{"id":52662,"date":"2008-03-14T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-13T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008"},"modified":"2019-04-06T10:02:33","modified_gmt":"2019-04-06T04:32:33","slug":"b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: H.Billappa<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,BAN{BALOF_{_E\n\nmares 'rs-us THE 14\"' DAY or mncu 20433;\n\nBEFORE  \n\nme HOBi'B%.\u00a3 MRJUSTICE      A\n\n    \n\n     \n\n    \n\n    \n\n'__ 1.' ..  [ ... .;'3\u00a2  \".3 .  \n\nasaumn msr AP9EALFjkg~;.773n-% T   \nRssugg nag: gggg uQ .:*.'zg;1g%  \u00a7   \n\nsm 3. NARAYANASWAMY L '        k\n\nSIG LATE BHIMANNA       L %\n\nAGEDMAJOR    :   \n\nR\/OMALURPOST  k _  F  % \n\nSIDLAGHATTA TAL;Ui{\"      \n\nKOLAR.  q  '  \n\n   \n\n-'o\n\n \n\nsm. GOViNDAMMA~ V  \nWiQ.D.GOV\u00a5_NDARAJ \" ~ V\n  '''' \nOCC:H\ufb01WOR\u00a7{. _ \n\nRIO MALuR~P0sT,%   \nSIDLACBHATTA \"~E'ALU2!S\"E'R!CT.'   1: \n Rssvaesstxsratamf HER P.A. HOLDER.\n  % *5 NARAYANASWAMY SIG BHIMANNA\nM \"'R!A.JOR,.ARl0 MALUR POST,\n1 _  c 3:oLAGHA'rIA TALUK\n  .. APPELLANT\n\n % tsv\u00e9mari ANUPAMA HEGDE ma APPELLANTS).\n\n\u00a21\/ .\n\n \n\n\n\n '*4. VR.!:\u00a3JANNA..\n\nAND\n\n1. saw suamwmva\nszo THIMMAIAH   % A\n132. NEW THIPPASANDRA  \nJEEVANBHIMANAGAR\n\nBANGALORE-75.\n\n2. MARAMMA TEMPLE\n\nour) THIPPASANDRA, X\n\nBANGALORE.    % A %\nREPRESENTEDBYSRL        \nRAJANNA.SlOPATEL PRLLRPPA7' :   \nSKSNED AS secF:5TARv-GFIHE  % t \ncomwmee  1.4'-{E MA_NA__GE'MENTg_''- '. _ \nNO.120,   \nJeEvAN3HsM;w.AGA:=i J   1  \nBANGALOREJS: \n\n3. KR:sHNAPi>AA%v%k% 'A   \n\nS10 ABB_A!APF'A_ A     L\nN0.1-48.  irnrppnsnu _ % % VILLAGE\nJEEVANBHiM_ANAGAR;_ J \nsANr:ALoRE+::5.  %\n\n \u00bbSi0_PATEL PILLAPPA\n' -_A<.'\u00a7E[}=45}.'r'RS\n\nN0.--120. cm WPPASANDRA VILLAGE.\nJEEVANBHIMANAGAR\nBAN~1'.'-3At-.OR\ufb01-?5. .. RESPONUENTS\n~ :. COMMON IN BOTH\nTHE APPEALS.\n\n  A %  533' aim T , sa. couusea. FOR\n%   sac osaavaam yon cm).\n\nTHESE REGULAR FIRST APPEALS ARE FILED UIS. 96\n\n OF CFC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DEGREE DT. 31.8.99\n\nPASSED IN O.S.NO.10181\/1990 AND 1018211990 BY THE XXVIII\nADDL. CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE.\n\n((1\/..\n\n\n\ntempie premises which bears I-LA. Sanitary Board Ka\ufb021a[':No.1f1\n\nincludes Kaiyani. The defendant Nc.4 is the 'cf\n\nMaramma Temple Committee. The third and the   _ H V' \n\nwere Secretary and President ti}!    \n\nobtained the buifding permission by ooyarooaoo; \n\nknow about that, the closer of\ufb01oerdd   5: mo"\n\nlicence. The plain\ufb01\ufb01s cha;!Ie%;1$*:d:sfaid"0gder. o'o*fom at-its Court in\nthe writ proceedings.  and\n145611985 for iogoooaon.   snjunoooo\ncame to be   pre\ufb01erred MFAs in\nM.F.A.N9.;3;35{i:\u00a7?.\u00a7'v_  which uitimately\ncame  oo   of the plaintiffs are barred by\nresjudicdta.Va\u00a5s in mo ooooooooo. moo by the plasma. it has been\nheld  oogoo in possession of the suit schedule\n\n  lt"is\u00e9Aaiso 'tonten\ufb02 %%%%%  ooo. the court fee paid is not suf\ufb01cient\n\n   properly valued. It Is also ccantended. \ufb02ue\n\ns1:::o do:o by limitation. The \ufb01tie of the plaintiffs in Impwt of\n\n suii  promrty has been disputed in the year 1982 itseif.\n\n% "?f1:_1efandants had ohanongod the \ufb01tie of the plaintiffs in the\n\n   oojoouoos mod before the HA. Sanitary Board. The plaintiffs am\n\n% ddasoo suits in o.s.No.1455n9as and 145611985 for injunction and in\n\nV\n\n \n\n\n\n to"a1;=.\u00a2t} 'i\ufb01f\u00e9ma number was 49. The entire viuage\n   suit scheduie property and the defendants\n\n' V 2.'j1;\u00a7$f\u20ac..:}:p\u00e9;\u00a7eL1edVV"\ufb011eir title by adverse possmion. it is also\n   the suits brought in the present form are not\n     %kmaiz\u00a7ia\u00e9nab:e. it is thetefote they have prayed for dismissal of the\n\nthe said suits me ti\ufb02e was denied. The plaintiffs ough\ufb01b  _\nEhe suit for mlaration within \ufb02wree years from   --\u00ab .  \ntheit titie. The present suits \ufb02ied  \n\u00a5earsarebarret3bVIimitation_   ' '-- ~. .   \nIn \ufb02ue year 1927. the   was\nfenced and renovated by   erected a\nShila Shasana in   renovated the\nKalvani. at his   in the year\n1963   The defendants conduct\nannual Thapp<:\u00bb:\u00a7a\u00a7a  ifaiv\u00e9asures no ft x 115 n.\nMaramma   and it comprises of\nbuilt area of 42 ft  mhrl  \ufb01ne temple atea measurm\n25'?! :\u00ab:..29}\u00b0ar2a:;9-f.:tlIae xro'-.~I1'n;iV:1ir:';}":3rea is a lung space. Formerly\n ." Prior to that. the Katha number was 18.\n\nh\/%%\n\n \n\n\n\n6. The trial court has framed the     ~ .'\nISSUES FRAMED IN 0.\u00a7_J.j"O\u00a781lt\u00a7{~)... ; [3     % ~ A\n\n1) whether the plaintiff proves thathe  the"mt}nt-if er'  %\n\nschedule property by virtue at the seteteatee3+\u00a7-1969? % A\n\n2) Whether the plaintiff tunheejetevee 'that"t!te  sh tewrut\n\npossession of the suitzscheduieh  2 _\n\n3) Whether the plainti\ufb01 if\ufb02urthafr  x'!t.r'at the defendants\ninterfered un[awfui!yAA.En,:'?i\u00a7S     ehd enjoyment of\nthe suit sch\u00e9dt\ufb02e pr\u00e9pemf?   2 \n\n4) is the siuii""t:oi'--rrtaihtajn\u00e9ialg"without seeking the relief for\n\n5) is   j of injunction barred by the\nptihetptee ht  \n\n6) is the xvesuatsehtmedettend the court tee paid thereon not\n\n% h  % 7)' 2"" defendant ptovee that it is the owner of the\n\n ::$ahet3\u00a7:f,ei_ipropefty of th the ettemattve whether the 2""\n'T  giroves that it has perfected its titte over the suit\n\u00e9chedui\u00e9 \ufb01pmperty by adverse possession?\n\n%   any ,  the defendants prove that there is a nomjoindef of\nA    =  parties as cantended in para 24 of their written\n\n statement, if so, what is its effect?\n\nT t he) whether the defendants prove that the suit is name to be\n\ndismissed for not impleading the member of the village\n\nV\n\n \n\n\n\nT'  Vvhether the  is properly valued and court fee paid\n--  3. \u00ab.t_l_1ereon is"si,r!T:oient?\n .V f  suit in the present form is not maintainable?\n  piaintiw is entitled for declaration and injunction as\n\nl elli9; .lT\u00a7'o what decree or order?\n Note: issue No.6 to be heard as preliminary issue.\n\ncommunity of old and new Thippasandra \n10) Vlihether the defendants provg;-,ihai suii is  \n\npublic policy and law for the \n\ntheirwrittenstatement'? V   . ~. "\n11) To what relieforreliefs\ufb01enythe'p!eiiriiffi:s\u00e9r\u00a7tiiieci"for? A i\n12) Whatdecree ororder'?    \n\nlsgggs Egmieg Q \n\n1) Does plaintiff proi\u00e9e ti\u00e9gasrlsuii   no feet x\nssmeet and rtbueagl-sieo&iri1la'ihalfi~i\u00a2:\u00bb.r5o?  \n\n2) Dow he [prover  owner of the suit\nproperty urzdef  \n\n3) is he in  of\n\n4) oo deremams u:"5i':ovr"li11at.'V'rsui't property is part of lchatha\n\n msio,1\/1o-'i\u00e9iiid:._it: is~lovvneii'by'defendant No.2 temple?\n\n5)  tlieyfuriheif that suit property as part of katha\n\n~o.e=;1irs.anpese;sen of defendant No.2?\n\n" fprayed?\n\nL4\/.\\\n\n \n\n\n\nevidence. He also submitted that the survey proceedinge \n\npending when die matter was decided and   M '\n\ncome out and the documents now sought-to be  the 'V\n\nappellants have direct bearing on iVnvol'w\u00a7\u00a7..i';: \n\nand therefore \ufb01re appellana    the'\n\nadditiona! evidence.  llaatt"-rso~:rEae of the\ndocuments were not in have come into\nexistence     were not\ntraceable and   earlier and\ntherefore the    to produce the additional\nevidence. Hedge: the \ufb01ndings recorded by the trial\ncourt cannothe su$te2he\u00a2ii:in iV'le\u00a7\u00a7. Further, he. submided that the\n\ntrial court_hae.Vfai.!ed'to aopreciate the evidence on record in proper\n\n_ -    therefore, die impugned Judgment and decree\n\n   in law. He also submitted that the appellants\n\narellre of the suit schedule property having purchased it\n\n"'-e.\ufb011rough._registered sale deeds dated 8-8-1969 and dwey are in\n\n"ii and enjoyment of the suit schwuie property and the\n\ni'   trial court without considering die evidence on record in proper\n\ni eerspeciive has dismissed the suits of the plaintiffs and therefore\n\nthe impugned Judgment and decree cannot be suetained in law.\n\nV\n\n\n\n_ '  shows" me! the suit schedule progeny has been used as\n  \u00a7;e,,:\u00a7or the purpose of Theppetfmva and also Ganapethi\n. \n<\/pre>\n
the suits are badly barred by iimitation. In   _
\nsubmission he placed reliance on the foilowing  V’ ‘% 3 1 V’<\/p>\n
1. A.I.R.1960 s.c.335.\n<\/p>\n
2. A.I.R.2007 s.c.s41.  %<\/p>\n
3. 1989(1) K.L.J. 377. V  _ _<\/p>\n
12. The seames_counse&  next
\ncontended that it is clear that the suit<\/p>\n
scheduie property M$’b:vi\u00a7”*s   submitted
\nthat the suits are   submitted mat
\nthe plaintiffs h:;i\\}e’Vfeiie.%\u00a7Vtog\u00e9ievesftej\ufb021e\u00a7ue}e’vin lawful possession’:
\nof the suit sabrnithw that the source of
\nti\ufb02e of the plVa_i_n\ufb01\ufb01s hes”netV ‘elgesnp\u00e9oved. He therefore submitted
\nsense  hes ri\ufb01htiy\u00e9aetd that the plaintiffs have faiied to<\/p>\n
13A.  Ft;a*E*.:e3r1’~”lse submitted that the evidence of D.W.’i<\/p>\n
Lt\/s<\/p>\n
 :1 “\u00ab-Vvihe feareexicoensei  the partim.<\/p>\n
V A ‘  ‘i8e..__T!i\u00e9.points mat arise formycensideretien are:-<\/p>\n
attention he the \ufb01ndings rwerded an LA. in5 ?\u00a7\u00a7s%j’\u00bb %<\/p>\n
proceedings and submitted that \ufb021e>AA\u00bbin_;’_unct\u00a3e:1″   ‘V <\/p>\n
granted and the plaintiffs are not in  6’:<\/p>\n
property and therefore the suit.fer..__\u00a2.;lecf\u00e9a ra_tji’i>:!  ;
\nrelief of possession is not maintaineble K is  ems
\nsubmission he placed reliance esgtae  A ”<\/p>\n
(1) MR. 1993 s.\u00abc:.957.s'e'    I;  \n(2) !.L.R.  A  1\n\n'I6.   cannot depend\nupon the  case. In support of his\nsubmission he    following decisiom\n\n .   u.'71e.- sssss 14 s\n\n<\/pre>\n
  1’22.  – :_hes{e4ve;s;e]3&:lly considered the submissions made by<\/p>\n
for inteafereme?\n<\/p>\n
(ii) Whether the eppellenm can be permitted to produce
\nthe addi\ufb01onal evidence?\n<\/p>\n
‘\u00ab.\/<\/p>\n
19. Point No.1:- The case of ihe plaint\ufb02fs   <\/p>\n
the owners of the suit schedule property;    K V’<\/p>\n
have purchased ihs suit schedule  <\/p>\n
deeds dated 3.3.1969. They’iV_hav_e  P4%4.\u00bbVis<\/p>\n
Exs.P41 and P42 are the sale   oi’ the
\npiaintiffs. In me said   Katha number.
\nsite number or   mentioned. The
\nsource of     ‘has? not been mentioned.
\nAli that is   ssh\u00e9or of the plaintiffs, is a
\n  possession of ytamatana
\npropertgvv\/”.’\u00ab Vi\ufb01xc\u00e9pt is mentioned regarding the source
\nof ti\ufb02e of   Exs.P1 to P8 are the encumbrance<\/p>\n
 ‘  .  fsgA\ufb011ex’y’e”a’rs’V1968 to 1995 but. may cannot prove the<\/p>\n
   ‘G! or their vendor. Ex.P9 is the tax paid receipt and<\/p>\n
Ers.’i-“A10  are the assessment extracts in respect of the<\/p>\n
 progiemi many No.93l122 and 150. In Ex.P10, it is mentioned<\/p>\n
 ‘ * \ufb01unsiaiah owned ptoperty measuring 39 ft x 28 ft. and it was a<\/p>\n
%%’a\u00a7haf.e.: buiiding. Thereafter, the maasumn-sens have been aimed<\/p>\n
  110\ufb01x52 mt. Thereisno basisforihis. ssmuany, state is no<\/p>\n
basis for the rmasuremenis shown in Ex.P11. it is clear from<\/p>\n
L\/s<\/p>\n
No.132 is e public property and it ie shown as Kur}te;** es _<\/p>\n
this. in my considered view, there is no  6i\u00a7.,:<\/p>\n
record to show that Kalyani i.e., the   <\/p>\n
to Maramma tempie. But mere ‘is  <\/p>\n
show that the suit scheduie has   lt <\/p>\n
is in the evidence of n.w.–1  me%se\u00e9t   has been
\nused as Kalyani since eme    and other
\nreligious purpose}-e.’  No.1 remains
\nunchatlenoeg.   show that there
\nis no Kenyanieege  e? and 33.013 to ms and
\nD19   suit scheduie property has been
\nused asAKa-J\ufb01ani.  considered view though there is
\nno pijttchigwa   regard to show that Kalyani i.e., the suit<\/p>\n
.’ V.  ‘A    “”” ‘  to Maramma tempie but tm fact remains<\/p>\n
 e  ‘i’t”i’.-5 as Kalyani since long time.<\/p>\n
  ”  next question is whether the suit is barred by<\/p>\n
23. The IearnedcoI.:nsalfoM:heappdiantsconte:1dedt!1at<\/p>\n
%  suit is not bened by iimitation. But. the teamed counsel for the<\/p>\n
respondents contended that the suit is badly barred by iimitation.<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
:  ‘Eialkaran”sjihghv-r\ufb02pgtrtt\ufb01d in Am 2007 s.c. 641. the Home\n<\/p>\n
–  Couimfias held. time starts to run when the right to sue<\/p>\n
 ‘-W aa’%\u00a2w9*%.~<\/p>\n
If Ganapw Benanki. reparted in 19% (1) KLJ 377.<\/p>\n
He also invited my amn\ufb01on to the various proceedings that have
\ntaken place earlier and also no para–2T of the plain: and
\nmat the suit is badiy barred by Iimita\ufb01on. In   _
\nsubmission he paced reliance on the foiiowing  31;:  % TJ   .
\n(1) A.l.R.1960S.C.335-   * v4
\n(2) AJR. 2907 s.c. 641 .  % %
\n(3) K.L.J. 1989(1), 377. <\/p>\n
\n\n24. The  case of\n\nRukhmabai ~v~  in AIR 1960\nS.C. 335 has    invasions or denials\nof a tight.    h 120 accmes when the\n<\/pre>\n
defendant has cIa\u00a3.r:g anz\u00a7 uzraaeenad to infringe the
\nright  ihe  suit.\n<\/p>\n
  k A a;m–::a::y;’%snam cm of State of Punjab And Am. —–vs\u00bb-<\/p>\n
  Similarly in the case of Dada Jirmappa Khot \u00ab—vs-<\/p>\n
01\/<\/p>\n
ipgrmimd in  the addi\ufb01onai evidance?<\/p>\n
_ h  and some of me them have came into existence
\na ‘V Lvijfsub\ufb01i\u00e9\u00e9xquent to the decree and therefore, they may be permitted to
\n ptbduce the additional evidence. As rightly submitted by the<\/p>\n
cansidered view, the trial court has rightiy held that the suits are
\nbarred by limitation under articie 58 of the Limitation Act.   <\/p>\n
27. one more aspect that needs to be  _
\nwhether the piainhffs’ can maintain the suit for
\nsaeking the reiiefofpossession?.   i   V <\/p>\n
23. in the previous pi\u00a7cxgedi:ig$ in O’.$’.i\u00a7i\u00a7;\u00ab1–4n553
\n1456f1985 a clear \ufb01nding has  ti-sat.   are<\/p>\n
not in possession agmi’ \u00a7;eir’i;i\u00a7:g\u00a7m   rejected.
\nP.W.1 in his   wanna.\n<\/p>\n
There is ampl\u00e9’1gAavi<:ieni.:V\u00a7"'\u00a3:v:'i:- that the suit schedule
\nhas been used  my considered view, me
\nsuit_ for    relief of possmion cannot
\n     ….. ..\n<\/p>\n
29;    gum.\u00bb is whether the appellants can be<\/p>\n
i     is stated by the appellants am these documents<\/p>\n
V<\/p>\n
by limim5on and the documents are not required
\ncase. Therefore. in my considered waw. the
\npermitted to produce the additiona! \ufb01aifgd  irks L
\nrejected. There is no merit In these
\nitabieto badlsmissed. jj % ” ‘     % %<\/p>\n
33. Accoruing\u00a2hy;. my  v in the
\ncircumstances of      ., <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008 Author: H.Billappa IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,BAN{BALOF_{_E mares ‘rs-us THE 14″‘ DAY or mncu 20433; BEFORE me HOBi’B%.\u00a3 MRJUSTICE A ‘__ 1.’ .. [ … .;’3\u00a2 “.3 . asaumn msr AP9EALFjkg~;.773n-% T Rssugg nag: gggg uQ .:*.’zg;1g% \u00a7 sm 3. NARAYANASWAMY L […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nB Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-04-06T04:32:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"11 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-06T04:32:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":910,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008\",\"name\":\"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-04-06T04:32:33+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-04-06T04:32:33+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"11 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-06T04:32:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008"},"wordCount":910,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008","name":"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-13T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-04-06T04:32:33+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/b-narayanaswamy-vs-t-subramanya-on-14-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"B Narayanaswamy vs T Subramanya on 14 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52662"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52662\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}