{"id":52664,"date":"2008-09-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008"},"modified":"2014-02-11T16:43:06","modified_gmt":"2014-02-11T11:13:06","slug":"h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of … on 16 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of … on 16 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Ajit J Gunjal<\/div>\n
nun wvunt ur AMKIVHIARR Nita?! LLEUKI OF KARNATAKA \n\n mar.\n\n F    53?, Am \ufb01or Jayakumar S.Pati1 saw,\n\n3*?  I-EIGH GCJURT C335' KERHATAKA AT BANGAIQRE\n\nDATED ms 'I'E{E mm may 05* SEPTEMBER \n\nEEFQRE\n\nrem Hownm Mr. JUSTICE ggna ca-Lrz\u00a2;3uxL-%%[[[  { V     \n\n \n\nBEIWEEN :\n\nL H.1\"\u00a3.\u00a3s.n_;'in\u00abe_v,ra Raddy,\nSic: Mamcwda, . \nAged about I55  \u00ab. \n\n2. H.Ii\u00a3.Rgiumg;:if>a,  \u00e9  _% % \n\nAged gbau: A:  A \nOm:  \"  \n\nSit:   V _ \nAgeciabuut\ufb01i\ufb01yumre, - \n\n4*.   \u00ab\u00ab\u00ab\u00ab\u00ab \nAs\ufb01i      \n\nA\ufb01   Villag\u00e9,\n\n'\u00a7'm:u-- W a \u00a7.14e'._t}:':\u00a71:.l  m\n. . . iPET'1TIONERS\n\n39 \n\n\n\n-rIIrI' \\-V-Vivi'! VI' I\\r'\\I\\I'Il'\\Il'Il\\l\"I I\n\nnun },...I.:1s.JI\\I us mmuvnunzwu ruurl guum wr RMKIVAIAKR I-slur! uuukl Ur KAKNAEAKA HIUH LUUKE U!' KARNATAKA HIGH\n\nEepaxunm cf Lhyath Raj,\nM.3.B ,\nGwamwm c::fKarnat*aka,\n\nB%1a_2*'e.\n\n2% 'mm Chief Executive O\ufb01\"1e the fcmrth\n\nX\"\n\n\u00ab\ufb01t\n\n\n\nuu.n- \\-vv-\\- -5\" -v-\"I-'run-uv~ Iululn ygvunv VI |\\I\"|l\\lVf\"'|lf\"\\I'\\I\"| r1n,:.IIr'I uwunl ur AMAIQMIMAM r'Iu..'n\"'l \\.\\)Ui\\I LII\" l\\.Hl\\!'|lI-\\ll-\\I\\I-I !'l}\\J'l'! LKJUNI LN' l\\HI\\!VHiHnP l'li'Jl'I l\n\nrmpas\ufb01ant did not grant pwmairzzsn tn put. up the said\nmmtnnztim tkxe\ufb01tkxraapanxinmt\ufb01mti an ail\n\nthe '\u00a7a1uk Paxwbayath respondent H65.-3.  <\/pre>\n
I9’a.3\u00a7 gmrsuant to im order at
\nmrspc:m.cn’\u00a5: Has? to issue: 9. no o;iajec{t$\u00a7ti <\/p>\n
mmtmzmiun. The sum     <\/p>\n
gcti\ufb01nnm-3 bcf-are the  of an
\napjpieaa\ufb01\ufb01 The same ia   .\n<\/p>\n
-m    the petitioner
\nsuhm$tsvVV..  murders passed by
\nrapalmdg\u00e9zxlm\u00e9’  cram, magmas’ h
\nass, rm  mpecially by re-apondmt<\/p>\n
 . V.\ufb01\ufb01’c:}1g_:rit.y far dismissal of the appeal. He<\/p>\n
  that a suit 73 pmding mm as between<\/p>\n
  rwpondent 30.5 in rapect of the<\/p>\n
 3.. Mr.Gaidy, mm awunml appearing for<\/p>\n
 Hn.5 sgbmim that the shim af the<\/p>\n
patit\u00e9zmem ‘mat the disputzs\u00e9 arm beko\ufb01 no the Gram<\/p>\n
\/’<\/p>\n
“”‘”‘”  ‘-vv-H v- Ivmw\ufb01innn Nnwn Luum ur KANNIHAKA HIGH!<\/p>\n
Paxmlzayath is imrrect. Ha submim that the \ufb01fth
\nra\u00e9mnaent has ‘title to the said pmpmy. I-Ia augg\ufb01pirg<\/p>\n
um gm impumesd erdm’ passcd by
\nrmm\ufb01ant as well .33 11% t%’d   =
\nmag: in tha circumstanw af   <\/p>\n
mrarrant  .\n<\/p>\n
\u20ac52″  far State<\/p>\n
 area belany as
\nthe \ufb01fth   raspondent, {irazm
\nPanshayath  a5a\u00a7uwajL%L%gumsm af fact which 3<\/p>\n
  aha where. Indead, in the<\/p>\n
mmijw. to ba m\ufb01oe\u00e9 that pursuant to
\n  comwuc\ufb01nn was  put up, a
\n  by the faurth Impot\ufb02emt <\/p>\n
V K   rmpandent is encroaching tm public road
\n  up a ccnam-uc\ufb01on. Indeed, this was
\n by the am respondent before the third<\/p>\n
  raspsm\ufb01mt. Tm third rmpondcnt has, purauam to a\ufb02\ufb02<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
I-nun \\.\\.)Ul\\| ur l’\\l~ll\\1VH-\\H-‘U\\.I-\\ rztun gmguui VI’ !\\.HKWHII~\\IV-I i”\u00a7I\\:W LUUKF Ur NANNK-HMHKA !’\ufb02%..~.-r1 LUUKI U!’ KAKNAIAKA Hila\ufb01 QUUKI ur KAKNAIAIKR rilu\ufb02 ‘<\/p>\n
 mzrder, mm tbs fourth respondent Gram<\/p>\n
 yat\u00a73 no imam 3. run abjec\ufb01on <\/p>\n
pazt\ufb01lig zap mmtruction, Th: saw was  <\/p>\n
the  I1&\ufb01 befare the rsacxzanxi  = .:f_\u00bb b  *<\/p>\n
rmpmsiant. Imimzzl,  apfje\u00e9u\ufb01ingvvvffor the
\npa-.-m*a:~m~ is right in  paid onclxar ‘u
\nmt a awk\u00e9mg sgrgdsg.   of the
\n    on a pub\ufb01c road.\n<\/p>\n
In   wrmlci dacmse that
\n 3′:-.:  rcwpondmt ‘$ putmg up<\/p>\n
.–__;a  area but hawevmr, t%<\/p>\n
 ‘_i:z.i\u00e9’ ggoasmsion. When the wnatrucfzion ‘a<\/p>\n
   up an the dhpumd area, the ascent!<\/p>\n
  ms Mm been more: csircumpect and
\n‘4   ‘ \u00a7%uidx:V   mm mnaidmed the mattm’ in pater clataJ1.’<\/p>\n
\u00a7_\u00e9.x1st}1;m’\u00a3ac’m*wka’chisrequi:’edmbem)timdiu<\/p>\n
\ufb01mt\ufb01mpe\ufb01uicammhaw\ufb01hdasmtm\ufb02<\/p>\n
 V’-Iv-\\’ v- nnnlw-unrxm “awn uuum VF KANN&HAKA PIIGE-ll<\/p>\n
a\u00a7s.s:&w+;2c<35 on me me af Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) at
\ncm: 39 Ruins 1 and 2 my ictjtznction and   _<\/p>\n
."\n<\/p>\n
 R The \ufb01\ufb01h respondent  app-‘*”* . ‘<\/p>\n
vaca\ufb02ng me 3%. The said.\n<\/p>\n
ma \ufb01m  order was    %<\/p>\n
w%::h Eh: ma mpondem
\ngym? as 5211 pending. mm is<\/p>\n
E% by batht2m4;x.-t\u00a73io;5a:’a .S:l\u00a7\u00a7  No.5<\/p>\n
ta mum  mm W  ,1.-1, W.\n<\/p>\n
that the   wim the ma
\n ” ‘Hinze, it b not open for
\nthe rm:  ttm the pr\ufb01pezty<\/p>\n
     he in required m emmsah 1:3:<\/p>\n
kL%m1\u00a7 Court. In fact, the third mapondcnt<\/p>\n
 Gram \ufb01hayatlu to issue-. Na<\/p>\n
  ought ta have also taken note of<\/p>\n
*   %%k%s:1:;;k.@;~;g\u00a3m\u00a7pasuaa by the Civ\ufb01 Court  ‘ ‘ the am:<\/p>\n
   _\ufb01*csm1mJ.tt:izg up any comtnmuon’ . , \ufb02<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
5″”-‘”” ‘-‘5-‘UK’ U’ *V'””‘”‘”-*”\\” “39” ‘-,-\u00bb’~!UK’ U!” IKAKIVAIARH HIUW LUUKF UT |\\l\\KNP”\\\u00a7\u00a7-ili\ufb02 HIUH LUUKI Ul” KAKNAIRKR HIUN LUUKI UP KAKNRIRKF ?”EIU|””<\/p>\n
2%. \ufb01ne mart facmr which 3% rsesquiread to be: taken<\/p>\n
note 3? is that he\ufb01re cammermirxg any <\/p>\n
ma area withirx the Gram Panchayath. an
\nreaqu\ufb01md ac; be made seeking :f  ‘* <\/p>\n
Swftwa 54 gr aha Act we-uld <\/p>\n
permiaaizssri is a mist
\nmm, in tine case on     it is
\n:1-13 “Z’a\u00a7u1c; Pan<:hayat}v1"'  the Gram
\nPm:Ie%s;ya?.k to igattg a  Having
\nwma to    in tha Civil
\nam  ' 4'   @:d.enm 2 and 3
\ncanmt M #'u\u00a7;taZ1rV1Ft=zi 'a  "  \u00e9<\/p>\n
  I  the following ordcris paaaed:<\/p>\n
ggggmxmgumzramx stand quamea.<\/p>\n
  Inmm stands remitmdtn the fourth<\/p>\n
rampcndmt, Gram Pamhgrathm mmidw the<\/p>\n
rmumteftiw\ufb01\ufb01hrmadmt\ufb01n putting<\/p>\n
up
\nmznstnw\ufb02m Al<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of … on 16 September, 2008 Author: Ajit J Gunjal nun wvunt ur AMKIVHIARR Nita?! LLEUKI OF KARNATAKA mar. F 53?, Am \ufb01or Jayakumar S.Pati1 saw, 3*? I-EIGH GCJURT C335′ KERHATAKA AT BANGAIQRE DATED ms ‘I’E{E mm may 05* SEPTEMBER EEFQRE rem […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52664","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nH M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of ... on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of ... on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-02-11T11:13:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"H M Anjineya Reddy S\\\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of … on 16 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-11T11:13:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":665,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008\",\"name\":\"H M Anjineya Reddy S\\\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of ... on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-02-11T11:13:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"H M Anjineya Reddy S\\\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of … on 16 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of ... on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of ... on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-02-11T11:13:06+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of … on 16 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-11T11:13:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008"},"wordCount":665,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008","name":"H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of ... on 16 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-02-11T11:13:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-m-anjineya-reddy-so-mallegowda-vs-the-secretary-department-of-on-16-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"H M Anjineya Reddy S\/O Mallegowda vs The Secretary Department Of … on 16 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52664","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52664"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52664\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52664"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52664"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52664"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}