> is not under challenge. The said circuiar is<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;b.ii1diI1g on the petitioner. Thus, from the facts stated<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p> above, it is evident that the petitioner was either<\/p>\n<p>dishonest or careless or gossly negligent. It is evident<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;it<\/p>\n<p>;_'&#8221;Vea. _ Ghtl\ufb02-    A  &#8221;  &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>that if the checking officials had not checked the bliss<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner would have collected the fare  ~<\/p>\n<p>passengers were alighting from the bus. In  &#8221; <\/p>\n<p><a href=\"\/doc\/110381613\/\">KSRTC vs. B.S.HuHkatt1<\/a>! 2001(2) see; 574,  <\/p>\n<p>court has held Where the<br \/>\npassengers without: tickets&#8217; or  at lesser<br \/>\nrate than the proper rsite;   interalia<br \/>\namount either  a   or gross<br \/>\nnegligence    Vliifere not fit to be<br \/>\nretained  inziction or action on<br \/>\nthe part otliziie  financial loss to the<\/p>\n<p>Corporatiorz. Irrthe cgisei Regional Manager, KSRTC<\/p>\n<p>V at reported in 2002 (10)<\/p>\n<p>   court has held that the act of bus<\/p>\n<p>iv&#8217;-&#8230;&#8217;conduCtor of  passengers Without issuing<\/p>\n<p>-\u00ab..i&#8217;_j&#8217;3t\u00a7.cl&lt;:ets aniouiits to dishonesty or gross negligence and<\/p>\n<p>Eifor&quot;  &#039;SL_1\u00a2:\u00a31 misconduct punishment of removal from<\/p>\n<p> service was jus\ufb01\ufb01ed. Following the aforesaid decisions<\/p>\n<p>Vii&#039;\u00ab:..TV&quot;of:~Vthe Apex Court, a Division Bench of this Court in<\/p>\n<p>MANAGLRG DIRECTOR, IWRYH EAST KARNBTAKA<\/p>\n<p>ROAD  T CORPORAHON VS. IBRAI\ufb02M &#8211; ILR<\/p>\n<p>l<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O &#8230; vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar &#8230; on 17 June, 2008 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer rm THE HIGH coumj&#8217; OF KARNATAKA. BANGALORE j DATED THIS THE 17th DAY 0:2 JUNE , 20:15&#8243; &#8216; &#8216; BEFORE THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE s.ABD:1L&#8230;feAz$g\u00e9&#8217;- W.P.No 50215 OF 2m4_(L-KSRTC) V * 1 BHEEMANNA EX-CONDUCTQ_F?&#8217;~ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49846","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O ... vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar ... on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O ... vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar ... on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-08-02T08:44:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\\\/O &#8230; vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar &#8230; on 17 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-02T08:44:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":718,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\\\/O ... vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar ... on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-08-02T08:44:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\\\/O &#8230; vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar &#8230; on 17 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O ... vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar ... on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O ... vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar ... on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-08-02T08:44:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O &#8230; vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar &#8230; on 17 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-02T08:44:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008"},"wordCount":718,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008","name":"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O ... vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar ... on 17 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-08-02T08:44:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/bheemanna-ex-conductor-so-vs-the-divl-controller-nekrtc-bidar-on-17-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Bheemanna Ex-Conductor S\/O &#8230; vs The Divl Controller Nekrtc Bidar &#8230; on 17 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49846","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49846"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49846\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49846"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49846"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49846"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}