{"id":51427,"date":"2009-12-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-12-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009"},"modified":"2018-10-25T19:18:23","modified_gmt":"2018-10-25T13:48:23","slug":"indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009","title":{"rendered":"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship … vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship … vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
'-'xii'\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF DECEMBER \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE 1~\u00a30N'BLE MRJUSTICE: ANIWD  _: I'  \n\nWRIT PETITION No.6126\/200776\/WWRH9' i>ET1*r'IIoN=\n\nN03 I57\/2008 AND 3940\/23-_OO.7{GM\u00a5CA.I?C] '~\n\nIN W.I3.NO.6126\/2007\n\nBEEWEEN:\n\n1\n\nIndian Gypsy Wor}' 2'  A\n(1\/0 Rahsesh Niiayaf  ._ ., =  ._ -\nHouse NQ.:7aU\"7_\/ I  Bal}usa\u00bbPa_lya  \nKalyan_Vl$lag;u'   '   \nBari\u00a7,'iilo1'V\u00a2*~4'3\"3'..__     \u00bb\n\n7 sri'  'MC1sh\u00e9::?N&1ik.> \nS\/-0 P.aul.NaikV  _ \n26\/38~l140',+5i'*.A' .. \nV Cointri t,!1*1'1s.t:_'C0l0_riy=*\"\n.. A 1. 2i'1.Zi11e, A T Agrah ara\n 'G:untu.;~Ap  ~~~~~   RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
  Petition is; filed under Articles 226 and<\/p>\n
Q 22′? ‘of the Constitution of india with a prayer to Call For
\nu l”‘Rec0rdv;1″In 0.s.No.16060\/2004 Pending On The File Of
\n{VThe’\u00ab.X1EI Adcil. City Civil Judge, Mayo Hall {CCH~22) And<\/p>\n
_ A After Examining Tliie Legality And Validity Of The Order
\n   Hailed 26.2.2007 Vide Aimexure A. With Regard To The
\n ~~.Applic21t.ion Dated 18.7.2006 Vide Anr1ex.ure~E Filed By<\/p>\n
\u00a33′<\/p>\n
The Petitioners For Ileleting Sixth P1aim:iff\/ Sixth
\nRespondent From The Above Proceedixugs And Issue A
\nWrit. Direction Or Order in The Nature Of Wri’t’.._ Or
\nCertiorari Quashing The lmpugned Order’…V1Zr4aied
\n26.2.2007 Vicle A1\/mexurewA.   <\/p>\n
EN W.P.NO.3157\/2008
\nBETVVEIEN:\n<\/p>\n
1 Sri Daniel Naik
\nAged About 70 Years V \u00bb ‘ ,
\nR\/At No 12\/83. Opp Go_v.er’1~”u_n*e11t
\nJunior College  _    .4 V
\nPathikonda Ap 51’83rs0–  L<\/p>\n
2 Sri
\nAged ;AbO_1.;T”‘6’5;_Ye-:21;.fs  ” V<\/p>\n
N0 27,-Jeyseelan \u00abE Cm_ss”:Stree’t;<\/p>\n
N   _ —\n<\/p>\n
IO?” ‘ Cross  M__\u00e9idL1rai
\nTanrilnadu ”\n<\/p>\n
3 ,j’s1–;G mango”\n<\/p>\n
 __ ‘ ‘Aged .Ab01,1″t: 35..Years
\n. 3 RO\/.At_ Gypsy Church
\nO  r.N’ivf._tuxfa111’*577004
\n  , I)’aVa,ne1ge’ie
\nV K23 1f1ie\u00e9_t.eika.\n<\/p>\n
 4 “S_ri1John Kuppuswami<\/p>\n
V 4_  About 35 Years
\n R\/At” N0 474, Krishna Nagar
\n.Bhara'{hpur 321001
\nReijastlxan<\/p>\n
Ci<\/p>\n
Sri M Dhempal<\/p>\n
Aged About 40 Years
\nR\/O Kumta Thanda
\nNorth Solapur
\nlVlahara.shf_1′:\u00ab;1 413224<\/p>\n
Sri James [,akSl1manan<\/p>\n
Aged About 35 Years I  _
\nC\/O Rahsesh Nilaya .’  .\n<\/p>\n
House No 707\/11. Babusa Paly:-g” ..
\nKalyan Nagar Post
\nBangalore 43<\/p>\n
Sri M Moshe Nail;\n<\/p>\n
Major<\/p>\n
S\/O Paul Naik<\/p>\n
26\/ 38- l 40 \/ 5 V<\/p>\n
Cor11r11u1ai\u00a7:ft’Cololij\/V’ ‘ –<\/p>\n
12 [,i11o,?_A ‘l\u00a7.!?:g3’a;l1a1*a”” _ – <\/p>\n
ounn,-.z= AP  ” \u00ab.j  q  l   .. PETIZTIONERS<\/p>\n
[By M \/ s””.Tai1iakalra:fio\u00ab  Advocate]<\/p>\n
 i:l11.(_13ia13 A.Gy1;lSy”‘Works Fellowship Trust;<\/p>\n
4 _1  3, ‘Chris Cons Ave<\/p>\n
 2 ‘Doc\u00a7Claba_ri;2sxxradi, Bangalore 413
\n2 ‘-.Vl’R\u20acpr’_es\u20acr,ited by its President’,
\n Sri.Sol-on1_a11 Venlmtal.<\/p>\n
A ‘T   Sal Soloman Venkatal
\n _,5A\u00a7_\u00a7ed About 50 Years<\/p>\n
N0 -M6\/3, Chris Cons Ave<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
 ”  for re::sp_ond,ents I ‘ta.-5]<\/p>\n
(3<\/p>\n
Dodciabarlaswadi
\nBangalore 43<\/p>\n
3 Sri James
\nAged About 50 Years
\nNo 188\/ 58. Kam121gi Ne1ge11′
\nAnagammal Coiony
\nSalem Tami1r1adu 636009<\/p>\n
4 Sri K Kamaraj<\/p>\n
Aged About 35 Years<\/p>\n
R\/O Gypsy Hostel<\/p>\n
Hanuma Nagar,
\nVinukonda 52264’?-._ <\/p>\n
Guntur AP  ‘ —\n<\/p>\n
5 Sri K Annaidalrai  — _ _   ~ <\/p>\n
Aged Ab::>u;i;:;3.–5 Years;     Va
\nc\/0 S1111″ \u00abRe:s~vg_t\u00a51\u00abkaf     \u00bb<\/p>\n
J iepi{2’11e1 AV [;aydi;-A ” 9<\/p>\n
U.V1″n1~_ed 44*}  ‘V <\/p>\n
Di’stI’iL_’,t N;:1g~pft;r,’e~_  ” __
\nMai-1.arast1n:a   >’ ”    ” …RESPONDEN’E’S<\/p>\n
(By .aCar\u00a3a};:pa’  Cempany, Advocates<\/p>\n
 Tijjs  Pef;iti0’r1 is {\ufb02ed under Articles 226 and<\/p>\n
 _ v.227 of  Consmufion of India with a prayer to quash
\n% v.[fe~:h\u00a7eo.1~c1er dated 5.2.2008 passed in O.S.NO.’I6060\/2004<\/p>\n
—   b1’ihAe memo filed by the ciei”er1dar1ts as per Annexure-J.<\/p>\n
{S<\/p>\n
IN W.P.NO.3940\/2007<\/p>\n
BETWEEN:\n<\/p>\n
Mr Pan} Ch2u’1d1’2m<\/p>\n
aged about 35 years.\n<\/p>\n
S\/O Abbu Naik, R\/O No.5~249\/2:3
\nVijayanagar Colony,
\nCross Road<\/p>\n
Jedcheria 509 302<\/p>\n
Mo:-rhboob Nagar,
\nAndhra Pradesh<\/p>\n
(By Sri:E Christopher; A_zEi’\\roc:.at.e;_)’  ” <\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
ind’1a__11~ C:ypSy_ Ee}1_o1=Qfshk;o Trust:
\n416\/ Cf\ufb01ris CooS–fvAx?e’\u00ab….y’ ‘ <\/p>\n
  ”\n<\/p>\n
Banga1’orf:~-43, 1’ep1=e’se11f.ccCi”<\/p>\n
By its Pfe’sfjd_\u00e9:13.t,E3.o1’oman Venkatai.<\/p>\n
; ‘So_1<)ni.\u00e9w-3
\n  Y<:3a1'S. _____ H .\n<\/p>\n
No.4 16_\/ 3, Chris Cons Ave<\/p>\n
 ” w _ D.otit1abanaswadi
\n  . Bayi”:.gal.o-re’~43<\/p>\n
3 31131 e :3<\/p>\n
A’\u00a7ge:5O Years;\n<\/p>\n
 No.183\/58, Kannagi Nagar<\/p>\n
AA Angammai Colony<\/p>\n
Salem.\n<\/p>\n
Tamilnadu 636 009<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
K. Kamaraj<\/p>\n
Age:35 Y<-tam<\/p>\n
R\/O Gypsy Hostel
\nI~–Ianuma Nagar
\nVinukonda 522 647'
\nGuntur, A?\n<\/p>\n
K Annadurai<\/p>\n
Age:35 Years<\/p>\n
C \/ O Sui} Resvathkar  _
\nJipkata Layout V
\nUmred 441 203
\nNagpur District
\nMaharastra ‘ <\/p>\n
M Moshe Naik ….   ‘
\nMajor {Ags3.un’o_t Km) <\/p>\n
S\/O Pam  ‘V     <\/p>\n
26\/33-lvf:i40f”5’3’..__ M V  1_ ._
\nC0n1n1′:;1’1~is’\u00a3j_..C0!onyA;7_1  Liijie
\nALT:Ag1f\u00e9fh  ” Gixntur, ”  ‘  ”<\/p>\n
Danie} VNaiV1\u00ab’:  ‘<\/p>\n
_Age:7″O  A _
\n R\/0 No.12’\/’ab,
\n“O’p.p:G.0vernr1’1e’nt Junior College<\/p>\n
Patllikoaadet AP<\/p>\n
%  {%5i8j <\/p>\n
G,:.aa_1L1’;i—{\u00a3<21r1 Selvaraj<\/p>\n
  Years<\/p>\n
N<;I27, Jeyseeian 1 Cross Street<\/p>\n
AA  N\u00e9uaraj Nagar
\n* 10th Cress Road<\/p>\n
Mudarai
\n'3Q'amiinad11<\/p>\n
records in C).S.No.16060\/2004 pending on the fiie of the
\nKm Additional City Civil Judge, Mayo Hall [CCH~22) and
\nafter examining the legality and validity of the order
\ndated 26.2.2007 vide Annexure~ A, mth regard 't,oFi:he<\/p>\n
application Dated 18.7.2006 vide AUI1\u20acX11f\u20ac~Effi}'\u00a7(Z].V.by<\/p>\n
the petitioner for being irnpleaded in _ft"r1'e..'VV'~21__'r3Co}rei~.
\nproceedings and quash the impugned orde1i_"eiai:eC}2 2'<\/p>\n
26.2.2007 Vide Annexure~A.<\/p>\n
These Writ Petitions coining  forpreiirni.nar\u00a7}"~h*eearing
\n'B' group this day. the Court made the 'i'o_Iiowing_;A- \u00bb _ 2 "  <\/p>\n
oRo_:\u00a7R_
\nThe petitions having boe~en."L'}isted foi'*fi.na1.'\u00a7hearing,
\nat first blush. a primaiyi r1'L1e's:tio\u00a7'i  which does not<\/p>\n
seem to have  Liietrial Court.<\/p>\n
2. These  “gitlier by the parties in two civil<\/p>\n
suits, 0:8-_..Nus.Vi606g0f2.004 and 3827\/2006, City Civil<\/p>\n
  Cofgiik, :E__3aI’iga1oi'”e\u00ab….___T_\u00a7They are in respect. of a trust Called<\/p>\n
   Workers Fellowship Trust (hereinafter<\/p>\n
rieferred.  ‘the Trust’ for ‘oreviI’.y). Though it is<\/p>\n
“v.,e1aiIne(viAto be a charitable trust created for the Welfare of<\/p>\n
  in India, since the gypsies are an<\/p>\n
 i\u00e9ientifiable group. of a certain number, the question<\/p>\n
CS<\/p>\n
would be whether the ‘i_’1’ust. could be called a public<\/p>\n
trust applying the established tests to decide as ‘tidsthe<\/p>\n
nature of a public or a p1*ivat.e trust. This needs be<\/p>\n
addressed in the first instance. in entei’t:\u00bbaii’1~ivr1’g.V:a. suit-\u00ab.. <\/p>\n
under Section 92.\n<\/p>\n
3. It transpires that   in
\nO.S.No.16060\/2004.   case. leave
\nhas not been grsiiited,  numbered
\nas an originat”    The trial Court
\nwould  question whether
\nthe trtist \ufb02an  trust. and then Consider<\/p>\n
whether leisure” co’:_.11d,  been granted or cannot be<\/p>\n
 and only-~\u00abtn.’heI1 to entertain the suit as a<\/p>\n
 _sehee1’ne”v\u00absVt;1itV: ..e_VT\u00a3*1eref0’re, these petitions are disposed of,<\/p>\n
withtwa  to the trial Court to consider the above<\/p>\n
V’~\u00bb.questio.nA’1i11 the first iristance, before proceeding with the<\/p>\n
 further. It is needless to i11dieat.e that the leave<\/p>\n
.A:.’_.g_r’e1nted in 0.8.1.6060\/2004 is hereby quashed and<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
‘fL1rther, as to what shat}! be the fut,u1’e course. open to<\/p>\n
the parties if the triai Court comes to the con..ei\u00bbat$\u00a7Qn<\/p>\n
that the trust. is’ not a pubiic trust <\/p>\n
option. In the result, the intpttgned 0rde1’s:i’n’V’e.aCh –‘.)f”<\/p>\n
the writ petitions are quashed.  <\/p>\n
for a fresh consideratiion e1s’\u00bb:=;t:\u00e9tt.e(i above; _ 1 .,<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship … vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy ‘-‘xii’ IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 16th DAY OF DECEMBER BEFORE THE 1~\u00a30N’BLE MRJUSTICE: ANIWD _: I’ WRIT PETITION No.6126\/200776\/WWRH9′ i>ET1*r’IIoN= N03 I57\/2008 AND 3940\/23-_OO.7{GM\u00a5CA.I?C] ‘~ IN W.I3.NO.6126\/2007 BEEWEEN: 1 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51427","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nIndian Gypsy Works Fellowship ... vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship ... vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-25T13:48:23+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship … vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-25T13:48:23+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1139,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009\",\"name\":\"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship ... vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-12-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-25T13:48:23+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship … vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship ... vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship ... vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-25T13:48:23+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship … vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009","datePublished":"2009-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-25T13:48:23+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009"},"wordCount":1139,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009","name":"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship ... vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-12-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-25T13:48:23+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/indian-gypsy-works-fellowship-vs-sri-daniel-naik-on-16-december-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Indian Gypsy Works Fellowship … vs Sri Daniel Naik on 16 December, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51427","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51427"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51427\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51427"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51427"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51427"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}