{"id":53064,"date":"2009-07-17T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-16T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-11-26T19:38:07","modified_gmt":"2016-11-26T14:08:07","slug":"sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 17\"' DAY OF zrupy 2009\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARAN, CHIEF_3US\u00abTIC'E   _\n\nAND _ V V\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JuSTIC;E\"\\\/QGSABHAHIT'-- \n\nWRIT PETITION NQ.155(ki2[2OAQ. g (S-,A_-g:A\"v.'1~.   '\nBETWEEN: '  \" A    \n\nS.G.HIREMATH,\nAGED 55 YRS, I ._  5 _ _ ~\nASST.DIRECTOR OF AGRI::LILTLI_RfE,.\nOFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER,'_ 1 s\nWATER SHED DEVELORI-I'E'NTT.DEPTI,j.._\n\nBANGALORE.  V' .. PETITIONER\n\n(By S'RI%\"RAv.IiVfvER'iii%IA  SHCOUNSEL FOR SRI KRISHNA\nDIxIT;_AD_\\\/--.)V    ' -\n\nAND: \"\n\n1.THE\u00bbSjTATE OF I<A'RNATAI<A,\nREP-.',BY ITS RRIN'C\u00abI9A.L SECRETARY,\n\n" V'  - DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE,\n, . MS.SL,DG,,\u00bbR.'R.._CIRCLE,\n  B.ANG.A,1;Q_RE -jsysgo 001.\n\n2;S_. I3. KON'GAIw'AD,\nS\/O;--5HAR:vIAIvRA,\n\n AGED~~,ABOuT 31 YRS,\n  ' ASST. DIRECTOR OF AGRICULTURE,\n WATER SHED DEVELOPMENT DEPT.,\n-.R\/'-.-AT. FLAT NO2449 SECTOR No.12,\n\nMAHANTESH NAGAR,\n\nV'   __BELGAuM - 599 015. .. RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
has been passed without application of mind and that the
\nsaid order passed is in violation of the transfer guideline<\/p>\n
issued by the Govt. by its order dated 22\/I <\/p>\n
4. It is the contention of the applicant”~t_hatjn’tran’sfe’r  <\/p>\n
is premature as per the provisio:ns”‘rn\u00abade._ in:the4__transfer’i<\/p>\n
guideline dated 22\/11\/2001 V and:the-_appiic’av_nt’has<\/p>\n
transferred in the middle of the\ufb01acadernic.yearzafridfvtransfer if<\/p>\n
has been made only to .accom’mod_ate”rthe Sf””r’es*pondent ~
\npetitioner herein who beVlo_ng’s.,t:o,:’Belga’urn’\u00bb__Dist., who has<\/p>\n
worked in Belga.unrri_Dis:,t,H abVou’t:,.3V(l years out of which,<\/p>\n
in Belgia’u”rh”Tavi.ukuit;seif:’fo,:r  years and the transfer
\nis not in public; in view of the Lok Sabha<\/p>\n
election for””mjich.,heA’had’\u00b0’been assigned election duty and<\/p>\n
 ~._a w’ro:ngA—rinformatiorfwas sent to the Chief Electoral Officer<\/p>\n
  “appiicant is not engaged in eiection duty,<\/p>\n
based on  the concurrence of the CEO was obtained<\/p>\n
 the transfer during the election period. The review<\/p>\n
   of the applicant has been rejected mechanically,<\/p>\n
  and the impugned order deserves to be quashed.<\/p>\n
22><\/p>\n
5. The application was resisted by respondents 1 to
\n4 and 6 contending that the Cadre Management Authority<\/p>\n
came to the conclusion that the applicant has n.ot_f.giv..en<\/p>\n
any reason for retaining him at Belgaunfiiiw’a~~ri,ti:__ffo_.r”.<\/p>\n
accommodating him in a nearby place and”t’he’_~order_wi_il <\/p>\n
only be effective at the end of the aca.demi_c’-.year’Vainadtiig\u00e9<\/p>\n
has been approved by the’\u00ab-Qahiefx’-iviinisterifanci,on <\/p>\n
approval, the earlier order   was also
\nconfirmed by the Cadre_lViVan2a’g’e’r’n’gl\ufb01\u00a7~_Authority. The
\napplicant is a  Commission’s
\napproval vvas: and there is no<\/p>\n
objection to  the Lok Sabha election.\n<\/p>\n
  ire’spAo_nd’e’nt resisted the objection by<\/p>\n
.–.,.._con:te’nding~~.that “h’e”riaVs already obeyed the transfer order<\/p>\n
i_V_’d’a:tedi.  and the impugned order is a weli-<\/p>\n
co’n_siidered’i:o.r’der made in public interest and does not call<\/p>\n
*.,for ari’y,Vaa_Ai’nterference and there is no vioiation of transfer<\/p>\n
“‘–“_ga.i_ideiines.\n<\/p>\n
7. The KAT after hearing the learned counsel<\/p>\n
appearing for parties, by an order dated 29\/53\/2009 heid<\/p>\n
U’<\/p>\n
that the transfer of the applicant was a premature transfer
\nand it was in the middle of the academic year and contrary<\/p>\n
to the guideline dated 22\/11\/2001. The rribuneliitghas<\/p>\n
directed the Cadre Management Authority <\/p>\n
dated 12\/12\/2008 to consider the review__<\/p>\n
applicant in conformity with the pilrovisiioris”‘cont-aihinedin<\/p>\n
Govt. Order dated 22\/11\/2091 aindfithe p,e’i,’us’al” oi’;’.tl\u00b0.e”ag<\/p>\n
original records reveal  revi’ew\u00b0=aiuthority has
\nbrushed aside the appl’i~c_ant_”slllp\u00e9t\ufb01p\ufb01-._Qn theiground that
\nthe petition did not conVta’in_Valn’y particuA.’lIa:Vr_’points requiring<\/p>\n
consideration,” ‘a’pga’i’t fiiom stating’ 5tiiat….the 5″‘ respondent<\/p>\n
had spent -in Beigaum Dist. and on this
\nground,theearl*ier’A:oi*d:e_r44Vhas been reaffirmed and the<\/p>\n
Cad.rfe’iVi.anagem_ent Authority has misread the provisions<\/p>\n
 :’.ti-efherer guidelines dated 22\/11\/2001. The<\/p>\n
 of stay applicable to the applicant is 4<\/p>\n
years “-.and”he has been transferred in just 1 year and 2<\/p>\n
mon_thsI The Cadre and Management Authority should<\/p>\n
 lhaveflconsidered this objection and dealt with it because it<\/p>\n
  for the transferring authority to record the reasons for<\/p>\n
considering the transfer of the applicant prematurely as it<\/p>\n
K5\u00bb<\/p>\n
is a case amounting to extraordinary circumstances.
\nAccordingly, the Cadre Management Authority has failed<\/p>\n
to consider the application of the applicant with rega.rd~.._to<\/p>\n
premature transfer and in violation of guidell:i.n’es~~’_’Vidiatedi’_<\/p>\n
22\/11\/2001. It is a solemn assurance to t.l1’e’e.5jploye’es of ” if<\/p>\n
the State Govt. that a proper system ::’of..effe.chting’ trahsfeiisil<\/p>\n
is in place and transfer is ‘not made as vv~h.irnVs..3and–.Vl’<\/p>\n
fancies of authorities, or under4_l:”‘t.h_e–pressurleiyofiriterested
\nparties or for other the material on
\nrecord reveal that transfer’  only to
\naccommodate…\u00bb at all in public
\ninterest and Authority did not record
\nreasons  transfer of the applicant<\/p>\n
andaccordingiyppasseid the impugned order.<\/p>\n
aggrieved by the said order dated<\/p>\n
29\/is\/2oo9;li:\n<\/p>\n
‘irespondent No.5 has preferred this writ<\/p>\n
‘*.,petitio”n_ contending that the order of transfer was valid as<\/p>\n
‘~.if”ihe_a”C:3dre Management Authority by order dated 1\/4\/2009<\/p>\n
 upheld the transfer of respondent No.2 and gave him<\/p>\n
 posting as Assistant Director of Agriculture, Bailhongal in<\/p>\n
\\)><\/p>\n
Beigaum Dist. itself and the said place is at a distance of<\/p>\n
about 40 kms from Belgaurn and the order of <\/p>\n
contrary to the law, facts and material <\/p>\n
record.\n<\/p>\n
9. We have heard the le.arn,ed senior cou4n’sel”=,<\/p>\n
appearing for the petitioner, learned  for
\nrespondent No.1 and,the le.a’rned’j4cVo’unsel appefaring for<\/p>\n
respondent No.2<\/p>\n
10.  been filed by
\nthe 2″”  “tha’rVV’p?etitioner is not entitied
\nto any  writ petition and the same
\nis liable   petitioner is entitled to be<\/p>\n
contiijoed. at the._V_Vpresent place of work for a period of 3<\/p>\n
 years,  he\u00ab–._has been disturbed within a period of one<\/p>\n
 and there was an interim “order of stay<\/p>\n
 _ granted and the application was disposed of on<\/p>\n
 with a direction to Cadre Management<\/p>\n
Atithority to consider his transfer and pass appropriate<\/p>\n
if  orders and the Cadre Management Authority confirmed the<\/p>\n
of order of transfer and as per the Bio–data of the petitioner,<\/p>\n
\\\/”‘<\/p>\n
right from the day of his appointment on 15\/12\/1978, he
\nhas worked in Beigaum oniy, except one year in Koppai<\/p>\n
during 1990~91 and Beigaum is his native district4aiVso_:’a.nd<\/p>\n
the impugned order is a premature transfer <\/p>\n
to the terms and conditions of the.~”g*u.i’deii’n~e’sand if<\/p>\n
wherefore, the impugned order is   if V<\/p>\n
11. Learned Senior ‘-cjournseiv. appeajr’_inV\u00a7,v\u00bb4’Vfor the’<\/p>\n
petitioner submittedV:’thVat tih’e*i’Vti’an’sfer way of
\ndeputation and there diffe-refnce__.y:be.twyeen the transfer<\/p>\n
and deputation..f;VIt_ isizffurthier -sVubrn.itt’ed’ that the transfer<\/p>\n
has bee’n”‘ia’pp:r’oveE\u00a5\u00a7V Cjhfhifeffdinister and also by the
\nCadre  Respondent No.2 has been<\/p>\n
now posted”-to’ Baiiafhongai, which is at a distance of 40<\/p>\n
  B.eigaun1’*and wherefore, the order passed by the<\/p>\n
 the order of transfer is Eiabie to be set<\/p>\n
a.sid;eanvd.’theiappiication filed before the Tribunal is iiable<\/p>\n
“.._to be dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
 “12. Learned Govt. Advocate appearing for<\/p>\n
 -“respondent No.1\/State submitted that 2″” respondent has<\/p>\n
aiready been transferred to Beigaum in view of the order<\/p>\n
0′<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
passed by the review authority conforming the order of<\/p>\n
transfer of the writ petitioner.\n<\/p>\n
13. Learned Senior counsel appe’a_ring:-fl”<\/p>\n
respondent No.2 argued in suppo;*t'”of”‘the <\/p>\n
the Tribunal and submitted that transfer responde’nVt”-..g<\/p>\n
No.2 was premature i.e., afte’r’~,one year .and.”‘3  of
\nservice at Belgaurn aVn’d..V_therefo’re};  liable’ to be set<\/p>\n
aside.\n<\/p>\n
14.   .given_rca_z4’ejfu’i’ Vconsideration to the
\ncontentions: ~vof7-.t:h_:e V’ie_a–rn’ed\u00ab-  appearing for the<\/p>\n
partiesiand sc’ruvtin.i_zied the-njateriai on record.<\/p>\n
15.  ‘mat.eria_l  record would cieariy show that<\/p>\n
-*,_the of tran~–s–fer of the petitioner in place of 2″”<\/p>\n
resp’ond’e.n’t ;a’t::Belgaum dated 21\/10\/2008 is an order of<\/p>\n
transfer ancifnot deputation, as the deputation of both the<\/p>\n
[writ petitioner and 2″” respondent has been made prior to<\/p>\n
A Xtiwne order of transfer and it is a simple case of transfer and<\/p>\n
 deputation. However, the material on record wouid<\/p>\n
fvacieariy show that being aggrieved by the said order of<\/p>\n
u}<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
application No.1-464\/2009 is set aside and the ap<\/p>\n
ptication
\nNo.1464\/2009 is dismissed. [<\/p>\n
  V     _A
\n   ”  s     <\/p>\n
(9.0%, D:I_Ni$K:A’R\u00a5i!.’\u00a7_)   X
\n % CHIEF Jusrszcg  <\/p>\n
  s  ~- ssasnaum<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 17″‘ DAY OF zrupy 2009 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. P.D. DINAKARAN, CHIEF_3US\u00abTIC’E _ AND _ V V THE HON’BLE MR.JuSTIC;E”\\\/QGSABHAHIT’– WRIT PETITION NQ.155(ki2[2OAQ. g (S-,A_-g:A”v.’1~. ‘ BETWEEN: […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53064","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-11-26T14:08:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T14:08:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1324,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-11-26T14:08:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-11-26T14:08:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T14:08:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009"},"wordCount":1324,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009","name":"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-16T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-11-26T14:08:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-s-g-hiremath-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-17-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri.S.G.Hiremath vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53064","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53064"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53064\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53064"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53064"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53064"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}