{"id":53227,"date":"2010-02-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-02T14:36:45","modified_gmt":"2016-10-02T09:06:45","slug":"mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#8217;S &#8230; vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#8217;S &#8230; vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nWP(C).No. 20618 of 2007(S)\n\n\n1. MANKUZHY NAGAR RESIDENT'S ASSOCIATION\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n2. TAHSILDAR,\n\n3. SECRETARY,\n\n                For Petitioner  :SRI.ANTONY M. AMBAT\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER\n\nThe Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice MR.P.R.RAMAN\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice THOTTATHIL B.RADHAKRISHNAN\n\n Dated :11\/02\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n                         P.R.Raman, Ag. C.J. &amp;\n                     Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.\n                  ------------------------------------------\n                      W.P.(C) No.20618 of 2007 &amp;\n                          I.A.No.13930 of 2007\n                  ------------------------------------------\n             Dated this the 11th day of February, 2010\n\n                             JUDGMENT\n<\/pre>\n<p>Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan, J.\n<\/p>\n<p>           This writ petition is filed by Mankuzhy Nagar<\/p>\n<p>Residents&#8217; Association essentially complaining that there is large<\/p>\n<p>scale encroachment of revenue land by different occupants of patta<\/p>\n<p>lands or even without any occupation of patta lands. The survey<\/p>\n<p>documents issued in relation to the area is sought to be redone.<\/p>\n<p>           2. With this public interest litigation in hand, this Court<\/p>\n<p>issued an order requiring publication of notice of this writ petition<\/p>\n<p>in a newspaper. That was promptly done. Thereafter, following<\/p>\n<p>different directions, the Tahsildar, Kanayannur had placed a report<\/p>\n<p>and certain exhibits. Thereafter an application for enlargement of<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No.20618 of 2007          2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>time was also filed to carry out the directions issued by this Court.<\/p>\n<p>Ultimately, the first respondent District Collector has filed an<\/p>\n<p>affidavit dated 3.11.2009 stating that the District Collector had<\/p>\n<p>appointed a special team with two surveyors,           in 2004, for<\/p>\n<p>measuring the thodu puramboke and it took three months to<\/p>\n<p>complete the work. The District Collector stated that, however, the<\/p>\n<p>Municipal authorities neither maintained the boundary stones and<\/p>\n<p>the survey markings nor acted upon the process of eviction on the<\/p>\n<p>basis of the survey report. It was, therefore,       asserted by the<\/p>\n<p>District Collector that, as such, the entire area having a length of<\/p>\n<p>more than 2.5 kilometres resulted to be surveyed again for fixing<\/p>\n<p>the thodu puramboke.      She further proceeds to say that there<\/p>\n<p>occurred some delay in completing the further survey owing to<\/p>\n<p>deficiency of revenue staff and the intervening Legislative<\/p>\n<p>Assembly elections.      Thereafter it is stated that the Tahsildar,<\/p>\n<p>Kanayannur was directed to start the survey afresh and make<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No.20618 of 2007           3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>reports.\n<\/p>\n<p>             3.     Pursuant to the aforesaid,  the learned Senior<\/p>\n<p>Government Pleader appearing in this case submits today that the<\/p>\n<p>District Collector has reported that the survey activities in terms of<\/p>\n<p>the direction have been completed on 10.12.2009.<\/p>\n<p>             4. The thodu puramboke which are nothing but land<\/p>\n<p>adjoining water-ways are vested in the local authorities in terms of<\/p>\n<p>the provisions contained in the Municipality Act.         Obviously,<\/p>\n<p>therefore, the Municipality cannot shirk its responsibility to plant<\/p>\n<p>and maintain boundary stones and ensure that there is no<\/p>\n<p>encroachment over the thodu puramboke. If any encroachment has<\/p>\n<p>been found, it is the bounden duty of the Municipality to remove<\/p>\n<p>such encroachment in accordance with law after following the due<\/p>\n<p>procedure.\n<\/p>\n<p>             5.     Learned counsel appearing for the Municipality<\/p>\n<p>states that following the survey,      the Municipality has fixed<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No.20618 of 2007           4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>boundary stones and is taking due care and caution to ensure that<\/p>\n<p>there is no tampering of the boundaries.            It is the personal<\/p>\n<p>responsibility of the officers of the Municipality to make strict<\/p>\n<p>vigil and supervision to ensure that the land vested in the<\/p>\n<p>Municipality is promptly protected. This is part of the public<\/p>\n<p>interest and public duty that the Municipal officers have to ensure.<\/p>\n<p>             6. In terms of the aforesaid, this writ petition is ordered<\/p>\n<p>directing as follows:\n<\/p>\n<p>             i) The survey having been conducted, the said survey<\/p>\n<p>records will be made available in the office of the Municipal<\/p>\n<p>Secretary and the revenue authority for perusal and if necessary for<\/p>\n<p>obtaining copy as may be applied for by any citizen.<\/p>\n<p>             ii) The competent authority in the Municipality or in the<\/p>\n<p>Revenue Department will ensure appropriate action in accordance<\/p>\n<p>with law against any encroachment that has been found and the<\/p>\n<p>encroachment shall be dealt with in accordance with law, without<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No.20618 of 2007             5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>in any manner impairing the right of an occupier to relief in terms<\/p>\n<p>of law.\n<\/p>\n<p>             iii) At any rate, both the authorities, as stated above,<\/p>\n<p>shall initiate such action within an outer limit of three months from<\/p>\n<p>today and the authorities, at the first instance, shall complete such<\/p>\n<p>proceedings after hearing the necessary parties within an outer<\/p>\n<p>limit of four months therefrom.\n<\/p>\n<p>             iv) It is further clarified that any land holder aggrieved<\/p>\n<p>by any action taken by the Municipal authorities or the Revenue<\/p>\n<p>authorities will be entitled to seek remedies before the competent<\/p>\n<p>statutory appellate authorities as against such decisions and all<\/p>\n<p>such rights and remedies are left open.\n<\/p>\n<p>             In so far as I.A.No.13930 of 2007 is concerned, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner in this public interest litigation states that the<\/p>\n<p>Municipality is proceeding to sell off two roads which are vested<\/p>\n<p>in the Municipality. The plea is that if those roads are sold off, that<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No.20618 of 2007            6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>will affect the right of the public for free movement through those<\/p>\n<p>roads and that the Municipality is acting in excess of their powers<\/p>\n<p>under the Municipality Act.        We are clear in our mind that the<\/p>\n<p>State legislation provides certain prescriptions on transfer of<\/p>\n<p>properties which are vested in the Municipality and in so far as<\/p>\n<p>such properties are concerned, there is a procedure prescribed<\/p>\n<p>under the Municipality Act and Rules for transfer.           Learned<\/p>\n<p>counsel for the Municipality states that due procedure has been<\/p>\n<p>followed in terms of the Act and Rules for dealing with those<\/p>\n<p>properties. This is countered by the learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner by stating that if those roads are sold out, that will<\/p>\n<p>affect the right of the citizens for free movement and that there will<\/p>\n<p>not be any road access for the public. Learned counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner further states that the Municipality may give effect to its<\/p>\n<p>decision as stated in the counter affidavit to the said interlocutory<\/p>\n<p>application, regarding the provision for alternate way. If the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">W.P.(C) No.20618 of 2007            7<\/span><\/p>\n<p>petitioner is further aggrieved on that count or if they are aggrieved<\/p>\n<p>by any decision of the Municipality, they may move either the<\/p>\n<p>Government or the learned Ombudsman for Local Self<\/p>\n<p>Government Institutions, as the case may be, since Government is<\/p>\n<p>the appropriate authority to grant sanction to the Municipality to<\/p>\n<p>deal with properties which are vested in the Municipality.        That<\/p>\n<p>issue is accordingly left open.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Writ petition is ordered accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                        P.R.Raman,<br \/>\n                                      Ag. Chief Justice<\/p>\n<p>                                Thottathil B.Radhakrishnan,<br \/>\n                                          Judge<br \/>\nvns<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#8217;S &#8230; vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM WP(C).No. 20618 of 2007(S) 1. MANKUZHY NAGAR RESIDENT&#8217;S ASSOCIATION &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, &#8230; Respondent 2. TAHSILDAR, 3. SECRETARY, For Petitioner :SRI.ANTONY M. AMBAT For Respondent :SRI.M.K.ABOOBACKER The Hon&#8217;ble the Acting [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53227","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#039;S ... vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#039;S ... vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-02T09:06:45+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#8217;S &#8230; vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-02T09:06:45+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1007,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010\",\"name\":\"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident'S ... vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-02T09:06:45+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#8217;S &#8230; vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident'S ... vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident'S ... vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-02T09:06:45+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#8217;S &#8230; vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-02T09:06:45+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010"},"wordCount":1007,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010","name":"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident'S ... vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-02T09:06:45+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mankuzhy-nagar-residents-vs-district-collector-on-11-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mankuzhy Nagar Resident&#8217;S &#8230; vs District Collector on 11 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53227","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53227"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53227\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53227"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53227"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53227"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}