{"id":50484,"date":"2009-03-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009"},"modified":"2014-02-28T06:28:41","modified_gmt":"2014-02-28T00:58:41","slug":"shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Shri Jayakumar Annappa … vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Jayakumar Annappa … vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm OF..KARNAT;\u00a74'\u00a7{;\u00a7~;\u00bb    %  A\n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DH\u00bb?RWAby:\/\/   \n\nEDATED THIS THE 4T\" L;A[3*oF \")\\.(aA\u00a7C!\u00ab-I!\"-=26\u20ac\u00a7u9M  k\n';:41'_BEFC\u00a7\u00a7E,A:VL\"':\u00ab    \nHONBLE MR3 USTICEv*\u00a7s\u00a7fjHAN.:'\u00bb$F\u00a7?\\b\u00a7%TANA6OUDAR\n .+g243x2m7 (sc\/51')\n\nBetwecxgmj,   \"~ -\u00bb .  \"  \n\nJayamxtl\ufb01ar \n\nAged abouf\ufb01i yeazts \" \"  \n\nR\/0 S0u11dat\u00a7;i..f\\1iIJage_ A' S\nTalukag\ufb01aibag V \n\n A'  .v .. Petitioner\n\n (  vSx:i..._VAla'3ra'3'.z;ji.A'i'2:..*-'>1,_.'\u00ab11* S. Patil, Szz\ufb02omctsel for\n\n'     Advocate )\n\n \n\n\u00ab ~  Lam1dan Rama Mang\n\n., Agagl aibeut \".73 yaars\n\"  I'1:Z'[_e_\u00bb_Soua\u00e9att:i village\n Raihag,\n\n'. '    _Ii}istz\"i(:1: Belgaum.\n\nA V    A }.  )2. The Tahsildzar,\n\nRaibag Taiuk\nRaihag,\n{District Balgaum.\n\n\n\n..2..\n\n3. The Assistant Commissioner,\nChikodi,\nDist: Belgaum.\n\n4. The Deputy Commissioner,\nBelgaum,   .\nDist: Belgaum.      \n\n( By Szfi 'l'.N .Rag}111pathy for Sri      \nAdvocate for R~1 and Smt,:V_idyavathi;  A\nHCGP for R-2 to 4) V ~. \n\n..s*\n\ncm\nI 2\n\nup\nI\n\nThis Writ Petitio1}'is}\"\ufb011ed_\"u1z_d;\u00e9r. Ar\ufb01clcs 226 85 227 of the\nConstitutign of India prajritlg. t0_ wt} a\u00e9itic\u00bb tiac impugned order\npasseci by the fourth resgiqnd\u00e9nf +--'\u00ab..De-911:3: Commissioner,\nB\ufb01lgaum, dated 2'E\u00a5.3.2{':O\"?\"*J.id.e\"\u00a3\u00a711nexur\u00e9%*B con\ufb01rming the\norder passed \ufb01he *__As,st;Cd*mIi1iSsiQQ}::r, Chikodi, dated\n'22.'?.2OG6 vid,-2     \n\nThis   been heard and reserved for\norders on 2?',..2.i'\u00ab1(}()*9_' an&..}\ufb01mnounced the Grders on this day\nthe 4t1\u00a71Mgxrch'22:}Q\u00ab_;r.V V '\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
    has purchased tins pmperty maxing<\/p>\n
Z  _ Sufvs ‘ \/2, measuring 17 gtmtas, situated at<\/p>\n
 “=%L samd\u00a7a::\u00a3 Viilagc of Raibag Taluk, through registered Sale<\/p>\n
 ._ Z)\u00a2Ved– i’n tha year 1994. He is in pOS5\u00a7\u20acSSi(I)I} of the property<\/p>\n
  ” -by} virtue of the said Sale Deed. The entries are mutated<\/p>\n
U in his favour. According to him, he has improved the land<\/p>\n
by spxezixcling considerable amaunt: af meney.<\/p>\n
\\\/”‘<\/p>\n
2. The Tahsildar, Raibag ‘I’ah\u00a313._I\u00ab:V,~–\u00bb..A4_:’:: 2 <\/p>\n
submitted a report: ciated 14.6:.=.20Q6 f?te <\/p>\n
Commissioner aileging that.\u00bb’th.e iarfid ‘Was   i:1: *<\/p>\n
favour of the pe\ufb01tioner in    I\u00e9aznataka
\nScheduied Castes 8:   ‘(Proi\ufb01bition of
\nTransfer of Certain  ;’\\;e:i1j:~,   referred to
\nas the   said report, the
\nAssistant__  to the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7tateme’e;t:   flied by the petitiorxer to the<\/p>\n
said notieee = v’1′;’:1ei’ea..*’\u00a3:\u00e9{;t,4 the impugned order Vida<\/p>\n
_VVAn1″:e’};1 n*e-fA’ is~..V\u00a7\u00e9,1ssed (rm 22.7.2006 by the Assistant<\/p>\n
V.  the petitioner to restore the land<\/p>\n
iii f\u00e9i.?{;1;1:*” reependent No.1 herein under Section 5 of<\/p>\n
V the  The eeid erder is cenfrmed by the Deputy<\/p>\n
 “‘ i3emm;\u00a3&s$iener, Beigaum, vide Axmexure\ufb01\ufb02’ dated<\/p>\n
 . Both the orders are questioned in this Writ<\/p>\n
“–j3\u00e9tition.\n<\/p>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
3. The records maintained by the  <\/p>\n
arts: Inade avaiiabie by the 1eaI’I;r:\u00e9” G@ye\u00a7mm\u00e9;\u00a7i._\ufb02dvbc\u00e91te  ‘ V<\/p>\n
for perusal of the Court. l’~\u00a7earci ‘S I*i'”~<\/p>\n
iearned counsel appearing “of j.ii:1:::  <\/p>\n
‘i’.N.Raghupathy, lea1*:;1t:e;\u00a7  behaif of
\nrespondent No. I  ‘V ”  leamad
\nGavemment E13-\ufb01cficr   of Siiate and
\nperused   <\/p>\n
4. is Jayakumar S. Patj}, iaarneci<\/p>\n
Smiioxf_CouIise{‘azp\u00a7eeiiv’i\ufb01g’ o1} behaif of petitioner that the<\/p>\n
 V’ oFdsf\u00a7”:’\u00a72,-\ufb01sed  tli\u00e9’ authorities below are: not justified,<\/p>\n
 335;; are passe\u00e9 in violation of prixzciples Of<\/p>\n
  He also argued 0:1 merits cf the matter.\n<\/p>\n
  = .\u00ab.g\u00a7gyVVV”coI1tra, Sri ‘i’.N .Raghup3.t11y, iearnad counsel<\/p>\n
  on behalf of respondent No.1 argued in support<\/p>\n
“ihe orders of the auflzori\ufb01es below. Be C\ufb01lfit\ufb01fidfjd that<\/p>\n
there is no _dispute that the lands are gI’\u00e9’33Ii\u00a5:6d lands and<\/p>\n
.–=”’\\.\n<\/p>\n
g; s.’<\/p>\n
‘F’<\/p>\n
,.5,.\n<\/p>\n
that the gantees are Ha\ufb01yans. He further argued, V3;.i:1:s\u00a7t.}\u00a7hs<\/p>\n
presumption arising under Section 5 (3) of the,  <\/p>\n
not rebutted by the petit:iene1f,_ Based:i:j.o\ufb01~:: th\u00a2::fs%_:”‘~ <\/p>\n
submissions, he argued for dismissalgbf<\/p>\n
Smtvidyavathi, Z  A     ‘<\/p>\n
appearing 0:1 behalf of fghe StatsVV:\u00e9\u00ab}_so\u00bb Vsfupport of<\/p>\n
the orders passed by  ;2i1:I;I:29r{\u00a7t.ies”<\/p>\n
5,   .;3:;\u00a5f?)t’efi;i~\u00a7r\u00a7;:1t’ic31f1<2d,  hssistarxt Commissioner
\nhas iss\u00a3i\u00a23d" ne\ufb01cs  after gsttjng the report<\/p>\n
from \u00a3118 Ts1hsi_1dzar,–.  'i.'Iu1\u00e9:~"'1fepor%: of the Tahsiidar is dated<\/p>\n
 r   Ths\ufb01e\ufb01tioner herein has \ufb01led statement of<\/p>\n
 A~f;l:3,.7.2OO6. Thereafter, 110 Sort of en<:;u_iry is<\/p>\n
hc:'l(1__ bj;  A\u00e9ssistant Commissioner. Without further<\/p>\n
  notice "a.;}f:1 Without hearing the petitioner, the or\u00e9er is<\/p>\n
   as per Am1r5:xu:*e~'A' dated 22."?.2\u20ac}06 by the<\/p>\n
V%   Assistant Commissioner against the peti\ufb01onsr. The crdsr<\/p>\n
* sf the Assistant Commissions}: is in vioiation of pzinciples<\/p>\n
sf natural j"\u00a3ZiStiC\u20ac, inasmuch as, 119 reasozzabie<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
.5-\n<\/p>\n
epgpermrzity of being heard is \ufb01ver: to the petitioner.<\/p>\n
Rule 3 (4}{5) of the Kamataka Scheduled <\/p>\n
Scheduled Tribes (Prol’1ibiti0n of ‘:’:~a1;srer\u00ab?\u00a7fj’ <\/p>\n
Lands) Rules, 1979, require that  ,Q4ppofti’1f::it}* lief eifigeii\ufb01gii <\/p>\n
heard should be given to the 15e’tit;i\u00a7}z1er.’ii’~. V’ <\/p>\n
dispute that the pCtiti0I}\u20acrVii}.Tl\u00e9’:iSV_ \ufb01led ~i::i thee’<\/p>\n
matter before the Assistanji.—-f’\u00a76mjm.issiof1e::_. ..93But’, an<\/p>\n
opporimzity of being   gven to – the<\/p>\n
petiti01″2e1*.i'”‘”ir;   eiibfir\ufb01ssion ma\u00e9e at the Bar<\/p>\n
by Sri.  had an oppostunity of<\/p>\n
being ..tOA”\u20ac.;h’6:ivp\u20actiti{)I1CI’ before the Assistant<\/p>\n
 V’ Com-iziissieeger, he iifdiild have placed adequate material<\/p>\n
“0fg1’V’:fe,ee=f<:i $.atisfy the Assistant Commissioner that<\/p>\n
 flue Tahsiidar is incorrect, deserves to be<\/p>\n
i3"\u00bb-'\u00ab4___e::eepte\u00a3l,,__i* The Assistant Cemmiseioner has proceeded<\/p>\n
   and has not eppiied his mine to the facts of the<\/p>\n
\\J\u00a7\\v\/\/)<\/p>\n
-7-<\/span><\/p>\n
6. Though the Deputy Commissioner has given an<\/p>\n
opportunity of being heard to the petitioner <\/p>\n
the Deputy Commissioner has passed a  <\/p>\n
same eaxmoiz be sustained in view. of t21’e”‘fa\u00a7:’jt, ‘1V:h.at_ t:%1e””<\/p>\n
Deputy C0}Z[}.II1iSSi0f}6’I’ has re1ied:”:.ii13*s’:i;,1’icertao  \ufb01\u00e9itatiisgi<\/p>\n
entries and factuai aspects  come to tfie \u00a2O\ufb02C.1LESiOn;w.i’<\/p>\n
The said factual aspects Werei.;1otv.bi*ofy1g1it”{o.meE1″io1;ice of<\/p>\n
the petitioner at any   =!t_)y him or by the<\/p>\n
Assistajef”CoI:i,\u00a5nissioner ‘}I’i1e”1′:’eiport of the Tahsiidar is
\nnot even’-served  ‘pe7′{iti,oner. These are the sue motto<\/p>\n
proeeedingsa””   the Assistant Commissioner<\/p>\n
. V. “oased:’:’oii’.fhe.. report. In View of the same, rules<\/p>\n
 require that the report of the Tahsiidar<\/p>\n
shouid  lseen served on the petitioner who is the<\/p>\n
 “–..VVV”e.iffe{ei:eiii’\u00bb.\u00a7e1’so;1. The factual statements made durizig the<\/p>\n
  of the order by the i\ufb01eputy Commissioner could not<\/p>\n
i   .h-2:i\\:’e been opposed by the petitioner as the said facts were<\/p>\n
“V not brought to his notice prior to passing of the impugned<\/p>\n
order. In View of the same, the order of the Deputy<\/p>\n
.. 3 E
\nCcmmissionar also cannot be sustained and the same is<\/p>\n
Bahia to be quashed.\n<\/p>\n
“F. Since the naatttzr has to be reman\u00a3i\u00a2;1: f\u00e9.th\u20ac<\/p>\n
ASSiS\u00a5Z8}f1t Cammissioner far fresh dispose} iI}:v”2*i{3{;()I%{‘x\u00a7f~i_Ifi{}\u20ac<\/p>\n
with iaw, this Court does not wish :0 c0m.I:ie\u00a31t’~9\u00a7:r;Vth:i:1–b<\/p>\n
on merits of the matter at this st;\u00a7ge.  If <\/p>\n
3.113; abservation on 1nez’its,V.T’t11e same”* mayV\u00bb’1;:-.1ff3\u00a7u.di<i'$ tirz\u00e9" L.<\/p>\n
case of either of the parties   Cf afresh.\n<\/p>\n
Hence,;’i<e\u20ac\u00a7\u00a7i11\ufb01;v_.0p\u20ac;1\u00a7 a\ufb01\u00a7'145\u20acf:i::1*?s\u00ab “ta remand the matter to the<\/p>\n
Assi$;t:a;::1: C{5IIiI}IiSSi0fi\u20aci’: by setting aside the impugxed<\/p>\n
“Gr::;i\u00e9”1″s. 9341*; \ufb02ew of the same, {he following order is made :<\/p>\n
” . . “‘Th\u00e9’ ‘Vida AImexure–‘A’ dated 22.7.2096 passes?<\/p>\n
‘{3}? ti\ufb01. \u00e9ggistani. Commissionar, Chikodi, and the order<\/p>\n
  ;s;2:1e;mnexurexB? dated :\u00e9?;*\u00a7-,\u00e9.3-.”;<.',\u00a3', \u00a72:\u00a7~\u00a7\u00a2<; 9: 59\u00a2 ;s\u00a2y9;::<\/p>\n
 C\u00e9mmissiener, Beigaum, are set aside. 'F136 matter is<\/p>\n
 remittaci to tha Assistant Commisaaner, Chikadi, for fresh<\/p>\n
ciispesal in accordance with Eaw. A1} questicms are kept<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Shri Jayakumar Annappa … vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009 Author: Mohan Shantanagoudar IN THE HIGH comm OF..KARNAT;\u00a74’\u00a7{;\u00a7~;\u00bb % A CIRCUIT BENCH AT DH\u00bb?RWAby:\/\/ EDATED THIS THE 4T” L;A[3*oF “)\\.(aA\u00a7C!\u00ab-I!”-=26\u20ac\u00a7u9M k ‘;:41’_BEFC\u00a7\u00a7E,A:VL”‘:\u00ab HONBLE MR3 USTICEv*\u00a7s\u00a7fjHAN.:’\u00bb$F\u00a7?\\b\u00a7%TANA6OUDAR .+g243x2m7 (sc\/51’) Betwecxgmj, “~ -\u00bb . ” Jayamxtl\ufb01ar Aged abouf\ufb01i yeazts ” ” R\/0 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50484","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Jayakumar Annappa ... vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Jayakumar Annappa ... vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-28T00:58:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Jayakumar Annappa … vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-28T00:58:41+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1091,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Shri Jayakumar Annappa ... vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-28T00:58:41+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Jayakumar Annappa … vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Jayakumar Annappa ... vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Jayakumar Annappa ... vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-28T00:58:41+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Jayakumar Annappa … vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-28T00:58:41+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009"},"wordCount":1091,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009","name":"Shri Jayakumar Annappa ... vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-28T00:58:41+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-jayakumar-annappa-vs-shri-laxman-rama-mang-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Jayakumar Annappa … vs Shri Laxman Rama Mang on 4 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50484","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50484"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50484\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50484"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50484"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50484"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}