{"id":53845,"date":"2008-09-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-09-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008"},"modified":"2017-05-09T17:17:36","modified_gmt":"2017-05-09T11:47:36","slug":"mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008","title":{"rendered":"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Deepak Verma Gowda<\/div>\n
VT   1. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT   \nDATED THIS THE 19111 DAY    kk\nBEFORE  E    J  %  X\nTHE HONBLE   \nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUS\ufb02\ufb01&('{'\\;i2DB;'Si\u00a7EF\u00a7KIYA\u00a7E (3o\\$IDA\n\ngxswmmous mar  2004 m)\n\n  or 200443\nmum NO.--300'i-  A ~ t)1}**    A \n\nMoham\ufb01iai Naj\u00e9az \nSo1:miMd.Ghause Ahmed\n\n \n\n     H  ..... \n\" Resident oI'No.60\/ 3\n ' 431'  \\ ia  thappa Block\nBa'r1galQ1fe~ 003 Appellant\n (By Sri Sriped V Shastri and Sri K.G.Bhat,\n\n' R--O.Leo Shopping Complex\nResidency Road\nBangalore ' \ufb01j\nBy its Manager\n\n \n\n\n\n'2. M\/s Sony India (P) Ltd.\nA--G-50, Gati Corporation\nSanjay Gandhi Nagar V _\nNewDe1hi 110001 \" \"\n\nBy its Proprietor   77:.\n\n(By Sri A.Ravishankar, Ac\u00a3\u00a7cgg1;c fm~V:R-1)dd %d   \n\n116 mm xo.s1o6 or \nBETWEEN: V  \"A\n\nThe Oriental irxsmanb\u00e9'  \nR.0.Leo Shopiiirag C?.>i!II.=i_pieX    \n\n \"    \nBangalorg   \u00bb  '_  V-Appellant\n\nS1'iA.}.\u00a3nI1an1132\u00a2:d ' Nay\u00e9z Ahmed\n ,  about 35\"years'\n = 'San of'dE'a4di1amA_ med Ghouse Ahmed\n ' ,.R'csi<ii1'1"gd at ANa.6O\/3, 43* Main\n V'asanttzappav.Block\n Guttahal\ufb01\nB&ngaEo1'a\u00ab~56O 003\n\n 3, Sony India (P) Ltd.\n AG':{30, Gati Corporaxion\n\ndd Sanjay Gandhin\ufb01\nNew Deihi\n\n   Represented by its Mana\ufb01xm Director ~--Rcspoa1dents\n\n(By Sri Sri Sripad V Shastri and Sri K.G.Bhat,\nAdvocates for R\u00bb 1) \nI\n\n \n\n\n\nThis Miscellaneous First Appeal No.3oo7o~;$\u00a3%2oo;;o['iso \n\n\ufb01led under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehid\nseeking to modify and enhance com\n\n65 oAct\u00bb%ooo1988, V . oo \nsation as _jaw\u00a3m'iodo- \n\nby the MACI', xx: Additional Judge,Banga1ms c3ityoE$CCf1,+J.'\n8) in MVC No.2o33 of 200:2' \n\n\u00a3mmRs.2,25,0oo\/- no 10,00,000\/g.\nThis MFA No.8106 of zoom \ufb01led~-ljinizcr 'on\n1731) of the Motor Vehicios Act, ,1988,"3.eekin'g--::o set aside\n\nthe award dated 25.8.2Ci' O4%._  o.:\u00a7\u00a2p;:.*o33 of 2002 on\nthe fiie of the MACT, Bangedore {$V(?5( 1I~I.-8)_.;   _\n\nThose Misoc4lian;cou\u00e9"   on for\nhearing this day,"'o;1T.o.DEEPAiK""  deiive-red the\nfollowing:    "    \n\n ' ' ' '     ._ \nSri  A  : s:1f__id' Sri K.G.Bhat, learned\n\ncounsel  fo'ro~_'\u00a7:l3;\u00a2'  in MFA No.8007 of\n\n am: fotxj\u00a2s1$oi1<iez2.t'No.I in MFA No.8106 of 2004.\n\nSH,'  ieamed counsel appeared for\n\n  MFA No.8007 of 2004 and, for\n\n% _;;4Lup'p(;fllant;.izr1V"'I\u00bb\u00a7IF;A No.8016 of 2004.\n\n  No.8007 of 2004 has been preferred by the\n  Mohammad Nayaz Ahmed under Section 173(1)\n\n ihe Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the award dated\n\n7%\n\n \n\n\n\n25.3.2004 passed by the Motor Accident   \n\nBangalore in MVC No.2033 of 2002.,  \n\nMFA No.8016 of 2004  \n\nInsmance Cempany    {he 0' 0\n\nground that the amount.' of  'awarjcled to\nclaimant together with   (ff 8 pa' cent\nper annum is    to be\nsuitably  0  0.1     \n\nThus,-~th\u20ac:     and the\n\nlatter is fof"    compensa;t1'on.\n\n3.  have  heard learned counsei for the\n\n _  fes the records.\n\n_{_l\\_I ivmA.0No;  goo4:\n\n    Ahmed was aged 35\n\n0 00311;!  working in Saudi Arabia with postmg' at\n\n 'He had some to India during vacation. When he\n\n on 2.10.2001 at about 1 p.m. as a pii\ufb01on\n\n at Ban.galone--Nelamanga3a Road,\n\n'B\n\n \n\n\n\nimpugned award. The said amount is to   \n\nthe rate of 8 per cent per  \u00a7;1\u00a71@3  \n\npetition till its actual payment. V\n\n6. It has not been disputad  'u.\u00a7\u00bb  \nvehicle was being   by its\ndriver and it was   insured\nwith Iespondeggt    dispute that in\nthe said  bodily injuriaes\nand was  in the hospital for\n\ntreatment.   Company to pay the\n\naJ11ount\u00ab\u00a7f've6mpc1isafjq;; has not been disputed.\n\n  k above, appeal in MFA M3007\n\n   preferred by the claimant for\n\n' "  Whereas the latter appeal MFA No.8106 of\n\n been preferred by the Insurance Company for\n\n'VVx3\u00a7\u00ab:i:;1Ex _--v_ h \"'i'bit \n\nMedical papers also show   iixpa\ufb01era\ufb01: \nHospital for a period of V 8. ...\u00a7lays\"hrayvd :4 \ufb01\u00e9fgre fh\u00a3it,\"'hc was\ntreated in some other  the accident.\n\nPW-2 Dr.su:end;;ag;g;uz   that his\n\n \n\nPermanent \"  imb is to the extent\nof 30   whole body it would\ncome to 1o'p\u00a71~  had su\ufb01bred six injuries.\n\nOut of the   injuries 5 and 6 were\n\n o1*~.:ig;t  pubic ramidia status at pubic\n\nsyii2'p\u00b0hi_:s'i's  si joint and \ufb01acture of Ieft temporal\n\nI  *'i2one,  of left Iobodisis rupture, and the\n\n J :L-;+c.~n\u00a2:~ai%%ningT \"were sun' pie injuries.\n\n A' Tribunal while considering the names' awarded\n\n. '  V '* A  amounts under different heads:\n\n  f(a) For pain, agony, trauma injury and\n\nRs.4(),OO0.<)0\n'E\n\nsufferings\n\n \n\n\n\n(b)Medica1 expenses as per bills\n\nproduced by the appellant     "  \n\n(c) Other incidental charges like\nconveyance, special diet,\n\nAttendant charges, noux'isI1meI;t.,_  V.  V'\n\n(d) Loss of amenities in life        :2s;o5;eoo.oo\n(6) F'umI'c medical     Rs.Ve5;e0o.0o\n(1) Loss of income during    ' j_=1;RS.06,QOO.0\n\n(8) Loss of cine:      \ndisab\ufb02ityinreepem; "    '\nWhole body  "  V' \n\nas 15 as    \n\nDecision n'_:poI1:_e(i    250 1.. . R:5.90,0OO.OO\nTotal amou1it__ef 'eiwal\ufb01ed  Rs.2,25, 188.00\n\nItwas mended  '   Rs.2,25,000.00\n\n '  for the claimant submitted that the\n\n a gave error in coming to the\n\n._ _&~_;.ceeeIusieri   the appellant was earning only\n\n- per month even though he had establistwd\n\n  'I'ribunal that he was earning 4,500\/~ Riyals per\n\n which would be equivalent to Rs.57,375\/- in\n\n  currency. To satzisty ourselves as to what could\n\nwe\n\n \n\n\n\nhave been the income of the appellant in  \n\nwe have carefuliy gone through  V\n\nExhibit P-7, pleading of the appcl]aIi'\u20ac."\n\ntherewith. Cumulativf: e\ufb01'ec't  \navailable on record and  '  P-7 a\ncerti\ufb01cate does not iI16piI'\u00e9 Liv\u00e9..'V'_c1ear1y made\nout that the sang:    of the\nclaimant    English but the\n    also not visible. It\nhas  This certi\ufb01cate shows\n\nthat he   General Manager, whereas\n\n  thgf:  he was working as clerk and\n\nv\u00a7'Va.s   4,000 Riyals. So there is great\n\n  and the proof. No other\n\n document has been \ufb01led Le. the bank\n\n any other details in this regard from Riyadh to\n\nH  his salary of 4,500\/~-- Riyals per month, was\n\n  to be crodited to his bank account. . This aspect of\n\nS  the matter has not been established by the claimant. In\n\n'B'\n\n \n\n\n\nVi(':W of this, we are of the opinion that the  \n\ncommitted no error in assessing the inwmc    V\n\nRs.10,000\/- per month.\n\n11. Admittedly, the appellant    8\ndays and had sulfa-red   agony. The\ndoctor has opined that his.  is to the\nextent of 10 per   the Tribunal\nhas    only at 5\npcr aunt    '  reasons for\nreduction    Jiiisability. Tribunal has\n\n  ai.-3 far as this aspect of the matter\n\ni3._cor'mc:::'1:t;;c;L  \n\ni ii   in evidence of the appellant that he\n\n_ jvmpii-:1 I1oti*s:_\u00e9ume to his duties and had lost one way air\n\n the process. Even after joining there _on a\n\niiipa%%  data, he could not be able to discharge his\n\n in the same fashion as he used to do mrlisr, and\n\nultimateiy had to lose thejob. It has further been deposed\n\nW\n\n \n\n\n\nby him that he stiil continues to stay in   \n\nlost that job due to his physical disabiiity  K x\n\nof bad performance after the   " J\n\n13. It is pertinent to  the\nrespondents have not   to the<\/pre>\n
evidence adduced by the e1ai1}ean.i.V _     <\/p>\n
14. In the    and features
\nand    of the considered
\nopinion   the amounts awarded
\ndeserve te   accordingly do so for the
\n   paragaphs.\n<\/p>\n
( 1)’ For’  ” \ufb01ranma, iixjury
\nand  it \ufb01t and<\/p>\n
: VV  vpmpertp’ award  ‘   Rs.50,0{}\ufb02.OO<\/p>\n
. %.Tf’_j-(?..)’ Medical” e\ufb01tpenses do not call for
\n_ _[“a1.-13*e,g:hs;n:ge. Henge, it is as awarded
\n by      Rs.72,688.00<\/p>\n
% eager incidental charges, like<\/p>\n
conveyance, special diet,<\/p>\n
 ‘Attendant charges, nourishment, etc ….. .. Rs. 10,000.00<\/p>\n
% 14) Loss efamenities in life ……. ..  Rs.25,00{).0O<\/p>\n
\/9<\/p>\n
(5) Future medical expenses…    <\/p>\n
(6) Loss of income during
\ntreatment at the rate ofRs.10,000\/-.; ‘<\/p>\n
Per month as has been assessed
\nby the Tribunal  V<\/p>\n
(7) Loss of future income due to 0′
\ndisability in respect ofthe
\nWhole body, taking mtnup\ufb01er as 15 1’ V
\n10,000 X 10% = 1,000 X 12 *9   Rs. 1,80,00.00<\/p>\n
(8) Loss of air tickette_wa17d”6z1e;   ‘f’2s.:25,000.00<\/p>\n
the appellant  ..\n<\/p>\n
Total compensa\ufb01on   T) 0
\n \u00bb   = Rs.4,02,688.00<\/p>\n
15. Undei\ufb01tile  of the case, we are of<\/p>\n
the opinion    of claimant appellant (MFA<\/p>\n
e10~io;3o$oe:?:EJ002004). \u00abewes to be allowed in part, and is<\/p>\n
 part. The impugzed award stands<\/p>\n
:   the appellant would be entitled to<\/p>\n
‘ ”  respondents jointly and severally 9. sum of<\/p>\n
V   together with interest at the rate of 6 per<\/p>\n
 anmun from the date of petition ma; its actuai<\/p>\n
 w<\/p>\n
IN MFA 1510.8 106 OF :_2oo4: .\n<\/p>\n
15. In the light or me  V
\nNo.8106 of 2004 preferred by the
\npartly ailowcd as far as    is ‘V V\n<\/p>\n
17. Parties am   respective<\/p>\n
costs through. H\n<\/p>\n
18. A   in the connected<\/p>\n
ySd\/—\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
Sd\/-a.\n<\/p>\n
.Tudg\u00e9_<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008 Author: Deepak Verma Gowda VT 1. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED THIS THE 19111 DAY kk BEFORE E J % X THE HONBLE THE HON’BLE MR.JUS\ufb02\ufb01&(‘{‘\\;i2DB;’Si\u00a7EF\u00a7KIYA\u00a7E (3o\\$IDA gxswmmous mar 2004 m) […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53845","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nMohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-09T11:47:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-09T11:47:36+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008\"},\"wordCount\":273,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008\",\"name\":\"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-09T11:47:36+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-09T11:47:36+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008","datePublished":"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-09T11:47:36+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008"},"wordCount":273,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008","name":"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-09-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-09T11:47:36+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mohammed-nayaz-ahmed-vs-the-oriental-insurance-co-ltd-on-19-september-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs The Oriental Insurance Co Ltd on 19 September, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53845","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53845"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53845\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}