{"id":50398,"date":"2008-06-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008"},"modified":"2016-07-09T04:50:53","modified_gmt":"2016-07-08T23:20:53","slug":"t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham &#8230; on 18 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham &#8230; on 18 June, 2008<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 18330 of 2008(F)\n\n\n1. T.V.C. KUNHAMMAD HAJI,S\/O.MOIDEEN\n                      ...  Petitioner\n2. V.A.C. IBRAHIM HAJI,S\/O.AMMAD HAJI\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. NUSRATHUL ISLAM SAMGHAM DEVARKOVIL,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. K.T.ABOOBUCKER,S\/O.THARUVAI, AGED 65\n\n3. T.H.AHAMMAD,S\/O.MOIDU HAJI,AGED 54 YEARS\n\n4. ASSISTANT EDUCATION OFFICER,KUNNUMMAL\n\n5. DEPUTY DIRECTOR, EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.B.KRISHNAN\n\n                For Respondent  : No Appearance\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR\n\n Dated :18\/06\/2008\n\n O R D E R\n                    M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR, J.\n\n                      -------------------------------\n\n                       W.P.(C) No.18330 of 2008\n\n                      -------------------------------\n\n                    Dated this the 18th June, 2008.\n\n                           J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>               Petitioners are the plaintiffs in O.S.No.19\/2008, on the<\/p>\n<p>file of Sub Court, Vadakara. Under Ext.P4 order, learned Sub Judge<\/p>\n<p>allowed the application filed by the petitioners and appointed an<\/p>\n<p>Advocate to act as an Observer in the meeting of the General Body,<\/p>\n<p>where petitioners have to move a no confidence motion. Under Ext.P4<\/p>\n<p>order, learned Sub Judge also permitted right to vote in favour or<\/p>\n<p>against the no confidence motion to 506 members, as contended by<\/p>\n<p>the respondents.       This petition is filed under Article 227 of<\/p>\n<p>Constitution of India to quash Ext.P4 order to the extent of permitting<\/p>\n<p>to attend the meeting and to vote in the no confidence motion to 234<\/p>\n<p>members, who were not among the 272 members as on 9.9.2007,<\/p>\n<p>when the office bearers were admittedly elected.<\/p>\n<p>               2.  The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners<\/p>\n<p>vehemently argued that in Ext.P5 plaint, petitioners         specifically<\/p>\n<p>pleaded that there were only 272 members on 9.9.2007 and in Ext.P7<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.18330\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>application for appointment of a Commission also, it was specifically<\/p>\n<p>stated that there were only 272 members eligible to vote on 9.9.2007,<\/p>\n<p>and in Ext.P8, counter statement filed to Ext.P7 application, there was<\/p>\n<p>no case for the respondents that new members were inducted or that<\/p>\n<p>there are 506 members and that case was projected only when the<\/p>\n<p>second application was filed for appointment of Commission pursuant<\/p>\n<p>to Ext.P1 judgment of this Court in W.P.(C) No.12303\/2008, and in<\/p>\n<p>such circumstances, learned Sub Judge should have restricted the right<\/p>\n<p>to vote to 272 members alone who were admittedly on the rolls on<\/p>\n<p>9.9.2007.    The learned counsel also argued that in any case the<\/p>\n<p>remaining members out of 506 members now held eligible to vote<\/p>\n<p>under Ext.P9 order may be identified and petitioners may be granted<\/p>\n<p>opportunity to dispute their right to vote in the suit, at the time of<\/p>\n<p>evidence, and depending on that finding, they may be allowed to<\/p>\n<p>challenge the result of the no confidence motion.<\/p>\n<p>                3. On hearing the learned counsel, I do not find any<\/p>\n<p>reason to interfere with Ext.P9 order. Under Ext.P10 bye-law, eligible<\/p>\n<p>members satisfying the requirements are entitled to get enrolled as<\/p>\n<p>members of the General Body, on satisfying the conditions provided<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.18330\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                     3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>thereunder. The plaint does not contain an allegation that after the<\/p>\n<p>petitioners expressed their intention to move no confidence motion,<\/p>\n<p>respondents      either inducted or attempting to intend to induct new<\/p>\n<p>members much less to defeat the no confidence motion.             In such<\/p>\n<p>circumstances, in the absence of evidence, it cannot be said that the<\/p>\n<p>234 members out of the 506 members less the 272 members, who<\/p>\n<p>were on the rolls as on 9.9.2007 or a part of them were inducted,<\/p>\n<p>subsequent to the intention expressed by the petitioners to move a no<\/p>\n<p>confidence motion. As Ext.P10 does not prohibit new office bearers or<\/p>\n<p>the executive committee from enrolling new members, it cannot be<\/p>\n<p>found that the new members to the general body are not entitled to<\/p>\n<p>cast their vote to the no confidence motion. In such circumstances,<\/p>\n<p>voting to the no confidence motion cannot be restricted only to the<\/p>\n<p>members as on the date of election on 9.9.2007. Right to cast vote is<\/p>\n<p>available to all     the eligible members on the date on which no<\/p>\n<p>confidence motion is moved.         In such circumstances, there is no<\/p>\n<p>illegality or irregularity in Ext.P9 order warranting interference. If the<\/p>\n<p>case of the petitioners is that remaining 234 members were inducted<\/p>\n<p>with the sole purpose of defeating the no confidence motion,<\/p>\n<p>petitioners are at liberty to adduce evidence in support of the same. If<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.18330\/2008<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>ultimately court finds that only 272 members are entitled to vote, and<\/p>\n<p>the other members were inducted against the provision of Ext.P10<\/p>\n<p>bye-law or after the notice of no confidence motion, petitioners are<\/p>\n<p>entitled to challenge the result of no confidence motion in the suit or in<\/p>\n<p>appropriate proceedings.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                The writ petition is disposed of as above.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                         M.SASIDHARAN NAMBIAR,<br \/>\n                                                      JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>nj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham &#8230; on 18 June, 2008 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 18330 of 2008(F) 1. T.V.C. KUNHAMMAD HAJI,S\/O.MOIDEEN &#8230; Petitioner 2. V.A.C. IBRAHIM HAJI,S\/O.AMMAD HAJI Vs 1. NUSRATHUL ISLAM SAMGHAM DEVARKOVIL, &#8230; Respondent 2. K.T.ABOOBUCKER,S\/O.THARUVAI, AGED 65 3. T.H.AHAMMAD,S\/O.MOIDU HAJI,AGED 54 YEARS [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50398","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham ... on 18 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham ... on 18 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-08T23:20:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham &#8230; on 18 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-08T23:20:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":688,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008\",\"name\":\"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham ... on 18 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-08T23:20:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham &#8230; on 18 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham ... on 18 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham ... on 18 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-08T23:20:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham &#8230; on 18 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-08T23:20:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008"},"wordCount":688,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008","name":"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham ... on 18 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-08T23:20:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/t-v-c-kunhammad-haji-vs-nusrathul-islam-samgham-on-18-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"T.V.C. Kunhammad Haji vs Nusrathul Islam Samgham &#8230; on 18 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50398","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50398"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50398\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50398"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50398"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50398"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}