{"id":49909,"date":"2011-09-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-09-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011"},"modified":"2018-10-29T14:58:32","modified_gmt":"2018-10-29T09:28:32","slug":"mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                        In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                               File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001721\n\n\n\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a030,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a030,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0J.P.Tiwari\n           H.No.16\/791\n           Santoshi\u00a0Ma\u00a0Marg\n           Madhinath\n           Bareilly\u00a0243\u00a0001\n           Uttar\u00a0Pradesh\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Bareilly.\n\n           Respondents\n\n           North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Izzat\u00a0Nagar\n           Bareilly\n\n\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Ram\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Sr.DMM\n                                    Shri\u00a0D.K.Srivastava,\u00a0APO\n                                    \u00ad\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Bareilly\n\n\n\n\n                         Information\u00a0Commissioner               :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                            at\n                                                    New\u00a0Delhi\n                                                                                         File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001721\n\n\n                                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Background<\/p>\n<p>1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.26.4.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       Bareilly \u00a0 seeking \u00a0 information \u00a0 against \u00a0 six \u00a0 points \u00a0 regarding \u00a0 implementation \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 promotion \u00a0 order\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       No.1132\u00a0dt.21\/08\/2009\u00a0of\u00a0Sr.ALP\u00a0issued\u00a0to\u00a0Shri\u00a0S.K.Tiwari,\u00a0ALP\/BC.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a024.5.11\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       furnishing\u00a0point\u00a0wise\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.7.6.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       commenting\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0against\u00a0points\u00a02(b)(ii),\u00a04,\u00a04(a)\u00a0and\u00a05.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       replied\u00a0on\u00a04.7.11\u00a0providing\u00a0further\u00a0clarification.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.11.7.11\u00a0before\u00a0CIC\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0information:<\/p>\n<p>       i)         Attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0incumbency\u00a0list\u00a0regarding\u00a0seniority\u00a0of\u00a0LP(Shunting)\u00a0Sr.ALP\u00a0&amp;\u00a0ALP\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       26.4.11, \u00a0 10.2.10 \u00a0 and \u00a0 21.8.09 \u00a0 respectively \u00a0 should \u00a0 be \u00a0 provided, \u00a0 and \u00a0 accordingly \u00a0 information \u00a0 in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       s.No.3(b)(ii),\u00a04(b)(ii)\u00a0and\u00a05(b)(ii)\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n<p>       ii)        Either\u00a0of\u00a0information\u00a0in\u00a05(b)(i)\u00a0or\u00a05(b)(ii)\u00a0as\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0should\u00a0be\u00a0provided<\/p>\n<p>       iii)       Attested\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0disciplinary\u00a0departmental\u00a0rule\u00a0applicable\u00a0to\u00a0case\u00a0of\u00a02(b)(ii),\u00a03(b)(ii)\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       4(b)(i) \u00a0 should \u00a0 be \u00a0 provided. \u00a0 \u00a0 Penal \u00a0 provision \u00a0 of \u00a0 section \u00a0 20(i) \u00a0 and \u00a0 20(2) \u00a0 should \u00a0 be \u00a0 imposed \u00a0 for\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       deliberately\u00a0providing\u00a0wrong\u00a0web\u00adaddress\u00a0for\u00a0misguiding\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant<\/p>\n<p>       iv)        Grounds \u00a0 including \u00a0 names \u00a0 of \u00a0 employees \u00a0 in \u00a0 first \u00a0 and \u00a0 second \u00a0 promotion \u00a0 list \u00a0 should \u00a0 be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       disclosed.\n<\/p>\n<p>Decision<\/p>\n<p>2.     During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0reviewed\u00a0the\u00a0relief\u00a0sought\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       and\u00a0\u00a0decided\u00a0as\u00a0given\u00a0below:\n<\/p>\n<p>       Point\u00a01<\/p>\n<p>       The\u00a0Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0this\u00a0is\u00a0a\u00a0new\u00a0information\u00a0not\u00a0sought\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0and\u00a0advises\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0file\u00a0another\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0seeking\u00a0this\u00a0information.<\/p>\n<p>       Point\u00a02<\/p>\n<p>       With\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0point\u00a05(b)(i),\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0order\u00a0available\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0records\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>       which\u00a0allows\u00a0the\u00a0competent\u00a0authority\u00a0to\u00a0transfer\u00a0an\u00a0employee\u00a0randomly\u00a0at\u00a0his\u00a0discretion,\u00a0without\u00a0any\u00a0<br \/>\n          reasons. \u00a0 Names \u00a0 of \u00a0 officials \u00a0 \u00a0 responsible \u00a0 for \u00a0 not \u00a0 keeping \u00a0 n \u00a0 mind \u00a0 the \u00a0 appropriate \u00a0 seniority \u00a0 in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         transferring\u00a0employees\u00a0on\u00a0administrative\u00a0grounds\u00a0are\u00a0also\u00a0not\u00a0on\u00a0record.<\/p>\n<p>         The\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0inform\u00a0this\u00a0fact\u00a0formally\u00a0in\u00a0writing\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.<\/p>\n<p>         Point\u00a03<\/p>\n<p>         The \u00a0 Commission \u00a0 advises \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 either \u00a0 to \u00a0 download \u00a0 the \u00a0 pages \u00a0 from \u00a0 the \u00a0 correct \u00a0 website\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         address\u00a0given\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0\u00a0or\u00a0alternately\u00a0to\u00a0obtain\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0on\u00a0payment\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         of\u00a0Rs.2\/\u00ad\u00a0per\u00a0page,\u00a0which\u00a0may\u00a0b\u00a0paid\u00a0in\u00a0advance\u00a0.<\/p>\n<p>         Point\u00a04<\/p>\n<p>         The\u00a0Commission\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0information\u00a0against\u00a0this\u00a0query.<\/p>\n<p>         The\u00a0information\u00a0should\u00a0reach\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0by\u00a030.10.11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0directed\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>         compliance\u00a0report\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0by\u00a06.11.11.<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0directions.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                                         \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)<br \/>\n                                                                                                 Information\u00a0Commissioner<br \/>\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>(G.Subramanian)<br \/>\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>Cc:\n<\/p>\n<p>1.       Shri\u00a0J.P.Tiwari<br \/>\n         H.No.16\/791<br \/>\n         Santoshi\u00a0Ma\u00a0Marg<br \/>\n         Madhinath<br \/>\n         Bareilly\u00a0243\u00a0001<br \/>\n         Uttar\u00a0Pradesh<\/p>\n<p>2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer<br \/>\n         North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Izzat\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n         Bareilly<\/p>\n<p>3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority<br \/>\n         North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway<br \/>\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office<br \/>\n         Izzat\u00a0Nagar<br \/>\n           Bareilly<\/p>\n<p>4.        Officer\u00a0in\u00a0charge,\u00a0NIC<\/p>\n<p>Note: \u00a0 In \u00a0 case, \u00a0 the \u00a0 Commission&#8217;s \u00a0 above \u00a0 directives \u00a0 have \u00a0 not \u00a0 been \u00a0 complied \u00a0 with \u00a0 by \u00a0 the \u00a0 Respondents, \u00a0 the\u00a0<br \/>\nAppellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0file\u00a0a\u00a0formal\u00a0complaint\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0under\u00a0Section\u00a018(1)\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0RTI\u00adAct,\u00a0giving\u00a0<br \/>\n(1)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0RTI\u00adapplication,\u00a0(2)\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Commission&#8217;s\u00a0decision,\u00a0and\u00a0(3)\u00a0any\u00a0other\u00a0documents\u00a0which\u00a0he\/she\u00a0<br \/>\nconsiders\u00a0to\u00a0be\u00a0necessary\u00a0for\u00a0deciding\u00a0the\u00a0complaint.\u00a0In\u00a0the\u00a0prayer,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\/Complainant\u00a0may\u00a0indicate,\u00a0what\u00a0<br \/>\ninformation\u00a0has\u00a0not\u00a0been\u00a0provided.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001721 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a030,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0September\u00a030,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0J.P.Tiwari H.No.16\/791 Santoshi\u00a0Ma\u00a0Marg Madhinath Bareilly\u00a0243\u00a0001 Uttar\u00a0Pradesh The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0at\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Bareilly. Respondents North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager&#8217;s\u00a0Office Izzat\u00a0Nagar Bareilly Represented\u00a0by\u00a0: Shri\u00a0Ram\u00a0Singh,\u00a0PIO\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Sr.DMM Shri\u00a0D.K.Srivastava,\u00a0APO \u00ad\u00a0NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Bareilly Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2011\/001721 ORDER Background 1. The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0Application\u00a0dt.26.4.11\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0North\u00a0Eastern\u00a0Railway,\u00a0 Bareilly \u00a0 seeking \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49909","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-29T09:28:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-29T09:28:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011\"},\"wordCount\":563,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-09-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-29T09:28:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-29T09:28:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011","datePublished":"2011-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-29T09:28:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011"},"wordCount":563,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011","name":"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-09-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-29T09:28:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-j-p-tiwari-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-30-september-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.J P Tiwari vs Ministry Of Railways on 30 September, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49909","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49909"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49909\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49909"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49909"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49909"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}