{"id":54981,"date":"2009-03-16T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-15T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009"},"modified":"2015-11-21T18:38:07","modified_gmt":"2015-11-21T13:08:07","slug":"kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007                                 -1-\n\n\n\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH.\n\n\n\n\nKulwant Singh                                        APPELLANT\n\n\n                          VERSUS\n\n\nThe State of Punjab                                  RESPONDENT\n\n\n\n\nCORAM : HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHTAB S.GILL\n        HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE L.N.MITTAL\n\n\n\nPresent:-    Shri S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate with Shri Kulwant Singh, Advocate\n             for the appellant.\n\n             Ms.Sonika Kapadia, Advocate, Amicus Curiae for the appellant\n             (in Cr.A.895-DB of 2007.\n\n             Shri Gurmail Singh, Advocate.\n\n             Shri Satinder Singh Gill, Additional A.G. Punjab.\n\n\n\n\nMEHTAB S.GILL, J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>             We will be deciding Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007 and<\/p>\n<p>Criminal Appeal No.895-DB of 2007 by this common judgment, as they arise out<\/p>\n<p>of the same judgment\/order dated 1.8.2007 of the learned Special Judge, Moga<\/p>\n<p>whereby he convicted Kulwant Singh son of Bachittar Singh and Gurmail Singh<\/p>\n<p>son of Sadhu Singh under Section 15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007                                    -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) and sentenced them to<\/p>\n<p>undergo RI for 12 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,25,000\/- each, in default, to<\/p>\n<p>further undergo RI for one year and six months.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The case of the prosecution is unfolded by the Ruqa Ex.P6 sent by<\/p>\n<p>SI Sukhmander Singh, S.H.O., Police Station Nihansinghwala. In the Ruqa he<\/p>\n<p>stated that he along with the Assistant Sub Inspector, HC Raj Singh, HC Jasbir<\/p>\n<p>Singh, Constable Naib Singh, Constable Jagtar Singh and PHG Ranjit Singh were<\/p>\n<p>on patrol duty in Govt. Gypsy No.PB08-L-2280 driven by HC Satpal Singh. When<\/p>\n<p>they were going from the side of Village Khai on the kacha path towards Village<\/p>\n<p>Pakharwadh (Kishangarh), on the curve, Nirmal Singh son of Mahla Singh Harijan<\/p>\n<p>of Village Khai met them. They joined him in their party. The police patty<\/p>\n<p>proceeded to Village Pakharwadh. When they reached the semnala in the area of<\/p>\n<p>Village Khai, the police party saw that two persons were sitting on the bags lying<\/p>\n<p>on the northern bank of the semnala. On seeing the police party, one of the said<\/p>\n<p>persons ran through the semnala towards Village Pakharwadh. The Assistant Sub<\/p>\n<p>Inspector stopped the Jeep and came down and with the help of other officials<\/p>\n<p>apprehended the man sitting on the bags. He disclosed his name as Gurmel Singh<\/p>\n<p>alias Gela son of Sadhu Singh of Village Khai. The Assistant Sub Inspector then<\/p>\n<p>asked about the name of the other person who ran away. Nirmal Singh said that<\/p>\n<p>his name was kulwant Singh alias Kanta son of Bachittar Singh resident of Village<\/p>\n<p>Khai. SI Sukhmander Singh and the Assistant Sub Inspector asked Gurmel Singh<\/p>\n<p>that the bags seem to contain some intoxicant substance. He was asked as to<\/p>\n<p>whether he wanted to be searched by the Assistant Sub Inspector or by a Gazetted<\/p>\n<p>Officer. Gurmel Singh stated that his search be conducted by a Gazetted Officer.<\/p>\n<p>A memo was prepared by SI Sukhmander Singh and the Assistant Sub Inspector<\/p>\n<p>requested Raghbir Singh Sandhu, D.S.P., Baghapurana to reach the spot. The<\/p>\n<p>D.S.P. Baghapurana along with his Reader Gursewak Singh reached the spot on a<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007                                     -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Govt. Gypsy.    The D.S.P. disclosed his identity to Gurmel Singh and asked<\/p>\n<p>whether he had confidence in him. Gurmel Singh stated that he had no objection if<\/p>\n<p>the bags are now searched. The D.S.P. directed the Assistant Sub Inspector to open<\/p>\n<p>the bags and check the same. The Assistant Sub Inspector then opened the mouths<\/p>\n<p>of the bags which were found to contain poppy husk. Thereafter out of each bag<\/p>\n<p>two samples each weighing 250 grams were separated and each of the remaining<\/p>\n<p>bags came to be 31 kg. 50 grams. Six bags and 12 parcels of samples were tied<\/p>\n<p>and converted into parcels and the same were sealed with the seal bearing &#8220;RS&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>attested by the D.S.P. Sample seal was prepared separately and it was attested by<\/p>\n<p>the D.S.P. The D.S.P. also sealed all the parcels with his seal &#8220;RS&#8221;. The seal after<\/p>\n<p>use was handed over to HC Raj Singh and the D.S.P. kept his seal with him. SI<\/p>\n<p>Sukhmander Singh along with the Assistant Sub Inspector then took all the six<\/p>\n<p>bags and 12 parcels of samples containing poppy husk duly sealed along with the<\/p>\n<p>sample seal, into his possession vide memo attested by the witnesses. On the basis<\/p>\n<p>of this ruqa, F.I.R. Ex.P7 was recorded.\n<\/p>\n<p>             The prosecution to prove its case, brought into the witness-box ASI<\/p>\n<p>Ruldu Singh PW-1, Nirmal Singh PW-2, Constable Karnail Singh PW-3, HC Raj<\/p>\n<p>Singh PW-4, HC Sukhmander Singh PW-5, Constable Karnail Singh PW-6,<\/p>\n<p>Raghbir Singh D.S.P. PW-7, SI Sukhchain Singh PW-8 and                Baljit Singh<\/p>\n<p>Photographer PW-9.\n<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the appellants have argued that recovery was<\/p>\n<p>made from an open space i.e. semnala. This was government land. Anybody<\/p>\n<p>could have put the bags there and the appellants were falsely implicated in this<\/p>\n<p>case as Nirmal Singh PW-2 had a grievance against appellant Kulwant Singh. No<\/p>\n<p>specific question was put to the appellants when they were examined under<\/p>\n<p>Section 313 Cr.P.C. regarding the appellants being in conscious possession of the<\/p>\n<p>bags of poppy husk. This is a legal flaw which itself goes to the root of the case.<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007                                    -4-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The Investigating Officer was bound to go further into the aspect as to how the<\/p>\n<p>case property was lying there, who transported it and to come to a definite<\/p>\n<p>conclusion that the case property was of the appellants. No neighbouring land<\/p>\n<p>owners were questioned regarding the case property. Sitting itself on the bags<\/p>\n<p>does not prove conscious possession.       In fact, as per the prosecution case,<\/p>\n<p>appellant Kulwant Singh was not arrested from the spot. He was not identified by<\/p>\n<p>appellant Gurmel Singh, but by Nirmal Singh PW-2.\n<\/p>\n<p>             There are discrepancies in the statements of the official witnesses<\/p>\n<p>regarding the running away of       Kulwant Singh.     Some witness stated that<\/p>\n<p>appellants were wearing shoes, and some stated that appellant did not have the<\/p>\n<p>shoes. There was no need for the police party to run after Kulwant Singh. When<\/p>\n<p>he was running through the semnala, the police party being armed, could have<\/p>\n<p>fired in the air to stop him from running away.\n<\/p>\n<p>             SI Sukhchain Singh PW-8 after using his seal, should have given it to<\/p>\n<p>the independent witness Nirmal Singh PW-2, so that no tampering could take<\/p>\n<p>place, but instead he handed it over to HC Raj Singh PW-4, who is junior to him.<\/p>\n<p>There was all likelihood of the samples being tampered with.<\/p>\n<p>             Learned counsel for the State has argued that there was no need for<\/p>\n<p>the Investigating Officer to go deeply into the matter of conscious possession, as<\/p>\n<p>the appellants were sitting on the bags of poppy husk when one of them Gurmel<\/p>\n<p>Singh was apprehended while Kulwant Singh ran away. The poppy bags were<\/p>\n<p>lying near the semnala on government land. If it had been lying in somebody&#8217;s<\/p>\n<p>private land, then the Investigating Officer was bound to question the owners of<\/p>\n<p>that land as to how the bags were lying there. But in the case in hand, since the<\/p>\n<p>appellants were sitting on these bags, the presumption is very clear that the<\/p>\n<p>possession of these bags was that of the appellants. Appellant Kulwant Singh ran<\/p>\n<p>away. This also pointed towards the guilt of the accused. There is no suggestion<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007                                     -5-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>put to SI Sukhchain Singh PW-8 or ASI Ruldu Singh PW-1 regarding any<\/p>\n<p>tampering being done with the case property. The case property was produced<\/p>\n<p>before the J.M.I.C. SI Sukhchain Singh PW-8 moved an application Ex.P17<\/p>\n<p>before the C.J.M.       The C.J.M., Moga then passed the order Ex.P17\/A and<\/p>\n<p>thereafter the case property was taken to the police station and deposited with the<\/p>\n<p>M.H.C. As per the F.I.R. Ex.P7 which gets corroboration from the statements of<\/p>\n<p>ASI Ruldu Singh PW-1 and SI Sukhchain Singh PW-8, all the appellants were<\/p>\n<p>sitting on the box.\n<\/p>\n<p>              We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the<\/p>\n<p>record with their assistance.\n<\/p>\n<p>              Learned counsel for the appellants have laid much stress in their<\/p>\n<p>arguments that the recovery was made on the banks of the Semnala. The bags<\/p>\n<p>were allegedly lying in an open space on land which belonged to the State of<\/p>\n<p>Punjab. Appellants could not be held liable for the recovery of six bags of poppy<\/p>\n<p>husk. No specific question was also put under Section 313 Cr.P.C. regarding<\/p>\n<p>conscious possession.\n<\/p>\n<p>              This argument of the learned counsel for the appellants does not cut<\/p>\n<p>much ice. As per the statement of ASI Ruldu Singh PW-1, the Investigating<\/p>\n<p>Officer, he along with the police party was on patrol duty and while going on the<\/p>\n<p>Kacha path leading to Village Pakharwadh, on reaching near the Kacha path, they<\/p>\n<p>joined Nirmal Singh PW-2 as an independent witness. When they reached in the<\/p>\n<p>area of Village Khai near the Semnala, they saw two persons sitting on bags on<\/p>\n<p>the side of the canal. One of them ran away, while the other was caught at the<\/p>\n<p>spot. The person who was caught, said that his name was Gurmel Singh. The<\/p>\n<p>independent witness Nirmal Singh PW-2 identified the person who ran away being<\/p>\n<p>appellant Kulwant Singh.\n<\/p>\n<p>              Similarly, the other witness to the recovery HC Raj Singh PW-4 has<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007                                       -6-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>also stated the same. It is clear from the statements of these witnesses that both the<\/p>\n<p>appellants were sitting on the bags of poppy husk and Kulwant Singh was<\/p>\n<p>identified by no other person, than the independent witness Nirmal Singh PW-2.<\/p>\n<p>The testimony of these witnesses could not be shattered in cross-examination. The<\/p>\n<p>bags were lying on government land. If they had been lying on land of which<\/p>\n<p>ownership was of a private person, then the argument of the learned counsel for<\/p>\n<p>the appellants would have had some weight that the Investigating Officer should<\/p>\n<p>have investigated further to find out as to how the bags were lying on the land of a<\/p>\n<p>private person. Then the owner of that land should have been questioned.<\/p>\n<p>              After the recovery was made and the necessary formalities were gone<\/p>\n<p>through of taking of the samples, the case property was produced before SI<\/p>\n<p>Sukhchain Singh PW-8. SI Sukhchain Singh PW-8 further produced the case<\/p>\n<p>property before the C.J.M., Moga vide application Ex.P17. The C.J.M., Moga<\/p>\n<p>passed order Ex.P17\/A that the case property be kept in custody in the Malkhana<\/p>\n<p>of the police station. The next senior person i.e. Raghbir Singh D.S.P. PW-7 knew<\/p>\n<p>about the recovery as he himself had gone when being asked as the appellants<\/p>\n<p>wanted to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer. Question No.1 put to<\/p>\n<p>the appellants in their statements under Section 313 Cr.P.C. has clearly spelt out<\/p>\n<p>that they were sitting on the contraband in six bags and Kulwant Singh ran away,<\/p>\n<p>while Gurmel Singh was caught on the spot. The question is elaborate and clear as<\/p>\n<p>to whether the appellants were consciously in possession of six bags or not.<\/p>\n<p>Nothing more specific could have been asked from the appellants in their<\/p>\n<p>statements under Section313 Cr.P.C.\n<\/p>\n<p>              With the above discussion and observations, we do not find any<\/p>\n<p>infirmity in the judgment of the learned trial Court. Conviction of the appellants<\/p>\n<p>is maintained. Sentence seems to be on the higher side. Sentence of the appellants<\/p>\n<p>is modified from 12 years RI to 10 years RI and fine is also reduced from<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007                             -7-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Rs.1,25,000\/- to Rs.1,00,000\/-.\n<\/p>\n<p>             With the above modification in sentence, both the appeals are<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.<\/p>\n<pre>\n\n                                          ( MEHTAB S.GILL )\n                                              JUDGE\n\n\n\n\n                                            ( L.N.MITTAL )\nMarch 16, 2009                                  JUDGE\nGD\n\n\n\n\n             WHETHER TO BE REFERRED TO REPORTER? YES\/NO\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009 Criminal Appeal No.732-DB of 2007 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH. Kulwant Singh APPELLANT VERSUS The State of Punjab RESPONDENT CORAM : HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE MEHTAB S.GILL HON&#8217;BLE MR.JUSTICE L.N.MITTAL Present:- Shri S.P.S.Sidhu, Advocate with Shri Kulwant [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-11-21T13:08:07+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"10 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-21T13:08:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1912,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-11-21T13:08:07+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-11-21T13:08:07+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"10 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-21T13:08:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009"},"wordCount":1912,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009","name":"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-15T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-11-21T13:08:07+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kulwant-singh-vs-the-state-of-punjab-on-16-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kulwant Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 16 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54981\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}