{"id":51059,"date":"2008-07-08T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-07T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-20T10:07:53","modified_gmt":"2017-05-20T04:37:53","slug":"commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Madras High Court<\/div>\n
Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008<\/div>\n
       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n In the High Court of Judicature at Madras\n\nDated :  08.07.2008\n\nCoram :-\n\nThe Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN\nand\nThe Honourable Mr.Justice P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA\n\nTax Case (Appeal) No.676 of 2008\n\nCommissioner of Income Tax\nChennai. \t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t..  Appellant \n\nVs.\n\nM\/s Indbank Housing Ltd.,\n480, Anna Salai,\nNandanam, Chennai-35.\t\t\t\t\t.. Respondent \n\n\n\tTAX CASE (APPEAL) filed under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras 'A' Bench dated  27.10.2006 in I.T.A.No.581\/Mds\/2005 for the assessment  year 1996-1997.\n\n\t\t\tFor Appellant : Mr.J.Naresh Kumar                                               \n\t\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA,J)
\n\tThis appeal is  filed by the Revenue against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras ‘A’ Bench dated  27.10.2006 in I.T.A.No.581\/Mds\/2005 for the assessment  year 1996-1997  raising the following substantial questions of law.\n<\/p>\n
“1. Whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the  Tribunal was right in holding that the reopening  of assessment under Section 147 was invalid when the assessee had  failed to furnish all the relevant material to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for proper assessment?\n<\/p>\n
2.Whether the  non disclosure of material facts viz., norms of National Housing Bank based on which the assessee substantiated certain provisions would amount to full and true disclosure?\n<\/p>\n
\t2. The brief  facts are as follows:-\n<\/p>\n
\t\tThe assessee is engaged in the business of housing finance.\n<\/p>\n
The relevant assessment year is 1996-1997 and the corresponding accounting  year ended on 31.03.1996.  The assessee has filed  the return of income on  28.11.1996 admitting the total income of Rs.1,96,31,710\/-.  The assessment was made on 27.10.1998 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act. Subsequently the assessment was completed   under Section 143(3) read with Section 147 of the Income Tax Act on 29.01.2002 determining the  income at Rs.2,13,18,659\/-.   Once again, the assessment  was re-opened  under Section 147 of the Act by issuing notice  on 25.03.2003 on the ground that there was escapement of income and the re-assessment was completed on 26.03.2004 determining the total income at Rs.4,80,64,413\/-.   It is noticed that the assessee has not recognised interest to the extent of Rs.1,91,37,015\/- in respect of non-performing assets  under the head ‘provision  for contingencies’ provided  for housing loan and investments to the extent of Rs.1,92,78,560\/- and  the assessee  has also written-off the amount payable by M\/s Flesta Properties. Therefore the Assessing Officer was of the view that there was a failure to admit the correct income and, hence, the income escaped assessment. Aggrieved by the second order of re-assessment, the assessee has  filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals).  The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals) has allowed the appeal  and held that  the re-opening was bad in law.  Aggrieved by that order,  the assessee has filed an appeal to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the Tribunal dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue confirming the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).  Hence, the present appeal.\n<\/p>\n
\t3. Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue has submitted that  the assessee has not furnished all the information  to the Assessing Officer.  He further contended that  the Assessing Officer was right in holding that the assessee failed to admit the correct income and therefore,  the income escaped assessment and the Assessing Officer was also right in invoking the jurisdiction to initiate proceeding under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act.  Therefore, the order passed by the Tribunal is not in accordance with law and the same should be set aside.\n<\/p>\n
\t4. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the Revenue.  There is no  dispute that the appellant has filed an elaborate  note on 27.10.1998 on interest income on NPAs before the Assessing Officer as to why the same is not declared.  Based on the  prudential norms, such income was not disclosed and the said fact  was  informed to the Department and also  National Housing Bank Act, 1987 was also enclosed with the note.  Further, the assessee  filed a copy of the Board Resolution along with the return of income with regard to writing off  the bad debts in the account of M\/s  Flesta properties.   So all the informations were furnished truly and fully disclosed to the Department  at the time of filing of return by the assessee. When all the facts are available with the Department, the authority has no jurisdiction to initiate proceeding under Section 147 of the Act.  Here, the Assessing Officer re-opened the assessment  on mere change of opinion.  The assessee relied on the proviso to Section 147 of the Act.  Unless these conditions are stated in the proviso, the Assessing Officer cannot acquire jurisdiction to initiate any proceeding under Section 147 of the Act.  It is also noted that initiation of proceeding is beyond  the period of four years from the end of the assessment year.    When all the relevant materials are available at the time of the assessment, the assessing Officer cannot re-open the assessment on mere change of opinion.  There is no dispute that  all the material evidence are with the Department.   So it cannot be held that the income  escaped assessment.\tIn a case, where the assessment was completed under Section 143(3) of the Act and  the  re-opening of the same   under Section 147  of the Act is beyond  the period of four years,   it can be sustained only  if it is established that there is a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose all material facts fully and truly.  But there was no such finding  that there was a failure on the part of the assessee to disclose fully and truly all material facts necessary for assessment. Considering the above facts, the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)  held as follows:\n<\/p>\n
“The other issue relating to provision of 1.92 crores the appellant states that it is added and declared as income on its own in the computation statement.  Thus it is the plea of the appellant that there is no failure on the part of the assessee to disclose any fact at any stage.  It is true that the appellant has disclosed the above matters fully and truly before  the Assessing Officer in the earlier proceedings.  The records show that  already  143(3) assessment was done on 27.10.98 and 143(3) read with Section 147 was completed on 29.01.2002.  In view of these facts and the principles laid down by the Madras High Court in the case of Fenner India Vs. DCIT 241 ITR 672 I hold that the re-opening of assessment under Section 147 is not valid in law.  In so far as the proceedings under Section 147 is  valid, the subsequent proceedings are also vitiated.  Since the reopening is held bad in law, there is no necessity for me to go into the merits of the case.  The assessing officer is free to take any other course of action to bring  to tax these sums, provided it is permitted by law. The appeal of the assessee on the issue of re-opening under Section 147 is allowed.”\n<\/p>\n
On further appeal, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has also considered all relevant facts and held as follows:\n<\/p>\n
“It was stated on behalf of the assessee that all the information was available in the records.  There was no failure on its part  to disclose fully all material facts necessary for the assessment.  CIT(A) has given a categorical finding that assessee did file along with the return copy of the Board resolution with regard to the write off of bad debts in the account of M\/s Fiesta Properties.  This fact was disclosed to the Department at the time of filing of the return.  Further an elaborate note was submitted on 21.10.1998 on interest income on NPAs  before the AO.  Based on the prudential norms such income was not disclosed and this fact was informed to the Department.  In regard to the provision the CIT (A) noted that the assessee added and declared the income on its own in the computation statement.  The CIT(A) stated in the order, ” it is true that the appellant has disclosed the above matters fully and truly before the Assessing Officer in the earlier proceedings.” Relying  on  the decision of the jurisdictional High Court rendered in the case of Fenner (India) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (241 ITR 672)(Mad.) it was held that the conditions precedent for assuming jurisdiction under Section 147 did not exist.  We have perused the reasonings adduced in the impugned order.  In our opinion, CIT (A) took a correct view in the matter and his order calls for no interference on this count.  Accordingly, we uphold the same.”\n<\/p>\n
Both the authorities have given concurrent finding that  there is no failure on the part of the assessee in   disclosing the facts fully and truly before the Assessing Officer and  also the re-assessment  is made only on mere change of opinion.   The authorities have correctly followed the principle enunciated in the judgment of this Court in the case of Fenner (India) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (241 ITR 672)(Mad.). The finding given  by the Tribunal is based on valid materials and evidence.  It is  a question of fact but  not a perverse order.  Hence, we do not find any error or infirmity in the order of the Tribunal warranting interference and the order of the Tribunal is in accordance with law and the same is confirmed. In these circumstances, no substantial question of law arises out of the order of the Tribunal and the Tax Case (Appeal) is liable to be dismissed and accordingly  it  is dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
\t\t\t\t\t\t\t(K.R.P.,J.)      (P.P.S.J.,J.)\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t      \t08.07.2008\nIndex:Yes\nInternet :Yes\nraa\n\t\t\nTo\n\n1.Assistant Registrar, Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal, III Floor, Rajaji\n   Bhavan, Besant Nagar, Madras 90 (with records five copies).\n2.The Secretary,  Central Board of Revenue, New Delhi (3 copies).\n3.The Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeals)XI, Chennai34. \n4.The Assistant  Commissioner of Income Tax Circle-II(3) Chennai-34.\n5.The Commissioner of Income Tax, Chennai.\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tK.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN,J      \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tAND                                   \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tP.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA,J.\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t    raa\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tTax Case (Appeal) No.676 \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tof 2008\n\n\n\n\t\t\t\n\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\n\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t   \t08.7.2008\n\n\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Madras High Court Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008 In the High Court of Judicature at Madras Dated : 08.07.2008 Coram :- The Honourable Mr.Justice K.RAVIRAJA PANDIAN and The Honourable Mr.Justice P.P.S.JANARTHANA RAJA Tax Case (Appeal) No.676 of 2008 Commissioner of Income Tax Chennai. .. Appellant Vs. M\/s […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51059","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nCommissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-20T04:37:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-20T04:37:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1505,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008\",\"name\":\"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-20T04:37:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\\\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-20T04:37:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-20T04:37:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008"},"wordCount":1505,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008","name":"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-07T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-20T04:37:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/commissioner-of-income-tax-vs-ms-indbank-housing-ltd-on-8-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Commissioner Of Income Tax vs M\/S Indbank Housing Ltd on 8 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51059","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51059"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51059\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51059"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51059"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51059"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}