{"id":50596,"date":"2009-07-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-06-14T15:19:52","modified_gmt":"2018-06-14T09:49:52","slug":"sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 13\"\" DAY OF JULY 2009\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARAN, CHIEF JUSTICE H.\n\nAND\n\nTHE HON'8LE MR. JUSTICE V.G. SAi3HA%---|__}'.-'f\u00a7\".:A..\"\"AV.' A\n\nway: APPEAL NO. 1828[2I}__Q_g_(_GM:\u00ab+R'[\u20ac'.):E\"-i  A  A\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\nSri. Kariyappa bin Thippanna,\nAged about 60 years.\n\n. Sri. Govindarayappa bin \n\nThimappa,\nAged about 43 years.\n\nSri. RamaAchar{d'ra'ppa:w.A A\nS\/0. Paiappa; ' _ '  \nAged about'5S years.  '-\n\n. Sri. Mo\u00ab_3d|aAppau,i \n.~*S\/O- H'a'r3uvmanthapp'a... _____ \n\n  Ag'ed a\"'QOl3'1i:'\u00bb45 yea rs.\n\n . SuJri..VVVI~1aEiya.;:j'pa\" tA\ufb01'.n.:'.'13annahanumanthappa,\n  Aged. about GS-:_vAears.\n\n\"e._AI| are resEd.,En\"g. at Iguru\n\" \" 5\u00a330--!.Ea\"rahattE Viiiage,\nA c '~Dav.anager.e Taluk,\n'-~._\"=Dav.ana'gere.\n\nAPPELLANTS\n\n\n\nAND\n\n Aged about 30 years.\n\n. State of Karnataka,\n\nRepresented by\n\nUnder Secretary to Government,\nRevenue Department (Muzrai),\nM.S. Building,\n\nDr. Arnbedkar Veedhi,\nBanga|ore--S60 O01. \nThe Deputy Commissioner,\n\nDavanagere District,\n\nDavanagere.\n\n. The Assistant Commissioner, _\n\nDavanagere Sub--Division,.__ \n\nDavanagere.\n\nSri. S.P. Govindappa bin paiisppga, V\" 'A V'\nAged about 55 y;earsi;s\u00bbi'_, . \"   A it \"\" \"\n\nSmt. Jayamma.,,.Ko._rn':Moortyneijoaw,\"'7  \n\nAged about 45. years'i\u00a2I\u00a7:,;  \"\n\nSmt. Kenoharn'm'a \nAged about4_5'years_. = '- \" \n\nSri. Jaya' z~.taii&lt;a&quot;&#039;biVii, mesa Nzaika,\n\n..\u00ab&#039;Aged ab3ou:t__,&#039;3S% years... _____ \n\nSari&#039;. K.&quot; Naga&#039;pp&#039;ai,dbin_ Doddaveerappa,\n\nAged -a.bou.t&#039; igears.\n\n&#039; Sri. Cri-i.kka_ppaijbin Huchappa,\n\nAged abo.ut.\u00a7+&#039;S years.\n\n.&quot;..f~.Sri.&#039;P_.3. Nvaiappa bin Gadrappa,\n&#039; _ &#039; --Agerii=about 54 years.\n\n  B.F&#039;. Umeshappa bin Thimrnappa,\n\n\n\n12. Sri. V.H. Thimmappa bin Thirramappa,\nAged about 43 years. .. RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>Respondents 4 -12 are residents of<br \/>\nIguru Goilarahatti Village, ..\n<\/p>\n<p>Gollarahatti Post, Davanagere Taiuk, Davanagere Dist&#8230;&#8230;.j_;   V &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri. Basavaraj Kareddy &#8211; Pri. Govt. Adv. for  &#8216;i_:to_3)&#8217;  _ <\/p>\n<p>This Writ Appeal is filed under Sevetiioin&#8217; 4, of<br \/>\nHigh Court Act praying to set aside.&#8217; tij1_&#8217;ei~&#8217;iorder&#8217;~_passe&#8217;d_&#8221;in:<br \/>\nW.P.No.19844\/2007 dated 13.04.2009.    &#8216;   &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>This Writ Appeal coming up fo&#8217;r-.\u00a7reliminar.y&#8221;i~ie-ariivag on this<\/p>\n<p>day, the Court delivered the following:  Z<br \/>\nJ   V<br \/>\n(delivered by,P&#8217;.D..&#8211; 1<br \/>\nThe learned  though the<br \/>\nimpugned  i\u00a7~:.as. issued as in the year 2003,<br \/>\ni.e., on  in the official gazette on<br \/>\n01.05.2003,  wi5it.gii&#8217;V was filed on 13.12.2007<br \/>\noh&#8211;a.ll_engiV_ng:  &#8220;~&#8217;n.o_t_i_fication and therefore, there is an<\/p>\n<p>ino&#8217;.+din:at&#8217;e..Vd\u00abela~yj.on.__the part of the appellants\/petitioners in<\/p>\n<p>:7&#8243;a_presentingFthe &#8216;\u00e9\u00a3\u00e9iijrit&#8217;.I=p&#8217;etition, dismissed the writ petition on the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;V\u00b0\u00bb._gro&#8217;und ofu&#8217;del&#8221;ay and laches. Being aggrieved by the said order,<\/p>\n<p>,1ritvhjeA&#8217;.apApeii&#8217;~!ants\/petitioners have come up with the present Writ<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>2. Today this matter has come up for Preliminary<br \/>\nHearing. When the matter was called, there was no<\/p>\n<p>representation on behalf of the appellant.<\/p>\n<p>3. Learned Government Advocate app:e~a.ri_&#8217;ng_&#8217;__i&#8221;lifo&#8217;r_<\/p>\n<p>respondents 1 to 3 submits that since the appellants\/gpetgitionersl_<\/p>\n<p>have filed the writ petition after a lapsehiof lmore&#8221;\u00abth&#8217;a&#8217;ri<\/p>\n<p>assaiiing the correctness of the notif_icatio&#8217;n Vilmpugned. the}<\/p>\n<p>petition, the learned Single Judge hlas:rightly'&#8221;d.is&#8217;misse&#8217;d: the writ<br \/>\npetition on the ground of&#8221;~dela\u00a7\/N:aVAn*d.._ iaches and\ufb02x thus no<\/p>\n<p>interference is called for.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. iiieairdlrthle  r&#8211;(\u00a7otrern.rrl&#8217;ent Advocate appearing<\/p>\n<p>for responde1nts&#8221;1:&#8217; to  the records.\n<\/p>\n<p>5.  i9_ara&#8217;i6~.,V&#8217;ofi.&#8217;the&#8217;V&#8217; order of the learned single Judge<\/p>\n<p>rega  th {is  it  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>   learned counsel appearing for<br \/>\nboth the .pa?i_&#8217;ties, after considering rival contentions<br \/>\n. \u00e9  urgeldubyl both the counsel and after careful perusal<br \/>\nV.  the rnateria! available on record, it emerges that,<br \/>\n   tact, petitioners have not produced any<\/p>\n<p>h  authenticated documents to establish that they have<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;locus standi to maintain this writ petition for<\/p>\n<p>f: . \ufb02<br \/>\n\u00a7a._-=\u00abr&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>redressing their grievance, except stating that, they<br \/>\nare the devotees and they have got exclusive right to<br \/>\nperform pooja and other functions of Sri<br \/>\nRamadevaru temple situated at Iguru Gollarahatti<\/p>\n<p>village, which has been exclusively worshipped <\/p>\n<p>the petitioners&#8217; community alone and it is <\/p>\n<p>muzrai temple. It is significant to note that,  2&#8243;<\/p>\n<p>reliance placed by learned counsel app_ea&#8217;i*&#8217;in1g_~. for <\/p>\n<p>petitioners on Annexure-A the er7dorseinen_t&#8217;1ai&#8217;leg&#8217;ed,_2&#8217;j,__Ti&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>to have been issued by the Tahsi&#8217;lda_r2. Dava-nageredw<br \/>\nTaluk dated &#8216;a\u00a73&#8242;;2_0o7&#8243;x- _ 1vbea_ri&#8217;rg <\/p>\n<p>No.DVS:CR:12:7:200?-08.  be seen. from the<br \/>\nperusal of the said ::_4Annexure-&gt;A,_V thagt, the &#8220;said<br \/>\nendorsement has not been issued request of<\/p>\n<p>these petitioners&#8217; and it &#8216;has  pursuance<\/p>\n<p>of the 1   &#8216;b&#8217; one&#8217;._&#8217;Sri}2V Ja varego wda S\/o.<br \/>\nKariyappa, 4&#8242; Igllrud&#8217;Gioliarahatti, on 30&#8243;&#8216; July 2007.<br \/>\nWhen the~c_petitio&#8217;n_ers&#8217; have&#8217; not filed any application<\/p>\n<p>seel&lt;inggginformation, they cannot place reliance on<\/p>\n<p> ,.,.,the&#039;:c__encio.rsement yvhich has been issued in favour of<\/p>\n<p> third, parts;\/:&#039;and.. the petitioners have not whispered a<\/p>\n<p>sma.  as to what is the source of<\/p>\n<p>i&#039;nforma_t&#039;io.n2}&#039; and as to how they got the said<\/p>\n<p>&#039;*._endorsen::ent. It is an admitted fact after careful<\/p>\n<p> pgerusal of the official communication dated<br \/>\n_  &#039;:.7;9;&quot;1998 bearing No.DVS:CR:9:1:98-99,&#039; the<br \/>\n&#8230;_notification produced by the respondents-4 to 11<\/p>\n<p>dated 11.2.2002 bearing NO. DVS:CR:1 97712001-02<\/p>\n<p>.2&#039; 2&quot;&#039;<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>and dated 28.2.2006 bearing l\\io.DVS:CR:348:<br \/>\n2005-06, for having constituted the committee of<br \/>\nManagement that, after the expiry of period of three<br \/>\nyears, the Committee of Management has been<\/p>\n<p>constituted from time to time to look after thee<\/p>\n<p>administration and day today activities of Sri <\/p>\n<p>Sri Basaveswara Devaru temple and the sai&#8217;d.l&#8217;g:&#8217;*&#8211; &#8221; .2<\/p>\n<p>committee has been represented by mem.be.rs&#8217;ffrom .<\/p>\n<p>different communities. These ;are 2&#8242; &#8216;theg Ci&#8217;ll&#8217;iC_li7i&#8217;\ufb02u\u00a7&#8217;.,VV  &#8216;V<\/p>\n<p>materials available on record and the pe&#8217;t&#8217;itio~ners&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>have intentionally and deliberately is-uppreslsveciift<br \/>\nsaid fact and it is nothing  an a2bus_e&#8221;:of the<br \/>\nprocess of Court. Fu&#8217;rt~h_er  e&#8211;sji.gn&#8217;ificant to note<br \/>\nthat, the impugned noti:fica&#8217;tio&#8217;n.,has beendssued early<br \/>\nas in the year 2603, i.e:,&#8221;on.:&#8217;30&#8242;&#8221;.g4pri;l,&#8217;_  and the<\/p>\n<p>same  thxeeofficial gazette on 15&#8217;<br \/>\nMay 2003  writ petition has been<br \/>\npresentedgon v1&#8217;3&#8243;_&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;Dece&#8217;mber 2007 and therefore,<\/p>\n<p>thereis an inc-=rdii7ate&#8221;&#8216;deelay of nearly four years and<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8221;\u00ab&#8211;..,the&#8217;..__$sa:;.ci delay H h&#8217;as&#8221;not been explained by the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;p.et;&#8217;tion.ers;satisfactori&#8217;ly by offering cogent and valid<\/p>\n<p>rea.s_ons&#8217; 7&#8243;_~fori~.jcondonation of the said delay.<\/p>\n<p>Therefo_re,.,eeas rightly pointed out by the learned<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;v._couns&#8217;el appearing for respondents in their objections<\/p>\n<p> e&#8217;..fjas&#8217;eVteferred above, the writ petition filed by<\/p>\n<p>.2  &#8216;petitioners is liable to be dismissed on the ground of<\/p>\n<p>be   ..,.delay and laches and also on merits.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>.53 <\/p>\n<p>6. In view of the submissions made by the {earned<\/p>\n<p>Government Advocate and for the reasons stated in para 6 of the&#8212;-.__<\/p>\n<p>order dated 13.04.2009 made in W.P.No.19844\/2007, <\/p>\n<p>Appeai stands dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>tChie\u00a3_.}&#8221;us&#8217;ti&#8217;C\u00e9&#8217;;  0<\/p>\n<p> A   <\/p>\n<p>Weti  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) &amp; V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF JULY 2009 PRESENT THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARAN, CHIEF JUSTICE H. AND THE HON&#8217;8LE MR. JUSTICE V.G. SAi3HA%&#8212;|__}&#8217;.-&#8216;f\u00a7&#8221;.:A..&#8221;&#8221;AV.&#8217; A way: APPEAL NO. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50596","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-06-14T09:49:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-14T09:49:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":900,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-06-14T09:49:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-06-14T09:49:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-14T09:49:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009"},"wordCount":900,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009","name":"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-06-14T09:49:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-kariyappa-bin-thippanna-vs-state-of-karnataka-on-13-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Kariyappa Bin Thippanna vs State Of Karnataka on 13 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50596"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50596\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50596"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50596"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}