{"id":54582,"date":"2008-03-07T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-03-06T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008"},"modified":"2017-10-03T11:20:18","modified_gmt":"2017-10-03T05:50:18","slug":"n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008","title":{"rendered":"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda<\/div>\n
'  GED; ABOUT 75 YEARS,\n\n \n\n \n\nB'EFORt:*E.:'\n\nfl\n\nTHE HGNFBLE 'MR. JUS11CEcA.'N: veuuamm %\n\nwarr pmnon ~o.3sao;29o6%($MecPc)\nE5E'!\"J;EE!\\!=.    'k  \n\n. N.C.' BASA\u00a5A%?.-AJU.  '\n\nAGED 45 YEARS,'  .  \n\n{-3\n\n2. MC. B;As.mi;z:s;3AsA;1,'  k  3   A\nA1359ABqu1j'*=:3a\u00a7raA;s2$, '  \n\n3. M2.    % %\nAGED \u00bb!'5\\IT5(?i?LifTV\"':?*j2_\"f~'1{'I'E.4'?.\u00ab_I_'n{'en:ci*--ether incidental reliefs in respect of the suit\n\n.' As'i:hedul'e?j;~ribbertles. 2\"' respondent herein being the sole<\/pre>\n
,  has \ufb01led written statement to the suit.<\/p>\n
 fiied i.A.2 under Order 1 Ruie :16 of tee<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
0 permit them te<\/p>\n
get lmpieaded as defendants 2 to 4 in the suit. I.A.2 was<\/p>\n
opposed by the plaintiff by mine the statement of<\/p>\n
\\\/<\/p>\n
hearing learned counsel for the,AApertiee*,””trl\u00a7i’e <\/p>\n
dismissed I.A.2 vlde its order  iietlltioraars ‘<\/p>\n
being aggrieved, have \ufb02ied this vi:-itipstitsoh  aueldeii\u00bb<\/p>\n
the order of the trial Court_:pheseo’_  arid to allow<\/p>\n
the prayer in I.A.2.\n<\/p>\n
2. Heordtsri.  learned counsel
\nfor the apetlgtiohersl:   “Inna Shelter, learned<\/p>\n
is no representation for<\/p>\n
e envs’ .r”:reependeot”-1. “l”her<\/p>\n
th.eir.._1’iat~rful right, title and interest in the suit schedule<\/p>\n
 .. ‘properties. Learned counsel pointed out that in the<\/p>\n
it  ‘efilidavit in support of I.A.2, petitioners have stated that<\/p>\n
 under a Panchayat Paiupatti dated 10.3.1992, their<\/p>\n
parents Le. plaintiff and defendant in the suit, divided the<\/p>\n
A I
\n3U|<\/p>\n
PI’
\n3}
\n:r
\nH)
\nca.\n<\/p>\n
5?.\n<\/p>\n
or
\n’55
\nc:\n<\/p>\n
‘:5
\ngr
\n1:!
\nan
\n::\n<\/p>\n
:3.\n<\/p>\n
\u00a31′
\n:3-\n<\/p>\n
on
\nU!
\nE’
\n:3
\nno
\n::i-\n<\/p>\n
ll
\n4:\n<\/p>\n
an
\nE3.’
\nii”\n<\/p>\n
:3
\n3′
\n:1′
\nin\n<\/p>\n
-e<\/p>\n
strres and on that ‘oasis and on the ii\ufb01’3iS=’=3f<\/p>\n
Palupatti, mutation was executed,’ and _i<'atn'e"_:ainri v'Panam~~ 5 <\/p>\n
have also been made out in'~e:4th+eir.. 7reep1ecti've"VI\u00a7namee.<\/p>\n
Learned counsel contenaanggnat  trial:Co_u4rtWn\u00e9itnoet*<\/p>\n
examining the claim of the':-\u00bbrn_etitionere_:ln the proper<\/p>\n
by megrrettlng   ghee :,\u00bb;__ea.
\nirreoaratlle  _and'jnrej:udi__ce;to tiiern, apart from leading<\/p>\n
to multinltci't;r1".;_9f Learned counsel further
\ncontend_edthat._:i'i:he'~.trlva_I Court has not examined the
\nmatter accordancetinitht. law while passing the order on<\/p>\n
IV'.;\u00a7\\;2,e.impugnedtherein.<\/p>\n
V T_  _  'contra, Sri. B.T. Indu Shekar, learned counsel<\/p>\n
.'eanoea.ringi_V..:'for the 1" respondent contended that,<\/p>\n
"  A 'A .-.auIn
\n_ Ulr. the u5'I'. huudi\ufb01 \ufb01t' |'Ti\ufb01rI.IE"'a,<\/p>\n
petltionere have no manner of lawful right, title or interest<\/p>\n
In<\/p>\n
 they base their claim is a created document to knock off<\/p>\n
valuable properties of the plaintiff and even otherwise the<\/p>\n
same is inadmissible document and as such their claim to<\/p>\n
\\\/="'<\/p>\n
h;\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
1|<\/p>\n
the suit properties is false and untenable. Leo:rned’V’.eotin.SeI~..’<\/p>\n
further submitted that, the petitioners  ‘ e. <\/p>\n
and proper parties for adjudicotion’.A_’_ofV the <\/p>\n
13′<\/p>\n
urt auu hence the trtel f:eert–. is–\u00bb..,.:stifi-ed..i:r:… dismissing<\/p>\n
C)<\/p>\n
I.A.2. Learned counisei:medeilsuibhnissioyns in support of
\nthe impugned. order.   H V<\/p>\n
5. 1′ \u00a7o3js\u00a7derr’rg_:tne rive: -‘ontentions and on perosei
\nof recordpthe poi\u00e9ints..the:t arises for consideration is;<\/p>\n
 ” Whethefr*.:’Vthe'<."triai Court has properly<\/p>\n
 e:-':e.-deed jtmedictton vested in !t Ln pest-lug<\/p>\n
the impuaned order?\n<\/p>\n
.  ..whet\u00e9h”erAthe petitioners are necessary and
\ny opro_per parties?\n<\/p>\n
rd <\/p>\n
Where is no deep-…e that the petitioners ere the<\/p>\n
 A chiidren of respondents 1 and .2. “esponde”ts 1 and 2 are<\/p>\n
 ‘w..hnsbend and wife. Respondent 1 being the wife of<\/p>\n
 respondent 2,’has flied the suit seeking declaration that<\/p>\n
the registered document No.1198\/56-57, registered in the<\/p>\n
office of Sub Registrar, Kunioai by her parents to be a<\/p>\n
\\\/<\/p>\n
\/..\n<\/p>\n
eve erisen for consideratiori~w..of the .su!tVA’oefere”ti1’e tri-oi’<\/p>\n
nominal document and not exe:;’uted.\u00abo:’ 4_<\/p>\n
misrepresentation, coercion ete.:,~~end defendant’ ‘ ; <\/p>\n
cannot be held to have acquired’i4an\u00a7friohtytitlevor <\/p>\n
her as the ahsehrte av.-her ef the stat echedhle hrehert\u00e9es,<\/p>\n
having inherited the eame   of her parents.
\nThere is also prayer  and alternate
\nprayer  dead’ if found
\nto   for partition and to allot<\/p>\n
halfilsharee  reliefs. The case of the<\/p>\n
ee.it|eri’ers.; vvhe hleretrae chlld-rear. ef the r-..e,e-endente is
\nthat, the suit schedule properties ‘oelone t’ their frther,<\/p>\n
vh Vfresp.ovn\u00abdent~2__,_ who has improved the same. It is their case<\/p>\n
  reepondents Le. parents, got divided the suit<\/p>\n
eehedule ‘properties under Panchayat Palupattl and the sult<\/p>\n
V ” Visehedlule properties were allotted in their favour, on the<\/p>\n
‘heels of whlch, the Katha has been transferred to their<\/p>\n
rar-he and ehtrtes lh the Pahah\u00e9 have came to. he made.<\/p>\n
\ufb02ay allege that to the Panchavath Paiupatti dated<\/p>\n
10.2.1992, the 1″‘ respondent has put her LTM. They have
\n\\<\/p>\n
X<\/p>\n
ver the saree;~v~.._she’t’has’ declare’ T<\/p>\n
q\\.\n<\/p>\n
further stated that the piaintilf suppressing 4_<\/p>\n
facts, has \ufb02ied the suit against. the ‘ree4pondeht:”‘2.4_et the ~ g <\/p>\n
instigation of her son-in-law and;’the5_A_suiVt is~av”i:oiviilsi\u00a7e.suit_.<\/p>\n
It is their case that, they  e_nti_p’roper parties i’<\/p>\n
V” ‘..-\n<\/p>\n
o th oroeeedings.\n<\/p>\n
7. Considering the  ‘AAri}ejiiitionshlp between<\/p>\n
the respontients1″and_ the.”‘:petit:ione.rs.V.5and also their <\/p>\n
i venvcn\u00e9ffat.F-‘ei’upatt’i”o’n 10.3.1992 and-that Katha
\nhas tween trensferred~,_:i”entries in the Pahani have been<\/p>\n
m\ufb01cie and .:that’:- the suit is for declaration and other<\/p>\n
  ‘ incidentaei ,rellei*s,””a’iso keeping in mind, the allegation that<\/p>\n
i  Iceliusive suit, in my view, I.A.2 ought to have<\/p>\n
teen t-!oti{.et,i by the triei court in order t- eeeeie the ceert<\/p>\n
effeatueliy and compirteiv tr ao’;iuciic’t’ user: eii the<\/p>\n
 V.questions invoived in the suit. The revenue records of suit<\/p>\n
 properties show the names of the petitioners, which is not<\/p>\n
in dispute. Since the suit is for comprehensive relief of
\ndeclaration and consequential reliefs, in View of the entries<\/p>\n
34<\/span><\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
in revenue records, the application of  <\/p>\n
meritorious. Since the petitioners are  the ‘ ; <\/p>\n
respondents and the suit schediiie   <\/p>\n
are claimed by the piaintir.iaebeidrigingiionnraena even<\/p>\n
5 tu\u00e9\ufb01\ufb01\ufb01f d”o’, in  ‘achedu-in property,
\nunder which ‘both the right, title
\nand intere\u00abist,__V  ;;._is’  to permit the
\npatition.er\u00a7vnet5’1\u00a7~n1plee.deo “aetdefendants 2 to 4 in the suit.
\nThe Ktriai’  itself, by acting with<\/p>\n
‘ materlaniirregoianty  illegality, has c_llsmi..se..r.i 1..A…2. In<\/p>\n
. 1rpeitlee,%lthAe~\u00abin1pugned order does not contain any rnateriai<\/p>\n
 ~. A’ree\u00abeoh5_’v_forV~.rii\u00a7aiiowino I.A.2. The trial Court has erred in<\/p>\n
hoidlno. tliot the dispute is only between the plaintiff and<\/p>\n
 ‘A the defendants. The claim made by the petitioners in I.A.2<\/p>\n
‘ with regard to suit properties has not been noticed. In my<\/p>\n
and circumstances of the case. Hence the   4_<\/p>\n
is liable to be set aside and I.A.2: is requiafed’1Aig5 ig;ai’5iiowea.u it i <\/p>\n
in the resuit, writ_;:~etition*\u00abi_i$’– eiiowedi’: <\/p>\n
order is set aside and I.A.2  ailo’wed’.c “Petitioners are
\ndirected to be img\u00a7iendeti””‘:e*s”:..\u00a7iefe.ndante  to 4 in
\no.s.6\/2oo4. pendingH_V_on._  fiiev.”tifv..’-the triei Court.<\/p>\n
Petitioners\/tiefenhdants =:2e’:to”” 4{\u00a7i’,’*:.”‘ehai\u00a7i fiie their written<\/p>\n
tocia\ufb01mei’nce;_Vthe\u00a7(:”heve copieeiof the pieint and written
\nstatenzent, whVici*ifere~..\u00a7’rm~exed as Annexures A and B to<\/p>\n
the writ i5’etition\u00a7’- i\ufb01nthe written statement, if any, being<\/p>\n
 A iii\u00e9u  the Viiioetitivoners, the trial Court shall frame<\/p>\n
  ;e_dd!tioneti”‘ieet:es, if any. The trial Court is directed to<\/p>\n
 V.:Co’i\u00abirt’ is directed to dispose of the suit within a period of<\/p>\n
 one year from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.<\/p>\n
\\
\nL\u00bb-\n<\/p>\n
No costs. ,<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
— __ ._ 1 :. *-.._;a.’<\/p>\n
It is made ciaar that iii the cont\u00e9ntncrin-3Aurgeq’-15$,<\/p>\n
both parties are left open to be decigjad sh ‘ti*i’\u00e9’_:_;.*u i’i::, by  . <\/p>\n
trial Court.\n<\/p>\n
KW-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008 Author: A.N.Venugopala Gowda ‘ GED; ABOUT 75 YEARS, B’EFORt:*E.:’ fl THE HGNFBLE ‘MR. JUS11CEcA.’N: veuuamm % warr pmnon ~o.3sao;29o6%($MecPc) E5E’!”J;EE!\\!=. ‘k . N.C.’ BASA\u00a5A%?.-AJU. ‘ AGED 45 YEARS,’ . {-3 2. MC. B;As.mi;z:s;3AsA;1,’ k 3 A A1359ABqu1j’*=:3a\u00a7raA;s2$, ‘ 3. M2. […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nN C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-10-03T05:50:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\\\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-03T05:50:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1238,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008\",\"name\":\"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\\\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-10-03T05:50:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\\\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-10-03T05:50:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008","datePublished":"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-03T05:50:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008"},"wordCount":1238,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008","name":"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-06T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-10-03T05:50:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/n-c-basavaraju-vs-smt-basamma-wo-channabasavaiah-on-7-march-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"N C Basavaraju vs Smt Basamma W\/O Channabasavaiah on 7 March, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54582"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54582\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}