{"id":49992,"date":"2010-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010"},"modified":"2018-02-11T22:25:16","modified_gmt":"2018-02-11T16:55:16","slug":"shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court<\/div>\n
Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp;<\/div>\n
   Gujarat High Court Case Information System \n\n  \n  \n    \n\n \n \n    \t      \n         \n\t    \n\t\t   Print\n\t\t\t\t          \n\n  \n\n\n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t \n\t\n\n\n \n\n\n\t \n\nSCA\/12292\/2009\t 8\/ 10\tORDER \n \n \n\n\t\n\n \n\nIN\nTHE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD\n \n\n \n\n\n \n\nSPECIAL\nCIVIL APPLICATION No. 12292 of 2009\n \n\n \n \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\nSHIVALIK\nBUILDWELL LIMITED & 1 - Petitioner(s)\n \n\nVersus\n \n\nCHAROTAR\nNAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LIMITED & 2 - Respondent(s)\n \n\n=========================================================\n \nAppearance : \nNANAVATI\nASSOCIATES for\nPetitioner(s) : 1 - 2. \nMR DIPEN A DESAI for Respondent(s) :\n1, \nNone for Respondent(s) : 2 -\n3. \n=========================================================\n\n\n \n\t  \n\t \n\t  \n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nCORAM\n\t\t\t: \n\t\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t \n\t\t\t \n\nHONOURABLE\n\t\t\tMR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL\n\t\t\n\t\n\n \n\n \n \n\n\n \n\nDate\n: 10\/02\/2010 \n\n \n\n \n \nORAL\nORDER<\/pre>\n
The
\n\tpetitioner by this petition has prayed for the  appropriate writ to
\n\tdirect the  respondents to consider the  One Time Settlement
\n\tproposal forwarded by the  petitioner at Annexure-E and it is also
\n\tprayed to direct the  respondents to extend the  benefit of the  One
\n\tTime Settlement Scheme framed by the  appropriate authority for the
\n\trespondent Bank.\n<\/p>\n
Heard
\n\tMr. K.S.Nanavati with Mr. Chudgar for the petitioners, Mr. Sunit
\n\tShah with Mr.Dipan Desai for the  respondent No.1 and Mr. Jani,
\n\tlearned Govt. Pleader with Mr.H.H. Parikh, learned AGP for the
\n\tState authorities.\n<\/p>\n
It
\n\tappears that the  proceedings which were initiated before the  State
\n\tGovernment against the  recovery have been withdrawn by the
\n\tpetitioner. The  aspects which may be required to be considered in
\n\tthe  present petition would be pertaining to the  action taken by
\n\tthe  Bank under the  Securitization Act and Reconstruction of
\n\tFinancial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002
\n\tpending the  proposal of OTS submitted by the  petitioner. It is
\n\tundisputed position that so far as the  respondent Bank is
\n\tconcerned, the  OTS was in force at the  relevant point of time and
\n\tthe  petitioner has applied for such OTS. However, such OTS is to be
\n\tapproved by the  committee constituted for such purpose. There are
\n\ttwo committees; one is for considering the  proposal involving the
\n\tamount of Rs.25,000\/- to Rs. 1 Crore and the  another is the  High
\n\tLevel Committee which is to consider the  proposal where the
\n\trecovery involved is of above Rs. 1 Crore.\n<\/p>\n
So
\n\tfar as the  petitioner is concerned, when the  matter came up for
\n\tconsideration, the petitioner had shown willingness to deposit the
\n\tamount as per the  undertaking which is restricted to the  amount of
\n\tOne Time Settlement, but with the  lesser rate of interest. In order
\n\tto see that whatever the amount is stated by the  petitioner comes
\n\tto the corpus of the  Bank, subject to the finalisation of the
\n\tmatter by the  concerned committee, the petitioner was called upon
\n\tto tender the  payment and accordingly, as per the  schedule given
\n\tby the  petitioner, the amount of Rs.1 Crore is deposited and the
\n\tremaining amount by four cheques of Rs.55 Lakhs and one cheque of
\n\tRs.53,77,616\/- are already handed over by the  learned counsel for
\n\tthe  petitioner to the  learned counsel for the  respondent Bank. It
\n\tmay also be recorded that this Court on 14.12.2009 had passed the
\n\tfollowing order –\n<\/p>\n
\t\t The
\npetitioner at para-6 of the additional affidavit dated 7\/12\/2009
\nfiled in this petition has stated as under:\n<\/p>\n
\t 6.\tThe
\npetitioner therefore submits that out of the aforesaid amount of
\nRs.3,73,77,616\/-, the petitioner proposes to pay an amount of Rs.1
\ncrore as upfront payment on or before 22.1.2010, which would be 27%
\nof the total amount instead of 15%, as was envisaged in the scheme.
\nIt is further states that the remaining amount of Rs.2,73,77,618\/-
\ncarrying interest at the rate of 8% till full payment (8% interest as
\npayment is to be made in less then 12 months), will be repaid by the
\npetitioner in five equal monthly installments as follows:\n<\/p>\n
Date<\/p>\n
Amount
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tpayable (Rs.) <\/p>\n
On
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tor before 22.2.2010<\/p>\n
55,00,000<\/p>\n
On
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tor before 22.3.2010<\/p>\n
55,00,000<\/p>\n
On
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tor before 22.4.2010<\/p>\n
55,00,000<\/p>\n
On
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tor before 22.5.2010<\/p>\n
55,00,000<\/p>\n
On
\n\t\t\t\t\t\tor before 22.6.2010<\/p>\n
53,77,616<\/p>\n
Total:\n<\/p>\n
2,73,77,616<\/p>\n
(interest
\non the amount so paid will be paid as per the calculation and
\ninstruction of the Bank along with the last installment) <\/p>\n
\tIt may
\nkindly be appreciated that even if at the relevant time i.e.
\n30.6.2008 the OTS proposal of the petitioners had been granted by the
\nrespondents, the 24 installments would get over on 30.6.2010, while
\nthe petitioners in the instant case, as per the above offer is
\nproposing to complete, the repayment on 22.6.2010.  Therefore, no
\nprejudice is likely to occasion to the respondents, in the offer
\nproposed by the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n
\tTherefore
\nthe aforesaid appears to be the liability admitted by the petitioner
\nas per OTS on the basis of interest at the rate of 8% per annum,
\nwhereas the bank contends the charging of  10% interest which would
\nbe Rs.4,14,42,019\/-.  The finalisation of OTS whether to grant it or
\nnot is at large pending but the liability as per OTS is undisputed,
\nsave and except the chargeability of the interest as contended by the
\npetitioner.\n<\/p>\n
\tTherefore
\nit appears to the court that even if this Court is to exercise the
\npower for directing the high level committee of the Government to
\nconsider the OTS proposal and to take appropriate decision, the
\npetitioner should deposit the amount with the bank as per the OTS.
\nAt this stage learned counsel Mr. Nanavati states that the amount of
\nRs.1,00,00,000\/- (rupees one crore) shall be deposited on or before
\n28\/12\/2009.  Hence, S. O. to 29\/12\/2009.\n<\/p>\n
Thereafter,
\n\ton 29.12.2009, following order was passed –\n<\/p>\n
 Mr.\n<\/p>\n
Nanavati, learned counsel for the  petitioners states that as
\nrecorded earlier, the  amount of Rs.1 Crore is already deposited with
\nthe  Bank and further amount also shall be deposited as per the
\ndeclaration made and recorded.\n<\/p>\n
Whereas
\nMr. Desai, learned counsel for the  respondent
\nBank states that the  petitioners are transferring the  property
\nwhich are mortgaged with the  respondent Bank.\n<\/p>\n
As
\nsuch, when the  property is mortgaged, any transfer or alienation by
\nfrustrating the  rights of the  Bank is not permissible and no third
\nparty right can be created by the  petitioners. Hence, it is directed
\nthat till next date, the  petitioners shall not transfer or alienate
\nthe  property which are mortgaged with the  respondent Bank in any
\nmanner whatsoever by creation of any interest of any third party. S.
\nO. to 22.01.2010.\n<\/p>\n
Once
\n\tagain, the  matter came to be considered on 01.02.2010 and the
\n\tfollowing order was passed –\n<\/p>\n
 Leave
\n\t\t\t\tto substitute the  annexures to the
\n\t\t\t\t additional affidavit.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\t\t\t\tpetitioner has filed the  additional affidavit today and the
\n\t\t\t\tremaining 5 cheques as per the  schedule given on page 152 total
\n\t\t\t\tamounting to Rs.2,73,77,616\/- has been handed over to the
\n\t\t\t\tlearned counsel appearing for the respondent Bank by the  learned
\n\t\t\t\tcounsel appearing for the  petitioner. It has been further stated
\n\t\t\t\tthat the  calculation of the  interest at the  rate of 8% from
\n\t\t\t\tthe  date on which the  proposal of OTS is to be submitted and
\n\t\t\t\tconsidered as per the  scheme of OTS will be calculated and the
\n\t\t\t\tsame shall be supplied by the respondent Bank to the  petitioner
\n\t\t\t\tto which the  petitioner shall make the payment one month
\n\t\t\t\tthereafter.\n<\/p>\n
Mr.Jani,
\n\t\t\t\tlearned Government Pleader seeks time to place on record the
\n\t\t\t\tresponse of the  Government. S.O. to 05.02.2010. IR shall
\n\t\t\t\tcontinue until further orders.\n<\/p>\n
Pursuant
\n\tto the  order dated 01.02.2010, the affidavit was filed by Shri J.
\n\tA. Thakkar, Deputy Secretary (Credit) and the  Principal Secretary
\n\tof the  High Level Committee and after considering the  contents of
\n\tthe  affidavit, this Court on 05.02.2010, had passed the following
\n\torder –\n<\/p>\n
 1.The
\n\taffidavit filed by the Deputy Secretary (Credit), who is also Member
\n\tSecretary of High Level Committee shows that there are 160
\n\tapplications pending before the High Level Committee comprising of
\n\tthe amount involved of Rs.39409 lacs, out of which, 157 applications
\n\tare pending.  So far as the other applications are concerned, up to
\n\tthe amount of Rs.25,000\/- to Rs.1 crore, 161 and 710 applications
\n\tare shown as pending and huge amount running into crores of rupees
\n\tare are involved.  Therefore, it would be required for the State
\n\tGovernment to pragmatically consider the issue of; (i) collection of
\n\tthe amount as offer as per the OTS Scheme pending the finalization
\n\tof the applications; and (ii) consideration and disposal of the
\n\tapplication of OTS within reasonable time by holding the meeting of
\n\tthe respective committees regularly at the interval of fortnight or
\n\totherwise.\n<\/p>\n
2.\tThe
\n\taforesaid prima facie appears to be in the larger interest of the
\n\tbanks, whose huge monies are held up for recovery, at the same time,
\n\talso appears to be in the interest of the persons, who have applied
\n\tfor OTS.  If the monies are recovered even as per the OTS, it would
\n\tenable the bank to have the fund, which consequently may enable the
\n\tbank to distribute amongst the deposit holders or otherwise.  So far
\n\tas the persons, who have applied for OTS are concerned, in any case,
\n\tsuch amount is payable even if the applications are accepted,
\n\ttherefore, there should not have any objection for offering the
\n\tamount, but the only condition could be that if the application is
\n\tnot accepted, they may be entitled to get back the amount, subject
\n\tto the right of the bank to recover the amount in accordance with
\n\tlaw.  In any case, the pendency of the applications for OTS for a
\n\tlong time involving amounts of crores of rupees  is not likely to be
\n\tin the interest of anybody.\n<\/p>\n
3.\tTherefore,
\n\tbefore this Court considers the matter for issuing directions in
\n\tthis regard, the Principal Secretary, Cooperation Department of the
\n\tState Government is directed to file appropriate response and also
\n\tthe difficulties, if any, to the State Government.\n<\/p>\n
4.\tAt
\n\t\t\tthis stage, Mr.Jani, learned GP seeks time.\n<\/p>\n
5.\tS.O.\n<\/p>\n
\tto 10.2.2010.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\tmatter would have been considered further, but, the  learned
\n\tGovernment Pleader has placed on record the  written instructions
\n\tcommunicated to him by the  Principal Secretary, Agricultural and
\n\tCooperative Department of the State Government, on the  basis of
\n\twhich the learned Government Pleader stated that the following
\n\tdecision has been taken –\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\tHigh Level Committee will consider and finalize all application
\n\treceived for one time settlement between 18.05.2007 to 17.11.2007 on
\n\tor before 15th April, 2010. No application shall be kept
\n\tpending beyond 15th April, 2010 if the application
\n\tsatisfies the  requirement of being considered under one time
\n\tsettlement scheme.\n<\/p>\n
That
\n\tHigh Level Committee will meet on regular interval of 15 days.\n<\/p>\n
So
\n\tfar as the  applications for one time settlement where the  amount
\n\tis less than Rs.1 crore, the  State Government through its officer,
\n\ti.e., Registrar Cooperative Societies, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar,
\n\twill monitor and supervise all application of 65 co-operative banks
\n\twhich are under liquidation, received from 18.05.2007 to 17.11.2007
\n\tthe  Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar
\n\twill ensure that applications pending before settlement advisory
\n\tcommittee are decided on or before 30.6.2010.\n<\/p>\n
That
\n\tthe  Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar
\n\twill call for regular updated progress report about recovery being
\n\taffected regarding the  amount, which is less than one crore.\n<\/p>\n
That
\n\tthe  Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Gujarat State, Gandhinagar
\n\tand his subordinate officer will continuously monitor the  progress
\n\tof recovery of outstanding dues of cooperative banks which are under
\n\tliquidation.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\taforesaid declaration made on behalf of the State Government appears
\n\tto be proper and can be accepted in order to ensure that the
\n\tapplications for one time settlement do not remain pending for
\n\tindefinite period. However, it would be required for the  concerned
\n\tBank or the  authority, as the  case may be, to examine the  aspects
\n\tof acceptance of the  amount of One Time Settlement, subject to the
\n\tfinalisation of the  application for One Time Settlement by the
\n\trespective committee. Since majority of the  aspects of
\n\tconsideration of the  application of OTS is taken care in view of
\n\tthe  aforesaid declaration, except observations made hereinabove, no
\n\tfurther observation deserves to be issued.\n<\/p>\n
Hence,
\n\tthe  following order –\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\t petitioner shall abide by the undertaking and the  declaration made
\n\tbefore this Court and also referred in the  interim order passed in
\n\tthe  present proceedings. However, all such payment shall be subject
\n\tto the  final decision which may be taken by the concerned committee
\n\tupon the  application of the petitioner for OTS.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\t application of the  petitioner for OTS shall be considered and
\n\tdecided by the concerned committee, in any case, before 15.04.2010
\n\tand the  decision shall be communicated to the  petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\t respondent Bank shall supply the details, if not supplied, to the
\n\tconcerned committee for consideration of the application of the
\n\tpetitioner. Until the  applications are finally decided, the
\n\tinterim relief which has been granted on 29.12.2009 and continued
\n\tthereafter shall continue to remain in operation.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\t State Government shall abide by the  declaration made before this
\n\tCourt and recorded hereinabove, for disposal of the  other
\n\tapplications which are pending and also for monitoring of the  same
\n\tin the  larger interest of all the  Cooperative Banks which have
\n\tbeen ordered to be liquidated as well as the  depositors whose
\n\tmonies are involved in such Banks.\n<\/p>\n
The
\n\t petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid direction. No
\n\torder as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
  (JAYANT PATEL, J.)<\/p>\n
*bjoy<\/p>\n
\t\t   \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n
\t\t   Top<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Gujarat High Court Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010 Author: Jayant Patel,&Nbsp; Gujarat High Court Case Information System Print SCA\/12292\/2009 8\/ 10 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No. 12292 of 2009 ========================================================= SHIVALIK BUILDWELL LIMITED & 1 – Petitioner(s) Versus CHAROTAR NAGRIK SAHKARI BANK LIMITED & 2 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49992","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gujarat-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-02-11T16:55:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-11T16:55:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":2053,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Gujarat High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-02-11T16:55:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-02-11T16:55:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-11T16:55:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010"},"wordCount":2053,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Gujarat High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010","name":"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-02-11T16:55:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shivalik-vs-charotar-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shivalik vs Charotar on 10 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49992","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49992"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49992\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}