{"id":51550,"date":"2011-01-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011"},"modified":"2014-07-06T04:46:52","modified_gmt":"2014-07-05T23:16:52","slug":"jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal &#8230; on 28 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal &#8230; on 28 January, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 25000 of 2006(A)\n\n\n1. JIMMY GEORGE,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. REETHAMMA MATHEW,\n\n3. REGISTRAR OF CO-OP.SOCIETIES,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.P.N.MOHANAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.D.AJITHKUMAR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.N.RAVINDRAN\n\n Dated :28\/01\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n                        P.N. RAVINDRAN, J.\n                     -------------------------------\n                   W.P.(C) No.25000 of 2006\n                     -------------------------------\n            Dated this the 28th day of January, 2011\n\n                           J U D G M E N T\n<\/pre>\n<p>             Ext.P7 order passed by the Consumer Disputes Redressal<\/p>\n<p>Forum, Alappuzha on 16.5.2006 directing the petitioner to refund the<\/p>\n<p>sum of Rs.7663\/- together with interest at 10% per annum on the<\/p>\n<p>sum of Rs.3603\/- from 14.2.2004 till the date of payment, Rs.1000\/-<\/p>\n<p>as compensation and Rs.450\/- as costs is under challenge         in this<\/p>\n<p>writ petition. Ext.P7 order was passed on a complaint filed by the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent herein.        It was contended that the second<\/p>\n<p>respondent was not given the benefits flowing from Exts.P5 and P6<\/p>\n<p>circulars, when she closed the loan account on 14.2.2004. The second<\/p>\n<p>respondent alleged that the petitioner herein, the President of the Co-<\/p>\n<p>operative Society, had realised a sum of Rs.7663\/- in excess from the<\/p>\n<p>second respondent.     The Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum held<\/p>\n<p>that as per Exts.P5 and P6 circulars, the second respondent was<\/p>\n<p>entitled to waiver of interest, and therefore, the second respondent is<\/p>\n<p>entitled to refund of    the excess amount paid by her by way of<\/p>\n<p>interest.\n<\/p>\n<p>            2. It is not in dispute that the second respondent did not<\/p>\n<p>settle the loan account under the one time settlement scheme. The<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.25000 of 2006<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>second respondent availed the loan on 15.4.1997. It was to be repaid<\/p>\n<p>in 48 instalments. She committed default in repayment of the loan<\/p>\n<p>and she closed the loan account only on 14.2.2004, after nearly 7<\/p>\n<p>years. She did not while settling the loan account claim any benefit<\/p>\n<p>under the one time settlement scheme.          A Division Bench of this<\/p>\n<p>Court has in Cheranalloor Service Co op. <a href=\"\/doc\/1016283\/\">Bank Ltd v. Alfred<\/a><\/p>\n<p>(2010 (1) KLT 749) held that schemes for waiver of interest are not<\/p>\n<p>meant for persons who have closed their loan accounts before the<\/p>\n<p>issuance of the schemes, which are notified only to collect arrears and<\/p>\n<p>not to refund the amounts already collected by banks. In the light of<\/p>\n<p>the authoritative pronouncement of this Court, the second respondent<\/p>\n<p>who had closed the loan account without availing the benefit of the<\/p>\n<p>one time settlement scheme cannot be heard to contend that she is<\/p>\n<p>entitled to the benefit of the scheme, and therefore, the bank should<\/p>\n<p>refund to her the excess amount collected by it by way of interest.<\/p>\n<p>The Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum appears to have lost sight of<\/p>\n<p>the fact that one time settlement schemes are not meant to enable<\/p>\n<p>debtors to obtain refund of the interest already paid, but to enable<\/p>\n<p>banks and       financial institutions to recover the arrears by giving<\/p>\n<p>reduction in interest to the debtors. In such circumstances, it has to<\/p>\n<p>W.P.(C) No.25000 of 2006<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                      3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>be necessarily held that Ext.P7 order cannot be sustained.<\/p>\n<p>              In the result, I allow the writ petition, quash Ext.P7 order<\/p>\n<p>and dismiss O.P.No.A.103 of 2004 on the file of the Consumer<\/p>\n<p>Disputes Redressal Forum, Alappuzha.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                               P.N. RAVINDRAN,<br \/>\n                                                       JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>nj.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal &#8230; on 28 January, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 25000 of 2006(A) 1. JIMMY GEORGE, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, &#8230; Respondent 2. REETHAMMA MATHEW, 3. REGISTRAR OF CO-OP.SOCIETIES, For Petitioner :SRI.P.N.MOHANAN For Respondent :SRI.D.AJITHKUMAR The [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51550","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal ... on 28 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal ... on 28 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-07-05T23:16:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal &#8230; on 28 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-05T23:16:52+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":490,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal ... on 28 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-07-05T23:16:52+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal &#8230; on 28 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal ... on 28 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal ... on 28 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-07-05T23:16:52+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal &#8230; on 28 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-05T23:16:52+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011"},"wordCount":490,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011","name":"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal ... on 28 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-07-05T23:16:52+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jimmy-george-vs-the-consumer-disputes-redressal-on-28-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jimmy George vs The Consumer Disputes Redressal &#8230; on 28 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51550","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51550"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51550\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51550"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51550"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51550"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}