{"id":52345,"date":"2010-10-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010"},"modified":"2015-12-05T08:54:31","modified_gmt":"2015-12-05T03:24:31","slug":"shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik … vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court<\/div>\n
Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik … vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Bench: S.A. Bobde, Mridula Bhatkar<\/div>\n
                                                   1\n\n              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY\n                        NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                              \n                            WRIT PETITION NO. 4839\/2010\n\n\n\n\n                                                                      \n    1.    Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik Samiti,\n          a Society registered under Societies\n          Registration Act, 1860, Tekdi Road,\n\n\n\n\n                                                                     \n          Gittikhadan, Katol Raod, Nagpur through\n          its Secretary Shri Govindlal Agrawal,\n          r\/o 80, Kotwal Nagar, Ring Road, Nagpur.\n\n\n\n\n                                                       \n    2.    Shri Ramdeobaba Kamla Nehru \n          Engineering College, through its Principal\n                                     \n          Shri Dr. V. S. Deshpande r\/o 120, Telecom\n          Nagar, Nagpur-22.                                              .....PETITIONERS\n                                    \n                               ...V E R S U S...\n\n    1.    The Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj\n          Nagpur University Nagpur, thr. its Registrar\n            \n         \n\n\n\n    2.    The Hon'ble Vice Chancellor,\n          Rashtrasant Tukdoji Maharaj Nagpur\n          University,Nagpur.                           ....RESPONDENTS\n\n\n\n\n\n    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n    Mr. M. G. Bhangde, Senior Advocate for petitioners.\n    Mr. B. G. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondents.\n    ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------\n\n\n\n\n\n                                CORAM:- S. A. BOBDE &\n                                            MRS. MRIDULA BHATKAR, JJ.\n<\/pre>\n
                                DATE    :-\n                                            \n                                            OCTOBER 7\n                                                      , 2010\n                                                            \n\n\n\n\n                                                                      ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 16:31:00 :::<\/span>\n                                              2<\/span>\n\n    ORAL JUDGMENT (Per:- S. A. Bobde, J.)\n\n\n\n\n                                                                                      \n    1.              Rule.     Rule   returnable   forthwith.     Heard   finally   by \n\n\n\n\n                                                              \n    consent of the parties.\n\n\n\n\n                                                             \n<\/pre>\n
    2.              The petitioners have approached this Court for direction <\/p>\n
    to   respondent   no.2-Vice   Chancellor,   Rashtrasant   Tukdoji   Maharaj <\/p>\n
    Nagpur University, Nagpur, to exercise the emergency powers under <\/p>\n
    Section   14   (7)   and   (8)   of   the  Maharashtra   Universities   Act,   1994 <\/p>\n
    (hereinafter   referred   to   as   the   “Act”)   and   grant   approval   to   the <\/p>\n
    syllabus   for   the   course   of  M.   Tech   (Power   Electronics   and   Power  <\/p>\n
    Systems) in Electrical Engineering and further First Time Affiliation for <\/p>\n
    academic   year   2010-11.     The   petitioner   is   a   reputed   college   of <\/p>\n
    Engineering affiliated to the Nagpur University.  There is no course of <\/p>\n
    M.   Tech.   (Power   Electronics   and   Power   Systems)   in   Electrical <\/p>\n
    Engineering in the Nagpur University. The petitioner, therefore, made <\/p>\n
    a   proposal   to   the   Nagpur   University   for   the   introduction   of   the <\/p>\n
    Course.  However, it seems that the proposal could not go through the <\/p>\n
    entire procedure contemplated by the Act for its commencement and <\/p>\n
                                                              ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:31:00 :::<\/span>
\n                                               3<\/span><\/p>\n
    has only gone past the Board of Studies under Section 38 of the Act <\/p>\n
    and not beyond.   Thus, the Board of Studies for the University has <\/p>\n
    approved the syllabus in the said course.  After approval by the Board <\/p>\n
    of Studies, in ordinary course, the proposal along with the syllabus <\/p>\n
    would have gone to the Faculty, Engineering and Technology under <\/p>\n
    Section 34 of the Act and, thereafter, to the Academic Council under <\/p>\n
    Section 30 of the Act.   Thereafter, it would have been placed before <\/p>\n
    the   Management   Council.     However,   admittedly,   these   last   three <\/p>\n
    stages   could   not   be   completed   because   of   cessation   of  the   term   of <\/p>\n
    those bodies under the provisions of the Act.  The bodies are not yet <\/p>\n
    constituted and we are informed that they would be constituted only <\/p>\n
    by the end of December-2010.\n<\/p>\n
    3.               Mr.   Bhangde,   the   learned   counsel   for   the   petitioners, <\/p>\n
    submitted that in these circumstances, it was incumbent on the Vice <\/p>\n
    Chancellor to exercise  powers under Section  14 (7) and (8) of the <\/p>\n
    Act.  According to the learned counsel, there is, in fact, an emergency <\/p>\n
    in   the   sense   that   the   newly   proposed   course,   ought   to   have <\/p>\n
                                                               ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:31:00 :::<\/span>
\n                                               4<\/span><\/p>\n
    commenced in July but it could not because the term of the bodies, <\/p>\n
    which were to approve  the syllabus for commencing of the course, <\/p>\n
    came to an end.  Section 14 (7) and (8) of the Act read as follows:-\n<\/p>\n
         “14. Powers and Duties of Vice-Chancellor.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         (1) …..\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         (2) …..\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         (3) …..\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         (4) …..\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         (6) …..\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
         (7) If there are reasonable grounds for the vice-Chancellor  <\/p>\n
         to   believe   that   there   is   an   emergency   which   requires
\n         immediate action to be taken, he shall take such action, as
\n         he thinks  necessary, and shall at the earliest opportunity,  <\/p>\n
         report in writing the grounds for his belief that there was an <\/p>\n
         emergency, and the action taken by him, to such authority
\n         or body as would, in the ordinary course, have dealt with  <\/p>\n
         the matter.  In the event of a difference arising between the
\n         Vice-Chancellor and authority or body whether there was in
\n         fact   an   emergency,   or   on   the   action   taken   (where   such  <\/p>\n
         action   does   not   affect   any   person   in   the   service   of   the
\n         University), or on both, the matter shall be referred to the
\n         Chancellor whose decision shall be final:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
               Provided that, where any such action taken by the Vice  <\/p>\n
                                                                ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:31:00 :::<\/span>
\n                                                5<\/span><\/p>\n
           Chancellor affects any person in the service of the university,  <\/p>\n
           such   person   shall  be   entitled  to  prefer,   within   thirty  days
\n           from the date on   which he  receives  notice  of  such  action,  <\/p>\n
           appeal to the management Council.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
           (8) Where  any  matter is  required  to  be  regulated  by the  <\/p>\n
           Statutes,   Ordinances   or   Regulations,   but   no   Statutes,
\n           Ordinances or Regulations are made in that behalf the Vice-
\n           Chancellor   may,   for   the   time   being,   regulate   matter   by  <\/p>\n
           issuing such directions as he thinks necessary, and shall, at  <\/p>\n
           the   earliest   opportunity   thereafter,   place   them   before   the
\n           Managements Council or other authority or body concerned  <\/p>\n
           for approval.   He may, at the same time, place before such
\n           authority or body for consideration the draft of the Statutes,
\n           Ordinances or Regulations, as the case may be, required to  <\/p>\n
           be made in that behalf.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                     The   above   provisions   clearly   confer   on   the   Vice <\/p>\n
    Chancellor,   powers   to   take   action   in   an   emergency.     Whether   an <\/p>\n
    emergency exists or not is a matter to be decided by Vice Chancellor <\/p>\n
    alone   or   by   the   Chancellor,   in   case   of   a   difference   on   that   issue <\/p>\n
    between   him   and   a   body.   In   normal   circumstances,   the <\/p>\n
    commencement   of   one   course   in   one   college   may   not   have   been <\/p>\n
    considered to be an emergency but the Vice Chancellor has himself in <\/p>\n
                                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:31:01 :::<\/span>
\n                                                6<\/span><\/p>\n
    exercise of powers conferred  by Section 14 (7) and (8) granted First <\/p>\n
    Time Affiliation of same course to the petitioner College itself and we <\/p>\n
    are told to other colleges also.  Thus, it appears that the circumstance <\/p>\n
    of commencing of a course has been considered to be emergency for <\/p>\n
    the Vice Chancellor.  Indeed, it is not the contention on behalf of the <\/p>\n
    Vice Chancellor before us that   there is no emergency, therefore, he <\/p>\n
    has declined to exercise powers to approve the syllabus for the course <\/p>\n
    in question.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
    4.               Mr.   Kulkarni,   the   learned   counsel   for   the   Vice <\/p>\n
    Chancellor, submitted that the only reason why Vice Chancellor has <\/p>\n
    not   exercised   powers   under   Section   14   (7)   and   (8)   of   the   Act,   to <\/p>\n
    consider whether the approval should be granted for commencement <\/p>\n
    of the new course in M. Tech (Power Electronics and Power Systems) <\/p>\n
    in Electrical Engineering, is not that there is no emergency but grant <\/p>\n
    of such approval for a new course requires amendment of Ordinance <\/p>\n
    and that he has no power to amend an Ordinance.  According to the <\/p>\n
    learned   counsel,   Ordinance   9,   which   is   styled   as  “An   ordinance   to <\/p>\n
                                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:31:01 :::<\/span>
\n                                                 7<\/span><\/p>\n
    provide   for   the   examination   leading   to   the   degree   of   Master   of  <\/p>\n
    Technology (Full Time) in the faculty of Engineering and Technology”, <\/p>\n
    contains a list of courses, which a college may offer to the students for <\/p>\n
    a   degree   in   M.   Tech.     That   list   in   Ordinance   9   does   not   have   the <\/p>\n
    subject in question, which is a totally new course.   It will, therefore, <\/p>\n
    be   necessary   to   amend   the   Ordinance   to   introduce   this   Course.\n<\/p>\n
    According to the learned counsel, a scheme of examination for this <\/p>\n
    course   is   also   not   in   existence   and   such   a   scheme   can   only   be <\/p>\n
    approved and finalised by same procedure referred to earlier.    The <\/p>\n
    learned   counsel   contended   that   since   the   Vice   Chancellor   is   of   the <\/p>\n
    view that dealing with the matter is governed by the Act and since it <\/p>\n
    involves the amendment of Ordinance, he has not exercised the said <\/p>\n
    powers.  We find from a plain reading of sub sections (7) and (8) that <\/p>\n
    power has been conferred on the Vice Chancellor expressly to deal <\/p>\n
    with   matters,   which   are   regulated   by   Statutes,   Ordinances   or <\/p>\n
    regulations   vide   Sub   Section   (8)   where   no  Statutes,   Ordinances   or <\/p>\n
    Regulations are made in that behalf.  Here is a case where there is no <\/p>\n
    absence of an Ordinance but the existing Ordinance does not include <\/p>\n
                                                                   ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:31:01 :::<\/span>
\n                                                8<\/span><\/p>\n
    and regulate the course in question.  It is not disputed that the entire <\/p>\n
    subject matter of granting permission to introduce a new course and <\/p>\n
    laying   down   the   scheme   for   examination   is   a   matter   governed   by <\/p>\n
    Ordinances,   for   which   specific   power   has   been   conferred   on   the <\/p>\n
    bodies referred to earlier in the regular course.  In the circumstances, <\/p>\n
    we are of the view that the matter of introduction of new course and <\/p>\n
    the scheme of its examination being a matter within the perview of <\/p>\n
    the Ordinance making power of various bodies of the University is a <\/p>\n
    matter, which can be dealt with by Vice Chancellor in exercise of his <\/p>\n
    powers under Sub Section (8) of Section 14 of the Act.\n<\/p>\n
    5.               In the circumstances, we hold that the Vice Chancellor <\/p>\n
    has the necessary powers to act under Sub Section (8) of Section 14 <\/p>\n
    of  the Act in the matter of introducing a new course by approving a <\/p>\n
    syllabus of new course and scheme of examination, particularly in this <\/p>\n
    case  since   the syllabus   has  already   been approved  by the  Board  of <\/p>\n
    Studies   on   27.07.2010.     We   make   it   clear   that   our   finding   is   not <\/p>\n
    intended   to   operate   as   a   direction   to   the   Vice   Chancellor   to <\/p>\n
                                                                ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:31:01 :::<\/span>
\n                                                9<\/span><\/p>\n
    mandatorily exercise his powers in the present case but that the Vice <\/p>\n
    Chancellor   is   free   to   exercise   the   powers   in   case,   he   considers   it <\/p>\n
    necessary as contemplated by law.\n<\/p>\n
    6.               At this juncture, it would be appropriate to consider a <\/p>\n
    contention raised by Shri Bhangde, learned counsel for the petitioner, <\/p>\n
    that Section 14 (7) and (8) confer on the Vice Chancellor a power <\/p>\n
    coupled   with   a   duty   to   exercise   it.     The   submission   cannot   be <\/p>\n
    accepted.  The provisions empower a Vice Chancellor to deal with an <\/p>\n
    emergency.  He must decide both, whether there is an emergency and <\/p>\n
    whether he should take action.  In fact, the section confers the power <\/p>\n
    to act where there are reasonable grounds to believe that there is an <\/p>\n
    emergency   which   requires   immediate   action   to   be   taken.     The <\/p>\n
    provisions   confer   a   power   to   be   exercised   with   due   care   and <\/p>\n
    circumspection.     There   is   a   wide   latitude   conferred   on   the   Vice-\n<\/p>\n
    Chancellor.  He may or may not reach the conclusion that there is an <\/p>\n
    emergency or that he should take action in his best judgment.  In The <\/p>\n
    Official Liquidator ..vs.. Dharti Dhan (P) Ltd.; AIR 1977 Supreme <\/p>\n
                                                                 ::: Downloaded on – 09\/06\/2013 16:31:01 :::<\/span>
\n                                                10<\/span><\/p>\n
    Court 740, the Supreme Court observed as follows:-\n<\/p>\n
             “If the conditions in which the power is to be exercised in
\n             particular cases are also specified by a statute then, on the  <\/p>\n
             fulfillment of those conditions, the power conferred becomes
\n             annexed with a duty to exercise it in that manner…”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                     Section 14 (7) and (8) do not specify that when certain <\/p>\n
    conditions exist in a particular case, the Vice Chancellor must treat it <\/p>\n
    as an emergency and take particular action.   Nor do the provisions <\/p>\n
    indicate that power is invested in aid of enforcement of a right public <\/p>\n
    or   private   of   a   citizen   vide  L.   Hirday   Narain   ..vs..   Income-Tax <\/p>\n
    Officer, Bareilly, AIR 1971 Supreme Court 33.   Section 14 (7) and <\/p>\n
    (8)   of   the   Act,   therefore,   do   not   confer   on   the   Vice   Chancellor   a <\/p>\n
    power coupled with a duty to exercise it.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                     With these observations, the writ petition is dismissed.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
    Rule accordingly.  No order as to costs.\n<\/p>\n
                             JUDGE                                  JUDGE\n\n\n\n    kahale\n\n\n\n\n                                                                 ::: Downloaded on - 09\/06\/2013 16:31:01 :::<\/span>\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Bombay High Court Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik … vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010 Bench: S.A. Bobde, Mridula Bhatkar 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 4839\/2010 1. Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik Samiti, a Society registered under Societies Registration Act, 1860, Tekdi Road, Gittikhadan, Katol Raod, Nagpur through […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[11,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52345","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-bombay-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nShri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik ... vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik ... vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-05T03:24:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik … vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-05T03:24:31+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1660,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Bombay High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik ... vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-05T03:24:31+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik … vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik ... vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik ... vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-05T03:24:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik … vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-05T03:24:31+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010"},"wordCount":1660,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Bombay High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010","name":"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik ... vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-05T03:24:31+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-ramdeobaba-sarvajanik-vs-unknown-on-7-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri Ramdeobaba Sarvajanik … vs Unknown on 7 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52345","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52345"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52345\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52345"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52345"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52345"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}