{"id":51725,"date":"2010-02-15T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-14T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010"},"modified":"2014-12-16T13:21:59","modified_gmt":"2014-12-16T07:51:59","slug":"jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: Aravind Kumar<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH comm' OF KAR_NA'I'A_KA AT BANGALORE\nDA'I'Ei7) THIS THE 15%} DAY OF FEBRUA\u00a7\u00a7'Kf A \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HONBLE A\/Ir.JUS'FICE'AAAi\u00a7{AVi.NI)\u00ab  \n\nH.R.R.P No.1\/2010 (V:\/w r\u00a7i%;\u00a32;'1\"\u00a7:A:9 Nc3\"f'2\/:2,\u00bbo3(j  \n\nBETVVEEN:\n\nSmt.JayaIakshmi,\n\nW\/0 late Srinivas.\n\nAged about 38 years, \n\nResiding atS.N0.l6\/2,*\"\"= :\"   1  :\nDoor No.54. 3v\"\"'\"5 v1\u00a3\"\u00bb\/Iaih \nAmrut:hah211.Ii;., O\ufb01p To  MSV Cabfie, .\nSahaka1'I12:\u00a3:\u00a3;\"ar..'PQ.-%.vtQ'w .    \n\nBanga1o__r\u00a7r--9'2..,\"\"  _   \"  ...PETITIONE2R\n\n\" \"=5 '\" '% moMMoM\n\n(Sri Y\u20ac3.Szh.L1' Mi\u00e9hr\ufb01q Fndo Legal Inc. GVS)\n\nAND:  _v\n\n'V V' \"Sri 'B..':S.2\u20ac\\i1'ui1if8}L:, A  \"\"\" ' \n    Subbaiah.\n'  ab_\u20ac:VJU't \" 5? years.\n\nR'esidir1g at'f.\"}:N<\u00a7[i:41~7, 19' Cro:e;s,\nI  M__.':11'n_... ~ Byat21re1yar1ap'uI'a1 Post'.\n\n g Yelahanka Hobli.\n VBanga1orC?56O 0:32. ...RESPONDENT<\/pre>\n
A  Ti\u00ab{Sfi\u00ab\u00bb7I7:APre1k21s}1. Adv.)<\/p>\n
(COMMON)<\/p>\n
\u00a7.J<\/p>\n
HRRP I\/I0 \ufb01led under Sectticm 46(1) of KR Act
\naga1’ns1 the order dated 07.1 1.2009 passed on IA~I in I-{RC
\nE51\/O7 on the file of the Chic:fJ1.1dge. Court of Smail
\nCauses, Bangalore. allowing the petition f”i1od’h.__b_j\u00a7 the
\npetitioner therein filed under Section 45 of K’R”A:(?.’f7e1r1d
\nHRRP 2\/10 filed under Section 46(1) of KR the<\/p>\n
order dated 07.112009 passed in HRC 151,407 Ao:;”~the7\ufb011\u00e9~
\nof the Chief Judge. Court of Smail C.21u:3e_$:.~..p\u00a33a1′;gal(_)r\u20ac\u20ac:,
\ndismissing the LA No.4 \ufb01led by f.}*1’e’;*i”ro8p()nd\u00a7:nr.’ ‘vi:=E._;erVre-15:1 u\/ T.<\/p>\n
43(1) and (2) of KR Act.\n<\/p>\n
Tllese HRRPS oon1ing.\u00bbon__ for i;1.drnissio’n Vdgiy. the”<\/p>\n
Court made the following:\n<\/p>\n
 IF’? A <\/p>\n
 . O Ronni)” “‘ .\n<\/p>\n
Though tlrtxe no1ar,iio1r Eistttjd’  admission, by<\/p>\n
consent: of 1ea;rrie_d:’Ad\\Lfocg1to?s  for the parties. the
\nrnatter’Ci;\u00a7”fa’k\u00e9i71_v1.1\ufb01’fVfor_:ii::1\u00e911 hearing and disposed of.<\/p>\n
2. ‘{“h_e” reV}’sio’n “p\u00a7:’i:it.ione1’ who is the respondent<\/p>\n
 befkliio utihe co1\u00a7:’rt\u00ab.brc:2 dated<\/p>\n
‘CV07’.121.2609″whoreunder I.A~I \ufb02ied by the respondent<\/p>\n
 “.f}<1or\u00e9i1;1 under Seciiican 45 of the Ka1'nata}<:a Rent Act, 1999<\/p>\n
VV\u00e9\u00a7S allowed by directing the revision petitioner to pay<\/p>\n
6..\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
1);-\n<\/p>\n
Rs.6.000\/- as a1’1’e211*s of rem from Je;1111.1e11″y 2004 to Mezy
\n2007 emd at the 111119 (H150\/~ per month I_}1c?1’eE1\u00a3'{eI’ till<\/p>\n
date within one m01’1i:1’1 {T0111 {the cIa.t(:\u00e9 of the ()I.f{if’\u00a7F  \u00a7 fA_-4<\/p>\n
filed by the re\\~’isiot1 pCi’.i.ti()I’1\u00a2’;?1.’ m1d\u20acr Se(:ij:i_()1i—.V4S–{_tI’*} “c’Ej’13d”{.2u} <\/p>\n
of [116 Ka1*11at..’:1ka Rent Act. to    ‘<\/p>\n
in HRC 151\/ 07 on the g:’Q1.t1’1(i 1 }ia{. 1”,h\u00a7319–\u00a3;:. :1 IR} <\/p>\n
1’el21t:i0I2ship 0f1a11d101*d and {iii-*z1i111i’:_ was’-di s1n’iss(;d_.<\/p>\n
3. T116 facts in 11L\ufb021’t’sh~eii, 215$’ fO’i1Vo”\\’>vs:<\/p>\n
The p211.*ti;\u00a7S v.are\u00e9;’f<3f'\u00e9i*1':ed<'  their rarlkings in
\ntha Court b\u00e9l<51..V:"=. 'V \u00ab<\/p>\n
'F116-.pet:iti'Qt1eA1*'\ufb011\u00e9d_}1':.1eviction petiiiion under Section<\/p>\n
2'\/{2)(a} a"ngj1"{1.j) xcitf .I:\u00a7E.11'1}\u00a3iT.\u00a3}k2} Rent": AC1. 1999 aga1i11s1[.<\/p>\n
 the, \u00ab13(\u00a7%spendc\u00e9n\u00a7; \u00ab.c};1iz_11:1'1g to be the I:1bS()1'L.lI',f,'. ()\\\/V1161' of the<\/p>\n
 \u00bbsCi1e_du.1e'~.p:fei*njses. P121vi11g acqu1'red the salne under the<\/p>\n
 05.02. 1988 {ram SIm:.Kemp2-1m111.21 and Sri<\/p>\n
j Sri1'1fv;1S'.A.V The re-sporldent filed her st.21{.emem_ of objections<\/p>\n
..f'd\u20ac:r1yi.11g the ave1'r:1e.I1t.s nlade in the pei[i1T1'(.'m and also<\/p>\n
taking up a ('on1'.c=:m;ion that'. there is 1'1()juraI 1*oEaI.j()11s}'1ip<\/p>\n
of landlord and t'e1'12u'11..\n<\/p>\n
4. During the pendencty of the eviC~tior_if~p\u00e9’t.i:tiQI1.__{.i”1:r:$ <\/p>\n
p\u20ac’.1′,i\u00a5iiOH\u20acI’~EE1I1d1()l’d \ufb02ied an h’1te1<1og311i:0.1*y."-z1p';\u00a7}i_\u00a7:2:%;i:)n.<\/p>\n
nameiy. {A-1 under Sect.ior1o"4-5V of
\n1999 seeking a <:1j.rectiou to  the
\narrears of rent — at the rate of
\nRs.l5O\/V per 1T1OT]th ';1i1::}:..1':'o  mollth during
\nthe pende1i1p3;;:v   applicatmrl carne to
\nbe   by fiiing; a memo and
\nc()nto.e1:':,\u00a71i11g  filed to the 1112111'; petition be<\/p>\n
treated elsobjsicrfiorixio' the 21pp1i(:ation aiso.<\/p>\n
  52.’7I’h’\u20ac_rerspo\ufb01de11I–tenam. f\ufb02ed an application under<\/p>\n
%o.oS’em{io:ijjo’:2;3(\u00e9oV)T–.V;:nd (2) of the Karnataka Rem Act, 1999<\/p>\n
wh13reL1V_r1de3f~w’she prayed that ail further prc)(?eedi1’1gs in the<\/p>\n
‘A ‘”-._V “efviTct;ior3… ;pet.i1:,ior1 be stopped on the groLmci_ that there<\/p>\n
 _ ‘existeci no jural 1’e121’t’i01’o1sh.ip of landlord and tenant. ‘1’ he<\/p>\n
(3<\/p>\n
7. I have heard Sri Mishra, .1\u20ac?21I’I1\u20ac:’d (tomasel
\na.ppeari11g on beh:\u00ab;11f0fIndo I,e>.g_[‘gz.-11 Inc. and Sri ‘I’.Pre1k21sI’1.<\/p>\n
lezuned e0’un.f”the<\/p>\n
Court that SL1bS\u20acq3,1.\u20acI’1[” to i1:1v\u00e9\u00e9”-vQ1’cie1*”p_e1sseVcv}_ l6″3?V”t”i’1’c\u00e9’VCourt:<\/p>\n
below they have been able.-~tr.)”V-ufiearthh’a~..n.ofi(:e dated
\n14.08.1989 issued by Smi,;Ke_1\u00a7’1p3an\u20acma, who is none other
\nthan the n10t.her?i__n–121;w (jf”t1;e f1″~e2ni_si0r:\u00ab petii:i0ne1′ wherein
\n has ca\u00a7teg(>.rii::a11y’atjn_ii”t1.ec?_ t’1′.1:at.she  a teenam under
\nSri  {he respondent hereirl to<\/p>\n
demorlstr\u00e9xte  1;he.rfe .i,\u00e9”_.”‘e11’1 admissi()11 of fact.<\/p>\n
 ..AIVI1’shVrx\u00e91″;A learned counsel for the 1*evis:ion<\/p>\n
 pefj_tiuOn.e’1=.._wh\ufb01e\ufb02aking me through the order of the Court,<\/p>\n
beltmf WL)’13_1’dA(2{)I1f;\u20ac11C1 that admittedly the respondente.<\/p>\n
K “deI1jied.ih’e re1at.1’onship of landlord and terzant’ and the<\/p>\n
 _ C.(}m’f..=’be10w was in error in passitag the order only on the<\/p>\n
u  of the jt,:cfgr11<-mt. passed in O.S.N'0.5-441\/93 wherein<\/p>\n
-.3<\/p>\n
the said Sri lVlLlT1i.l”‘cZ1jl1 had produced :1 _lega1l notice said to
\nhave been issued (‘.or1t’ending t:l’ie;11’. the revisi(‘)n petii.Ii’o1’1e1′ is<\/p>\n
21 t.e1ia1i1t, under him. It  co11t.e1’ided by Si’i~\u00ab~~;’\\.\/i.’i’:e.:.l’f_1’i*;fajj. ,_1e’l1re11:<\/p>\n
the said \ufb01i’1di1’1g is not biiiding and l1ez’1ee__.1_A’li.;1t:’–e:a1’1r1oi’be <\/p>\n
made use of by the Courts laelouwii, fo ‘:lfi(3l_d’-..tvl3e.1:r?:efisl<\/p>\n
re.lai.ionship of landlord anrd, te1’i2m_i.”– I1’1,V’S;Ll_’}-F1\/I:)()rt’.;Ofv’h’iS’.<\/p>\n
submission. he relies upon  of CbLii”1 in the
\nCase of Sn\/\u00a3T.SABI’;lf}&i.A ..v__\u00bb4\u00a7li”‘JD OTHERS Vs.<\/p>\n
sMT.s.K.sREEpEv1 lA’Q_\u00a7I)V(:.)’l”\u00a7(?(.’l..liAIi 2’oo9i5_) MR KAR R 1 12<\/p>\n
to ermtexad t.h”211.:;:jde1″V:fii1dinl;:V21sxfo ‘fl1lVe”_’j’i:1ral relar:io11ship of<\/p>\n
landlofdH’\u00e91i1ecf:v7.t:e.I1i\u00a7lht  ijuomhave been independently
\nfound  the NRCA:.jC_5Li~1%l””aiid it should be arrived on the<\/p>\n
be1sis_oi’ ih\u00e9c-E _rV11.-:’ite1’i2i’l placed before it. and not by the<\/p>\n
‘  mai;efiail”i;)l\u00e9ieAed in \u00e9Lmdiil’e1’e:i’1i. _pI’oeeeding.<\/p>\n
  talVp(arL,1sal of the order passed by the Court<\/p>\n
j b\u20acl()W”…ilfiS Seen mat. in order to allow the applieat;ior1 filed<\/p>\n
 ;’i;.ll.E’.’, landlord and dismisss the applieatiori filed by the<\/p>\n
‘  1′:ei;12,m1, the Court below lias relied upori tzlie judg”me.h1.<\/p>\n
passed in O.S.N’o.5-441\/93 to come to a conclusion that in<\/p>\n
the said suit there was a fi1’1di11g_g directing the;’.p–l21intifi’<\/p>\n
therein (“respondent herein) to approach ‘f,l’1\\.’;~’\u00ab~~–I’:\u00a7’I1.l’, ‘ ‘Co”uri.<\/p>\n
and on the basis of such a finding the _C’o_L1~–r:”.:)1e}o_w has <\/p>\n
held there is relationship of laiidlorri ‘aicidi-t.e1-1.ant ,ar.d<\/p>\n
allowed the landlord’s applieationhhand <\/p>\n
teraantfs application. The 1’elVev_ar’1t:_porti-oijiiojf  order of<\/p>\n
the court below reads’ asxunderi: V  ~
\n“F’ur1:her, even petij;io’i1″er’establishes
\nhis ownvership over \u00abme. .pe’t:ii.ioVi1 schedule<\/p>\n
remisesg,the’1l’_burder1~~.isLi”‘\u00a7o11’him to a ain<\/p>\n
establish7..~vv_t_hat*.._fl1:,e — respondent is in
\no(\u00e9(:z,1pationV .c’>’i:'{cl.1t’-*’~prct=nises  tenant under
\nhim. ‘In “that re.ga’rd, the petitioner has got<\/p>\n
,.\u00ab\u00a7p”1uai=ked  jndgment and decree passed in<\/p>\n
  O.:’3?i’$o.”5.441\/1993, wherein, the respondent<\/p>\n
 second defendant. On perusal
\n   decree. it is seen that; the
\na”plaintiil’\/petitioner herein filed a suit, seeking<\/p>\n
“V A e.vic”tion of the respondent and I}fl(){‘.l’1f3I’~il’1~laW’
\nV’ -. .ir()m the scheduie property and also for
\npayment, of damages claimiiig mesne profiits<\/p>\n
– gr”: _,..4<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
at the rate of  150% per mor1i:}’i from the-.___<\/p>\n
date of the suit. iii} deiix-*e1*y of suit <\/p>\n
property. F1,1riher._ it; is alleged iihai.;”\u00e9iii;eif-\u00bb..:f.’<\/p>\n
purchase of the property, the dVei’\u20ac\u00e9’3<1da.i.i'i'<\/p>\n
requested him to permit. t:ifie'i*i1"t'r3 (?()I'lIZ_i\u00ab!1_'i.i'L\u00a7._in  V'<\/p>\n
possession of the propefty  ai\u00b0~.r_e.i'1I_ of "<\/p>\n
RS.150\/- per month ..e~ii1d_ asVhe'isV reviei.\u20ac:ig1.\ufb01\/,i,Vt}V
\ndefendant. No.1. he u'"pe_i'm_iiteei*-.  to
\ncontinue to O{?C'&py t.hie""pi'einVi'se_s o1"ii"en"i of
\nRS150\/W per    it is
\nseen that.  :'\u00bbitiism_issed
\nobserv_ii_ig\u00a7'fh.eii. the   iiioi"maintairiable
\nand iih"e't.he purview of
\nt;h.ei—-.=.A<':'t,V\u00bb  the \u00a3'or'egoing
\nc_\u00a7'i__rCL1msVt2i1it2e;'Si  'fi.I1diI1g given in the<\/p>\n
s1;1i'i.,V V*vhiCh._ the same parties and<\/p>\n
VW11i1\u20ac.uE1'IjiS'J'J\u20acI"iIig isstie No.2. framed with<\/p>\n
 to 'i.i1e..–\u00abi<iatLire of possession of the<\/p>\n
A  _V plfoperiy-.of the responde11i.. thus, in View of<\/p>\n
 theW._:ii;\u00a7"\u00a7ii'hgs given holdi.rig that the<\/p>\n
 resp~<w_hjde1'ii.  itenam. in o<_:ei,1pat.ior1 of the<\/p>\n
psfemises. it has become (1onelus1've and also<\/p>\n
A  the respondent has not preferred any<\/p>\n
"appeal against such .21 finding given in the<\/p>\n
said suit, ii: is held tiiat. there exists jurai<\/p>\n
\/ ,. KL<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
L?\n<\/p>\n
relationship of landlord and tenant between<\/p>\n
him and the respondent.”\n<\/p>\n
Now as referred t.o supra. Sri Prakash has pr(3C\u00a71,i(fEijCEV”Ch\u20ac<\/p>\n
legal notice dated 14.08.1989 to C,’.()!T1J[\u20acYl\u00a7?1V”t’.’i'”i”‘~t’-l,.’f  <\/p>\n
law of the respondent herself had  a ‘*<\/p>\n
tenant under respondent Sri I3.S;’ML1’nirajuWlfiiiis rri;at.e1’i_a1,<\/p>\n
which was unavaiiabie \u00a5:)efoi’e_’h’t}1_e Co-urti”beIow is now
\nmade available in the”‘r.evisio:1Vip*ro(:e’e.di11gs. Admittediy.
\nthe revision pet.it.ior1er_di:’d-.no.t  ti’ie~-beriefits of either<\/p>\n
traversing it?_”or:;1je’ojeeiin\u00a7g ‘it. xiHe1’1ee’;”‘wit.hc)ut expressing<\/p>\n
  ‘I      ‘   ‘ . –  I
\nany opiniongon the merits or demerits oi the rival
\neolitentions raisvedlin regard [i.e.. with reference to the<\/p>\n
1egai_.notice”   the order of the Court<\/p>\n
“”-beI’e\\2{i’ iisvhereby se’tMasi_de and the matter  remanded to<\/p>\n
-._the. Ci(3.Li’2<fj,  to consider afresh and decide both the<\/p>\n
app1i(:ati~(3:1Sf~\u00bb'on merits after considering any other material<\/p>\n
it  be placed by the parties in accordance with law.<\/p>\n
 _  said exercise shaii be carried out within a period of<\/p>\n
 =  month from the date of receipt of this order.<\/p>\n
a.\n<\/p>\n
Acr<t()rdir1g}y. both the 1'evisio1'1 petit'i()11s 211j\u00e9.._;:i}}g)\\ved
\nand {"116 1m1{te1' is 1*ema1'}cied to the trial C()'i.i'rf–\u00abf;_e"sh<\/p>\n
disposal in accordanzre with law.\n<\/p>\n
No order  to Costs.\n<\/p>\n
 Sd\/_<\/p>\n
AI\/~ _\ufb02    <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010 Author: Aravind Kumar IN THE HIGH comm’ OF KAR_NA’I’A_KA AT BANGALORE DA’I’Ei7) THIS THE 15%} DAY OF FEBRUA\u00a7\u00a7’Kf A BEFORE THE HONBLE A\/Ir.JUS’FICE’AAAi\u00a7{AVi.NI)\u00ab H.R.R.P No.1\/2010 (V:\/w r\u00a7i%;\u00a32;’1″\u00a7:A:9 Nc3″f’2\/:2,\u00bbo3(j BETVVEEN: Smt.JayaIakshmi, W\/0 late Srinivas. Aged about 38 years, Residing atS.N0.l6\/2,*””= :” 1 : Door […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-51725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nJayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-16T07:51:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-16T07:51:59+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1904,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-16T07:51:59+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-16T07:51:59+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-16T07:51:59+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010"},"wordCount":1904,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010","name":"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-14T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-16T07:51:59+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/jayalakshmi-vs-b-s-muniraju-on-15-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Jayalakshmi vs B S Muniraju on 15 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=51725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/51725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=51725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=51725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=51725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}