{"id":50210,"date":"2010-08-24T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-23T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010"},"modified":"2015-12-01T20:41:54","modified_gmt":"2015-12-01T15:11:54","slug":"h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath And B.Manohar<\/div>\n
E\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 2%\" DAY or AUGUST, 2013\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE Mm. JUSTICE K.L. MAN:bNArHl*d\"k\n\nAND\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUsTicE2e.MA\ufb01QHAR=n'\n\nREGULAR FIRST APPEAL \ufb01e 1565\/2003 fpi\ufb01j\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1. H.V.Ramakantha s\/o Vadhrraj\u00a7mftd_\nShet, 53 years, Qcc:jProyisienal\nStores, R\/axK}M.Road,'Kadug,W_T\n\nRukminiyamha*3\/oalatervad\ufb01iraj\nShet, Oedig\ufb01o\ufb01sah\u00e9ld wcrk,\n\n86 years, R\/6gSubha\u00a7h Nagar,\nKadur=:\u00a2wn;,d'\"V\"='\"~' APPELLANTS\n\n(By Adv6cateWSr\u00a7.\ufb01.Ravindranath famath)\n\n:lARD:\"a'i= Rn; W \"\"\" t\n\n\"Of CPC against the\n\nAH.V;Cha\ufb01drahasa s\/o Vadhiraja\nShetf 55 years, Occ: Jewellery\nWorks,aR\/Q}K.M.Road,\n\n'VKadur,\" RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
x?’:’BY Advocate Sri.G.Balakrishna Shastry)<\/p>\n
This Regular First Appeal is filed under Sec.96
\njudgment and decree dated<\/p>\n
$3\/\ufb02<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
2.9.2003 passed in O.S.No.11\/O1 on the file of the
\nCivil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Kadur, dismissing’ the suit
\nfor partition in respect of Suit ‘B’. and ‘C’
\nschedule properties. ” 7<\/p>\n
This Appeal is coming on for final hearing this
\nday, MANJUNATH J. delivered the following{v.’ ‘ W<\/p>\n
J U D G M E Nywf<\/p>\n
Appellants were the gigjhtiffs in o%s:\ufb01o.1l\/O1
\non the file of Civil Judge (sr$Qn.iL Kadur. Suit
\nwas instituted by dthehfe\ufb01pellants against the
\ndefendants pclaiming1dhpartition’: and separate<\/p>\n
possession\u00a5offtheir”2{\u00a7@ share in all the plaint<\/p>\n
schedule propei\u00a3;esj”,\u00a7he’suit was initially filed<\/p>\n
before the pcivil 7Judge (Sr.Dn.), Tarikere in OS<\/p>\n
_\ufb02o.22\ufb02Q$j’ On estahlishment of court at Kadur, suit<\/p>\n
hwas transferred and remnumbered as OS No.11\/01;<\/p>\n
“*2. Ehe \ufb02eets of the case are as hereunder:<\/p>\n
d*A One ,Vadiraj Shet had ‘three children .by’ name<\/p>\n
\u00ab”\ufb01handrahasa~defendant, Ramakanthawlst plaintiff and<\/p>\n
hdsur\ufb01akanthi daughter. Plaintiff No.2 Rukminiyamma<\/p>\n
“”~is the widow of Vadiraj Shet who died in the year<\/p>\n
A,”\n<\/p>\n
1976. Initially suit was filed by the 1″ plaintiff
\nagainst the defendant. During the pendenoy of the<\/p>\n
suit, mother of the parties came on record es 2″:<\/p>\n
plaintiff. It is the case_of the olaintiffs3that\\<\/p>\n
plaintiffs and. defendant arey eembei\u00bb cf jthe,?jointf’<\/p>\n
family and they lived together’ stillst’h\u00e9’~~death’=of’<\/p>\n
their father Vadirej Shet and thereafter they are
\nliving separately V\u00a3ee- the; sehe: of convenience.
\nHowever, plaint’scheddlegoroperties which are joint
\nfamily propertiesfhereu treetedl as joint family
\nproperties and on the gronnd that plaint Bwschedule
\npropertg is standing i\u00a7 the name of 1″ defendant is<\/p>\n
claiming exolusive right over the same and that C-<\/p>\n
.~Scheddlei’pro\ufb01ertym_is purchased. out of the joint<\/p>\n
v”fart;ily–vV_vinco1\ufb01e_, plaintiffs filed the suit for<\/p>\n
partition and separate possession.<\/p>\n
\u00bbffd3f’xgDefendant contested the suit on the ground that<\/p>\n
flate-Vadiraj Shet came to Garje village of Kadur<\/p>\n
llTalnk long back from North Canara District and<\/p>\n
d”thereafter shifted to Kadur Town. He was a gold-<\/p>\n
\ufb01w<\/p>\n
\ufb01mi\ufb01n by \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01f\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb02\ufb01w \ufb01e acqairad plaint1\u00a7,an\u00a7 B<\/p>\n
sahedule jpxaperzias ad. 3 grwaeryf s\u00a7o\u00a7\ufb01 \u00a7\u00a7\u00e9:ia1sa<\/p>\n
being run at Ka\u00e9nrw\ufb01angaloxe EOaQ;_ \u00a5qEhe’–\ufb01\u00a7i\u00a7<\/p>\n
daughter Suryakanti waa givan \ufb01g arrigga aga 55\u00a2 %<\/p>\n
has been living separately wi\ufb01#>har’\u00a2h\u00a7l\ufb01\u00a7\u00e9\u00a7*%ftgr
\nthe dmath mf hax hus\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01; \u00a7\u00a2\u00a2m$\ufb02\u00a3\ufb01% V\ufb01m \ufb01\ufb01m,
\nprcperty 13 agquife\ufb01 \ufb01\u00a7m\ufb01%%\u00a7\u00a7rgj\\ \ufb01e\ufb02  wag selfw
\nacquirwd pr0@erties’\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 Q\u00a7\u00a3_\u00a7\ufb01f;\u00a7\u00a5$ amd affectian
\nBugahedule \u00a7r\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7rti\u00a7$g%\u00e9r\u00e9 \u00a7$@\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9 in favmur cf the<\/p>\n
defendant; 3;;-‘;’%c:c>1;\u00e9$\u00a73″*w..   Settieznent; Daed and<\/p>\n
sim\u00a7&:$han \u00a7$\u00a7$\u00a7daa\ufb01”has became the absalute awner<\/p>\n
af pl\u00a7in\u00a7~ Ewsc\ufb01e\u00e9ui\u00e9. praperty and tkat the<\/p>\n
_V defe\ufb01\ufb01ant” wa\u00a7 “g1$a d9ing* businegs indeymdently.<\/p>\n
 ‘\ufb01&t mi \u00a7i$7&ardw&arned mmnay ha purchasea a site in<\/p>\n
L\u00a7u\u00a7\u00a3;\u00a2”7\u00a7ua\u00a7ibn and canstructad, buiiding therecn<\/p>\n
  whi@h \u00a7$”\u00e9hQwn as Cmsahedule praparty. T\ufb01erefore,<\/p>\n
 ‘ \u00a7eg\u00a2a\u00a7%e&ded that E% amd C schedule prm\u00a7erties as<\/p>\n
–} Ei$ $&if~acquixed \u00a7rmp@rtie$. He further aontands<\/p>\n
Vum%hat Qne mf the pra\u00a7erty has alga hen acquired out<\/p>\n
Qf the gmint family gncameg a site in he name Qf<\/p>\n
61\/<\/p>\n
the 1″ gsiaigxtiff and thamafter 3 hmme ‘mas b\u00e9\u00e9fi
\nmmnstruatad andT tharefaze dafam\ufb01ant; 13 alga
\nentitle\ufb01 ta alaim 3 share in %he 331$ gzapegty’ I3
\nthe circumstanme\ufb01g 3 aaunter claim was ai\ufb01\u00e9 gag by
\nthe \ufb01e\ufb01endamt, $a$&\ufb01 an the ab$%: \u00a7i%#\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7g\u00a7,<\/p>\n
failawing issues wara framed by aha c\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 \ufb01ei$#:V<\/p>\n
1. Whether the plaintiff \u00a7%\u00a2va\u00e9g\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7t”\ufb01\u00a7f$\u00a7ong ‘<\/p>\n
with the defandant a\ufb01\ufb01_:ate,f3thar}\u00a5\u00e9\ufb01iraj
\nShet Vera runnimg the grmwaryx\ufb01\ufb01qp and %y
\nutilizing the jei\ufb01t ‘a=_arnir:g.%;”\u00a7o;$$esse\u00a7. the
\nmuit pra\u00a7er\u00a7;as?A\u00bb~_*_”  “~. I<\/p>\n
2, Whethar, the pia;\ufb01ti\u00a7\u00a3 prwvea that the
\n*”&\u00e9fa$damt” ma\ufb01aged Mia get settiamant \ufb01aad
\n3 fr$\ufb02:”t\ufb01eV<\u20ac&th%;– in re$peat. mi' B. schedule
\n"prmper@y? '-T<\/p>\n
35 :~:r;;e=%;1\u00bb;<e;{;~_'Vi;1ri%ee_' fgsviaintiff pistmres that am said
\n* "sett\ufb01ament \u00e9eed mat acted upan ana it was<\/p>\n
"5. Qm:y far —- \u00abthe managamant mg the family
\n \u00a7r\u00a7\u00a7gxti&$?\n<\/p>\n
gra.’ %\u00a7ym:;e: the plaintiff prmre\ufb01 that the ‘B’<\/p>\n
$;’::;a:1___ VG’ scheciul\ufb01 pxepertiesgs blesn\u00e9ad with
\n,t%$”jeint iamiiy?\n<\/p>\n
‘xv 59’\ufb01%at%er the dafem\ufb01ant praves that Va\ufb01hiraj<\/p>\n
 \ufb01xet purcha\ufb01ed the suit: p3::@ert.:Les by his<\/p>\n
individual earnings amd thare is no \ufb01aint
\nfaxnily nuaieus?\n<\/p>\n
5. \ufb01hather \ufb01he defandan\ufb01 pxovas tkat vadhiraj
\nshat. has purchased the ‘ B 5 sch\u00e9dule<\/p>\n
\u00a7r\u00a7\u00a7erti$s amt af his earnimgg an\ufb01 exeaute\ufb01<\/p>\n
(3\/1<\/p>\n
10:\n<\/p>\n
11 .\n<\/p>\n
{‘1<\/p>\n
the settlement deed dated 21.6.1976 in his
\nfavour and he constructed a hotel building
\nby borrowing loans from Vysya Bank and Veda
\nFinance in his individual capacity?,ie<\/p>\n
proveswogthatux he<\/p>\n
schedulejfproperty1\u00b0as<\/p>\n
defendant
\nNC,<\/p>\n
Whether the
\npurchased the
\nvacant site by<\/p>\n
constructed the residential”\u00bbfhouSeW<\/p>\n
it is self–acquired property?=?.<\/p>\n
Whether the de\u00a3\u00e9ndant”,pr9ves “that ‘his
\nsister Smt.Suryakenthi is “a proper and
\nnecessary party to the suit and the suit is
\nbad for non&jcinder_of necessary party?<\/p>\n
Whetherp the_ plaintiff’ pte\ufb01es that he ais
\nentitled, for the_’re;ief,’of partition by
\nmates and bounds and separate possession of<\/p>\n
his share? V<\/p>\n
pwhether the pieihtiff is entitled for mesne<\/p>\n
profits?”fa<\/p>\n
Whether the-plaintiff is entitled for the<\/p>\n
accounts of the suit property?\n<\/p>\n
VWhat”order?\n<\/p>\n
Aee;).:es\u00a2ee:,c<\/p>\n
ig<\/p>\n
“Whether the defendant proves that he is<\/p>\n
“.entitled for the share in the written
\nstatement schedule properties?\n<\/p>\n
Whether the plaintiff proves that the<\/p>\n
written statement schedule properties are
\nthe self acquired properties?\n<\/p>\n
3%’<\/p>\n
auction on _18,9g1976″uand_
\n, u byir
\nraising loan in his individual capacity and L<\/p>\n
7*’<\/p>\n
in arder ts prmr\u00e9 their raggacztivw; can\ufb01aantimnsg<\/p>\n
lalaintiffa 1 & 2 W\u00e9if\ufb01 gab exa.m.::.Z.ne\u00abd as <\/p>\n
they relied upen E:r;.s.E\u00bb-E, ta 8. \u00a7C.\u00a7<\/p>\n
examined hixagelf as mum  \u00a2_r’=;.’-“:3..:\u00a7.<4.a:\u00a2;i"  AV<\/p>\n
evidence af three witnessaa  w@if\u00a7e:A.A'A3e:;a3\u00a7a;\u00a7g.:\u00a7<:,p\u00a7\u00a73I;._VV;,s
\nmvxmz :$ a and zarsarma is no:;ie\u00bb::\u00a7\u00a7w,he$~
\n1" glaintiff azz\u00e9 ._E:}T\u20ac'f;.en\\\\cxosrmidering the
\nentire   I as partly 373:: the
\na\u00a3’fix’E\u00a7:a_tiv’\u00a7.1
\nin  6 , ‘? aim; Add}. . E53329
\n340.2   and ugtimatmy decxee\ufb01 am<\/p>\n
5111?: 5* -scarf  ‘t.”:\u00a7\u00a7a’Vw.vp3..”a.i%\u00a7.*.E,iff in gzaart holdaizzg that<\/p>\n
 ‘;\u00a73-4\u00a31\u00a7;37\u00a3;t\u00a7:~\u00a7i”f$\u00a7” ganci &?\u00e9\u00a3’encia::t;$ are tagether antitlaa ta<\/p>\n
1′.’:.\u00bbf::*%\u00e9\u00a2}’1 in glaint A~–$che&ule ;::3:mp%rtfg am\ufb01<\/p>\n
 d;tZ.\u00a7$:’a:_3″K5sv;_s:\u00a7<::*,:.VLA<}'%:1A":\u00a7a alaim cf the plaizat\ufb01dffs in ragard ta<\/p>\n
':2: & 3 aria similaxiiy the claim image: hy the<\/p>\n
 , :3je\u00a5'i*-2:;ida.za%.: wag gist: di\ufb01iiii\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01d by the jzz\ufb01gzmnt agzd<\/p>\n
.\u00a3i\u00e9c\u00a7ee mam 2.9u2Gt:3\u00ab Being mt \ufb01atigfied with<\/p>\n
the gran": af dearea in ragyact af &-s<::haduE.e<\/p>\n
6\/<\/p>\n
yroparty an\ufb01 claiming a ghare in p3~ain:;"V.:FB;–\u00ab.:';\u00bb:;1:i Q<\/p>\n
schedule prepertiesg plaintiffs hava3.A4":—-ca\u00a7\u00a7:a "' ',3':<\/p>\n
this aweal. Againgt me d*:i._:\u00a72\u00a7;i….:.~:=gsa.:   _15a;\u00a7L\u00a7nt;\u00a7e\u00a5;:*<\/p>\n
claim respcrzdent. has :':c..":i*  ~.     I<\/p>\n
saparateigzu In this %3.u:i~.'3[\u00a7\u00a7rQun\ufb02; _w::%_ hax;%\u00e9""2;a$rd tiita\u00e9<\/p>\n
caunsel \u00a7$;l:' the paxtgies.\n<\/p>\n
Q , ffhe main aonten’\u00a7c!\u00a7%fo\u00a5’z\u00a7VV   Kamatl:
\nbefore 1:25 15*’  :”A?;h\u20ac2;  Dee\ufb01 mazrlicad as
\nE:s:.?—-6 w\u00a2u,1i;:i   right in favmtr af
\nthe am:\u00a5e5rQdl;ai:\u00a7%:;\u00bbv__V   plaint Bmaahedule
\np3::c;pea-:r”&;y .7.   him, his fathuer Vaaliraj<\/p>\n
She%: had mxi\ufb01v’  the defendant to image anezi<\/p>\n
 :\u00a7:iia;in%:.’\u00e9.\u00a7iirz  : pf: aint A V S\ufb01h\ufb01ciiil\ufb01 pramrty i ihare\ufb01cxe<\/p>\n
p51gi’r;t.’i;f’\u00a7fsAV:AM ” entitiad \u20ac110 claim aqaai ahare<\/p>\n
—  = thm:\u00b0\u00e93\u00a5f_.aix, is alga} his @353 that trig; gaurt dig<\/p>\n
 cm’1$.’.’:,g;’ \u00a7ter that mm af aim income frcsm thaa joint<\/p>\n
 fisusizmasa Qf gamaery gimp Cwacshe\ufb01azle gsxmfwxty<\/p>\n
  _ \u00a7pu:<:mha:3ed 3232 aha mama af tha dafendagat 938,<\/p>\n
V '  ' ~ Zn\u00e9iiil\ufb01irgg wags aanstmzcited later , iiherafora<\/p>\n
"\u00a7.1a:;;.:1t:\u00a7.ff$ ara antitied ta ciaim 3. \ufb01hara in S\u00bb<\/p>\n
3\/.\n<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
schedule property. In the circumstances, he
\nrequests the court to remappreciate the_ entire
\nevidence so far as the evidence let .ind$h\u00a5_ the<\/p>\n
parties in regard to their claim in’ respect agf<\/p>\n
plaint B and C schedule properties and granting of’<\/p>\n
a decree in ‘those properties WaIso{*i.Per”icontra,d’<\/p>\n
counsel for the respondent contends “that\ufb01 Ex\u00a7P46
\nclearly shows that; Vadirajtv\ufb01het has .settled. the
\nproperty out of love and ai\ufb01ection in favour of his<\/p>\n
son Chandrahasawde\ufb01endantiabsoiutely and therefore<\/p>\n
plainti\ufb01fs’ cannotp cream ‘any share in plaint B-<\/p>\n
schedule propertf;:”i$o far as C-schedule property<\/p>\n
H_is concerned, he contends that even during the life<\/p>\n
VWti\ufb01e of father of the parties, defendant had his<\/p>\n
own income and business and out of the same in the<\/p>\n
‘year 1376 site was purchased in public auction for<\/p>\n
:a sum of Rs.2000\/– and later on he constructed a<\/p>\n
” building by raising the loan from the bank. In the<\/p>\n
dgcircumstances, he requests the court to dismiss the<\/p>\n
RV<\/p>\n
ii<\/p>\n
maintenance as aontended& by the $\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7;iant$.<\/p>\n
Therefere, in order ta camsider the zigh\ufb01g bf t\ufb01g<\/p>\n
partges in Bwschedulef wa }xra’ws.*–.&tc\u20ac ic\ufb01iisizf\u00e9 .i”n%;a – ‘the <\/p>\n
racitala 6f the Sattlement D\u00e9\u00e9d gfodu\ufb01\u00e9d aa Ex \u00a7r\u00a7. A<\/p>\n
Parties admit that thei\u00a3 \u00a7a\u00a7h@\ufb01”Vadgkajf\u00e9h\u00e9\ufb02 wa\u00e9 a<\/p>\n
xesidant cf Garje ,vi:1age. a\u00a7a_ laE\u00e9Q~~\u00a7hi\u00a3tad to<\/p>\n
Kadmx’ and. ant ‘of’ hi$ “\u00e9ar\u00a7\u00a7n\u00a7 Egg V; galdgmith. he
\nacquired p1a;n\u00a7W B\u00ab@\u00e9$\u00e9%\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3 p;\u00e9\u00a7%%\ufb01y. Then tha
\nplaint B\ufb0134he\ufb01#\u00a7\u00a7~ \u00a7\ufb01ap\u00e9E\u00a7y_’ is aeifmacguired
\nyrgper\ufb01y sf \ufb01$\u00e9%\u00a3ath%r; fhaw\u00e9nly questimn is umdar
\nthe Se\u00a3t1\u00a2$\ufb01\u00a7”f\u00a7\u00a7e\u00a7ii%$J per. Ex.Ew6 whather the<\/p>\n
d@fendantV%a$.p&r\ufb01i\ufb01m%\ufb01 ta manage tha prayexty Q?<\/p>\n
,%as v\u00e9\ufb01. \u00e9cmvey\u00e9\ufb02u ta him absmiutaly ig the only<\/p>\n
Vq$e$\ufb01iQng”a$\ufb01\u00e9,re\u00a2ital under Ex.\u00a7~6 readg t\ufb01at thg<\/p>\n
 V_v abwV\u00a7”\u00a7x\u00a2p$\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7 has b\u00e9en givan absmiutaiy in favuur<\/p>\n
: u Qf the \ufb01\u00e9\ufb01e\ufb01\ufb01ant Chandrahasa. ?his raaita; we havw<\/p>\n
‘f g\u00a2ti\u00a2e@\u00ab immadiataly aftar the schadaie by<\/p>\n
‘ x_&@$\u00e9;:\u00a7ing the pr\ufb01pery givan under the \ufb01ettiamemt<\/p>\n
 V ‘i&\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9w in viaw 9f the reeital in Ex.?\u00bb5, paint R$-1<\/p>\n
‘” has ta \ufb01e hel\u00e9 agaimat ihe aypellanta.<\/p>\n
8\/<\/p>\n
2%:\n<\/p>\n
?. $0 far ag point \ufb02o.2 is a\u00a2m\u00a2ern\u00e9\u00a7g \u00e9\u00a7m\u00a7t\ufb01&\ufb01&y,<\/p>\n
\ufb01efandant has acquired .C:$\u00a2h&$\ufb011e? \u00a7rQp&$$\u00a7W by<\/p>\n
gartlaigating in the gubli\ufb01 a\ufb01c$1\u00a7m;  \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01\ufb02gh it ia<\/p>\n
aantmda\u00e9. that mane? h\u00e9$;”—\u00a7ee\ufb01’v-\ufb01g\u00e9a\u00e9wd   ~’_.”‘\u00a7:\u00a7.2\u00b0>.t
\nfamily incemeg siaae mg \u00e9#\u00ae\ufb01$gc\u00e9 $3 1\u00a7\ufb01 in to Shaw
\nt&e xi\ufb01tanca mi %%\u00e9_\ufb01\u00a2in% fg\u00a731y and its incameg
\nwhen the de\u00a3gm\ufb01an&”\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 \ufb01g; %@\ufb01\u00a7\u00a3\ufb01@ame and buaine\ufb01\ufb01<\/p>\n
and by .\ufb013t\ufb01\u00a2q’\u00a7f *the=fbus\u00a3\ufb01ess in\ufb02ame if the<\/p>\n
\ufb01&fQii’\u00a7$,\u00a7,\u00a773\u00a7.T.u”v}’\ufb01’\u00a7E\u00a3.$1.::,_@’\u00a7I:.f\u00a7’\u00a5ii3C33;5\u20ac\u20ac53\u00bb._ :.–::?:ite in a ;m1bf;,31c auctian<\/p>\n
and \u00e9Qn$t$\u00a7\u00a7@\u00e9d h\ufb01i\u00a7\ufb01ihg by barrawing 1033 frwm the<\/p>\n
\ufb02ank? &Q\ufb01tg\ufb01\u20ac\u00a7b\ufb01’\u00a3\u00a7f \ufb01he apgeliamts aannat he<\/p>\n
__ aca\u00e9p\ufb01ed. Rik; gagent. avi\ufb01emce is let in iby the<\/p>\n
\u00bb\u00a7\u00a7ei@amt\u00a7” ta shaw’ that Qwsahedmla pra\u00a7exty’ W33<\/p>\n
‘a\u00a2\u00a7uif$\ufb01f.\u00a2\ufb01\ufb01 of the emntrikutimn ma&% by the<\/p>\n
‘V p1\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7\u00a3iff$ an\ufb01 canstratien was dame an accaumt af<\/p>\n
math@_fiaancial assistance c\ufb02 ma plaintiffs. \u00a7he<\/p>\n
fi\ufb01\ufb01ingg mf the trial court 15 ha\ufb01ed an he yrapar<\/p>\n
W\u00e9ppreaiatian mf evidenae and pleadi\ufb02gs and that t\ufb01a<\/p>\n
trial cauxt is ju\ufb01tified in re\ufb01ecting the miaim of<\/p>\n
aha plaintiffs in zespegt Qf \ufb02msaheduie \u00a7z5party.
\n\ufb01p\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010 Author: K.L.Manjunath And B.Manohar E IN THE HIGH COURT or KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2%” DAY or AUGUST, 2013 PRESENT THE HON’BLE Mm. JUSTICE K.L. MAN:bNArHl*d”k AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUsTicE2e.MA\ufb01QHAR=n’ REGULAR FIRST APPEAL \ufb01e 1565\/2003 fpi\ufb01j BETWEEN: 1. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50210","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nH V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-01T15:11:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-01T15:11:54+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1976,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010\",\"name\":\"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-01T15:11:54+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-01T15:11:54+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-01T15:11:54+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010"},"wordCount":1976,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010","name":"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-23T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-01T15:11:54+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-v-ramakantha-vs-h-v-chandrahasa-on-24-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"H V Ramakantha vs H V Chandrahasa on 24 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50210","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50210"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50210\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50210"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50210"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50210"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}