{"id":52476,"date":"2008-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008"},"modified":"2019-01-17T00:17:33","modified_gmt":"2019-01-16T18:47:33","slug":"cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008","title":{"rendered":"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
as: THE HIGH Comm' 0}? KARNATAJ\u00a3A_AT Ism\u00e9\ufb01mks   \n\nDATED THIS THE 13th mar OF:'~H0'\u00a7E\u00a7\u00a74BER\"\ufb028' \n\nBEF(3f\u00a71?\u00a7.V.. A %    \nTHE HOWBLE MR.  as Bomjnm.\n\nWRYI' PE?I'FTIO \u00a7: sci, \n8610\/2007(LTEI?)_LTAL-- \n\nBETWEEN:\n\nW.P.NO.325t\u00a7\/2C_1')?53:.\u00e9\u00bb..f;7__ \"  j   \n\n1 CAUVERY h\"_EEF<'AVA.Ri"~N}GAMA LIMITED\nREPRESENTED-\u00bbBY'\u00bbTITS._  '\n\u00a3viANAGING 'i3IREjCI'0R_," ~ \u00ab. \n4TH FLOOR COFFEE BGARD BWLDING,\nNo.1, DR. AM.I3ED}{AR"'VEEI)}}!\n\n\u00a2 .BAi's.'.GALOR \n\nV 'THE ASSISTAIWF EXECUTIVE ENGINEER\n.  1.Nc,~,_3',~%R;aHABIL:TAT10N SUB mv'1sI<3N,_\n  MaAR.'RA{mV:_Av s'm*1v.,;\n\nA Jami') :\"\n\n~  _ - $1,;  NAGARAJ\n*  ;s2_s \u00a5I::A;2:s,\n\"  JAVALGI, ARASIKER ETIAUK\n\n HASSAN axsmxcr 573 is\n\n RESF'ONDEN'I'\n\n.4\n6\n\n\n\n(By 811' : V S NAIK. MDV. 1\n\n'ms w.P. FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 2279? me % ~ , \nC0Ns*I*mmoN OF {mm PRAYING TQ...cALL;r\u00ab'0R\u00bbI12Ds\u00ab-V '\nPERTAINING TO THE AWARD D1'. 5.13.2006 ..PAss,Ei>_\";3?fmE \nLABOUR COURT. CHMAMAGALUR IN-._LI}'.'R;..HO.'?4\/~.1996\"VID\u00a7Z\u00a7:; \n\nANX--C.\nW.?.NO.8610\/2007\n\nSR1 J s NAGAI-?AJU'   \nSON OF' SRl.J.G. SIDDAPFA'3HE'I;\"IY .\nAGEI} ABOUT 47 YEARS  ~ _   1\nR\/AT PETEBEEDI, JAVACAL T  \" *\nARASIKERE 'l'ALUK,_   _ \nDIST' HASSAN - :  ' \n\n i'*'E'T'I'i'IONER\n\n(By Sri  S1~m:':: & \u00a7$i;gi~.Uui,\u00a7x N :;itjLKARN1,ADv., )\nAND: 1 & M .' _  _   V. .\n1 CAUVERY :\u00abIEf;RA\\.%a\"&1::_'rJzNGAMA LTD\nera FLOGR. COFFEE BQARD BUILDING\n\n...a:o;1=. DR.AIvI3EDK\u00a3;sR VEEDH!\n-  ?{\"+;Ai\u00a7:<.?zALQRE:-0 1" """ "\n\n   "'ifHE};C\u00e9S;*If"\u00a7;;<EcU*:'IvE ENGINEER Eli\n\n RE'?-iE&E%_I1.i.TATION SUB DIVISION\n. 'RAILWAY STATION\n'~._HASSANF'\n  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
1* V’ *  *\u00bbi;B3’*L’3.(;1t :  ‘SHWETHA ANAND. ADv., 3<\/p>\n
  ‘THIS W.R FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF’ THE<\/p>\n
  ‘”CC,3NS”f’iTU'{‘ION OF’ INDIA PRAYING T0 QUASH THE AWARD
\n_  PA-SSE9 BY THE LABOUR COURT, CHIKKAMAGALUR, IN 3.0.,
\n“.REF’.NO.?4\/1996 IZY1′. 6.3.2006, THE CERTEFIED COPY OF’ IS<\/p>\n
” PRODUCED HEREWITH AS ANX-A, TO THE EXTENT THE<\/p>\n
PETITIONER {S AGGRIEVED<\/p>\n
{pl<\/p>\n
These: Writ Pcatitions ooming  he\u00e9ii\ufb01gii Vc’_l:ay,’:_V u u<\/p>\n
the Court made the following : I  T<\/p>\n
The employer has  i11*:vtv”1i1\u00a23s.ti;:)11–
\n6.3.2006 passed in H3}? :”1~{;\u00bb.74,!’\u00a392=\u00a7E$; \ufb02a’s”‘t1ae :Labour
\nCourt gaming I’ci11:s3t1’\u00a2”1’4’ii1=:V1.:_1’ue1:a”t-v–~%’iV:=.:ir  party in
\n    has been
\nquestioned  : \ufb02}’I:_W0rkn1an insofar as<\/p>\n
the dcnia\ufb01 caf    t<\/p>\n
2.   arrayed in di\ufb01lexcnt ranks in<\/p>\n
  would be Icfcnrwd to in the rank<\/p>\n
V.  a\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01a\ufb02 befom the Labour Court for the purpesc of<\/p>\n
 ‘ty.\n<\/p>\n
‘ ”  I  ‘3, The first party had raised a dispute contending that<\/p>\n
  were dispensed with by thc respondents wi\ufb02zxout<\/p>\n
‘  ‘  A\u00bb ” of the provisions of the ixziciustrial Disputes Act<\/p>\n
and the same was It-zfermd to the Labour Ckzsurt at<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
Chiclcrnagalur in ID}? No.74\/1996. The   <\/p>\n
first party was that he was wor1:ing:v’.\u00e9u; \u00e9i    <\/p>\n
second party from 26.2.1986 onwmtis,  ‘It.was. aJ1\u00a2fge(i <\/p>\n
a\ufb02zr 25.4.1937 his
\ncomplying the pmvisicixgg   intittsuiai
\nDisputes Act      In the said
\ndisputn, the:   \ufb01mt party is
\nnot entitled t;;’ti$’\u00a2._  ;;\u00bb;4:.:1 _’m  Court, after
\nnoticing the  s  it, had come to the
\nmnciusi\u00e9g  worked \ufb01r more than 240<\/p>\n
days and :53,’ ‘smki.  ” ticm canncat be s11stamcd’<\/p>\n
 _   provisions of the Act and in that<\/p>\n
 _ilT1\u00a5Z’Al\ufb02iE4\u00a7A!:’.’!”l3′.\u20ac_’I’c\u00a3I\u00a7 reinstattmtent of the first party to the<\/p>\n
5:2″ ‘@ :a1A   Labour Court has however darned’<\/p>\n
V _ back\ufb01ragc\ufb01  continuity of scnwes’ .<\/p>\n
4. in this regard, the peruse} of the award passed by<\/p>\n
\u00abEh: Labour Court wcmm indicate that the Labour Cou:rt has<\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
noticed’ the evidence tendered on behalf of the m\u00a7n”‘a’ \u00ab .35′ _<\/p>\n
through MWs.1 and 2 and aim the u “~ <\/p>\n
behalf of the \ufb01mt party as ww.1. Th;  T<\/p>\n
the management at Ex:hs.M1 :13. on <\/p>\n
first party at Ex.W.1 am: also notn\ufb01  _<\/p>\n
5. A further     ilidicatc that
\nthe Labour has  V<Vt:\\1':\u20ac.'.*\u00a3:;!VViV".".I2I-Cit? which was<\/p>\n
availabl\u00e9g befoxfi  cdrme to the conclusion on<\/p>\n
noticing   for which he was empioyed<\/p>\n
 from" year 1936' :?has come to the oonciusian that he<\/p>\n
  .f\u00a7i1=-..mere than 24-0 days. Insofar as thc \ufb01nding<\/p>\n
 Court with mgaxd to this aspect of<\/p>\n
 _ the 1:i:t.attc_j1*  naming to the oanclusion that the \ufb01mt party<\/p>\n
_. , 4'  the, conditions of Scctioza 258 and thcm\ufb01rm the<\/p>\n
  as oontcmplatsw under section 25?' should have<\/p>\n
  f  camprzzed with is in accxmrianoe with law and the same<\/p>\n
" <*:annot be said to be erroneous.<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
6. Having smtccl go, the questkgn <\/p>\n
to the nature of relief which is .12)-l)_c  In}%ih;’;\u00a7;\u00a7ga\u00a7:d%;”<\/p>\n
the contentions of the second    t1 1}e delay
\nin raising the dispute   Court
\nand after noticing’ the   the Hoxfblc
\nSupreme Court  Athat only on that
\nbasis, the  the relief would
\nhave to     of the Labour Court is
\nalso in   therefore suswnable. In<\/p>\n
any evmt, cvi\u00e9n utho13ghAth\u00e9”‘\u00e9;eoond party had contended that<\/p>\n
     9 years, what requires to be<\/p>\n
 -‘the pzeseent case, it was a mfcmnce made<\/p>\n
to  and if the date on which the dispute was<\/p>\n
   the authorities is (xmsidemd, the delay would<\/p>\n
  as stated. Though the dispute was raised at an<\/p>\n
 paint of \ufb01mc, some time had cxapsed by the (‘mac the<\/p>\n
.4 hm decided he mibr the mataer an the Labour<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
Court. Thcrcfoxt, even on this aspect the   _A  <\/p>\n
juati\ufb01ed.<\/p>\n
\n\n7. However, the onlys'   far \n\naztonaideration in this petition is    'iiilltixaatc\nrelief which has been    At the\nca-utset, it mquirea to  of this\nnature, where    the conclusion\nthat the    wager and in that\nview,    acme t9 the conclusion\n<\/pre>\n
that he Vvisv1\u00e9a\ufb01ug\u00a7*1′.g\u00a7%.\u00a7;e2as\u00bb:\u00e9tcment in that capacity, the<\/p>\n
{about  also : in not granizhg the bene\ufb01t of<\/p>\n
 ”  backwages and to the saxd’ extcnt,<\/p>\n
 \ufb01lgcd by the \ufb01rst party would have to an.<\/p>\n
 ., AA   as the xeizzsmhsracnt granted by the Labour<\/p>\n
 has been assailed by the second wty<\/p>\n
“-.J;:”a’aT11agc:u1c11t, it is to be ncticad that the ultimate<\/p>\n
‘ U reinstatement is 1:0 the post of daily wager. In this mgard, no<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
f’<\/p>\n
detaiiwd discussion is nccessazy since this aspgapfis izdmom’ ”  <\/p>\n
res intcga inasmuch as the Hon’b}4;\u00e9;  <\/p>\n
as this Cacurt has neticod the similar v\u00e9ittiia\ufb02onsjbigd.   ‘V<\/p>\n
that in a mattscr where thcxiy.  oi’ the
\npr0vi51on’ s of Section      he of
\nreinstatcment but the sam’  by payment of<\/p>\n
compensation tp  2   V<\/p>\n
9.:”: In–.   to the quantum of<\/p>\n
oompcnsafrkm ta}   ‘there are varied views which<\/p>\n
 have” ~  oofxsider this aspect of the mattcr, the<\/p>\n
  r1   the \ufb01at party has relied on a decision<\/p>\n
_  Bench of this Ccmrt in w.A<\/p>\n
 _Ne.569\/G3’  the case of K.M..SOMASI-IEKARAIAH vs.<\/p>\n
 EXEQUTi’JE ENGINEER (13.13. (LIN 21.3.2903). The zeanmd<\/p>\n
 ,\u00e9<3\u00a7iI1–s:5::i wou\ufb01 contend that the facts mzising in the said case<\/p>\n
  warm; mzlar" ' to the \ufb01acts in the present case. As such the<\/p>\n
" c<:s:mpensaiian awmvdad in the said case Imuires to be<\/p>\n
\u00abE<\/p>\n
awarded in the present case as Wei}. <\/p>\n
ocwuusel far the 5%} party management. wouitgi  H<\/p>\n
that in fact the learned Single qadge. of f V'<\/p>\n
W.P.No.96'?2\/0'7 disposed of on 25.o'i4e2c}:i3 <\/p>\n
compensation of Rs.50,()OO\/-. V\u00bb  n\ufb01ifiejng of " V<\/p>\n
the matter, it is seen  that _ jLld.g:I I1\u20ac31tV_i\u00a7Vh\u20acI'Ci1l
\nRs.50,0{)O\/~ was  153*'  Judge was
\ncalled in quesu'o;a_Ai.-an fhe;sa"W1d" I'\\}.I;;ie:.'gappea1_   .%:\u00a7\u00a2a\u00a7.'569;os. This
\ncam-t   matter relied on a
\njudgzrne\ufb01t of  Court in the case of<\/p>\n
SEETHARAu1\\i!._.. MsI{V)VV'   MOTILAL NEHRU FARMERS<\/p>\n
   II LLJ 688) to come to the<\/p>\n
 the mmpcnsa\ufb01on would be in a sum of<\/p>\n
 \ufb01eugh the said compensation was awarded<\/p>\n
V — thert\u00e9in, is to be noticed is as to whether in the pmscnt<\/p>\n
4_ thv\u00e9' cast would admit of sixnilar circumstances to<\/p>\n
 similar compensation. The said case before the<\/p>\n
VT  " \ufb01i\ufb01sbn Bench was the case of Civil Enginetar who was<\/p>\n
" working as a daily wamr, who was aged about 40 years. In<\/p>\n
2<\/span><\/p>\n
the said case also, a zxmiacntion with regard to  .<\/p>\n
delay in raising the dispute was  In  ” = ‘V<\/p>\n
fht: facts thczcin, in the present   ting.\u00bb “‘{-\u00a7ag6r:;_*A<\/p>\n
was m Enginaering Graduate
\nyears when the dispute was   Ciourt.
\nin mt, the dciay in   the
\ndelay which has t\ufb01nothcr aspect<\/p>\n
of the mattcr   that in a case of<\/p>\n
this natum  cznginecrizng graduate
\nand  “years at this juncture, the<\/p>\n
possibility   in government would he<\/p>\n
 ,    to\u00bb depend on private employment.<\/p>\n
AV’:’VKc\u00a7f:’p\u00e911g aspects ‘m view, the award passed by the<\/p>\n
   as grmting the zeinstaiemcnt would<\/p>\n
V — havettio  to held that in lieu of I\ufb02mstatnment, the<\/p>\n
” K   ‘   management would pay compensation of<\/p>\n
‘.”A’*_.i’i”\u00e9..\ufb011′;U(},OOO\/- to the \ufb01tst party within a period of mm<\/p>\n
Vt  “motlths \ufb01mn the date at’ furnishing a certi\ufb01ed” copy of tlfm<\/p>\n
‘ ” order.\n<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
‘ru<\/p>\n
With the above modi\ufb01cation, both the pcuuons__ si\u00a2apc\u00a3V*.T.jj’ <\/p>\n
disposed of. No order as 13:) costs. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna as: THE HIGH Comm’ 0}? KARNATAJ\u00a3A_AT Ism\u00e9\ufb01mks DATED THIS THE 13th mar OF:’~H0’\u00a7E\u00a7\u00a74BER”\ufb028′ BEF(3f\u00a71?\u00a7.V.. A % THE HOWBLE MR. as Bomjnm. WRYI’ PE?I’FTIO \u00a7: sci, 8610\/2007(LTEI?)_LTAL– BETWEEN: W.P.NO.325t\u00a7\/2C_1′)?53:.\u00e9\u00bb..f;7__ ” j 1 CAUVERY h”_EEF<'AVA.Ri"~N}GAMA LIMITED REPRESENTED-\u00bbBY'\u00bbTITS._ ' \u00a3viANAGING 'i3IREjCI'0R_," […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nCauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-01-16T18:47:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"8 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-16T18:47:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1203,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008\",\"name\":\"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-01-16T18:47:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-01-16T18:47:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"8 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008","datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-16T18:47:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008"},"wordCount":1203,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008","name":"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-01-16T18:47:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/cauvery-neeravari-nigama-limited-vs-j-s-nagaraj-on-18-november-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Cauvery Neeravari Nigama Limited vs J S Nagaraj on 18 November, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52476"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52476\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}