{"id":50425,"date":"2010-12-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-12-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010"},"modified":"2017-04-24T05:19:46","modified_gmt":"2017-04-23T23:49:46","slug":"ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010","title":{"rendered":"M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre> \n\n11; THE HIGH czznum' 017 KARHATAKA AT  \n\nDATED THIS me am DAY 0? DEcELmEg;%j\u00ab2o%1\u00a7%     \n\nBEFORE:  \n\nTHE I-IOIPBLE MR. JUS'11CE:'Af3I_\ufb013HI?.S'IiB  \n\nM\/a.V1jayanan:1  '  \"\nHa\\rl:1gits!ed1n'.:m.C)\u00a711c\u00a2:_at  ~.  '\n'Vijaya  &lt;+&#039;\ufb01rh=nj k .\u00bb \nAnrnxe,R\u00a2Egd&#039;,  \nHub]i--5.8.0C3:S\u00a7 2.. ,  * iv\n\nBy its I\u00e9!.D.&amp;\u00a7ri\u00a7%{.B.Sa&quot;jV mm    ..APPELI..ANT\n\n{BY  &#039;1=V:,%g1ii.#:\u00a3m}3: &amp; 8RI. \nREDDY  Awvqcamsy\n\n  as Co. Ltd..\n\n  mm,\nMumbaivi  001. and Br. omen\n\n. Q At Ro.24....Mamuna Gandhi Road\n\nTHIS RFA F&#039;fLED UNDER ORDER 41 RULE 1\n\n A  READ wrm sacnon 96 or CFC AGAINST THE\n\n\n\nJUDGMENT AND DEGREE DATED 08.11.2005 PASSED\nIN O.S.No.8%6l2&#039;OO1 ON THE FILE OF THE XXX}\n\n \n\nADDL. cm&#039; CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE (cr;H\u00e9TH)&#039;,V%%%\nPARTLY DECREEIHG THE smr FOR  \nMONEY, IN so FAR AS 1&#039;1&#039; PERTAHIS TO   M. \nme: cum FOR n,2o,1&#039;75\/-- \n\nPA.\n\nTHE COURT DELIVERED  \n\nThough this    for payment\n\nof   the consent the\n\n in   as such no purpose is served\n\n V&#039;    the respondent.<\/pre>\n<p>  in by the plaintiff against the:<\/p>\n<p>  j:  Decree dated 03.11.2095 in<\/p>\n<p> %%%k%;Q;3.s9a6\/2001 on the xxx: Aden. City Civil Judge,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;   inao far as rejection of his suit for part of his<\/p>\n<p>THIS RFA columns on FQR mir, <\/p>\n<p>3.Partjesarere\u00a3erredtoaspertl&#8217;nairr <\/p>\n<p>the Trial Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>4.<\/p>\n<p>The p1am&#8217; rift&#8217; sought for   <\/p>\n<p>\u00a5*&#8217;r,66,550.50p with interest at 24%*p.\u00bba,,  &amp; L<\/p>\n<p>suit till realxr.-ya&#8217; tion. Case of the  V   <\/p>\n<p>reputcd gcoda transport<br \/>\nall aver India, irzcludinggne  &amp;  is<br \/>\npharmaceutical  g\ufb01oda of<br \/>\ntheir COII1pany .   company.\n<\/p>\n<p>Being a  company allowed<br \/>\nthe  &#8216;ifs goods on crcdit basis<\/p>\n<p>ante&#8217;   payments vmuld be settled<\/p>\n<p>  _____  the mean wh\ufb02c defendant<\/p>\n<p>  before the Karnataka State<\/p>\n<p> Rodrcasal Commission intcraha&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>  I  .  um: of ?11,8-8,520.49 al1eg1ng&#8217; that the<br \/>\nV&#8217;  was delivered to the oomignce without than<br \/>\n copy of the way bill whxch&#8217; was to be<\/p>\n<p> ,&#8217;4&#8242; .&#8217;V&lt;v\u00a7btaincd by mnaignee from the Bank. That case Tm<\/p>\n<p>oontestead by thc pL9.inti\ufb02&#039;and on the date of\ufb01ljng of tha<br \/>\nsuit the 3a1d&#039; complaint was still pendxng&#039; . De\ufb01erT1d&#039;\u00bb: aTnt<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01led a suit in o.s.7279;2ooo before the<br \/>\nCourt, Bangalore aeeldng recovery of    <\/p>\n<p>appeared and denied hh   <\/p>\n<p>defendant acknowledged   in   {gr <\/p>\n<p>z3,1e:a,55o.50p upto June  As  is<br \/>\nentitled for a sum   an\n<\/p>\n<p>5.   did not<\/p>\n<p>    exparte. Defendant<br \/>\nwas  %V  summons, lrxowever steps&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>was   &#8216;    ant by way of substituted<\/p>\n<p> V. &#8220;&#8216;:mrvh._     Am-.r paper publication<br \/>\n appear and service of Bummorm heki<br \/>\n _ su\ufb02x\ufb02  11fc&#8221;a1uidATwaa placed axpartc. However the Trial<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; H   not framed the issues.\n<\/p>\n<p>6. F&#8217;1aint1&#8217;\ufb02&#8217; in support of its case exaxnined its<\/p>\n<p> , representative as PW-1. Though Judgment. does not<\/p>\n<p>show the marking of documents, however learned<br \/>\ncoumel for p]a1&#8217;nti:E&#8217;sub:mitn the docuxnenta are <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;7. The Trial Court deemed the   u w <\/p>\n<p>z1,65,735.5op with intcreat <\/p>\n<p>dismissed the suit in so far&amp;a\u00ab._{1,2VG,.1&#8242;?&#8217;5[&#8211;   *<\/p>\n<p>on the ground that the&#8217; suit    from<br \/>\n31.129? to  of an-. suit it<\/p>\n<p>the    <\/p>\n<p> &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;     for the p1an&#8217;d:1H&#8217; &#8216;<br \/>\n  is a transport company,<br \/>\nwh:ch&#8217;       the goods. The<\/p>\n<p> i&#8221;3.. s.  customer and the goods were<\/p>\n<p>I   L  to make payment. It &#8216;m in am regard,<br \/>\npleiinii\ufb01 made a claim om.=&#8217;&gt;6.55s.5op for a period<\/p>\n<p>K V&#8217;   31.12.97 to 31.07.2001. The Trial Court was<br \/>\n   justified in rcjcc\ufb01xg the claim for 3 period between<\/p>\n<p> 3  31.12.97 to 30.07.98 on the ground that his portion of<\/p>\n<p>wk,<\/p>\n<p>the debt had become tizxxe barred dabt. He relicad an the:<br \/>\nobservation made by the Trial Court and submitted that<\/p>\n<p>the Trial Court diamimd the: suit by<br \/>\n&#8216;admowiedgement of time barred debt  <\/p>\n<p>lirnitzztion&#8217; and submitted that Q = <\/p>\n<p>Court is erroneous to Section 18 &#8216;o&#8217;f <\/p>\n<p>Once the defendant achmwl\u00e9\ufb01gcg tzi\ufb01i-3   <\/p>\n<p>limitation starts from   and<br \/>\nTrial Court  _1&#8217;n so far as<br \/>\nthat port3&#8217;.or1 Qf_ t11e  He also<br \/>\nsubmitted  dated _1%3k.%o7.93, the latter<br \/>\nby the   in a clear, express<\/p>\n<p> vv.a(v1ou:_ri;5:.:.ig;_j::r\u00a7d &#8220;tr.md\u00a2*mment and has dismissed the<br \/>\n &#8216;I&#8217;n&#8217;a1 Court 1-3&amp;1-ned to the said<\/p>\n<p> it has dismissed the suit as<\/p>\n<p>  will not save limitation. In tb\ufb01<br \/>\nA &#8216;   also rclicd on the decision of the Apex Court<br \/>\n   in 2004 (12) sec 360 in the matter of Food<\/p>\n<p> jCorpomtion of India Vs Assam State Co-operatztve.<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; k&#8217; . V V . I<br \/>\n_ _.\n<\/p>\n<p>_ .35 53.\n<\/p>\n<p>2s%mk\u00a2\ufb01rg and Csmumar Fe\ufb01\ufb01ra\u00e9\u00e9sn ki\ufb01a, xmi $&#8217;\u20ac\u00a7\u00b01\u20ac:\u00a7&#8217;$<\/p>\n<p>~   sag  &#8216;&amp;3at miqmwlwgamsarit saatf gas: may be in<\/p>\n<p>writixg mg by impiiaaagm Er: gm aa\ufb01e: me:-c <\/p>\n<p>a\u00e9mmi\ufb01n hy tfm \u00e9efen\ufb01xzit aa r\ufb01m\u00e9 &#8216;\u00a333  _<\/p>\n<p>mm him ea am mm 9?&#8217; i&#8217;3,};\u00a7;\u00a75\u00a7gf -. Ff \u00bb <\/p>\n<p>mxma &#8216;aim \ufb01ght far the peria\u00e9 <\/p>\n<p>3G\u00a7?.\u00a7$ ami as gush by exgeifessig <\/p>\n<p>\u00e9gfm\u00e9wt adnzitmd tiwdebt,    \u00a33<br \/>\n5% suii within   222$ \ufb02ats ef<\/p>\n<p>a\u00a2}m\u00a2wi:&amp;dgam\u00a2:1\u20ac:.&#8217;&#8211; <\/p>\n<p>\nQ;   \ufb01fie y\ufb01izit that afae<br \/>\nfa?     V&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>  :\u00a7::\u00a7\u00a3aa2a\u00e9 \u00a7&amp;3&#8242;?12\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7 mfsrma ta<\/p>\n<p> C\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 &amp;m\u00ab  &#8220;&#8221;&#8221;  42:23 am aa\ufb01zm. E\ufb01\ufb01emgmge<br \/>\nV     which ara 3%: fm aiiagsui\ufb01 af\ufb01 \ufb01m:<br \/>\n  mght far ram-y sf ?4\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a75S3.\u00a7Q\u00a7:<\/p>\n<p>  V mag: at 25% 9.5:. 1: \u00a33 alga mi *3: \u00e9ispum ma it<\/p>\n<p> thaa traz\ufb01wrtgaiian mi&#8217; gas\ufb01s hgk\ufb01girzg is ma<\/p>\n<p> 5%? E  \ufb01nm 33;;\u00a7.2\u00bb\u00a7? ta 3\u00a7;g\u00a7?sg&amp;\u00a7,\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>Saga sf E325 y\u00e9aizat\ufb01&#8217; is timt tha \u00e9afm\u00e9a\ufb01t lfmd bwmma<\/p>\n<p>dim sf the amun: t\ufb01ww\ufb01s wm\ufb01wrmgam af ia gn\ufb01\ufb01ga<\/p>\n<p>me Tm; mm whiiaa eewzaagizzg the <\/p>\n<p>giaizx\u00e9\ufb01&#8221; has zm\u20aciss&#8217;.\u00a7% azzci  iimg Eraa\ufb01a\ufb01;<\/p>\n<p>aa an &#8216;aha dmg &#8220;m\u00a71i\u00b0\u00a7.V;&#8217;g &#8216;\u00a7&#8217;i:ze    <\/p>\n<p>3:&#8221; %:,\u00e95L\u00a7?35.5\u00a7\u00a7 with i:*g\u00a7g:z&#8221;e.$&#8221;\u00a3*, am tizmse as<\/p>\n<p> :&#8217;-  _z\u00a7:{g   agairzgt &#8216;fim mm.<\/p>\n<p>.&#8217; V.  &#8221; _  :\u00a5\u00a3&#8221;,E;45;%.EwrA  ammt Ema Ema agk\ufb01swiedge\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>  Ee\ufb01waen 3iglRf\u00a7&#8217;? ta 33.s\u00a7?L%<\/p>\n<p>ix-.&#8217;r mum &#8216;<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01g &#8216;\u00e9e:;:a:2\u00a7\u00a3&#8221;\ufb01}\u00a7i*&amp;&amp; yaaam gem\u00e9 as \ufb01g: 32$ iigm egf suit<br \/>\n&#8216; H   \ufb01\ufb01m \ufb01rm \ufb02aw af the \ufb01jm af $13 \ufb01uii, \u00a33<\/p>\n<p> T.\u00a7\u00a7:\u00a7;:i\u00a71  {Em anzmiztzz is is Em rammf\ufb01, \ufb01zmn titmra must<\/p>\n<p>mm: by ma\ufb01a Q: by \u00e9mp\ufb01izsat\ufb01szx<\/p>\n<p>\ufb01fimt \u00a33 miia\u00e9 by me piaiz\u00e9ti\ufb01&#8217; \u00a33 a i\ufb01tf\ufb01i&#8217; \u00e9am\ufb01.\n<\/p>\n<p>3.s,a*m\u00a7a1 whim}: raa\u00e9g \ufb01g mag:<br \/>\n \u00a7\u00a5? \u00a7\u00a7\u00a73\u00ab..}&#8221;\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7i$E<br \/>\n atzm\ufb01m <\/p>\n<p>3%: Sim<\/p>\n<p>we write $31115  Es:\n<\/p>\n<p>mzrmmaiisn. we mci  y\u00e9tu&#8230;\n<\/p>\n<p>sg\u00e9i\ufb01amami at&#8217; 91:? \u00a71\u00a7\u00a7$._ gag gmm\ufb01  gm<br \/>\ngar\ufb01mwciitw izai\u00e9itizagm\ufb01  1,23 \u00a7.i:._Q\u00a7S\u00a7\u00a7::-;?&#8221;$?\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01@<br \/>\nan $13 $3 cf   Ci::%3.;z&lt;*E&#039;\u00e9:.E&#039;j,Ba2ga1are*&#039;;<\/p>\n<p>Yam  . fa\u00a7&#039;&#8211;&#039;$?\u00a7 &#039;  aum sf<br \/>\n\u20ac3,\u00a7&amp;,5_5\u20ac\u00a5\u00ab\u00a3_-&quot;-payabic  &#039;%;:?\u00a7~7&#039;E_\u00bb\u00a73_ 35%;&#039; with rmpesct in<br \/>\nyear ;5&#039;\u00a7c_\u00a7:* .,  _  far \ufb01g pem\u00a7;<br \/>\nEmem&#039;!:g:%;;r.  {$3&#8211;\\\u00a7;{l\u00a7l\u20acV_;&#039;3{.@~1&#039; sm\ufb01 he a\ufb01just\ufb01<br \/>\nby &#039;:13-.t\u00a7is?a:d$ \u00a7%:*3:\u00bb\u00e9a$f&amp;9i\u00a7\u00a3\ufb01\u00e9:&amp;nt af dam s\ufb02virg is<\/p>\n<p>9&#039;?\n<\/p>\n<p>$3<\/p>\n<p>jt\u00e9;:\u00a7i:;*::3;{a:z*   Egg} \u00a7ma:m-  ,<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab  $5 %3,3.m\u00a7:\u00a7\u00a7- 52$  <\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V  &#8216;\u00a7\u00a7\u00e9 z%*&#8217;:\u00a7;a\ufb01  yam far a   in<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V.  -, &#8216;   \ufb02ax&#8217;  _ . . . . ..\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;&#8211;   sf \ufb01\ufb01 Eaziaf &#8220;\u00a31&#8243;  ii @332&#8242; $3:<\/p>\n<p> V E\ufb01w  \u00abV  gara E Ema refgw\ufb01 Es \ufb01hxag :13? his 313%&#8217;:<\/p>\n<p> Twzwaeiz &#8216;aha dazzfzm\ufb01amt<\/p>\n<p>Fmm &#8216;Kim E\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01m\u00e9<\/p>\n<p>  $2? aim Exam it :3 mgsgmziaza $5 mag. \ufb01g gram $3&#8243;<\/p>\n<p>   \u00a33   it   mi<br \/>\n    Eif\ufb01i&#8217; is <\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;:i\u00e9?:;f\u00a7.:::\u00a7;\u00a7.\ufb01\u00a3, \ufb01afazzda\ufb01i Ema gimrz $5: @i {:2 Sim aha\ufb01rmi<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;\u00a33<\/p>\n<p>Eh: giaizit\u00e9\ufb01 6%? 1113 ai\u00e9iapimn\u00e9, \u00a7\u00a2f&#8217;er:ci&amp;n:. has zzseithm&#8221;<br \/>\na\u00e9mtta\ufb01 \ufb02l\ufb01 aai\u00e9 c\ufb01afm mm&#8217; has atatas\u00e9 timt ih\ufb01 a.%$*s&#8211;&#8216;:;_.,:&#8217;3.&#8217;\u00a3:<\/p>\n<p>is \ufb01ne \ufb01am him. Wm: wag sistm\u00e9 &#8216;mg&#8217; mg -.,<\/p>\n<p>\u00a7;:.z.:*12&#8217;1g&#8217; the iaaa\u00e9epkaazz\ufb01m mmwma\ufb01an 223 {ha  <\/p>\n<p>mm raimram\ufb01w \ufb01r: a\u00a2im$%a\u00a7&#8217;E&amp;gz3\u00a73\u00e9\u00a7i:&#8217;%\u00a7;&#8217;L\u00a72;;\u00a3\u00a7g3r.;$\u00e9;i:&#8217;\u00a5.ii:::\u00a3:a; &#8216;$3 <\/p>\n<p>arf the Lim2&#8242;:iat7m11 \ufb01e: as get  <\/p>\n<p>\ufb01xi\ufb01fi\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9, there must, ha by V.  5;<br \/>\nskar aai\ufb01wwI..e\ufb02%:1\u20ac.&#8217;:&#8217;    fiw<br \/>\npiaizxti\ufb01&#8217;, in 22:33  %%t:ie;A%  war: by<br \/>\nimpii\ufb02a\ufb01mz mm..j:;Zc;i     ;,\u00e9If;&#8217;.\u00a3\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7$wiadgem\u00a3ni\u00a7<\/p>\n<p>as d%f$\ufb01{i&amp;:\u00a3&#8217;i&#8217;:  \ufb01\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a7a%\u00a7\u00a7$&amp;g@\u00a7 &#8216;mat h&amp; :13 532%<\/p>\n<p>3:&#8217; }iahi\u00e9:__ts._ 1: Gn\ufb01y reitmam\u00e9<br \/>\nthe  Ezazsa \ufb01at: ma\ufb01a by \ufb02ue<br \/>\np\u00a7.:L.;*:_\u00a5\u00a7;ii&#8221;..&#8217;\u00a3sa; 223%: \u00bbma &gt;\u00a2\u00a7a:s&amp;&amp;a;z:E&#8217;L$;1m:2:\u00a2\u00a7 $2 is aamizm $3&#8242; ma<\/p>\n<p> ix \u00a7,a:?2?\u00a7;2\u00a7m $2.3 am<\/p>\n<p> mi: bafam tifm mart; im \u00e9csszzumanta<br \/>\n*=* &#8216;aha: in the suit by the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">11<\/span><\/p>\n<p>sf eiw a\u00e9mkgian sf \ufb01ght, tim Egiiar miia\ufb01; by Eim<\/p>\n<p>p\u00e9aizz\ufb01\ufb01&#8217; \ufb01mm mt aamuzzt \ufb01t} an a\u00a3;%mw\u00e9\u00a7\ufb01gema\u00e92r3:\u00a2,<\/p>\n<p>mm ma pxaintig&#8221; rm Ma 29 \u00a7\u00a7f\u00a7.$$ :V.<\/p>\n<p>amiamw\u00a7\u00a3 t 3f \ufb01ght: hie Tm fi\ufb01t anti\ufb01a\u00e9    K <\/p>\n<p>tim bayrad debit&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>2:3. &#8216;\u00a3&#8221;ha amzsm cf gm; ,cms~:%:a1:\u00a7m: agggsiaaazgj\u00e9s <\/p>\n<p>the iam mz\u00e9 E t\ufb01Zm$E sf Qazgaasf   %%<br \/>\na\u00a2};m9w&#8217;Z\u00a2dg&amp;m.\u00a2:1t zzaf &#8216;    &#8216;: 4\u00a7\u00a3f%:i&#8217;\u00a7E2&amp;r \u00a7\u00a7\u00a7f\u00e9$Es$ at<br \/>\n3:&amp;\u00a7ii\u00a3&#8217;:a\u00a7.\u00a7\ufb02E3.; \ufb01at&#8217;: sf  1  that he<\/p>\n<p>hm rm: di$\u00a7ut_\u00a2%\u00a3&amp;\u00a7\u00e9&#8217;j?2%.\u00a7  &#8221;   is neat an<br \/>\n \u00a33? \ufb01w ?T:*ia\u00a7 Saga 23%:\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;aeEm\u00a7;wEe.dg%::x\u00a7rzi.\u00e9\u00a7 \u00a7\u00a2\u00a7&#8217;*:. qim\ufb01 mi 33328 E\u00e9mizaiiszz&#8221; :13<\/p>\n<p>  gag  is mnmmzfg ta \ufb01g pmv\u00e9simm<\/p>\n<p>E:\u00ab~\u00a7&#8217;  \ufb01x Limiia\u00e9ziaza \ufb01ga\u00e9w \ufb01\ufb01wevw {Ex<\/p>\n<p>%    \ufb02lx\ufb01\ufb01ii \u00a33 wnai\u00e9am\u00e9 in ihia apw:<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  T;3n..\u00ae:%%2$\u00a7\ufb01\u00a2r&amp;\ufb01i@-2; E \ufb01t: mt fi\ufb01d {Eat it ammznis an<\/p>\n<p>  E-iexzw $36: mmi\ufb01era\ufb01sn mf &#8216;tim<\/p>\n<p>VT  &#8216; &#8216; =::i&lt;;n:.:.:9:3.%:&quot;i%. 331% $25  <\/p>\n<p>15 6:&#039;: gm\u00e9r\ufb01y E\u00e9ag :33: \ufb01n\ufb01 \ufb01at<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">12<\/span><\/p>\n<p>aha  sf am ma: mm @333 $2&#8242;   <\/p>\n<p> 3  {Em a i  an\ufb01 mm 23  d.\n<\/p>\n<p>sd\/&#8211;&#8216; ]           <\/p>\n<p>332%<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010 Author: Subhash B.Adi 11; THE HIGH czznum&#8217; 017 KARHATAKA AT DATED THIS me am DAY 0? DEcELmEg;%j\u00ab2o%1\u00a7% BEFORE: THE I-IOIPBLE MR. JUS&#8217;11CE:&#8217;Af3I_\ufb013HI?.S&#8217;IiB M\/a.V1jayanan:1 &#8216; &#8221; Ha\\rl:1gits!ed1n&#8217;.:m.C)\u00a711c\u00a2:_at ~. &#8216; &#8216;Vijaya &lt;+&#039;\ufb01rh=nj k .\u00bb Anrnxe,R\u00a2Egd&#039;, Hub]i&#8211;5.8.0C3:S\u00a7 2.. , * [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50425","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-23T23:49:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"M\\\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\\\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-23T23:49:46+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1332,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010\",\"name\":\"M\\\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\\\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-23T23:49:46+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"M\\\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\\\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-23T23:49:46+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010","datePublished":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-23T23:49:46+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010"},"wordCount":1332,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010","name":"M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-12-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-23T23:49:46+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ms-vijayanand-roadlines-ltd-vs-ms-geoffrey-manners-and-co-ltd-on-6-december-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"M\/S Vijayanand Roadlines Ltd vs M\/S Geoffrey Manners And Co Ltd on 6 December, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50425","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50425"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50425\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50425"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50425"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50425"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}