{"id":54836,"date":"2010-01-20T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-01-19T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010"},"modified":"2018-11-24T12:35:27","modified_gmt":"2018-11-24T07:05:27","slug":"sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 20 January, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 20 January, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: L.Narayana Swamy<\/div>\n<pre>* E'-\"'\" \n\n (B 1\" \"SRI.2:AI--IEER AHMED, AGA EOR R~ 1.\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT ISANGAEORE\nDATED THIS THE 20m DAY OF JANUARy;..2D;1_':Q_'O:\".: \" \nBEFORE _  _ \" V  '   '\nTHE HONBLE \nWRIT PETITION NO. 17964   fg\ufb01sj  \"\nBETWEEN: A   V V    _\n\nSR1 K.M.SHIVA   -  \"\nSON OF LATE K.S.MAL.L1'KAI2,JLINA\"RRASANNA,\nAGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,'  _ \nRESIDENTS OF._BIRUR,--  _  '\nKADUR    I    :\nCH1CKMANGiAL'(:;R_.DI,STRI_CT. _  ' \n     :PETITIONEB\n(BY SRI.K.SRINIyASA; IADV. EOR  ASSTS.)\n\nAND:\n\n1. TIIE'JO1I~:\u00a3T'RiE&lt;\u00a7IST*RAR\nOECo--ORERATIVE.&#039;CSOCIE&quot;rIES,\n\n ISANCALOREQSSO O18.\n\n&#039; -- ARCANIJT PROCESSING AND SALES\n\n* CO;;0PERATIVE SOCIETY LTD,\nSACAR;\nSHIIVEOGA DISTRICT,\n&quot;BY? ITS SECRETARY.\n\n&quot; : RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p> &#8221; &#8216;Sm.R.V.JAYAPRAKASH, ADV. FOR R2)<\/p>\n<p>:2&#8242;<br \/>\n3,<\/p>\n<p>THIS WRIT PETITION FILED PRAYING TO QUASH<br \/>\nTHE IMPUGNED AWARD PASSED BY THE R1 DTD 24.01.01<br \/>\nIN DISPUTE NO.JRB\/DIS\/426\/1990431. VIDE TuANuNEX~A<br \/>\nAND THE ORDER PASSED BY THE K2-\\RNATAKA<\/p>\n<p>APPELLATTE TRIBUNAL IN APPEAL NO.24\u00a2\u00a7,l_7&#8217;200*}..,__<\/p>\n<p>20.02.09 VIDE ANNEX&#8211;F TO THE W.P.<\/p>\n<p>THIS PETITION COMING .ON-.?fO1f\u00a7 <\/p>\n<p>DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; &#8221;  <\/p>\n<p>0ePPP    <\/p>\n<p>The petitioner.&#8217; hast&#8212;&#8212;\u00ab&#8217;Vfiied&#8217;-\u00bb..pAthis&#8221;wri.ti\u00a7 petition<br \/>\nchallenging the or\ufb01ieifdat\u00e9giit 302001 in Dispute<br \/>\nNo.GRB.B.}_D_ISt{\u00a3i?,6\/ the Assistant<br \/>\nRegistrar;     Shimoga Sub-\n<\/p>\n<p>  at AnneXure&#8211;A and the<br \/>\nOrdervvtitiatetd&#8217; passed by the Karnataka<\/p>\n<p>Appeliate ;I&#8221;1*ihaunha1 p&#8217;roauced at Annexure-F.<\/p>\n<p>  &#8216;v2Q&#8221;T11e&#8221;iearned counsel for the petitioner submits<\/p>\n<p>  had obtained loan of Rs.8 lakhs from the<\/p>\n<p> 2nd respondent. Since the same has not been repaid<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;0 \ufb02\ufb01if&#8217;i\u00abi\ufb02 the time stipulated, the Second respondent raised<\/p>\n<p>   dispute before the Assistant Registrar of Cooperative<\/p>\n<p>it<\/p>\n<p>1.<\/p>\n<p>Societies u\/s 70 of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies<\/p>\n<p>Act. The same came to be allowed by  S<\/p>\n<p>directing the petitioner to pay Rs.8,93, <\/p>\n<p>interest at 18%. Being aggrieved;.&#8217;petitiori.erVV &#8216; S. <\/p>\n<p>preferred appeal before   <\/p>\n<p>Tribunal in Appeal  v_vhi.ch;  to be\u00bb<\/p>\n<p>rejected by the order dated.&#8221;p_:iZO;2..2009&#8217;.&#8221;&#8216;i. Hence the<\/p>\n<p>present Writ petiton.  &#8216;M<\/p>\n<p>3.  contends<br \/>\nthat  by the Karnataka<br \/>\nAppeilate  -setting aside the order passed<br \/>\nby the  of Cooperative Societies.<\/p>\n<p> after \u00abremand, the first respondent has not<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Vaffordved~i ;&#8217;op&#8217;portunity to the petitioner and his<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;s.L.ibrnissio&#8217;1i..that the amount paid by him on different<\/p>\n<p> occasions running to several lakhs has not been taken<\/p>\n<p>A 5  by the second respondent. He has produced some<\/p>\n<p> r\u00e9eceipts Annexures~B to D to show that he has paid<\/p>\n<p>ii<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>substantial amount. He has also produced bill for<\/p>\n<p>having paid Rs.9 lakhs dated 30.11.1994 andxdaniother<\/p>\n<p>bili for Rs} Iakh dated 4.3.1995. But.m&#8217;the\u00e9\u00e9g&#8217;e-..\u00e9 <\/p>\n<p>payments have not been co_ns.idered&#8217;V  <\/p>\n<p>Hence the petitioner has prayed   <\/p>\n<p>passed by the first respondefnt_pand&#8221; a1__so.by.:th.e'&#8221;appe11ate&#8217; 9&#8242;<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal.\n<\/p>\n<p>4. The learnedCouxfiseiior  submits that<br \/>\nas per the?_:   the Karnataka<br \/>\nAppeliatei    1995 notices have<br \/>\nbeenhissuedvd\u00bbVtci:&#8217;:-theL4pe.ti&#8217;t&#8211;ioner by the A R CS but the<br \/>\nsame  claimed. Therefore, the ARCS<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;th\u20ac=..__sa-me in the order sheet and held that<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; service'&#8221;isf.sufficient. Notwithstanding the same, one<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;more not&#8217;i.ce..5&#8217;was issued on 29.6.1999. The same was<\/p>\n<p> served on&#8217; the petitioner and in response. he engaged an<\/p>\n<p>A  adifocate. The learned advocate made a request for<\/p>\n<p>1  adjournment to file objections. Accordingly on several<\/p>\n<p>.41.;\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>dates, adjournments were made abut no statement of<\/p>\n<p>objections has been filed. On subsequent da;tes,_:&#8217;db_oth<\/p>\n<p>the petitioner and his counsel remained<\/p>\n<p>Hence the case Was posted for .evidence&#8217;.'&#8221;&#8221;T&#8217;  <\/p>\n<p>ARCS by the order dated 24f.;.2dpoA1d&#8217; <\/p>\n<p>dispute. Even before th._e&#8221;&#8216;-appeliatea  &#8220;jsameddv<\/p>\n<p>contention of not  an opportlniity was<br \/>\nadvanced. The   came to the<br \/>\nconclusion .vt}.1:at_ the  given fullest<br \/>\nopportunity  &#8216;<br \/>\n for the respondent submits<br \/>\nthat  &#8221; has paid amount as per<\/p>\n<p>Anr_texvu1&#8243;es~B&#8217;  he could have produced the same<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  But no such effort has been made<\/p>\n<p>before V  Even in the appeal before the<\/p>\n<p> Karnatdaeka Appellate Tribunal such a material was not<\/p>\n<p>A &#8220;it produced. Even assuming that he has paid the alleged<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; amounts, the same can be sorted out in the execution.<\/p>\n<p>Hence the learned counsel for the second respondent<\/p>\n<p>submits to dismiss the writ petition.<\/p>\n<p>6. On the basis of the contention   <\/p>\n<p>petition and also the submission made  ..behaIf-it,ofv:.th-he<\/p>\n<p>respondent,&#8221; I have gone throughdithe  <\/p>\n<p>the writ petition. As per  it that the<br \/>\ncase of the petitioneiidrizasidcoaijisideried&#8217;on remand to the<br \/>\nfirst responden-tvxwho&#8221;iiitiirnthe matter to the<br \/>\nARCS for  of the Karnataka<br \/>\n  been referred at para<br \/>\nNo.3i7that&#8217;  the petitioner had returned<br \/>\nwith shara _  Thereafter on several<\/p>\n<p>occiasioiis, the &#8216;matter was adjourned in order to provide<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  the petitioner but except engaging a<\/p>\n<p> not participated in the proceedings by<\/p>\n<p> filing objections and also appearing in the case. Hence<\/p>\n<p>A  the&#8221;_.A R C S recorded the evidence, perused the<\/p>\n<p>  documents and the \ufb01le maintained by the respondent<\/p>\n<p>at<\/p>\n<p>3.<\/p>\n<p>bank and thereafter an order has been passed in favour<\/p>\n<p>of the Bank for recovery of the amount.<\/p>\n<p>7. In the appeal before the KAT,  h\u00e9\u00abs i <\/p>\n<p>taken a ground of non  &#8220;of it<\/p>\n<p>natural justice. The appeilate &#8216;4[A&#8217;ri.b&#8217;una1 consi;de1&#8217;ed&#8217;a.<\/p>\n<p>in detail the contention of t\ufb01jvihijiletianswering<br \/>\nPoint No.2 framed   respect of<br \/>\nthe eontentionof   paid Rs. 10<br \/>\nlakhs,  by the appellate<br \/>\ntribunal  any receipt or<br \/>\ndocument   lakhs has been remitted<br \/>\ntowardstttkipe  If the petitioner has remitted<\/p>\n<p>theignroprrey as Aiaiieged, he could have appeared before the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;  evidence to that effect&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;Therefore, the contention of the petitioner that<\/p>\n<p>  has.&#8217; paid amount has been disbelieved by the<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;&#8221;..VA.&#8217;ppeHate Tribunal. Under these circumstances, the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has not made out any good ground to<\/p>\n<p>interfere with the impugned orders.<\/p>\n<p>9. Notwithstanding the observati&#8217;ensv,ip&#8217;_e&#8217;V.if [tide V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>petitioner has paid the amouritiiiofi&#8217;Rs.&#8221;l_O-I<\/p>\n<p>Annexures&#8212;-B 8: C, it is always ovpentfor hing  <\/p>\n<p>same at the time of eXeei&#8221;1t.ion, which&#8217;etiiieztexecuting<br \/>\nCourt shall considerin-acoofdariee  lawn <\/p>\n<p>With this observation,  petition&#8217;-is disposed of.<\/p>\n<p>The learned&#8217; Go_ve&#8217;rIif:nei&#8217;it:VI51eader is permitted to<br \/>\nfile memo  it<\/p>\n<p>Sd\/2*<br \/>\nIuds\ufb01<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 20 January, 2010 Author: L.Narayana Swamy * E&#8217;-&#8220;&#8216;&#8221; (B 1&#8243; &#8220;SRI.2:AI&#8211;IEER AHMED, AGA EOR R~ 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT ISANGAEORE DATED THIS THE 20m DAY OF JANUARy;..2D;1_&#8217;:Q_&#8217;O:&#8221;.: &#8221; BEFORE _ _ &#8221; V &#8216; &#8216; THE HONBLE WRIT PETITION NO. [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54836","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-11-24T07:05:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 20 January, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-24T07:05:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010\"},\"wordCount\":894,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-11-24T07:05:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 20 January, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-11-24T07:05:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 20 January, 2010","datePublished":"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-24T07:05:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010"},"wordCount":894,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010","name":"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of ... on 20 January, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-01-19T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-11-24T07:05:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-k-m-shivakumar-vs-the-joint-registrar-of-on-20-january-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri.K.M.Shivakumar vs The Joint Registrar Of &#8230; on 20 January, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54836","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54836"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54836\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54836"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54836"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54836"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}