{"id":51680,"date":"2011-01-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011"},"modified":"2015-04-07T23:38:53","modified_gmt":"2015-04-07T18:08:53","slug":"chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nRCRev..No. 112 of 2007()\n\n\n1. CHAMBALAN RAGHAVAN, S\/O.KANNA,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. AERUMMAL BALAKRISHNAN, S\/O.JANAKY,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. P.V.SATHI, D\/O.JANAKY,\n\n3. P.V.INDIRA, D\/O.JANAKY, AGED 55 YEARS,\n\n4. AERUMMAL HARIKUMAR,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.P.NARAYANAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice PIUS C.KURIAKOSE\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice N.K.BALAKRISHNAN\n\n Dated :03\/01\/2011\n\n O R D E R\n                 PIUS C. KURIAKOSE &amp;\n                N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JJ.\n                ----------------------------------\n                  R.C.R. No.112 of 2007\n                 ------------------------------\n         Dated this the 3rd day of January 2011\n\n\n                          O R D E R\n<\/pre>\n<p>Pius C. Kuriakose, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      Under challenge in this revision filed by the tenant is<\/p>\n<p>the judgment of the Rent Control Appellate Authority,<\/p>\n<p>Thalassery ordering eviction against the revision petitioner<\/p>\n<p>on the ground of Sub section (3) of Section 11 in reversal of<\/p>\n<p>a negative order passed by the learned Rent Control Court<\/p>\n<p>dismissing the RCP. The need projected by the landlords,<\/p>\n<p>who are five in number, is that the 5th respondent herein<\/p>\n<p>one Mr.Harikumar wants to conduct a day care for his<\/p>\n<p>livelihood in the petition schedule building.      One of the<\/p>\n<p>prominent contentions raised was that the landlords are<\/p>\n<p>having in their possession other buildings and that there<\/p>\n<p>are no special reasons as to why they should evict the<\/p>\n<p>R.C.R. No.112 of 2007<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             -: 2 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>revision petitioner from the petition schedule building.<\/p>\n<p>They would also contend that atleast one room in the larger<\/p>\n<p>building, of which the petition schedule building is another<\/p>\n<p>room, was let out by the landlords recently, that is just prior<\/p>\n<p>to filing of the RCP. It became evident that the landlords<\/p>\n<p>had let out a vacant room forming part of the larger<\/p>\n<p>building and another part of the petition schedule building<\/p>\n<p>some time prior to the filing of the RCP. Thus, question<\/p>\n<p>seriously arose as to when the above room was let out. The<\/p>\n<p>landlords&#8217; version was that the same was let out in 1998<\/p>\n<p>more than one year prior to the filing of RCP. The tenant&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>version was that it was let out just one month prior to the<\/p>\n<p>RCP. The Rent Control Court on evaluating the evidence<\/p>\n<p>dismissed the RCP taking a view that the need is not<\/p>\n<p>bonafide. The Appellate Authority however, reversed the<\/p>\n<p>decision of the Rent Control Court and ordered eviction.<\/p>\n<p>      2.   In this revision various grounds are raised by the<\/p>\n<p>tenant assailing the judgment of the Appellate Authority.<\/p>\n<p>R.C.R. No.112 of 2007<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             -: 3 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Sri.K.V.Pavithran,    the  learned    counsel   for  revision<\/p>\n<p>petitioner addressed arguments on all those grounds<\/p>\n<p>Sri.Mohanan and Sri.P.Narayanan, the learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the landlords resisted all the submissions of Mr.Pavithran.<\/p>\n<p>      3.   The question that arises for consideration is as to<\/p>\n<p>when one of the rooms in the five room structure was let out<\/p>\n<p>by the landlords, whether it was immediately prior to the<\/p>\n<p>filing of the RCP or more than one year earlier to the filing<\/p>\n<p>of the RCP. First proviso to Sub section (3) of Section 11<\/p>\n<p>can operate only if the landlords are in possession of vacant<\/p>\n<p>building belonging to the landlords at the time of<\/p>\n<p>commencement of the RCP. But if it becomes evident that<\/p>\n<p>landlords have let out an identical room belonging to them<\/p>\n<p>just prior to filing of the RCP or at a time they were<\/p>\n<p>harbouring the bonafide need in the RCP, then the same<\/p>\n<p>can reflect on the question whether the need is bonafide.<\/p>\n<p>      4.   After considering the submissions addressed at<\/p>\n<p>the Bar we directed the respondents by order dated<\/p>\n<p>R.C.R. No.112 of 2007<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                             -: 4 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>15.12.2010 to make available for our perusal the rent<\/p>\n<p>kaychit executed by one Mr.Babu, the new tenant, in favour<\/p>\n<p>of the landlords and posted the case on 21.12.2010. On<\/p>\n<p>21.12.2010 the learned counsel sought further time to<\/p>\n<p>produce the document. It was accordingly the case was<\/p>\n<p>posted to this day.     Today the learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>landlords submitted that the landlord will not be in a<\/p>\n<p>position to produce the kaychit and the kaychit was in the<\/p>\n<p>custody of his mother who is no more. The learned counsel<\/p>\n<p>also submitted that if time is given the landlord may be able<\/p>\n<p>to produce some document which will prove that it was in<\/p>\n<p>1998 that the building was let out to Mr.Babu. We are not<\/p>\n<p>inclined to grant further time. We are inclined to remit the<\/p>\n<p>matter back to Rent Control Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>      5.   We notice another aspect of the matter that the<\/p>\n<p>monthly rent payable by the revision petitioner for the<\/p>\n<p>building in question situated within the area of Thalassery<\/p>\n<p>Municipality at the rate of Rs.125\/- is very low.        The<\/p>\n<p>R.C.R. No.112 of 2007<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                              -: 5 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>submission of the learned counsel for the landlord that for<\/p>\n<p>an adjacent room the tenant is paying Rs.500\/- per month<\/p>\n<p>was not seriously disputed. We are therefore, inclined to<\/p>\n<p>refix the rent tentatively at Rs.500\/- per mensem with effect<\/p>\n<p>from 1.2.2011.      The result of the above discussion is as<\/p>\n<p>follows :-\n<\/p>\n<p>           The judgment of the learned Appellate Authority<\/p>\n<p>and order passed by the learned Rent Control Court are set<\/p>\n<p>aside. RCP.200\/99 is remanded to the Rent Control Court,<\/p>\n<p>Thalassery. That court is directed to take fresh decision<\/p>\n<p>regarding the order of eviction passed on the ground of Sub<\/p>\n<p>section (3) of Section 11. The question as to when the room<\/p>\n<p>was let out to Mr.Babu will be specifically enquired into.<\/p>\n<p>Both sides are given opportunity to adduce further<\/p>\n<p>evidence.     Fresh decision will be taken on the basis of<\/p>\n<p>evidence already on record and further evidence which may<\/p>\n<p>be adduced by the parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>           The rent payable by the revision petitioner for the<\/p>\n<p>R.C.R. No.112 of 2007<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                              -: 6 :-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>building is refixed tentatively with effect from 1.2.2011 at<\/p>\n<p>the rate of Rs.500\/- per mensem. We make it clear that the<\/p>\n<p>above refixation is tentative. If either party is aggrieved, it<\/p>\n<p>is open to them to move the learned Rent Control Court and<\/p>\n<p>get the fair rent fixed under Section 5. Till fair rent is fixed<\/p>\n<p>the revision petitioner shall pay rent at the rate of Rs.500\/-<\/p>\n<p>per mensem.        The parties shall appear before the Rent<\/p>\n<p>Control Court on 7.2.2011.           That court is directed to<\/p>\n<p>expedite matters and take fresh decision early and at any<\/p>\n<p>rate within three months of appearance of parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                       PIUS C. KURIAKOSE,<br \/>\n                                                     JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                      N.K.BALAKRISHNAN,<br \/>\n                                                     JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>Jvt<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM RCRev..No. 112 of 2007() 1. CHAMBALAN RAGHAVAN, S\/O.KANNA, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. AERUMMAL BALAKRISHNAN, S\/O.JANAKY, &#8230; Respondent 2. P.V.SATHI, D\/O.JANAKY, 3. P.V.INDIRA, D\/O.JANAKY, AGED 55 YEARS, 4. AERUMMAL HARIKUMAR, For Petitioner :SRI.K.V.PAVITHRAN For Respondent :SRI.P.NARAYANAN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51680","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-04-07T18:08:53+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-07T18:08:53+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":978,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-04-07T18:08:53+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-04-07T18:08:53+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-07T18:08:53+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011"},"wordCount":978,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011","name":"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-04-07T18:08:53+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/chambalan-raghavan-vs-aerummal-balakrishnan-on-3-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Chambalan Raghavan vs Aerummal Balakrishnan on 3 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51680","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51680"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51680\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51680"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51680"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51680"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}