{"id":51230,"date":"2008-06-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008"},"modified":"2017-03-21T07:45:48","modified_gmt":"2017-03-21T02:15:48","slug":"narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Narasimhamurthy S\/O … vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Narasimhamurthy S\/O … vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Ananda<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH coum OF KARNATAKA AT    ~\n\nBETWEEN:\n\n1.\n\n,. Raddy\n\n~ --._Vs.P.R\u00e9vn\u00e9q1na\n\n1..\n\nDATED THIS THE 13'\"! DAY.9F..J4UN:\u00bb::'}2QGL4j, \u00bb'    \n\nBEFORE I\n\nTHE HQWBLE MR.J US'FJ\u00a73E N';A;~:A:~\u00a7:;-.5   \n\nR.F.A.N9.341(2Qi3fg_.(PAR) .' \"\n\nNarasimhamulthy _ .\nS] 0. Seethmamaiah'  - \nAged a*mi'#5\u00e9%&'eaI*s i k \nS\/o.  \n\n 37' AV \n\nBath  ':4-\/Ma; \nAnckal Taluk,  Hobli\n\n ' ' Appcllraznls\n\n . (By P\\:i';;'.;3.1VzidL1\u00a71 i.a\u00a7\\?A,V\"E'2riyI_.;t31s S.Che11naraya Reddy 85 C.Shankar\n, Ad\ufb01acatgai\n\nA  Sfo. .Lat.c'TPuttaswam'ajah\n\n Aged aiziout 84 years\n\nNev. 119, 3\"?' Main Road,\" KHM Block\n\n* s  Gafxganagar\n, _ 'Baxxgalorc-32.\n\nS.P.Sridha1amurth3r\n\nS\/0. S.}'.Rama1ma\n\nMajor\n\nNo.19, 3rd Main Road, KHM Block\nGanganagar\n\nBangakore-32.\n\n\n\n\u00a32}!\n\nSectharamaiah (Since ciexzeascd)\n\nGundamma (Since deceased)\n\nRangaiakshmamma V\nW\/0. K.V.Scshadri Jois' \nAged. about 70 years '\nNo.2-45, 531\"\" Cross\n\n4* Block, Rajajinagar\nBangalore-10. '  ~\n\nRamaswamy Redd;   \u00ab\n310- Lat\ufb01 P3?='\ufb011.iaP1?'4'* ' .\nAged abqut   '\"\n\nVenk\u00e9;f\u00a2s\u00a7i'' _ \" ' . 4'  A\nS\/.\u20ac>V'_I\u00bbzii'3t:;   ' '\nAgfgcd abailg 5Q'; yca;s_'\n\nTiiiI\ufb01mafay;\u00a7' 2 .. .  ,--~\n8\/ 0. '=Gu1appa Raddy\" \" \n\nAged aii;~o1it65.yc'ars'~\u00b0\n\n \"\u00b0R\u00a2spopdent\u00e93*%----\u00a3':s'6 to 8 are\n\n ' R\/at Siizgcna Agrahara\n\n \" ~ .Anck31\"Ta1a1k, Sarjapuna, Hobli\n Ba1igal02tfev.!3istIict.\n\n. . . Respondents\n\n(E33?   Reddy 85 C.Na;'ayana Swamy. Advocates for\nR'? 8; \u00a7?8;\" R\ufb02arayana 85 H.R.Lakshrnan Raddy, Advocates for R1,\n\n  -R4 85 R5; R2, R3 85 R5-Notice dispensed with; .'R'6~Servt=:d; an\nA \" \u00bb,P.'\u00a3*.LNanja Raddy. Advocate for R8; R4~Servim Compietc 85 no need\n\"aIit:;,briiig L123 v.c.o. dt.29.05.08)\n\nThis appeal is filed under Section 96 fl\"? Order 41 R1116 1\n\npartition and separate possession 85 eic.\n\n \n\n%   .,(\u00a75C, against the judgment and decree dated 28.06.2002, passed\n in O.S.No.I67\/1991, on the \ufb01le of 11 Add}. Civi} Judge {Sr.Dn.},\n.~ Bangaiore Rurai District, Bangalore, dismissing the suit for\n\n\n\nThis appeal coming on for finai hearing this day, \ndelivered the following:  \"   \n\nJUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n
The unsuocess\ufb01ml plain\ufb01f\ufb01s in  167 \ufb02it}  u V’<\/p>\n
\ufb01le er 1; Add}. Civil Judge (sr.::m..;, gna ngeaaglm’ D i\u00e9.\u00a7 t:rig'”t’.;: <\/p>\n
\nBang\ufb01bre, have \ufb01led   jl\ufb01wcnt and
\ndecree dated 23.0\u00a7.2u02.__  3   <\/p>\n
In this    Vto by their anay
\nbefolt: the        V V<\/p>\n
  i;a1\ufb01cs is as f0Ik:rws;–\n<\/p>\n
  @1113 of iate Puttaswamaiah.\n<\/p>\n
E)efend_aI1ts’ 4 :a;.\ufb01m thb’:\u00e9’~:in\u00a7aughtcrs ef late Puttaswamaiah.<\/p>\n
  <3; 2  was of defendant No.3. Defendant<\/p>\n
 r~z\u00a2;%:;~ -is she' Ldcfendant The suit schedule pm-parties<\/p>\n
Wer;:"t5he  properties of lat: Puttaswamiah, who<\/p>\n
'V died  tlw year 1964.\n<\/p>\n
”  VT  It is the case of plain\ufb01\ufb02s that defendants I 35 3, who<\/p>\n
  the sons of late Puttaswamaiah were members of jaint<\/p>\n
u  After the d\ufb02ath of Puttaswamaiah, defendants 1 to 3<\/p>\n
‘f\\).\n<\/p>\n
landed properties are mentioned in Schedu1\u00a7?~.I;’  _<\/p>\n
pI’0pcI1ies are mentioned in 11 <\/p>\n
pmpertacs am mentioned in Sc1;edu1t;$4I_II:.’*.V_A.<\/p>\n
4. The I–dcfcnda11t   V<\/p>\n
stateInent:– _’ V A<\/p>\n
The E-defendant  between
\nparties. The  avexmcnts.\n<\/p>\n
The !~defa;1(ia;;igtV    the lifetime of
\nPuttasw\u00a7n.m4ai;\u00e9i:11~:f11;\u00a7i:\u00a7\u00a7 .wa-\u00a7 ::z1.\u00a7$’  in the joint family. Th:
\nI–dc\ufb01=:nc\u00a7ant– ‘ -\\—-  after the death ef<\/p>\n
Puttaswa1:c\u00a3ai\u00a73h,Vvli\u00e9   of joint family and was<\/p>\n
  the   properties. The I-defendant has<\/p>\n
   father late Puttaswamaih and younger<\/p>\n
 V’ i\ufb01fii\u00e9fendant were per\ufb01:}rm1’ng poojas in Sri<\/p>\n
V V’ _ Nanjund\ufb01shtv\ufb01a tcmpic.\n<\/p>\n
 ”  lands in survey No.85 and 1811, mcntinod in suit<\/p>\n
  fih)s.I(a) & (b) were endowed to Sri Nanjundcshwara<\/p>\n
‘  ]  * Swamy temple of Narayanaghatta. The mcfendam; ‘became<\/p>\n
” Amhak ofsaid temple in the year 1965 and said lands were<\/p>\n
*’f\\}.\n<\/p>\n
exclusively cultivated by l~defenda:\u00a33.t. After   K <\/p>\n
Act, came into force. as I\u00abdcfcndant.’ia\u00a7\u00e91\u00e9’ ‘cI;1tivat\ufb01g’ bfizevvvsaxd’  <\/p>\n
lands personally, he was declare .33′ ” Id’ ~. 13″  <\/p>\n
The other members of family bf’  ‘V<\/p>\n
concerned with Sri Narzj;;nde:}i1Ve;$i;\u20aca’VV \u00ab or the lands
\nendowed to Sri    —\n<\/p>\n
5. Dining    in older to\navoid \ufb01ntha\ufb01    ' between his sons,\n   into two equal\nshares  shares to defendants 1 85\n\n<\/pre>\n
3. In the  ” E\u00e9defendant was allotted i acre 17<\/p>\n
 , \u00e9 gang; efiand eIi”the__\u00a7QfatheIn side out ofitem No.I(c) of suit<\/p>\n
   The lands bearing survey Nos.4 as 5 of<\/p>\n
  Saxjapura Hobli and ha\ufb02 pertiora in item<\/p>\n
V L No.:i{a) ‘z$1:1\u00a7:ci” northem half por\ufb01on in Item No.Il(c) wm<\/p>\n
   tbsl~defe;1dant. Similarly, survey No.11\/5, 11\/6 and<\/p>\n
   of suzvey No.10 of Singena Agrahara and survey<\/p>\n
 -V +5.11 of Crotamamnahalli village, half portion of Item No.H(a)<\/p>\n
* and haif p-mm in II((:) were allotted to III-defendant and 111-<\/p>\n
    of Singena Agrahara. Further, it is<\/p>\n
 , in older to have a Written document, a<\/p>\n
  _ pali1;:;\u00a71t.1:i$__v’v\u00a2’::2\u00a7\u00a7,-Q’ iampmea and both 1 85 1I1-dercndams have
\n  H  same. The I–defcnda11t has contended a\ufb02cr
\n   of properties by late Puttaswamaiah bdcfendant did<\/p>\n
‘  PQEI manage the suit scheduic properties. The Iildcfendant<\/p>\n
 took an iron safe and allowed I~defc11da:at to enjoy suit item<\/p>\n
defendant was enjoying his sham ir1\u00a3i\u00a2=3pen(5l.V<j;1f1""'::3.%s::r',  u
\nsmvey No.1 1 of Go\ufb01am  b\u00e9l\u00e9jagm,
\nkatha was jointly standing in [the ;;;f
\nIII. The Ill\ufb02efendant sold    of 'V
\nRs.25,000]\u00bb. At the tixn\ufb01qf   deed,
\npurchaser insisted that  in execution<\/p>\n
of 331:: dead   " \ufb01re names of
\ndefendants I:_.&.iivI  and as requested<\/p>\n
by III\u00bb\u00a7it=fcI_1'fis'3.'3sii;;\u00bbV'1–I III-defendant in<\/p>\n
exacu\ufb01\u00e9p of  III–defendant weeivcd entire<\/p>\n
consiiem\ufb01eg\ufb01 and"pu"fi  in possession of land in<\/p>\n
Sulvfjff' No.11.' 'Fh_\u00e9 V\u00e9alev'was e\ufb01cct\ufb02d to sink a bomwell in<\/p>\n
No.II(a} in its entzircty. The I–de:fc:nda11t has sold away all t::\ufb02
\nN  M<\/p>\n
 '~  it is '  possession of the wife and children<\/p>\n
 7..Aof;. ;:ine_  son of Sonnappa of Sirzgcna<\/p>\n
_ . T ‘,B1OHl\u20ac5’,  Saki the property conditionally to one Obala
\n:ii”\u00e9tit;i3r_. oviv'”‘ Narayanaghatta village, Anekai Taluk, for loan
\n by him. The said Obala Raddy was insisting said<\/p>\n
V[ Veiikatappa to mtfunl the loan amount arid get back the<\/p>\n
: property. At that point of time, said Venkatappa appmachcd<\/p>\n
pmpertics except Iraamti Land. The I~dcfendag:’LT\u00a7V-:\u00ab..i’\ufb01  ”\n<\/p>\n
possession of any of joint    K V’
\nschedule item No.H(b) never belong\ufb01l  u’V1v5i:\u00a2: T~+_:\u00ab
\ndefendant had aoquimd item D1t\u00a7.’Il(b) M     *
\naway. The suit Items  ,I_v(b)” 1  \u00e9\u00e9xclusivc
\npossession of 1–dcfend.’a;:_1._.i’:’–  V acquired
\nproperties. The  was \ufb01lod by
\npLainti\ufb01’s at thft    — HI defendant.<\/p>\n
Therefore,    any xtalicf.\n<\/p>\n
sf} ” :;”\u00abhe– .. .1153-_1t1<a'i\u00bb's:},41::'dz:\u00a7:u;'t:n:i:'_' axscf\ufb01laa additional written
\nstatcnzexvit aiiit. 110.1(0) is neither joint <\/p>\n
property of  d\u00e9fi\ufb01dants are in posscssion of suit<\/p>\n
  The said Venkatappa was in need of<\/p>\n
w.  ~2\u00bb–\u00a3L.\n<\/p>\n
  h{j{::;\u00a7”:\u00a2\u00a2m 1(9) and she is iiving in that hut. The
\nI  in schedule 1(0) is in possession of wife
\n2  _ i\ufb01f Venkatappa. Therefore, Ldefendant prayw<\/p>\n
 ‘ ”  –  fro; disn\ufb01issaz of game suit.<\/p>\n
” Micfcndant, have adoptcd the written statczmcnt \ufb01led by I —<\/p>\n
: V defendant. N;  ,<\/p>\n
I\ufb01efendant to pay the: loan amount to Obala    ~<\/p>\n
sale demi from Obala Raddy. Aooogxzligggly,   ‘ V<\/p>\n
lean amount to Obala Reddy and
\nin his ilavttmr. Thereafter,   I\ufb01\u00e9xgu  to ‘V
\nI–defcndant and mquestc\u00e9  aa sale
\ndeed. Unfortlmatcly,     the death
\n0f Venkatappsyv ‘..’.,?,V.’=~V{%:’a’\\:-I11en’\u00a3 in favour
\nof wife    oonveycd the
\n  executed in favour of<\/p>\n
I–dcfbn(\u00a7_ant W35.   without any possession.<\/p>\n
At 110  – qf  –  or defendants were in<\/p>\n
 of  v:.[11 fact. wife of Venkatappa has put<\/p>\n
b’  Defendants 2, 4 an 5, who are the son and sisters of<\/p>\n
1iff2IIiS>’I;(C.), Ifd)    wen: sold to defendants 6 to 8<\/p>\n
   sale deeds in their faveur.\n<\/p>\n
 his two brothers have purchased<\/p>\n
‘   pmga\ufb01y  at suit item No.I(d) under two sale deeds
\n \u00a7.21V..E)l.l984 and 09.08.1978 fmm L-defclmxiant.
\n   defendant No.7 has purchased property shmm at
\n  No.fl(a) under two sale deeds dated 22.02.19’2’9 and<\/p>\n
   1.09.198’? fnom bdcfemiant. Bcefcndant No.8 has purchased<\/p>\n
8. Defendants 6 to 8 have \ufb01lad the
\nstatement\u00bb   ‘ 1 A   Iv<\/p>\n
Defendants 6 to 8 have
\njoint possession of any items \ufb01f  gait
\nitself is not   \u00a36  the
\nabsolute ewners in posse\u00e9sign  \ufb01g}, 1 (:1) and H03)<\/p>\n
and the same wart’ said    der di\ufb02\u00e9rent<\/p>\n
registered sale  ngieggaangs 7.1′ 5;\u00bb 2 are the absolute
\nmvners Qf    family partition that
\ntook plaige jsbint family. Defendants I as<\/p>\n
2 were in  phys}i:\u00a7a1  and enjoyment of suit<\/p>\n
land nrwasurzing 1 acre 15 5’5 gnntas of land in airway No.10,<\/p>\n
moQma\u00bb\u00abL<\/p>\n
  hegconsuuctnd a building and obtained
\n  to said pmperty. Defendant No.6 and<\/p>\n
  hiz\u00e9  purchased two items shown at suit item
\nN9.I(d) z improved the same by investing more than
\n  \u00ab-; they have planted number of fruit bearing
\n  and have dug a well. They have also izcastallsd S I-LP.<\/p>\n
 motor (pumpsct) in the auit item i(d). Defendant No.8, after<\/p>\n
situate at Singena Agxahara Village, which has; ‘. V-<\/p>\n
described at item No.I((“:} of plasint schadulc  &e\u00a7a\ufb01ea;1;sF%%_V ‘ ”<\/p>\n
1 65 2. Accordingly, they are   uf
\nrespective pzmperties from pf \ufb01e\u00e9jds.
\nDsfendants 6 to 8 have; ,.–\u00a2;f;ntcgdngi is ‘1i\u00e9”exi.s:t\u00a7:\u00a3:3:}..aQwr>~’L ,<\/p>\n
of coconut plants and raised a gaxden by <\/p>\n
than E1.’s.2,0G,0\u00a3)0\/-. The plaintiffs<\/p>\n
fransactions in between defendants  and.p’\u00a7}efendan331{s~~.Iv <\/p>\n
85 II. Defendants 6 to 8 have   to ‘V<\/p>\n
avextments made above,  f\u00a7y”de’fendants
\n6 to 8 from defendants I   is}: the shares of
\ntheir vendors, _jf~::’f’.i.i\u00a3I’6  de\ufb01es in favour of
\nplaintiffs.\n<\/p>\n
9g’Cii};   trial Judge \ufb02amed
\nfollciwinege _ise\u00a71eS   iesues: –\n<\/p>\n
1.   prove that sllit scheduie item
\nV,  ‘V No.11!   family properties of this fam\ufb02y’?
\nV”  E’=Wh”et1;er  prove that they have also got
\n.   performing pooja in Nanjundeshwara
\n Singena Agrahara, Saxjapura Hobli,
\n_;1aan-7ga1m~e Distri-::t’:’\n<\/p>\n
3.V \u00a7&’hether the defendants 6, 7 and 8 pmve that they
\nare the bona\ufb01de purchasers under Iegetezed sale
\ndeede in respect of Item Nos.I(c), I(d) and 11(3) for
\nvaluabie oonsideratian?\n<\/p>\n
4. Whether the defendants 6, 7 and 8 prove that after
\npurchase, they have improved the pm \ufb02ies by
\nW ‘  ,_,.\u00a2,-\n<\/p>\n
   Qudge has answered issues 1, 2, S as 6 in negative,<\/p>\n
  isV-‘aiucs 3 85 4 in a\ufb01nnative. The lcalncd trial Judge answared<\/p>\n
inves\ufb01ng large amount as entered  _
\nw\ufb01ttcn statement?   \u00bb. 4’     , ‘V
\nWhether the parties are en\ufb01\ufb01ied–fQ%’ \ufb01i\ufb01\u00e9n\u00e9
\nWhether the parties 8.I:’f:_\u20acI1\ufb01\ufb01f3{ifO1′  1 ‘  V’<\/p>\n
What cider or decree?’   <\/p>\n
I’1E3’S-H<\/p>\n
1. Whether the pl\u00e9im \ufb01ff$– pimea’ suit schedule
\npmpertics. are   —- pmpczrties of
\npIain\u00a75a\ufb01”3\u00ab.\u00a7;:f1d d;:\u00a3e::;\u00ab;.1..\u00e9anta%’:*V’:n%5\u00a7\u00e9 j’ V<\/p>\n
2. Whcfi\u00e9cr    8_ pmve that th\u00e9zy are
\nbtyzvla\ufb01iiil-5  pwpe\ufb01iss for<\/p>\n
 M\u00a7\u00a7iua$Vi\u00a2 c\u00a7\u00a7;\u00a7id\u00a7’r\u00a7tian;=_”‘ A  V<\/p>\n
 $33.1, 2, 4 and 5 prove that<\/p>\n
t’1ie1fc*WaVs  partition in their joint family<\/p>\n
1 ‘ ~   of Puttaswamaiah?\n<\/p>\n
;_Al5:l1mA1;hcrV”Vi3:1::***’1j}aintiffs prove they are entitled to
\n  and, scparafct possession of 10\/3633 share
\n_  % 1  schedule properties?\n<\/p>\n
‘  5.  ‘\u00e9mer or decree?”\n<\/p>\n
1UV.H i3y masoning of the impugned judmtznt. learned<\/p>\n
N. c:>g’v–1″\u00bb\/”‘&”*=u<\/p>\n
additional issues I as 4 in negative, additional    .<\/p>\n
in affirmative and dismissed the Su\ufb01;<\/p>\n
11. The \ufb01ndings recoiiitiai. b3%=.nia1V  as <\/p>\n
foiIows:–  _ ‘<\/p>\n
Suit item Nos.I(a)    grcquimd properties
\nof I–d\u00a2:2fendant;. Then: w2as:T._  nest of suit
\nschedule  A&. 111. Defendants
\n6 to 8 havei.    from I-defendant
\nand  H  the same. With these<\/p>\n
obsewati\ufb02n\u00e9;– lcamV ‘  “‘~ digmisscd the suit.<\/p>\n
3  :1 haaVin’c.’..V_VV:1V1’t2a:it:’\u00a3 Sri Srinivas Raghavan, learned<\/p>\n
 %\u00a39-.~%%%:%1:.3g1ntir1’s. 811′ H.R.Lakshman Raddy, learned<\/p>\n
‘ff5r..:\u00a2_ie:\ufb01f’:\u00a3:dants 1, 4 & 5 and Sri P.N.Na11ja Raddy,<\/p>\n
‘  ‘   for defendant No.8.\n<\/p>\n
” ~  VT ~..13.”‘i’he submissions of Learned Counsel for plain\ufb01\ufb01s<\/p>\n
‘  as follows:–\n<\/p>\n
”  The suit item Nos.I(a) 65 103} were endowed to Sri<\/p>\n
Nanjundeshwaxa temple of Nazayanaghatta. During<\/p>\n
3<\/span>
\ni<\/p>\n
m _ <\/p>\n
the tiziae of late Puttaswamaiah, he   _  <\/p>\n
puja of Sri Nanjundeewara te3ti;;3le;’   <\/p>\n
performirzxg pooja in the  \ufb02ies? it}:  <\/p>\n
Cxlltivation of lands
\ngiant of   f\u00e9ivqur ef”iAv-defendant
\nwould enure to    and all the
\nmembers age      lands.\n<\/p>\n
Under     trial Judge
\nwags;  \u00a3403.18] 1. 85 85 are
\n   of I–defe11dant and the<\/p>\n
eagme is enorieoize. .–\n<\/p>\n
 ‘3]_’11’ere ie  evidence to prove there Was
\n‘ *  pf  properties. The Learned trial
\n   prop-er appmciatiozn of evidence,<\/p>\n
A Ekcbinsiderafion of caontents of documents, has<\/p>\n
hejd”A\u00ab:’t.here was partition of joint family properties<\/p>\n
V’ v  eenongst defendants I 65 III.<\/p>\n
The leaznaed Counsel wouid smbmit in View of existence
\nof joint family and joint ihmiiy properties. I-defendant<\/p>\n
did not have absolute rights over suit schedule<\/p>\n
A,’ ‘___\u00a3’\\_,\/i._.\u00ab-5’\/””””\u00e9<\/p>\n
0% I<\/p>\n
 , \u00e9faznii\ufb01jei. 1e1emhere.” “-*\u00a7711jeJ;fefo1e, the learned trial Judge was<\/p>\n
 ju\u00a73ti\ufb01ed.Vi3:g  there was partition of joint family<\/p>\n
V .V wouia su\u00a7\u00a7;;1i\u00a3’inso\u00a3ax as suit items Ha} 85 Kb), which endowed<\/p>\n
 .,    N\u00e9iilitmdeshwaaa temple, Iwiefezndant, was the archak
\n H~__\u00abef.V’Vthe’;\u00abi:emp1e sinm 1965. The f-{it’3fBII\u00a33.aI1f was in ottzscupation<\/p>\n
  ” of\ufb01iihe same and oectipancy rights were granted in favour of<\/p>\n
‘ I~\u00abdefen<ia1:t. Thereforex, neither plainti\ufb01e nor Iiiwzmfendaztit<\/p>\n
properties and defendants 6 to 8 are   V'
\npurchasers. Therttfeze, learned;   K x<\/p>\n
impugned judgment calls far      <\/p>\n
14.T}:u=:iear11t=:d Counsel f<$i~e:.{:iefendve1i1$s;  \u00a34:
\nme through various dOC!1{\ufb02'1\u00a7}11iS",'AV.i'.ii'}\u00bb'   dated
\n08.11.1986 as per Ex.\ufb01.:8   .*'1'.g}g:\u00a7-cment dated
\n08.08.1986 as   Was; partition
\nof joint famzil\ufb01\u00e9  1 & 111. The
\nleamed  "geneaiogical tree pmduced<\/p>\n
by pmjnig\ufb01s (z33,;ef:1\u00e9e{i""1?).bears clinching evidence in<\/p>\n
proof ef  efeuit'  properties amongst joint<\/p>\n
 defendants I & III. The learned Counsel<\/p>\n
V.   Dalgnbmissions made by learned Comrmel for<\/p>\n
V VV . jHdg\ufb0136I}\u00a7. .. . -.\n<\/p>\n
    and impugned judylcnt.\n<\/p>\n
had any \ufb01ght over suits 1(a) and H11). They   K
\noccupancy rights granted in  ‘
\nenure to the bene\ufb01t of plaintiffs  VV
\nlearned Counsel woukl  . t.:’2t% of ‘V
\nPuttaswamaiah, thcwv :”$:\u00a7{a$ _ of \ufb01\u00e9.1’1’i”i’ “SE-t:hwule
\nplopcltics. On 16.02.1\u00a78%_;’   mduced into
\nwriting, to   Thereafter, I-\n<\/p>\n
defendant mi  \ufb01rs; ‘1;q g pmjpcrties, which<\/p>\n
had   \ufb01ph;’tnt:1.:\ufb01’s have no manner of<\/p>\n
right o{rgr   The learned Counsel
\nwould j1iSf3T:\u00a7F’ \ufb021I3v <\/p>\n
The  &C:.’oun-scl for daihndants 6 to 8 have<\/p>\n
  and they have supported the impugned<\/p>\n
I’\ufb01,V__A!~ have been taken through oral and documentary<\/p>\n
17. Having I\ufb01gar\u00e9 to contcnticns   M
\nbefore trial (3ou;rt and reiterated ivli\ufb01fdixz \u00a2_.;
\npleadings, cvi\u00e9encx: and \ufb01ndings
\nformulate foliowing points for      1<\/p>\n
1. Whether triai C-.’\u00bb-:}.11rt was   ‘iieldfzzg suit
\niiem Nos.I(a)     properties
\nof {defendant   0%’ No.3 had
\nnothing  :10 with Ai*ihak’s%vi:>?%  A<\/p>\n
2. Whi:\ufb011\u00a2\u00a7E’1\u00e9\u00a7i9\u00a7x\ufb01<i:j'f\u00a7iiai'J1\u00a7dg\u00e9.\u00a7w\u00e9sjus\ufb01\ufb01cd in holding<\/p>\n
 thaf,  '\u00a7aj{\ufb01tib\ufb01"af tile rest of suit schedule<\/p>\n
dcfttildants I 351"?\n<\/p>\n
3.   trial Judge has appieciated
\n‘ ‘V eviden-Ste pxbper perspective and arrived at right
\n. 5\u00bb-.C0nC111sion\u00e9f?””A
\nV   recorded by lcamcd trial Judge
\nV  interference? If so, what order?”<\/p>\n
18..J’\u00a7’he plaintiffs have contended dining the lifetime of<\/p>\n
   he was the priest of Nanjuncieshwma<\/p>\n
”  tgggpxe; after the death of Puttaswamaiah, plaintiffs 1 55 2<\/p>\n
u were perfomxing poo-ja in the temjphf: as priests and landa<\/p>\n
endowed to tezmple were being cuitivattacl an bah of joint
\n I .=  K<\/p>\n
famiiy. Therefore, occupancy rights granted to   M
\nthe Land Txtibunal Vida Case No.LAQ’] <\/p>\n
20.97.1982 would 6111.116 to the Vb\u00a2}Ci\u20acfi$_'():i7  1\ufb01iemheii\u00a7”afVT’V.<\/p>\n
joint: family. Therefore, suitit:eV1:1:1:$a;:’.E'{,s2A1b) 85  I{h)  av\u00e9:\u00a3:\u00e9’b1e”:ror
\npartition.  ‘ ‘ i<\/p>\n
19. On     ev\ufb01ence
\n1 \ufb01nd, during  .1:396:’-31,’ii-de\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01\u00a31a\ufb01t.T.\u00a5v\u00e9$ appointed as
\narchak of  he had received
\nThastik:v’VV\u00e9iIl\u00a75w.aV.i;:;e.\u00abV’: not pm-cluced any
\ndocu1z1e1 it t;)\u00ab..pIV’0VVt%  f\u00e9ther Puttaswamiah was the<\/p>\n
priestgf ~!”\ufb01IXi})l\u00a7’iV–.aA}fif;1s  post of priest was a heneditary<\/p>\n
    **** <\/p>\n
V  ‘V issued by the Tahsiidar would show I~<\/p>\n
titff\ufb01niti\ufb02ii\ufb02vii’  Thasiik allowance for Working as<\/p>\n
‘ prics\u00a3 efV”‘N.afij’nndeshwaIa temple during the period between
\n “..j0i.(}?_,_19’\u00a7”0 and 30.\u00a76.1990. The katha of land bearing
\n  No.85 was made in the name of I–defenda11t. RTC<\/p>\n
”  mlating to survey No.85 for the years 1979-80 and<\/p>\n
1980-81 as per Ex.D.iO would disclose land bearing survey<\/p>\n
N. QQ\u00bb*\\.~\/V”””‘4%’r<\/p>\n
dateti 06.02.1981. Thus, above due-ungentary    b <\/p>\n
reveal from the year 1965, ldefe\ufb01\u00e9e\ufb01t’ was ‘1<\/p>\n
Amhak of Nanjundeshwara temple    ‘V<\/p>\n
Iands in survey 1403.18\/I as   on
\nconsideration of these decpmenf\u00e9   wen’   ngh’ ts
\nin favour of I-defe11dant””};}3eIefa\u00a3e,:V  of plaintiffs<\/p>\n
that they were    temple<\/p>\n
as archaks   iands in survey ‘<\/p>\n
Nos. 13\/  be  <\/p>\n
2q_”=F(;\u00bbu;e3\u00a2V;\u00a7gs\u00e9us;”z<do mt \ufb01nd any in\ufb01maxty' in the
\n\ufb01a:1ciing s_v mime .1sy  trial Judge that suit item<\/p>\n
 *   are  properties of I-defendant.<\/p>\n
  point No. 1 in ai\ufb01zmative.\n<\/p>\n
:  L21. Regazwgimgfegint No.2:\n<\/p>\n
 _ _T}:.1.ev..–E:~{iefend1e1;1t has cxmtendesd during the lifetime of<\/p>\n
V’  Liege –.Piittaswamaiah, there was partition of joint family<\/p>\n
  : defendants I 65 H} were allotted their shares in<\/p>\n
  , Isuit schedule properties. The I-de\ufb01sndant has not stated the<\/p>\n
year during which parti\ufb01on was effected. The Pdefendant<\/p>\n
7\\7=  a<\/p>\n
 E\u00a3ig1i\u00a3at:gn~es\u00ablll~dcfcndant. From the document<\/p>\n
 .. it is not clear as to Whether them was<\/p>\n
  ‘-\u00bbdecumE:1;f3~wou1d demonstrate that genuincness of document
\n   ;;1\u00a7i= \ufb01ne fram doubts. If ‘(hi3 document had COKIC into\n<\/p>\n
1.  e\ufb01iistcncc can 08.11.1986, them was no impedilnent for 1-<\/p>\n
 dcfcndant to \ufb01ve particulars of this document in his written<\/p>\n
has relied on palupat\ufb01, which is stated to have. ._’
\ncxecutnd on 08.11.1986. In the written statcmcn\ufb01 ifihzl  ‘
\ndefcndallt on 05.01.1993, them is: “rm.-_    Ru<\/p>\n
palupatii. Duzing the course of   <\/p>\n
marked through I\u00bbdefcndanL’1V.’\u20acE\u00e911;;pa1\ufb01’-
\ndoes not make any mfcrgzjoc  ggiiomcnt
\nof pmpertics ta pa11:ics,v\\”a%r!zvV~.ic.t_:  gifectcd by late
\nPuteaswamaiah. Tag  jqf  reveal it is
\nnot  the other hmld
\nrecitals vsfo}11d..   in prescnt\ufb01-.,There am
\nsevemj   .  document. The stamp
\npaper w%:’s._   on 13.08.1986 and<\/p>\n
docurxtcnjg w\u00e9is  08.1 1.1986. The p}.ai11ti\ufb02’s have<\/p>\n
intezfentii\ufb01iiyanchayatdaxs. A careful e;-ramination of this<\/p>\n
TV!  “\ufb02u g<\/p>\n
 had  existence to evidence allotment of
\n    pmpamd in two sets. Oonttmy to<\/p>\n
  \u00a31115,’__’\u00a71\u00a2Ad’of\u00a2ndnnt.1–:”h,as deposed that he obtained palupatti
\n  _  There is no plwding that a\ufb01er palnpatti
\nLexoonfed, it was given to the custody of III–defcnda:nt.
\n   has admitted that palupat\ufb01 contains several
\n1′ gn\u00e9lpola\ufb01ons, which an: not attested by parties. The<\/p>\n
 evidence of DW2, who is said to have prepared palupatti is<\/p>\n
statement filed on 05.01.1993. It appears when    H<\/p>\n
statement was \ufb01led, Iwdcfsendant hri\u00a7dHmhis\u00ab
\nabout this document. In the j:2tvt:1*ni-;*.1:1:1;_.*_3V_A.
\nstatemtmt \ufb01icd on
\npalupatti cazuw to ho   These
\navcrnaents certainly dou\ufb02  1 ‘to 08.11.1936.
\nPalupatti dated  one side without
\nleaving any      stamp paper and
\nit does not.    schedule properties,
\nwhich  jig  T136 palupatti dated<\/p>\n
{}8.11.19816~ document If the document<\/p>\n
not satisfactory. DWI has deposed Ex.[). 18 was 3 panchayat<\/p>\n
N LQWQ,<\/p>\n
24<\/span><\/p>\n
palupatti. DW2 has deposed except defendants  V.<\/p>\n
was pxeseznt at the time of prepaxah;   “‘<\/p>\n
palupatti. DW2 has depost\ufb01 that p.:a1upga:tfi:’w\u00a3i.*a_.’n \u00a2t’ <\/p>\n
by independent witnesses ana.i;mqid 155.: \ufb01ixform’
\nas III to have document attested   It
\nis not in dispute as on  dgfcnd\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01 I 83 II!
\nhad major sons. Them   to Show that
\nsons of {iCi’CIICi\u20ac”i.;VII’t’:’.L:\u00a7’;;I   about execution
\nof   V.  V did not apply for
\nmuta\ufb01oji’ ”   of palupatti datcd
\n08.1 1. 1<V\u00a73\u00ab5". 4.951—   1 hoki that lcamcd trial<\/p>\n
Judgc  _vsho1iln:\u00a5  'x::pVt' _ p\ufb01 any reliance on this<\/p>\n
 have relied on sale agreement<\/p>\n
'  _ m\u00e9rkcd 53:3' stated to have bwn executed by plaintii\ufb01<\/p>\n
 \u00a5tI;dLI1f;Ci4\ufb01?6ndant, 311 favour of one N. Venksataswamy Roddy<\/p>\n
A   lgianjunda Raddy of R  vill\ufb01ge. Attibelc Hobli,<\/p>\n
    Taluk. In this dmument, it is mcitoct, sum-.y No.11<\/p>\n
 had faiicn to the share of Iif–defendan.t and Ilbdcfcndant and<\/p>\n
25<\/span><\/p>\n
plain\ufb01\ufb01b had agced {:0 Sell the same in  A.<\/p>\n
N.Venkataswamy Raddy, son of   _’f9x. Q “‘ V<\/p>\n
consideration of Rs.5o,ooo\/– and 1I1:de\u00a3;e_zxa:an m<\/p>\n
Rs.3,000j– as advmcc. In  it
\ntransaction should he e0;npletcd_   the
\ndate of agmemcnt   further
\nendorsements dated  151.1986 and
\n08.12.1986 tq  ” 1 3s 11 had
\nreceived a V.  :W’\ufb02”V’V’;|.6 .Vl0.l986, a sum of
\nI?s.13.O\u20acf35\/ \u00a7%  of Rs.1I.000[- on
\n08.12.1955′; it is stated plaintiffs and 111-<\/p>\n
defendant   emc”re(:Al’*.  agecment of sale to sin’ k a<\/p>\n
 V’   sz1;vcyV No’;”i”iV. However, payment of consideration<\/p>\n
_ii1$t’a\u00a7:1;a:nts would create a strong suspicion as to<\/p>\n
 document was executed. Plainti\ufb02\u00e9 1 55<\/p>\n
  ana..i1;_-defendant an: a\ufb02egtzci to have received sale<\/p>\n
A ‘~:iff”3E[1L\u00a7}i\u00a7.\u20acI’ati9I1 in instalments, which would not serve purpose<\/p>\n
 _   sale: agreement. ‘  \ufb01 <\/p>\n
   A’  …..\n<\/p>\n
    to the contents ef Ex.P.17, it is
\n‘  _  this document was issued by a Village
\n  However, the pmvision of law or autherity_
\nV    by the statute on the Village Accountant to issue
\n  in terms of Ex.P.13 is not made known to the<\/p>\n
 This document was issued on 26.10.1994. This<\/p>\n
the family pmpezrties and III-defendant was giVCIi’V.’,1:!_;’;2i.’VfV’ <\/p>\n
in suit item No-Ilia). In this View of the nzattacr   %
\npieadeti by I-defendant calllzo\ufb01be    -‘
\nJudge without referring to om}   to V
\n\ufb01nd out the manner in .’wer\u00a7: \u00a2i’ea1\u00a3’with by
\nparties, entirely  ‘V   tree as per
\nEx.P.1’7 has   vpa.rtition of joint<\/p>\n
family pmpea\ufb01es 1 as 3.\n<\/p>\n
  on the contents of<\/p>\n
gencalogiisai tree  =’Ex.P.17 has held there was<\/p>\n
partition of jam: fa1i:i1jf’v.pe5.pcr\ufb01es amongst defendants 1 85<\/p>\n
document apart from showing genealogr of family states<\/p>\n
TU.  ‘.\n<\/p>\n
 V.   qf Iai\u00e9fendant to the extant permissible by law.<\/p>\n
     ta quanti\ufb01cation and allotlnent of<\/p>\n
sachedutepmperties excluding items {(33 (35 {(13) am the sen’
\n  3 properties of late Puttaswamaiah. Therefore,
\nV. –=. ‘dc\u00a7?olu\ufb01o:n. of interest is governed by section 8 of the Hindu<\/p>\n
Tsuccession. Act, 1956. From the evidcznec on record, it i3 not<\/p>\n
32<\/span><\/p>\n
partition amongst cicfendants I 85 HI. ‘l’hcreforc:,  .<\/p>\n
defendants; 6 to 8 cannot be <\/p>\n
28. Defendants 7 81+’
\nimprovements mack: by them  Gftisiiit Qgthedulc
\nproperties purchased     8 are
\nresidents of the same   of rights of
\npxainws and   suit schedule
\npropertrics.   they are bona\ufb01dc
\n  in the \ufb01nal dccme
\npmceedilvvng\u00e9”,   \ufb01zay seek allotment of suit<\/p>\n
schedule   by them \ufb01om the I–defendant<\/p>\n
shaf\ufb01t\ufb01,  t’_ht:ATdiscuss:k)n made supra, I have held suit<\/p>\n
possible to hold defendants 4 8:. 5 have abandoned their
\nTu.  C\/L-\u00abWK-‘ ‘<\/p>\n
nights ix: suit scheduis pmpesrties. Therefoze,  M<\/p>\n
III–dcfcndant am trogcther ezatitlcd toj’1′]V4*1’   <\/p>\n
1, 4 and 5 are entitled to 114* <\/p>\n
30. In the result, I pass  V    <\/p>\n
The appeal is   passed in
\nO.S.No.I6?[  35 10:); is
\nctem\ufb01nrnw. suit item Nc}s.I{c),
\nl(d), iI(a)._ .1.1(;\u00a7)V.,$g    The plaintiffs and 111-
\ndcfcndeizgt –_Et’1Ii\ufb02Cd to 1\/ 4*” share and
\ndefenda.n,”\u00a3\u00abs’*–   \u00e9g\ufb01\ufb02cd ta 1\/4″‘ share each in<\/p>\n
suit ‘it.\u00a7\u00e91j1s.I(c),V 1&1; (ay; 11 (b) and II (C). A pmnmmmy decme<\/p>\n
   accordingly. The trial Court shall hold ax:<\/p>\n
 c*:.1;1q”:iir_’\u00a7r Incsne profits in reap-act of suit items Kc),<\/p>\n
_  [(d)A,”-I_I(a),_v’ii{1\u00a7}’\ufb01nd II((::). For want of proof, suit in respect of<\/p>\n
iniovcalilczsl described in plaint schedule III is dismissed.<\/p>\n
\u00ab   regard to relationship of parties, they are directed to<\/p>\n
    their costs.\n<\/p>\n
SNN<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Narasimhamurthy S\/O … vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008 Author: N.Ananda IN THE HIGH coum OF KARNATAKA AT ~ BETWEEN: 1. ,. Raddy ~ –._Vs.P.R\u00e9vn\u00e9q1na 1.. DATED THIS THE 13′”! DAY.9F..J4UN:\u00bb::’}2QGL4j, \u00bb’ BEFORE I THE HQWBLE MR.J US’FJ\u00a73E N’;A;~:A:~\u00a7:;-.5 R.F.A.N9.341(2Qi3fg_.(PAR) .’ ” Narasimhamulthy _ . S] 0. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51230","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNarasimhamurthy S\/O ... vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Narasimhamurthy S\/O ... vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-03-21T02:15:48+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"19 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Narasimhamurthy S\\\/O … vs S P Ramanna S\\\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-21T02:15:48+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":3485,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Narasimhamurthy S\\\/O ... vs S P Ramanna S\\\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-03-21T02:15:48+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Narasimhamurthy S\\\/O … vs S P Ramanna S\\\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Narasimhamurthy S\/O ... vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Narasimhamurthy S\/O ... vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-03-21T02:15:48+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"19 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Narasimhamurthy S\/O … vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-21T02:15:48+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008"},"wordCount":3485,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008","name":"Narasimhamurthy S\/O ... vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-03-21T02:15:48+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/narasimhamurthy-so-vs-s-p-ramanna-so-late-puttaswamaiah-on-13-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Narasimhamurthy S\/O … vs S P Ramanna S\/O Late Puttaswamaiah on 13 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51230","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51230"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51230\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51230"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51230"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51230"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}