{"id":54709,"date":"2009-05-28T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-05-27T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009"},"modified":"2016-07-08T07:18:39","modified_gmt":"2016-07-08T01:48:39","slug":"amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009","title":{"rendered":"Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit<\/div>\n
111 THE men corner or xjxmurmxa AT  \n\nnamn THIS THE 28*\" DAY or MAY zoq\u00e9. 1'  ~.'  \"' \n\n93.333151'    %\nTHE nomsm MR. ran. nxnmmr\ufb01n, \nTHE H0!l'BI..E  \n\nWRIT PETITION nosls\ufb01s 1&:'.11-1;:  \/0 9 ( aw mm 5)\n\nBETWEEN:     '\n\n. AMRUT 3\/0  \n\nAge 41 yeam,. o'er; 1>w;:)_ cm:2:;acto:>.__ \nR\/0 H.Nc;. 60, Sbalcti E1*\u00abI4aga1',=._ .\nGULBAR(} A.: ' .  = _   ' ..PE'I'I'I'IONER\n\n(BY=.sf\ufb01s.s;--  Advocate.)\n\nAND:\n\n1; Q erha stage  xgammka\n\n'R\u00e9pmsaentcxi ' :ny%.1ts--% Secmtary\nD&:pa.\ufb01imcnt\"Mi1:\u00a2s.--& Geology\nM.s; B\".'1i1dingj'j_ \n\ni  BA:~:c3u\u00a2s._1_._c3:3__:::,; 1.\n\n\"  Statc~:>f'Kar.aata1ca\n ' R'apA.'by'its secreztary\n   E\ufb01cpartgxxcnt of Industries ea Commence\n --..Iw'I.S'g. Building, Bangalare -- 1.\n\n'  3)-- 'uI'Ii\u00e9TI.'lxecutivc Engineer,\n    ..PWD Division Gulbarga.\n V4) The Executive Enginecr,\n\nPanchayat Raj Eng Division\nGulbarga.\n\n \n\n\n\nS) The Executive Engneer,\nFradhanamanei Gram Sade}: Yojana I\n\nPlanmng Div. Gulbarga.     \n6) '\u00a3'hc Executive Engineer _ it 1\nMiner Irrigation Division, Gulbarga.\n7') The Commissioner,   _\u00bb\nThe Gulbarga Urban DevcieQme1';'tAut,hr>z'ity,\nMain Road, Gulbafga. \" '  v  \n\n8) The ()ommissioncr,,_  it\n\nCity Municipal    \n  = 1 _e..V\".[R;\"3S\u00a5'ONDENTS\n\nGulbaxga. H V . _\ni (By er;   Gen.)\n\nThese writ petitio_n:';.aie4v \ufb02ied _u_rader Articles 226 and 227 of\nthe Constitution' ofilndie..preyi'n_g'to direct the respondent not to<\/pre>\n
deduct royalty from ‘the -bills”—o_f”the paitioner and not to insist
\nthe petitioner te produ_ce._ i:i’ie”‘ royalty paid receipts by their
\nvendors. ,Direct the respondent to refund the royalty already
\ndVe\u00a3iucted\u00bb\u00bb from’ the bills ofthve petitioner.<\/p>\n
 These 9i;ri~t’pe\ufb01tions coming up for preliminary hearing this
\nday,’ ethet_eCqiu.zrt\u00a7deiiverw the following:–<\/p>\n
lLLQ..\u00a7_H_\u00a7..E.I
\nit -.e:(Delivered by PD. Dinakaran, C3.)<\/p>\n
  rfl’E1e. Epetitloner in these petitions is a registered civil<\/p>\n
“e.\u00a7’.i:<':::'*.':Al:'|.'3.t.'ior carrying on civil works of the Government Department<\/p>\n
 Local Bodies. It is contended that for the purpose of<\/p>\n
i 'execution of civil works, the petitioner is required to purchase<\/p>\n
x<\/p>\n
buiiding materials from the private sources. It<\/p>\n
contended that the petitioner does not own._any."'euVa'rr\u00a7i\u00bb'aiici_'_:thetKi'<\/p>\n
he is not iiabie to pay any royalty to <\/p>\n
the respondents are deducting royalty from 'the-v_At55i_iIs*~-'of; the-it<\/p>\n
petitioner without authority of IawV,t…..i-f{ence.,L' these writiipetitions
\npraying not to deduct the roiyeigty froiri'ivth'eVee.t:iiis\u00bb\u00bb of the petitioner
\nin respect of the rria\u00a7te__riais"bro\u00e9'i;redjfvfront  from private<\/p>\n
sources for exec_utisvr;_  s_ifi_il" t;on–treft,t works.<\/p>\n
2. In    c:..v. KUMAR AND\nomens V.:z'\u00a7'Vl:'i\ufb01TVE    AND OTHERS in Writ\n<\/pre>\n
Petition\ufb01 Nor-i 31Vs’s4;3:t2iss*\u00a7r’iss4 disposed of on 31″ October,
\n1994-._ down AAthe””‘principies reiating to the payment of<\/p>\n
royisiity’   The same are extracted hereunder:<\/p>\n
  (3)   providing the material (subjected to<\/p>\n
royaity) is the responsibility of the contractor and
\nA’ ‘ the bepartment provides the contractor with
\nit “specified borrow areas, for extraction of the
\n required construction mate-riai, the contractor wiil
\nbe liable to pay royalty charges for the material
\n(minor mineral) extracted from such areas,
\nirrespective of whether the contract is a item rate<\/p>\n
V’  .\n<\/p>\n
3;’ I
\nL_,,= M?”\n<\/p>\n
at’<\/p>\n
contract or a lump sum contract.\n<\/p>\n
deduction of royalty charges in such cases irriii   A’
\nlegal. For this purpose non-execution ”
\nlease is not relevant, as the liability to
\narises on account of the contracts?   ”
\nmaterial from a Government land, ‘for  the  <\/p>\n
work.\n<\/p>\n
(b) where under the ._ responsihility to<\/p>\n
I   a is
\nK  __ *._o,Toen marked, that is material purchased from
\ni  .V  jarivate sourcw like quarry lease holders or private<\/p>\n
supply the material (niinortmiiwerals) v”istnat of the
\nDepartment,\/en:ployer”‘   ..th_e V’.contractor is<\/p>\n
required to any the ‘and service for _<\/p>\n
execution _A it  involving use of such
\nmaterial,’ and  does not include the
\ncost oft’ myataria-i, there is no liability on the
\nconitractor to  any royalty. This will be the<\/p>\n
..  .,  even if the contractor is required to
\n   tire: “material from outside the work site,
\n‘5o”*long’as};tha unit rate is only for labour or service<\/p>\n
and  ‘not include the cost of material.<\/p>\n
‘ Where the contractor uses material purchased in<\/p>\n
quarry owners, there is no liability on the<\/p>\n
contractor to pay any royalty charges.<\/p>\n
(d) In cases covered by paras (\u00a33) and  <\/p>\n
Department cannot recover or deduct aq}{“‘r:\u00a7yalty<\/p>\n
from the bills of the contractor and    A V
\nthe Department will be bound  . ~aref\u00a3:nd <\/p>\n
amount so deducted or collected to  wntraezert  3<\/p>\n
(e) Subject to the above, colleotion of :oyaltyVibyvi~he
\nDepartment or refunti thereof _  . Department
\nwill be govomeor by the storm: or  <\/p>\n
(0 Nothing state;i_’ –abe_ve   as a
\ndirection for”  ta any particular
\ncontrac_;t} V   :5_rVa\u00a2.Etbority concerned
\nshall in   wizether myaity is to be
\ndedueted’ or   is already deducted,
\nwhether it4._si;auid.\u00a345e._rei:’iJnded, keeping in View the
\nabqye principies\ufb02iaivd terms of the contract. ”<\/p>\n
  has been upheid by the Divisicn Bench<\/p>\n
Visor this coon; in the case of ormze or me oxnecron or<\/p>\n
.1 eEi=5ga1″He_sTior muss AND GEOLOGY v. M. nonnum’-:1)<\/p>\n
 mt Appeal No. 330 of 2905 dispesed of on 25*”<\/p>\n
  i  V 1 sopotorober, 2006.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. Foiiowing the judgment of this Court ren&r\u00a7q.__”E–5 “\u00a73it\u00a7{‘2V<\/p>\n
Appeai No.83) of 2006 disposed of on 25″‘  M<\/p>\n
these writ petitions are aiso disposed of. f\ufb02b “o4rdA_e\u00a3rA as;  <\/p>\n
Ssh] _
\nindex:  ‘Q . V
\nWeb Host: Y\u00e9\u00e9,\/I 1s\u00a3d–<.. "<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009 Author: P.D.Dinakaran(Cj) & V.G.Sabhahit 111 THE men corner or xjxmurmxa AT namn THIS THE 28*” DAY or MAY zoq\u00e9. 1′ ~.’ “‘ 93.333151′ % THE nomsm MR. ran. nxnmmr\ufb01n, THE H0!l’BI..E WRIT PETITION nosls\ufb01s 1&:’.11-1;: \/0 9 ( aw […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54709","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nAmrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-08T01:48:39+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Amrut S\\\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-08T01:48:39+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009\"},\"wordCount\":710,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009\",\"name\":\"Amrut S\\\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-08T01:48:39+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Amrut S\\\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-08T01:48:39+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009","datePublished":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-08T01:48:39+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009"},"wordCount":710,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009","name":"Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-05-27T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-08T01:48:39+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/amrut-so-tippanna-doddamani-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-28-may-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Amrut S\/O Tippanna Doddamani vs The State Of Karnataka on 28 May, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54709","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54709"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54709\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54709"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54709"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54709"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}