{"id":53949,"date":"2011-08-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-04-25T20:02:25","modified_gmt":"2017-04-25T14:32:25","slug":"somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court<\/div>\n
Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI\n                W.P.(S) No. 1170 of 2011\n                         --------\n<\/pre>\n
Somaru      …    …   …      … … … … Petitioner
\n                         Versus
\nCentral Coalfields Limited and others … … … Respondents\n<\/p>\n
                        ——-\n<\/p>\n
CORAM:              HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.PATEL\n<\/p>\n
                        ——–<\/p>\n
\nFor the petitioner:     Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad Sinha\nFor the respondents:    Mr. A.K. Das\n                        --------\nOrder No. 02: Dated 16th August, 2011\nPer D.N.Patel, J.\n\n<\/pre>\n
1.   The present writ petition has been preferred by the petitioner for
\n     getting compassionate appointment, because his father has
\n     expired on 23rd December, 2003 while in service of the
\n     respondents. The petitioner, being the son of the deceased
\n     employee,     applied    within   the   stipulated   time   for   getting
\n     compassionate appointment and since the respondents have not
\n     appointed the petitioner, the present writ petition has been
\n     preferred in the year, 2011.\n<\/p>\n
2.   Having heard learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the
\n     facts and circumstances of the case, I see no reason to entertain
\n     this writ petition, mainly for the following reasons:
\n     (I)     Father of the petitioner, who was serving with the
\n     respondents, expired during course of employment on 23rd
\n     December, 2003 and the petitioner, being son of the deceased
\n     employee, has applied for compassionate appointment.\n<\/p>\n
     (ii)    It appears that more than half a dozen years has lapsed
\n     from the date of death of the father of the petitioner and, thus, the
\n     very purpose of compassionate appointment has been frustrated
\n     by now.\n<\/p>\n
     (iii)   The Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of State of U.P. v.
\n     Paras Nath,<\/a> as reported in (1998)2 SCC 412, especially at
\n     paragraph nos. 4, 5 and 6, has held as under:\n<\/p>\n
                  “4.    Seventeen years after the death of his father,
\n                  the respondent, on 8.1.1986, made an application for
\n                  being appointed to the post of a Primary School
\n                  Teacher under the said Rules. His application was
\n                  rejected. He, thereafter, filed a writ petition before the
\n                  High Court. This writ petition was allowed by the High
\n                  Court and an appeal from the decision of the Single
\n                                -2-<\/span>
\n            Judge of the High Court was also dismissed by the
\n            Division Bench of the High Court. Hence the State
\n            has filed the present appeal.<\/p>\n
            5.    The purpose of providing employment to a
\n            dependant of a Government servant dying in harness
\n            in preference to anybody else, is to mitigate the
\n            hardship caused to the family of the employee on
\n            account of his unexpected death while still in service.
\n            To alleviate the distress of the family, such
\n            appointments are permissible on compassionate
\n            grounds provided there are Rules providing for such
\n            appointments. The purpose is to provide immediate
\n            financial assistance to the family of a deceased
\n            Government servant. None of these considerations
\n            can operate when the application is made after a long
\n            period of time such as seventeen years in the present
\n            case.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            6.     We may, in this connection, refer to only one
\n            judgment of this Court in the case of Union of India v.
\n            Bhagwan Singh. In<\/a> this case, the application for
\n            appointment on similar compassionate grounds was
\n            made twenty years after the railway servant’s death.
\n            This Court observed:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
               ‘The     reason     for   making    compassionate
\n               appointment, which is exceptional, is to provide
\n               immediate financial assistance to the family of a
\n               Government servant who dies in harness, when
\n               there is no other earning member in the family.'”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                           (Emphasis supplied)<\/p>\n
      Further, the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Sanjay
\nKumar v. State of Bihar & ors., as reported in (2000)7 SCC 192,
\nespecially at paragraph nos. 2 and 3, has held as under:\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            “2.    Learned Senior Counsel appearing on behalf of
\n            the petitioner has placed strong reliance on the
\n            decision of a learned Single Judge of the Patna High
\n                               3.<\/span>
\n            Court in Chandra Bhushan v. State of Bihar. Learned
\n            Senior Counsel points out that it was held in that case
\n            that an applicant’s right cannot be defeated on the
\n            ground of delay caused by authorities which was
\n            beyond the control of the applicant. Learned Senior
\n            Counsel further points out that instead of following the
\n            above judgment, the same learned Judge has now
\n            held on 21.4.1997 that the application is time-barred.
\n            Learned counsel has placed before us a judgment of
\n            this Court in Director of Education (Secondary) v.
\n            Pushpendra Kumar. He<\/a> submits that, in this case, a
\n            direction was given to create supernumerary posts.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
            3.     We are unable to agree with the submissions of
\n            the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner. This
\n            Court has held in a number of cases that
\n            compassionate appointment is intended to enable the
\n                                                     -3-<\/span>
\n                                family of the deceased employee to tide over sudden
\n                                crisis resulting due to death of the breadearner
\n                                had left the family in penury and without any means of
\n                                livelihood. In fact such a view has been expressed in
\n                                the very decision cited by the petitioner in Director of
\n                                Education v. Pushpendra Kumar. It<\/a> is also significant
\n                                to notice that on the date when the first application
\n                                was made by the petitioner on 2.6.1998, the petitioner
\n                                was a minor and was not eligible for appointment.
\n                                This is conceded by the petitioner. There cannot be
\n                                reservation of a vacancy till such time as the
\n                                petitioner becomes a major after a number of years,
\n                                unless there are some specific provisions. The very
\n                                basis of compassionate appointment is to see that the
\n                                family gets immediate relief.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n
                                                                (Emphasis supplied)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n
              5.   Thus, in view of the aforesaid decisions and also looking to the fact
\n                   that more than half a dozen years has lapsed after the death of the
\n                   deceased employee, I see no reason to entertain this writ petition
\n                   for granting compassionate appointment to the petitioner. Hence
\n                   there is no substance in this writ petition, which is, accordingly,
\n                   dismissed.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n
                                                         ( D.N. Patel, J. )
\nManoj\/cp.2.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Jharkhand High Court Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 1170 of 2011 ——– Somaru … … … … … … … Petitioner Versus Central Coalfields Limited and others … … … Respondents ——- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.PATEL ——– For […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,18],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-53949","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-jharkhand-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSomaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-25T14:32:25+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-25T14:32:25+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":904,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Jharkhand High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-25T14:32:25+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-25T14:32:25+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-25T14:32:25+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011"},"wordCount":904,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Jharkhand High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011","name":"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-25T14:32:25+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/somaru-vs-central-coalfield-limited-or-on-16-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Somaru vs Central Coalfield Limited & Or on 16 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53949","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=53949"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/53949\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=53949"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=53949"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=53949"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}