{"id":5312,"date":"2009-07-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-07-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009"},"modified":"2016-12-05T02:30:47","modified_gmt":"2016-12-04T21:00:47","slug":"biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nMACA.No. 297 of 2004()\n\n\n1. BIJU KUMAR, S\/O. KUTTAPPAN NAIR,\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. P.BALACHANDRAN THAMPI,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.S.V.PREMAKUMARAN NAIR\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.N.S.MOHAMMED USMAN\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice M.L.JOSEPH FRANCIS\n\n Dated :16\/07\/2009\n\n O R D E R\n        K.M. JOSEPH &amp; M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JJ.\n                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n                    M.A.C.A. NO: 297 OF 2004\n                 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\n               Dated this the 16th Day of July, 2009.\n\n                              JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Joseph Francis J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      This appeal is filed by the petitioner in OP MV 463\/01 on the<\/p>\n<p>file of MACT Neyyattinkara.               Respondents 1 and 2 are the<\/p>\n<p>respondents 1 and 2 in that OP which was filed under Section 166<\/p>\n<p>of the Motor Vehicles Act. The allegation is that on 5.12.00 the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner was traveling in a motor Cycle bearing No.KL 01 T<\/p>\n<p>4637 as a pillion rider through the Utchakkada &#8211; Poovar road. The<\/p>\n<p>motor cycle was ridden by one Shaji. When they reached near<\/p>\n<p>Thiraviyam hospital at Uchakkara, an ambassador car bearing No;<\/p>\n<p>KLV-5599 owned and driven by 1st respondent came from opposite<\/p>\n<p>direction dashed against the motor cycle, as a result of which the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner fell down and sustained serious injuries. The accident<\/p>\n<p>was due to the rash and negligent driving of 1st respondent who<\/p>\n<p>was driving the ambassador car.               Second respondent was the<\/p>\n<p>insurer of the car. The petitioner claimed Rs.5,00,000\/- as<\/p>\n<p>compensation.      In the Claims Tribunal the first respondent<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. NO: 297 OF 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                    : 2 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>remained exparte.       Second     respondent filed written statement<\/p>\n<p>admitting the policy of the car and contends that the accident was<\/p>\n<p>not due to the negligence of first respondent and compensation<\/p>\n<p>claimed is excessive.\n<\/p>\n<p>     2.    In Claims Tribunal PW1 was examined and Exts.A1 to<\/p>\n<p>A21 were marked.         The Claims Tribunal on considering the<\/p>\n<p>evidences allowed the petition and the petitioner was allowed to<\/p>\n<p>get compensation of Rs.1,51,890\/- together with interest at the rate<\/p>\n<p>of 9% per month from the date of petition till the date of realisation<\/p>\n<p>from first and second respondent. Second respondent is directed to<\/p>\n<p>pay the compensation. Being dissatisfied with the quantum of<\/p>\n<p>compensation the petitioner filed this appeal.<\/p>\n<p>     3.    Heard the learned counsel for the appellant and learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the second respondent.\n<\/p>\n<p>     4.    The Medical records would show that due to the<\/p>\n<p>accident the appellant sustained following injuries:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>       &#8220;lacerted wound 2 x 3 (L) frontal region, fractures of<br \/>\n      facial bone, antero lateral posterior wall nasal bones on<br \/>\n      (L) maxillary sinus, nasal septum, ethmoic air cells,<br \/>\n      lateral to medial walls (L) orbit, medial walls of (R)<br \/>\n      orbit, walls of frontal sinus with depression to (L)<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. NO: 297 OF 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                : 3 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      zygomatic, arch, fracture on the (L) maxilla, fracture on<br \/>\n      the (L) zygoma, (R) globe is smaller in size with hazy<br \/>\n      hyperdense vitreous, loss of vision on ( R ) eye due to<br \/>\n      retinal detachment.    The petitioner was treated as<br \/>\n      inpatient   in    the   Medical      college    hospital,<br \/>\n      Thiruvananthapuram from 5.12.2000 to 14.12.2000,<br \/>\n      from 8.10.2001 to 20.10.2001 in the Jewhar hospital,<br \/>\n      Madurai from 9.12.2001 to 22.12.2001 and from<br \/>\n      28.8.2002 to 2.9.2002 in the Aravind Eye hospital,<br \/>\n      Madhurai.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>     5.    Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that the<\/p>\n<p>accident   occurred on 5.12.2000 and the appellant underwent<\/p>\n<p>treatment from that day onwards and the appellant produced<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A11 to Ext.A17 series of medical bills for Rs.77,968\/- But the<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal awarded only Rs.28,000\/- towards medical<\/p>\n<p>expenses stating that the other bills are prior to 9.12.01. The<\/p>\n<p>appellant produced Ext.A11 series medical bills for Rs.10,130\/-<\/p>\n<p>Ext.A12 series of medical bills for Rs.1,328\/- Ext.A13 series of<\/p>\n<p>medical bills for Rs.3,114\/-, Ext.A14 series of medical bills for<\/p>\n<p>Rs.6,909\/-, Ext.A15 series of medical bills for Rs.29,300\/- Ext.A16<\/p>\n<p>medical bills for Rs.6,296\/- and Ext.A17 series of medical bills for<\/p>\n<p>Rs.6,689\/-. Thus in total the appellant produced medical bills for<\/p>\n<p>Rs.63,766\/-       As the appellant underwent treatment from<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. NO: 297 OF 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                               : 4 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>15.12.2000 onwards, there is no justification for rejecting the<\/p>\n<p>medical bills prior to 9.12.01. Therefore we are of the view that<\/p>\n<p>the appellant should be allowed to get Rs.35,766\/- more towards<\/p>\n<p>medical expenses.\n<\/p>\n<p>      6.    Ext.A19 is the salary certificate issued from the<\/p>\n<p>Postmaster Neyyattinkara dated 30.1.2003 in which it is stated that<\/p>\n<p>the salary of the appellant, who is working as Postal Assistant is<\/p>\n<p>Rs.7,297\/-. But the appellant had not produce any salary certificate<\/p>\n<p>to show that the monthly salary of the appellant on the date of<\/p>\n<p>accident. Therefore, the Claims Tribunal fixed the monthly salary<\/p>\n<p>on date of the accident as Rs.5,000\/- Ext.A20 is the leave<\/p>\n<p>certificate showing that due to the accident the appellant availed<\/p>\n<p>earned leave for 106 days, half pay leave for 110 days and<\/p>\n<p>commuted leave for 4 days. The Claims Tribunal awarded<\/p>\n<p>Rs.27,390\/- towards compensation for loss of earning.           The<\/p>\n<p>appellant has not produced any document showing that the loss of<\/p>\n<p>earning is more than the amount awarded by the Claims Tribunal.<\/p>\n<p>Therefore the appellant is not entitled to get any more amount<\/p>\n<p>towards loss of earning.\n<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. NO: 297 OF 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                  : 5 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      7.    Ext.A9, Disability certificate shows that<\/p>\n<p>           &#8220;Due to retinal detachment with loss of vision<br \/>\n           in ( R) eye, the petitioner has 40% permanent<br \/>\n           partial disability.      In the accident, the<br \/>\n           petitioner sustained depression fracture of (L)<br \/>\n           fronto asal complex and zygomatic arch<br \/>\n           including lateral wall of orbit, superior<br \/>\n           orbital margin and frontal bone, depression<br \/>\n           fracture of nasal bone and loss of vision on<br \/>\n           (R) eye due to retinal detachment.&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>      8.    PW1 admits that even now he is attending his job and<\/p>\n<p>getting salary and that he will retire at the age of 60 years. The age<\/p>\n<p>of the appellant at the time of the accident was 30 years. The<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal found that permanent partial disability affected<\/p>\n<p>the earning power of the appellant only after his retirement and the<\/p>\n<p>Claims Tribunal assessed at Rs.2,000\/- as monthly income after<\/p>\n<p>retirement and applying 5 as the multiplier, awarded a sum of<\/p>\n<p>Rs.48,000\/- as compensation for loss of earning power.<\/p>\n<p>Considering the facts and circumstances of the case we are of the<\/p>\n<p>view that it is only just and reasonable to fix the monthly income<\/p>\n<p>after retirement as Rs.2,500\/-.       Calculating on that basis, the<\/p>\n<p>appellant is entitled to Rs.12,000\/- more towards loss of earning<\/p>\n<p>M.A.C.A. NO: 297 OF 2004<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                                : 6 :<\/span><\/p>\n<p>power.     The Claims Tribunal has awarded Rs.25,000\/- as<\/p>\n<p>compensation for loss of amenities in life and Rs.20,000\/- towards<\/p>\n<p>compensation for pain and suffering, which are according to us<\/p>\n<p>very reasonable.      Therefore the appellant is entitled to get<\/p>\n<p>Rs.47,766\/- more as compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>      Accordingly, this appeal is allowed in part and the appellant<\/p>\n<p>is allowed to realise Rs.47,766\/- more together with interest at the<\/p>\n<p>rate of 7.5% interest per month from the date of petition till the<\/p>\n<p>date of realisation from the second respondent.<\/p>\n<p>                                   K. M. JOSEPH, JUDGE<\/p>\n<p>                              M. L. JOSEPH FRANCIS, JUDGE.\n<\/p>\n<p>dl\/<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM MACA.No. 297 of 2004() 1. BIJU KUMAR, S\/O. KUTTAPPAN NAIR, &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. P.BALACHANDRAN THAMPI, &#8230; Respondent 2. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, For Petitioner :SRI.S.V.PREMAKUMARAN NAIR For Respondent :SRI.N.S.MOHAMMED USMAN The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice K.M.JOSEPH [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5312","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-12-04T21:00:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-04T21:00:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1063,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009\",\"name\":\"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-12-04T21:00:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-12-04T21:00:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-04T21:00:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009"},"wordCount":1063,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009","name":"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-07-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-12-04T21:00:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/biju-kumar-vs-p-balachandran-thampi-on-16-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Biju Kumar vs P.Balachandran Thampi on 16 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5312","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5312"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5312\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5312"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5312"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5312"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}