{"id":5115,"date":"2009-08-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-08-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009"},"modified":"2017-02-19T06:30:37","modified_gmt":"2017-02-19T01:00:37","slug":"dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009","title":{"rendered":"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science … vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Supreme Court of India<\/div>\n
Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science … vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P Sathasivam<\/div>\n
Bench: K.G. Balakrishnan, P. Sathasivam<\/div>\n
                                                   1\n\n                                                      NON-REPORTABLE\n\n                IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA\n\n                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION\n\n               CIVIL APPEAL NO.5839-5844 OF 2009\n(Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 15016-15021 of 2009)\n\nDr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences,\nthrough Registrar                                     .... Appellant(s)\n          Versus\n\nP. Amulya & Ors. Etc.                                 .... Respondent(s)\n\n\n\n                            O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n
P. Sathasivam, J.\n<\/p>\n
1)   Leave granted.\n<\/p>\n
2)   Being aggrieved by the interim order dated 10.06.2009 in WAMP<\/p>\n
No. 1327 of 2009 in W.A.No. 676 of 2009 and common order dated<\/p>\n
23.06.2009 in WAMP No. 1631 of 2009 in W.A. No. 676 of 2009, WA Nos.<\/p>\n
755, 543, 793 & 794 of 2009 of the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at<\/p>\n
Hyderabad,   Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences (for short “the<\/p>\n
University”) – the appellant herein, filed the above appeals.<\/p>\n
Since these appeals are against the impugned orders passed by the<\/p>\n
High Court in an appeal filed by the University and of the fact that<\/p>\n
the main Writ Petition No. 3749 of 2009 is still pending before the<\/p>\n
High Court, there is no need to traverse all the factual details.<\/p>\n
3)   Heard learned counsel for the parties.\n<\/p>\n
4)   Learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant-University<\/p>\n
submitted    that   the   University    conducted   the   first   year   MBBS<\/p>\n
examination to the students for the year 2005-06 during the period
\n                                                  2<\/span><\/p>\n
between 05.09.2006 to 10.10.2006 and the results were declared on<\/p>\n
02.12.2006.     Out of 4,076 students who appeared in the examination,<\/p>\n
992 students have failed.              Among the failed students, 436 students<\/p>\n
had applied for re-verification\/re-totalling and out of them 294<\/p>\n
students were declared passed.               The University declared the results<\/p>\n
of only those students who had passed all the three subjects in re-<\/p>\n
verification\/re-totalling             and   has       not    declared          the   subject-wise<\/p>\n
results, since the students who failed in one or two subjects are<\/p>\n
not entitled to be promoted for the second year MBBS Course as per<\/p>\n
the Medical Council of India Regulations.                         On receipt of complaints<\/p>\n
about    certain    irregularities          in     the      re-verification\/re-totalling<\/p>\n
process, the University had cancelled the results.                                   The students<\/p>\n
filed a batch of writ petitions before the High Court challenging<\/p>\n
the   action   of   the    University        and      the    same       were    allowed     by   the<\/p>\n
learned Single Judge.           Questioning the same, the University filed<\/p>\n
writ appeals and a Division Bench of the High Court, vide judgment<\/p>\n
dated    20.07.2007,      set   aside       the    judgment        of    the     learned    Single<\/p>\n
Judge.     Aggrieved by the same, the students filed special leave<\/p>\n
petitions before this Court and by order dated 13.08.2007, this<\/p>\n
Court directed the University to permit the students to continue<\/p>\n
their studies on the basis of interim order passed by the High Court<\/p>\n
on 13.04.2007.      Accordingly, the University permitted those students<\/p>\n
to attend the second year classes and also to appear for the second<\/p>\n
year MBBS course examination held in October, 2008.                              On 22.10.2008,<\/p>\n
this Court     in   Sahiti      and    Others      vs.      The    Chancellor,        Dr.   N.T.R.<\/p>\n
University of Health Sciences and others<\/a>, (2009) 1 SCC 599, after
\n                                                  3<\/span><\/p>\n
recording the statement of the Additional Solicitor General, who<\/p>\n
appeared for the University for conducting supplementary examination<\/p>\n
of   all   the     students    who        have    yet        to     clear   first      year      MBBS<\/p>\n
examination        directed,   inter        alia,        the        University        to       conduct<\/p>\n
supplementary       examination.      Pursuant          to    the       same,   the    University<\/p>\n
conducted special supplementary examination in December, 2008.                                     The<\/p>\n
results of the special supplementary examination were declared in<\/p>\n
the month     of    January,   2009.         The       respondents-students                –   (1) P.<\/p>\n
Amulya (2) Fazam Jahangir (3) Kodali Gopi and (4) T. Venkateswara<\/p>\n
Rao had cleared the first year MBBS examination.                            They are eligible<\/p>\n
to be promoted for the second year MBBS only from January, 2009 i.e.<\/p>\n
from the date of declaration of results.                          The remaining students (1)<\/p>\n
D. Kaushal (2)Shaik Firoz Basha (3)Reddy Hema Latha (4) Jakeer Shaik<\/p>\n
and (5)N. Sindhura were failed and therefore they are not entitled<\/p>\n
for promotion to second year MBBS course as per the Regulations.<\/p>\n
The University conducted regular supplementary examination of the<\/p>\n
first year MBBS in March, 2009 wherein (1)D. Kaushal (2)Shaik Firoz<\/p>\n
Basha (3)Reddy Hema Latha (4)Jakeer Shaik and (5)N. Sindhura have<\/p>\n
passed the first year MBBS examination.                             Thus, according to the<\/p>\n
University,      they   are    eligible          to    appear        for    second     year      MBBS<\/p>\n
examination to be held in September\/October, 2010.<\/p>\n
5)   The    Division     Bench       of    the        High        Court,    vide    order        dated<\/p>\n
10.06.2009, directed the University to declare the results within a<\/p>\n
week.      Aggrieved     by    the    said       order,           the   University         filed   an<\/p>\n
application seeking modification of the said order contending that<\/p>\n
none of the writ petitioners were permitted to attend the classes
\n                                                     4<\/span><\/p>\n
either by the High Court or by this Court and no one fulfilled the<\/p>\n
criteria laid down in the order dated 10.06.2009 passed in W.A.M.P.<\/p>\n
No.   1237    of     2009.        In    spite       of    the    clarification           sought,      the<\/p>\n
Division Bench, vide order dated 23.06.2009, confirmed the order<\/p>\n
dated 10.06.2009 with slight modification.                                 Both these orders are<\/p>\n
under   challenge          in    these       appeals.           On    07.07.2009,         upon     being<\/p>\n
mentioned     by     the    University,           this    Court       directed         maintenance     of<\/p>\n
status quo till 17.07.2009.                  On 17.07.2009, this Court issued notice<\/p>\n
returnable     on     07.08.2009            and   permitted          the    respondents       to      file<\/p>\n
counter if they so desire and also extended the interim order until<\/p>\n
further orders.        On 17.08.2009, when the matter came up for hearing,<\/p>\n
this Court reserved the orders and in view of urgency in writing<\/p>\n
examination passed a brief order which reads thus:<\/p>\n
“Pending orders, the students who have submitted their applications<\/p>\n
for taking supplementary examination may be allowed to participate<\/p>\n
in the examination, provided if they are otherwise eligible.”<\/p>\n
6)    As said earlier, aggrieved by the various interim orders of<\/p>\n
Single Judge\/Division Bench of the High Court, the University has<\/p>\n
approached this Court.              It is relevant to point out that on earlier<\/p>\n
occasion, this Court in Sahiti (supra), while disposing the same,<\/p>\n
issued certain directions which reads thus:-\n<\/p>\n
43.   Mr     Gopal    Subramanium,            learned      Additional            Solicitor     General<\/p>\n
appearing     for     the       respondents,        has    stated          at    the    Bar   that    the<\/p>\n
University     is     inclined         to    hold    supplementary              examination      of   the<\/p>\n
students, who have yet to clear the first year MBBS examination.
\n                                                5<\/span><\/p>\n
Therefore,    Dr.    N.T.R.      University         of    Health       Sciences       is    hereby<\/p>\n
directed to hold supplementary examination of all students who have<\/p>\n
yet    not   cleared      the    examination        of    first        year    MBBS     held      in<\/p>\n
September\/October 2006.\n<\/p>\n
44. Pursuant to the interim orders, 294 students were permitted to<\/p>\n
prosecute    studies      in    second    year      MBBS.    If    any        student\/students<\/p>\n
fails\/fail     in    supplementary         examination            of        first    year      MBBS<\/p>\n
examination,        the        declaration          of     the         results        of       such<\/p>\n
candidate\/candidates who appear for second year MBBS be withheld or<\/p>\n
their further course of study be decided based on the Rules and<\/p>\n
Regulations of the University applicable to such students. It is<\/p>\n
clarified    that   the     abovementioned          direction      would       apply       only   to<\/p>\n
those students who had appeared and failed in the first year MBBS<\/p>\n
examination held between 5-9-2006 and 10-10-2006.<\/p>\n
45. Subject to the direction given above, this Court finds that no<\/p>\n
ground is made out by the appellants to interfere with the ultimate<\/p>\n
conclusion reached by the Division Bench and, therefore, the appeals<\/p>\n
are disposed of accordingly. There shall be no order as to costs.”<\/p>\n
7)     The controversy according to the University is that this Court<\/p>\n
has directed it to conduct supplementary examination only to those<\/p>\n
students who have not cleared the first year MBBS examination held<\/p>\n
between 05.09.2006 and 10.10.2006.                  In other words, according to the<\/p>\n
University, only 294 students were eligible to pursue second year<\/p>\n
MBBS   examination.         This    was   not       acceptable         by    the    respondents-<\/p>\n
students.    It   was     pointed   out    that      by   virtue        of    various      interim
\n                                              6<\/span><\/p>\n
directions, these students were also permitted to pursue the second<\/p>\n
year   MBBS   examination.        It    is    also    the    definite     case     of   the<\/p>\n
respondents-students that all of them had completed 18 months course<\/p>\n
and    this   Court    upheld    the    cancellation         of     re-verification\/re-<\/p>\n
totalling and they were also permitted to write the examinations.<\/p>\n
In view of the same, it is the claim of the respondents-students<\/p>\n
that the stand of the University that these students stand on a<\/p>\n
different footing from others is a misconception and such claim<\/p>\n
cannot be countenanced.          The Division Bench, while accepting their<\/p>\n
stand, also relied on para 44 of the judgment of this Court in<\/p>\n
Sahiti (supra), which, according to it, applicable to those students<\/p>\n
who appeared and failed in the first year MBBS examination held<\/p>\n
between   05.09.2006     and    10.10.2006.          In    those    circumstances,      the<\/p>\n
Division Bench issued direction to the University to declare the<\/p>\n
results of all those students who appeared and failed in the first<\/p>\n
year MBBS examination held between 05.09.2006 and 10.10.2006 who<\/p>\n
cleared\/passed all the three subjects of first year MBBS by January,<\/p>\n
2009 who were permitted to pursue second year MBBS course under the<\/p>\n
interim orders.        When the University again moved before the very<\/p>\n
same Bench for modification, it reiterated its earlier decision and<\/p>\n
declined to accept the stand of the University.                      Finally, by order<\/p>\n
dated 01.07.2009, in view of the fact that the results have already<\/p>\n
been declared, no further cause of action survives for adjudication<\/p>\n
and closed the main Writ Appeal No. 676 of 2009.\n<\/p>\n
8)     Inasmuch   as   under    the    interim      orders    passed    by   the   Single<\/p>\n
Judge\/Division    Bench    of   the    High       Court,   the     respondents-students
\n                                            7<\/span><\/p>\n
were   permitted    to   pursue     their       studies\/write          examination,                         and<\/p>\n
results were also ordered to be declared and also order of this<\/p>\n
Court dated 17.08.2009 permitting eligible students to participate<\/p>\n
in the ensuing examination and of the fact that main W.A. No. 676 of<\/p>\n
2009 filed against interim orders itself has been closed by the<\/p>\n
Division Bench of the High Court, we are of the view that no further<\/p>\n
order is required except directing the disposal of the main writ<\/p>\n
petition i.e. WP No. 3749 of 2009 pending before the High Court.<\/p>\n
Accordingly,   we   request   the    High       Court   to   dispose              of       the         writ<\/p>\n
petition preferably within a period of three months.                                  We make it<\/p>\n
clear that we have not expressed anything on the merits of the case<\/p>\n
raised by both parties.        Subject to the above direction, all the<\/p>\n
appeals are disposed of.      No costs.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                               ………………………………CJI.\n<\/p>\n
                                                              (K.G. BALAKRISHNAN)<\/p>\n
                                                               ………………………………….J.
\n                                                             (P. SATHASIVAM)<\/p>\n
NEW DELHI;\n<\/p>\n
AUGUST 28, 2009.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Supreme Court of India Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science … vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009 Author: P Sathasivam Bench: K.G. Balakrishnan, P. Sathasivam 1 NON-REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5839-5844 OF 2009 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 15016-15021 of 2009) Dr. N.T.R. University of Health Sciences, […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[30],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5115","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-supreme-court-of-india"],"yoast_head":"\nDr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science ... vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science ... vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-02-19T01:00:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science … vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-19T01:00:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1599,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Supreme Court of India\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009\",\"name\":\"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science ... vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-08-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-02-19T01:00:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science … vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science ... vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science ... vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-02-19T01:00:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science … vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009","datePublished":"2009-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-19T01:00:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009"},"wordCount":1599,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Supreme Court of India"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009","name":"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science ... vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-08-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-02-19T01:00:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dr-n-t-r-univ-of-health-science-vs-p-amulya-ors-etc-etc-on-28-august-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dr.N.T.R.Univ.Of Health Science … vs P.Amulya & Ors.Etc.Etc on 28 August, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5115","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5115"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5115\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5115"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5115"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5115"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}