{"id":53821,"date":"2010-05-06T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-05-05T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010"},"modified":"2016-07-27T09:52:03","modified_gmt":"2016-07-27T04:22:03","slug":"mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010","title":{"rendered":"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Central Information Commission<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>                        Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\n                 File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000982\u00a0dated\u00a012\u00ad10\u00ad2008\n                Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19)\n\n\n\n\n                                                                  Dated:\u00a06\u00a0May\u00a02010\n\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0               :    Shri\u00a0Dudh\u00a0Nath\u00a0Ram\n                                          S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Dwarika\u00a0Ram,\n                                          Vill\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Post\u00a0-\u00a0Ranipur,\n                                          Distt\u00a0-\u00a0Mau,\u00a0UP\u00a0-\u00a0276\u00a0402.\n\n\nName\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0        :    CPIO,\u00a0State\u00a0Bank\u00a0of\u00a0India,\n                                          Local\u00a0Head\u00a0Office,\n                                          Moti\u00a0Mahal\u00a0Marg,\n                                          Lucknow.\n\n\n\n        The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0Kundan.\n\n        On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad<\/pre>\n<pre>        (i)      Shri\u00a0S.\u00a0K.\u00a0Asthana,\n        (ii)     Shri\u00a0A.C.\u00a0Aggarwal,\n        (iii)    Shri\u00a0Varun\u00a0K\u00a0\u00a0Kumar\n\n\u00a0\n<\/pre>\n<p>2.      In\u00a0this\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a012\u00a0October\u00a02008,\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>requested \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 for \u00a0 a \u00a0 number \u00a0 of \u00a0 information \u00a0 regarding \u00a0 the \u00a0 wrongful\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>withdrawal\u00a0of\u00a0money\u00a0from\u00a0his\u00a0Saving\u00a0account.\u00a0In\u00a0his\u00a0reply\u00a0dated\u00a029\u00a0November\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>2008,\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0offered\u00a0some\u00a0clarification\u00a0against\u00a0some\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0queries\u00a0while\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>also\u00a0observing\u00a0that\u00a0some\u00a0other\u00a0queries\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0amount\u00a0to\u00a0information\u00a0at\u00a0all.\u00a0Not\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0preferred\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0on\u00a01\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>December\u00a02008.\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0appeal\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0order\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000982<br \/>\n dated\u00a07\u00a0January\u00a02009\u00a0in\u00a0which\u00a0he\u00a0endorsed\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO.\u00a0It\u00a0is\u00a0this\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>order\u00a0which\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0has\u00a0challenged\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0second\u00a0appeal.<\/p>\n<p>3.      We \u00a0 heard \u00a0 this \u00a0 case \u00a0 through \u00a0 videoconferencing. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Appellant \u00a0 was\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>present\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0Mau\u00a0studio\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0NIC\u00a0whereas\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0were\u00a0present\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0Mumbai\u00a0studio.\u00a0We\u00a0heard\u00a0their\u00a0submissions.\u00a0The\u00a0facts\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0relate\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0alleged\u00a0fraudulent\u00a0withdrawal\u00a0of\u00a0money\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0account\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0It\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>appears\u00a0the\u00a0Bank\u00a0have\u00a0already\u00a0reported\u00a0the\u00a0matter\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0police\u00a0and\u00a0it\u00a0is\u00a0being\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>investigated. \u00a0 The \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 during \u00a0 the \u00a0 hearing \u00a0 that \u00a0 no\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>responsibility\u00a0has\u00a0however\u00a0been\u00a0fixed\u00a0within\u00a0the\u00a0Bank\u00a0so\u00a0far\u00a0on\u00a0any\u00a0individual\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>officer\u00a0of\u00a0employee\u00a0for\u00a0this\u00a0act\u00a0of\u00a0fraud,\u00a0and\u00a0therefore,\u00a0they\u00a0are\u00a0not\u00a0in\u00a0a\u00a0position\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>to \u00a0 indicate \u00a0 the \u00a0 name \u00a0 of \u00a0 any \u00a0 particular \u00a0 officer \u00a0 or \u00a0 employee \u00a0 who \u00a0 might \u00a0 be\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>responsible\u00a0for\u00a0this.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>4.      The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0specially\u00a0exercised\u00a0over\u00a0the\u00a0fact\u00a0that\u00a0in\u00a0spite\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Bank\u00a0admitting\u00a0that\u00a0a\u00a0fraud\u00a0had\u00a0been\u00a0committed\u00a0on\u00a0his\u00a0account,\u00a0it\u00a0did\u00a0not\u00a0make\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>good\u00a0his\u00a0loss.\u00a0Besides,\u00a0he\u00a0also\u00a0complained\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Bank\u00a0had\u00a0tried\u00a0to\u00a0implicate\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>him\u00a0in\u00a0some\u00a0case\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0his\u00a0life\u00a0was\u00a0under\u00a0threat.\u00a0The\u00a0Respondents\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>other\u00a0hand\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0such\u00a0allegations\u00a0were\u00a0baseless\u00a0and\u00a0had\u00a0no\u00a0merit\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0Bank\u00a0had\u00a0done\u00a0nothing\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0kind.\u00a0The\u00a0dispute\u00a0between\u00a0the\u00a0customer\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the\u00a0 Bank\u00a0 is\u00a0 something\u00a0 which\u00a0 cannot\u00a0 be \u00a0 resolved\u00a0 by\u00a0 us\u00a0 under\u00a0 the\u00a0 Right\u00a0 to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Information\u00a0 (RTI) \u00a0 Act. \u00a0 However,\u00a0 if \u00a0 the \u00a0 Bank\u00a0 has\u00a0 admitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 a \u00a0 fraud \u00a0 had\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>occurred\u00a0and\u00a0money\u00a0was\u00a0wrongly\u00a0withdrawn,\u00a0it\u00a0might\u00a0consider\u00a0compensating\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>the \u00a0 customer\u00a0 without\u00a0 waiting \u00a0 for \u00a0 the \u00a0 final \u00a0 results \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 police \u00a0 investigation\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>which, \u00a0 by \u00a0 its \u00a0 very \u00a0 nature, \u00a0 could \u00a0 be \u00a0 indefinitely \u00a0 long \u00a0 involving \u00a0 possible\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>prosecution\u00a0in\u00a0courts\u00a0of\u00a0law.\n<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000982\n<\/p>\n<p> 5.      As\u00a0far\u00a0as\u00a0providing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0concerned,\u00a0we\u00a0do\u00a0not\u00a0find\u00a0if\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>anything\u00a0more\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0can\u00a0provide\u00a0since\u00a0most\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0queries\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>are \u00a0 in \u00a0 the \u00a0 nature \u00a0 of \u00a0 comments\u00a0 on \u00a0 the \u00a0 functioning \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Bank\u00a0 rather \u00a0 than\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>seeking \u00a0 any \u00a0 information \u00a0 within \u00a0 the \u00a0 meaning \u00a0 of \u00a0 Section \u00a0 2(f) \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Right \u00a0 to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Information \u00a0 (RTI) \u00a0 Act. \u00a0 The \u00a0 only \u00a0 information \u00a0 which \u00a0 could \u00a0 be \u00a0 provided \u00a0 is\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>regarding\u00a0the\u00a0complaints\u00a0received\u00a0about\u00a0this\u00a0Branch\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0last\u00a010\u00a0years.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The \u00a0 Respondents \u00a0 submitted \u00a0 that \u00a0 collecting \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 regarding \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>complaints\u00a0 for\u00a0 a\u00a0 period\u00a0 of\u00a010\u00a0 years\u00a0would\u00a0be\u00a0 a\u00a0 very\u00a0 voluminous\u00a0and\u00a0time\u00ad<\/p>\n<p>consuming \u00a0 task \u00a0 which \u00a0 would \u00a0 disproportionately \u00a0 divert \u00a0 the \u00a0 resources \u00a0 of \u00a0 the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Bank. \u00a0 Therefore, \u00a0 keeping \u00a0 this \u00a0 submission \u00a0 in \u00a0 mind, \u00a0 we \u00a0 direct \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 to\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>provide\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0within\u00a010\u00a0working\u00a0days\u00a0from\u00a0receipt\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order,\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>photocopy\u00a0of\u00a0relevant\u00a0pages\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0complaint\u00a0register\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Branch\u00a0for\u00a0a\u00a0period\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>of\u00a0two\u00a0years\u00a0preceding\u00a0the\u00a0date\u00a0of\u00a0application.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>6.      With\u00a0the\u00a0above\u00a0direction,\u00a0the\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0disposed\u00a0off.<\/p>\n<p>7.      Copies\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0order\u00a0be\u00a0given\u00a0free\u00a0of\u00a0cost\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0parties.<\/p>\n<p>                                                                      (Satyananda\u00a0Mishra)<br \/>\n                                                              Information\u00a0Commissioner<\/p>\n<p>        Authenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy.\u00a0\u00a0Additional\u00a0copies\u00a0of\u00a0orders\u00a0shall\u00a0be\u00a0supplied\u00a0against\u00a0<br \/>\napplication\u00a0and\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0charges\u00a0prescribed\u00a0under\u00a0the\u00a0Act\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0CPIO\u00a0of\u00a0this\u00a0<br \/>\nCommission.\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                                                 (Vijay\u00a0Bhalla)<br \/>\n                                                                          Assistant\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n<p>CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000982\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Central Information Commission Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010 Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission File\u00a0No.CIC\/SM\/A\/2009\/000982\u00a0dated\u00a012\u00ad10\u00ad2008 Right\u00a0to\u00a0Information\u00a0Act\u00ad2005\u00adUnder\u00a0Section\u00a0\u00a0(19) Dated:\u00a06\u00a0May\u00a02010 Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0 : Shri\u00a0Dudh\u00a0Nath\u00a0Ram S\/o\u00a0Shri\u00a0Dwarika\u00a0Ram, Vill\u00a0&amp;\u00a0Post\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Ranipur, Distt\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0Mau,\u00a0UP\u00a0&#8211;\u00a0276\u00a0402. Name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0 : CPIO,\u00a0State\u00a0Bank\u00a0of\u00a0India, Local\u00a0Head\u00a0Office, Moti\u00a0Mahal\u00a0Marg, Lucknow. The\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0present\u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0Shri\u00a0Kundan. On\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0Respondent,\u00a0the\u00a0following\u00a0were\u00a0present:\u00ad (i) Shri\u00a0S.\u00a0K.\u00a0Asthana, (ii) Shri\u00a0A.C.\u00a0Aggarwal, (iii) Shri\u00a0Varun\u00a0K\u00a0\u00a0Kumar \u00a0 2. In\u00a0this\u00a0case,\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0had,\u00a0in\u00a0his\u00a0application\u00a0dated\u00a012\u00a0October\u00a02008,\u00a0 requested \u00a0 the \u00a0 CPIO \u00a0 for \u00a0 a \u00a0 number \u00a0 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53821","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-05-05T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-27T04:22:03+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-27T04:22:03+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010\"},\"wordCount\":622,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010\",\"name\":\"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-05-05T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-27T04:22:03+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-05-05T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-27T04:22:03+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010","datePublished":"2010-05-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-27T04:22:03+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010"},"wordCount":622,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010","name":"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-05-05T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-27T04:22:03+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-dudh-nath-ram-vs-state-bank-of-india-on-6-may-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr. Dudh Nath Ram vs State Bank Of India on 6 May, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53821","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53821"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53821\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53821"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53821"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53821"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}