{"id":54595,"date":"2010-02-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-02-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010"},"modified":"2016-08-10T05:36:38","modified_gmt":"2016-08-10T00:06:38","slug":"state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010","title":{"rendered":"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Kerala High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>       \n\n  \n\n  \n\n \n \n  IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM\n\nST.Rev..No. 1 of 2010()\n\n\n1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY\n                      ...  Petitioner\n\n                        Vs\n\n\n\n1. EUREKA FORBES LTD.,\n                       ...       Respondent\n\n                For Petitioner  :GOVERNMENT PLEADER\n\n                For Respondent  :SRI.ANIL D. NAIR\n\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR\nThe Hon'ble MR. Justice P.S.GOPINATHAN\n\n Dated :10\/02\/2010\n\n O R D E R\n    C.N.Ramachandran Nair &amp; P.S.Gopinathan, JJ.\n   ============================================\n             S.T.REV.Nos.1 and 4\/2010\n   ============================================\n     Dated this the 10th day of February, 2010.\n\n\n                       ORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>Ramachandran Nair, J.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>1.The question raised in the connected revision<\/p>\n<p> filed by the State is whether the Tribunal was<\/p>\n<p> justified in cancelling the brand name assessment<\/p>\n<p> made on the respondent assessee under Section 5<\/p>\n<p> (2) of the K.G.S.T.Act for the assessment years<\/p>\n<p> 1998-99 and 2003-04.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>2.We heard Government Pleader appearing for the<\/p>\n<p> petitioner and Adv.Sri.Anil D.Nair appearing for<\/p>\n<p> the respondent.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>3.The contention of the Government Pleader is that<\/p>\n<p> the two items involved, namely, water purifier<\/p>\n<p> and vacuum cleaner were sold under the brand name<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">STRV 1&amp;4\/10               -:2:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Acquaguard&#8221; and &#8220;Euroclean&#8221; respectively by the<\/p>\n<p>assessee and so much so, the assessee, which has<\/p>\n<p>control    over the   brand    name, is  liable  for<\/p>\n<p>assessment under Section 5(2) of the KGST Act.<\/p>\n<p>The Tribunal, however on facts, found that the<\/p>\n<p>brand name for the two products were not owned by<\/p>\n<p>the assessee.    However, after hearing both sides,<\/p>\n<p>we are not able to sustain the Tribunal&#8217;s order,<\/p>\n<p>because, we are not being appraised of the true<\/p>\n<p>facts.    In the first place, acquaguard is a brand<\/p>\n<p>name owned by M\/s.Acquamall Water Solutions Ltd.,<\/p>\n<p>its manufacturer, which is a 100% subsidiary of<\/p>\n<p>the assessee.    If the brand name owner is a 100%<\/p>\n<p>subsidiary    of  the   assessee,   then   certainly<\/p>\n<p>assessee has got control over the affairs of the<\/p>\n<p>subsidiary company and it is for the officer to<\/p>\n<p>find   out   the  trade  margin    received by   the<\/p>\n<p>assessee in their sales after purchase of the<\/p>\n<p>items    from  the  manufacturer,   which  also  had<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">STRV 1&amp;4\/10             -:3:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>sales outlet in Kerala.   Since policy decision of<\/p>\n<p>the subsidiary company is under the control of<\/p>\n<p>the holding company, the transaction has to be<\/p>\n<p>closely watched and if the local sale by the<\/p>\n<p>subsidiary company to the holding company is at a<\/p>\n<p>low price, then certainly even without recourse<\/p>\n<p>to Section 5(2) of the Act, assessee&#8217;s sales can<\/p>\n<p>be assessed as first sales, which is the genuine<\/p>\n<p>sale of the product in the market.      The gross<\/p>\n<p>profit obtained by the assessee itself would<\/p>\n<p>prove beyond reasonable doubt as to whether the<\/p>\n<p>transaction between the companies was intended to<\/p>\n<p>evade payment of tax.  The brand name used by the<\/p>\n<p>assessee   was not  considered   by  any  of   the<\/p>\n<p>authorities.   The position is same in so far as<\/p>\n<p>the sale of the other product, namely, vacuum<\/p>\n<p>cleaner under the brand name &#8220;Euroclean&#8221; where<\/p>\n<p>the brand name is said to be owned by M\/s.FAL<\/p>\n<p>Industries Ltd., which was controlled by Forbes<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">STRV 1&amp;4\/10              -:4:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Gokak Ltd. of which the assessee is a subsidiary.<\/p>\n<p>In fact, it is seen that M\/s.FAL Industries Ltd.,<\/p>\n<p>the manufacturer, has now claimed brand name and<\/p>\n<p>the   said  company  later    got amalgamated  with<\/p>\n<p>Forbes Gokak Ltd.     Since the respondent is only<\/p>\n<p>a subsidiary of Forbes Gokak Ltd., which controls<\/p>\n<p>the brand name owned by its subsidiary, which was<\/p>\n<p>later    amalgamated  with    it, the   transaction<\/p>\n<p>between     subsidiary  companies    and    related<\/p>\n<p>companies, namely, the two subsidiaries of the<\/p>\n<p>very same company, which are M\/s.FAL Industries<\/p>\n<p>Ltd. and the assessee have to be examined.    Here<\/p>\n<p>again, we make it clear that the trade margin<\/p>\n<p>obtained by the assessee or the gross profit<\/p>\n<p>received by them will be indicative of the brand<\/p>\n<p>name &#8211; right and genuineness of the transaction<\/p>\n<p>between the related companies.      We, therefore,<\/p>\n<p>set aside the orders of the Tribunal and that of<\/p>\n<p>the first appellate authority and remand the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\"> STRV 1&amp;4\/10               -:5:-<\/span><\/p>\n<p> cases    to  the  assessing    officer for  detailed<\/p>\n<p> consideration after giving an opportunity to the<\/p>\n<p> assessee of being heard.       The assessing officer<\/p>\n<p> will also go through the website details produced<\/p>\n<p> by the    Government Pleader in court.<\/p>\n<p>                      C.N.Ramachandran Nair, Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>                          P.S.Gopinathan, Judge.\n<\/p>\n<p>sl.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Kerala High Court State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM ST.Rev..No. 1 of 2010() 1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY &#8230; Petitioner Vs 1. EUREKA FORBES LTD., &#8230; Respondent For Petitioner :GOVERNMENT PLEADER For Respondent :SRI.ANIL D. NAIR The Hon&#8217;ble MR. Justice C.N.RAMACHANDRAN [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54595","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-kerala-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-08-10T00:06:38+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-10T00:06:38+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010\"},\"wordCount\":638,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Kerala High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010\",\"name\":\"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-08-10T00:06:38+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-08-10T00:06:38+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010","datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-10T00:06:38+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010"},"wordCount":638,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Kerala High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010","name":"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-02-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-08-10T00:06:38+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/state-of-kerala-vs-eureka-forbes-ltd-on-10-february-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"State Of Kerala vs Eureka Forbes Ltd on 10 February, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54595","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54595"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54595\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}