{"id":55002,"date":"2009-07-01T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-06-30T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009"},"modified":"2018-04-02T09:08:32","modified_gmt":"2018-04-02T03:38:32","slug":"h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009","title":{"rendered":"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009<\/div>\n
Author: Anand Byrareddy<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH COURT OF  A': \n\nDATED THIS THE  943?  %\nTHE HON'BLE M1\u00a7.\"'Ji}ST}ZQIi, BYRA1\u00a7.E1)DY\nREG:;1.;;ARF1I:sT  1993\n\nBETWEEN'    % '\n\n \n\n1. Sri H.'L'\u00a7Srir\u00a7iivas\u00a3\u00a3fi\ufb01~u;5\u00a3-4 \nAged ahGutV53.y\u00a7\u00bb\u00e9rs  -- .\nSI' 0.M.\u00abLalLsh1nip:i_i_i1i :3*\u00bb.'.\u00bb_{\"l' 3+,' ' \nMerch3nI_s,%A Res\ufb01dchts >5)?'  '\nHiriyur T\u00e9iwvja, Ckilr-adnijga District\n\n.  \"2,  Gupta\n'  \"Aged ab0:3t\" 5.1 ywrs\n\n._ *ISizi<;a:  by his\nA L*egai Repra\u00e9senta\ufb01ves:\n\n*3) A 'Swamnamba\n Wio.Latc H.L. Ananthapadmanabha\n\nGupta\n\nAged about 52 years\n\nResiding at No.23, 7*' Main,\n\nNear Yogeshwara Apartments\nHosakerehalli, Bangainre ~-- 560 085\n\n3\n\n\n\nb) Janardhana\n\nSfo.Latc H.L. Anan\ufb02mpadmanabha\nGupta\n\nAged ::tbou134 years\n\nResiding at No.23, 7"' Main,   \u00e9\nN63! Yugcshwara   _\nHosakerchalli, Bangalore --~  G85\n\nS\/0.Late I*I.L.\u00a2\/\\11anthapadimvirL\u00a3!\u00bb.l_3ha "  I\n\nAgtxl about 30  _   ;  _ \n\nResiding at No.23, '}'-'"_Main;  " V  '\n\nNear Yugges}1wa.t*.ei'I*;;3:.43'!_rrie.1{\u00a7!s .  \u00bb\n\nfiosak\u00e9reiiaiii, B'2anga3\u00e9re'"--~_560"O8.\u00a7  APPELLANTS\n\n(By   Advocates)\nAND:     A % V %\n\n1. S;i_\u00a7\u00a7}'!'.L.Sri\u00a2Tlh\u00e9m\u00a7VV(\u00a7up\u00a3 a\n\n V'  . about 48 \n\n' A 'S\/9.Mv.Lak$hm_ipalI1i Sully\n\n     of\n\n" Hiriyur'  Chilradurga District\n\n:2. sg\u00a5i.H.L.1<aga:a5\n\n .. Agedabeut 45 years\n\n" _Sfcy..M.T.ak"shmipa1hi Setty\n hticfchanis, Residuals of\n\nHiriyur Town, Chitradurga Disnict\n\n .  Sri.H.L.Guvindardja Gupta\n\nMajor\nSI'u.M.Lakshmipa1hi Salty\n\n3\n\n\n\n \n\nMerchants, Residents of  \u00ab  __ S _,_ \nHiriyur Town, Chitradurga District   1 4_\n\n{By Shri.RaInesh.P.KuIkami, Admaxe for    2 n\n\nShri.R.Chandra:ma, for Respondent 'No.25 eahd'eeReSp0n\u00e9ejn\u00a7 HQQ3<\/pre>\n
served) .  V’  V ‘~  <\/p>\n
i=.=a=ei=–\u00a7_=__:c:\n<\/p>\n
This Regular Firs1__Appea1__isV: \ufb01I_ed_\u00bb_vunder’ \u00abSectiq\u00e9l 96 of the
\nCode of Civil Procedure;__1~9G8,_\u00ab’Aagainst tilieeiudgenietit and decree
\ndated 23.04.93 in  the Civil Judge,
\nChitradurga, dismissing H_1;l_1V'<'v:*. .._suit : fe'r~~.Vp3\u00a7riit\u00a7'on and separate
\nEbssession. A '    .  –\n<\/p>\n
This   feasting been heard and reserved
\non 16.06.2009 ‘am3_con:ing”‘v{)n fiir \ufb01ronouncemcnt of Judgment
\nthis day,’ ‘”l\u00a7ie’C\u00a7mrt di\ufb01iivered’-the \ufb01)’1icr’\\”\u00bb.ri:1g,:-<\/p>\n
A Heard \ufb01ir jc::;i1i3s;\u00a72:I for the parties.<\/p>\n
_    are referred to by their rank before the trial
\n 4:  sake uf convenience.\n<\/p>\n
H   The appeal is by the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs no. I and 2<\/p>\n
   defendants no.1, 2 and 3 are all was of late Lakshmipalhi<\/p>\n
5<\/span><\/p>\n
In the year 1967 a mew \ufb01rm in the fitilfitt of “Sri Ganssha<\/p>\n
Trading Cumpsngf’ was commenced. The \ufb01rs! \u00bb~sli:$<:9nd<\/p>\n
defendant and {Wu strangers to the family ware  <\/p>\n
in that firm. After about 10 months di.!I'srr:%nces's\u00a7i5se: V' r <\/p>\n
sluod uscunstiiulcd with the  <\/p>\n
plaintiff being inducted as a   is  their<\/p>\n
plsinLi{T was actively Vmsnag\u00e9\ufb01g *  busiriesses: and [he
\nde\ufb01sndanis were dormant   for the business<\/p>\n
had alwsys family funds. In 1970 3. brother<\/p>\n
cf the    and Dufcndanls? 1&2 got<\/p>\n
 _ lhcmsslses reicsscsfifrots the \ufb01rm Ganesha Trading Company on<\/p>\n
   Capital. No funds were given to the first<\/p>\n
  partition of the business.\n<\/p>\n
 ..  rnuvabic properiy dtsscribcsd under Schedule ‘B’ 8:. ‘C’<\/p>\n
   ‘{L%VVlhc’i3l’sint were also acquired Burn the: juint family funds.<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
This first plaintiff is said to have been cxpeilcd {he<\/p>\n
joint family residcncc: in the year 1970 and was dcnigii _<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
the family properiiczs. It is stated that i\u00a7;:.~.’pilt: c3{“ii rag  = <\/p>\n
to contribute to the family busincsagiss l% l’i?    “I  <\/p>\n
Sectmd plaintiff was alsu expei1Vlf5c1..VfIu;:\ufb01v-i}1c.I}\u00a7;i\u00a7\ufb01’ii’jg(_:’\u00a7:Vs3n:{: gn.z f%<\/p>\n
denied his share of the property.\n<\/p>\n
It is alleged lhat  til the insianct: uf<\/p>\n
mac J.R.Ashwa_thzi\u00a7:rayaa\u00e9\u00a7\u00a7VV’   the terms of<\/p>\n
 v\u00e9i\ufb01\u00a7”‘&\u00a7;:istt:nc:: of plain\ufb01ff no.1 ~
\nhuwevcr, ~ih&i– {H31 an-{ed upun. Later the father of<\/p>\n
lh\ufb01’ plaintiffs  s\u00a7zid-in \u00e9ifcctud at parliliun in the year I9′?9<\/p>\n
 ‘whi\u00e9iz  (mag rvgi\u00a7$ie11:\u00a2      The: pxamam xvcrc: nu: Piiriics to am<\/p>\n
s;a.\u00a511\u00a2:_,V  lhcrein. It was alleged that the Scuund<\/p>\n
  4  his sislrs\ufb01s daughter and was thus able: to<\/p>\n
” H    influence over his father and lhus kepi him along with<\/p>\n
 his death, in 3986. And during this pcriud has cwcn<\/p>\n
T   their falhcr lu csxmzuie a will bequcathing vaxiuus<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
M<\/p>\n
plainiilll; that he has been excluded fmm lhc juini family’ was<\/p>\n
denied a sham as early as in I970. The pkaa urm<\/p>\n
claim of adverse posscssiun by the other  that. 9 <\/p>\n
[hertz was no positive: action uf uusltsr\ufb01s nr.-tef, ;i:nabI\u00e9:~.ai3\u00a21 be<\/p>\n
pressed into service.\n<\/p>\n
7. The several   Cijuiisel for the
\nappellant wuuid not apply’ a*$l*~;\u00a7\u00e9i\u00e9v\u00a2$_;–Vwhich turn an 111::
\nfacts limrcin anti  gameicgl t:5i”.1:\u00a71\u00a7.;’i’a::–t:;sun mud.<\/p>\n
The Qby\ufb01sgl  has mlitsd on 2\u00bb: large number<\/p>\n
of aulhu_2i\u00a3it;3 in $upp’ori’his’cun1cniiuns:<\/p>\n
  Parzickzm vs. Vehmgpi Kztnji, AIR 1953<\/p>\n
 ‘~\u00bb.Rad}ru\u00e9’zq_A’&3e:loba Vagiz and oiherts vs. Abumo Bhagvmntnw<\/p>\n
   cmdalhem, AIR I929P.C’. 2347<\/p>\n
    Chettzyar vs. Kathwsdztpanbi Chet\ufb01iar and<\/p>\n
VV anaiher, AIR 1927Ar{ac!rus 111<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
ikfczllzczri Hznzzzrz Kranrznrcmt and vfherzx vs. <\/p>\n
Kramczvani and oihers, AIR I929 Bombay 3&3   ‘<\/p>\n
Goumrnga Saba amd others vs . Bhaga:   u ‘ x<\/p>\n
1976 Orissa 43<\/p>\n
Reliance is placed an iizcfzzlzyuvcz .2k:!.\u00a7hear\u00a7\u00a3ie;:s “i1\u00a7IV”sa2g7:;iurl of V<\/p>\n
the uuntcnlioxl that ii,\u00bb is 1:cii!Ie:*;’–..’t::i:t:’3;:-:\u00bb;f.~;t: of first .p IainliiT not
\n111:: case of sccund dcf:\u00a71id_\u00e91n{ \u00a3f:idt:;cc is adduccad to<\/p>\n
show that thy: ;c\u00bbA1.;:V1i _1xti\ufb02iA_11u.:_’1′ iii-s   [he suit schcdnlt:<\/p>\n
prup\u00e9t\ufb01es;  uf’advt:rsc pusamssion or ouster or
\ncxt:lusi\u00a23\ufb01\u00bb…t_5I’.vI’1Vi*3.1_ 4V1:;~.Iain:\ufb01IT from joint family pmpcrlics in<\/p>\n
\\f\u20acti:\u00a7.le;z_1 s1.;;ium\u00a2i1\u00a3v!x2.m:h less any evidence in terms of Article:<\/p>\n
‘   the suit is barred by time. The totality of the<\/p>\n
.’ iyt\ufb01lplainl and evidence of PW~i, the \ufb01rs! plainii\ufb01’<\/p>\n
 unfy’ gsfiuws that he was expcs\ufb02cd fmrn join! famiiy residence:<\/p>\n
  lhiii (hart: was sumc; panchayatflis and that rtssgxmdcnis<\/p>\n
promised to give share but did not give and hence he was<\/p>\n
compelled tux \ufb01le the suit, Exsciusiun cuntcmpiaied under<\/p>\n
‘\u00e9<\/p>\n
16<\/span>
\narticle 110 is a cunsciuus and deliberate: act on the part of ulhtzr<\/p>\n
side amuunting 1:.) denial of right of plain\ufb01ff and lhgai such<\/p>\n
cxulusinn bccmnes known 1:; plainiif\ufb02<\/p>\n
As is evident from the pleadings <\/p>\n
circumstances, it is plain thal the   V ‘<\/p>\n
from the family home and awarding <\/p>\n
share — hence: limitation      1ht:\n<\/p>\n
suii is barred under  I   I963.\n<\/p>\n
.P.LaI;.\u00bb,-xngi Ag-;  Redazy, AIR 1957 Supreme<\/p>\n
C’0?I*\u00a7t31}1%%%%L’  AA  X<\/p>\n
 .  % A,sg\u00e9;ls;:t:\u00bb*z\u00a7\u00a2;.::% <3u14z;;\u00a2;\u00bb\u00a2me zidbhiuzlzlin and athem: 12.;-. Syed Shah<\/p>\n
  AIR 19?] Szgpreme Court 2184<\/p>\n
  vs. A<{ohclScz_32eed and zmolher, AIR 1981<\/p>\n
 .A  Court ,7?\n<\/p>\n
”   vs. K.Domisa:r;y, AIR 1996 Supreme Cctzurt 1724<\/p>\n
 V’ ”  Sing}? and o\u00a3her.s* vs. Gu\ufb01ar Sirgh and o\u00a3}w?:s, AIR<\/p>\n
2002 Supreme Court 606<\/p>\n
g<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
In support of the wnicnlion that possession \u00ab;:>1″‘=s)_h;:’V’a,f’o~<\/p>\n
owner or on-sham! is possession of other  <\/p>\n
and men: possession by other forf\u00e9iiy”<\/p>\n
participation in rent and pro\ufb01ts, mul\u00a7iiioi\u00a7–  <\/p>\n
shamrs would not amount to     other,'\n\nthat is appellant no.1 in    the af\u00a7pollan1's right\nis no1z:x[inguis_hcdA._   \n\nThis    j_ or1vl ' 'ofizonlcxt. The above\n<\/pre>\n
proposiiion :  Chore is no axpulsion of a co-<\/p>\n
parccncr ioui:i_:;Vi<.noihr'icd;_;t\u00a7. V . <\/p>\n
   ,{\\\ufb02}I\u00a3,;x.'*zzH1muuIl7E":'&  o __kaz" gas;;mzm\u00bb Shaikh And Othem vs. Abdulla<\/p>\n
 i{os::;;\u00a7:b}oii"f'\u00a7?z\ufb01?if}:.:3;\u00a7;' (2004) 13 SCC' 335<\/p>\n
 _ –   and another tax. ML. Sztblmraya Salty And<\/p>\n
14 , 4; ; T '   V. Qghepzs, }\u00ab11R 1972 Sttpreme Cam 1279<\/p>\n
   Nagappa Divate vs. Vlslrvamzlhsa Rurnchtmclrustz<\/p>\n
 k    T Kczbacli, AIR 1943 Bombay 419<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
Hi<\/p>\n
– Sml. Lajwanf Kaz:rAncI cmolher vs. Abnzwhi Singh <\/p>\n
AIR 19?9P &H268<\/p>\n
– Kumarappa Chettiar and Olirers vs.   <\/p>\n
ozhm, 11.12 42 Alczdraztx Series 43;?<\/p>\n
Rclying on the said authm_*itit:s,t’it  contcizdcii tthzit i’:’\\;t:2.’iQ<\/p>\n
uthcrwisc: in view of the contantitni’ by  defendant
\nand the \ufb01ndings  trial (,–1n”ui*-t_’t”!1.z’1tt  was scsveranee<\/p>\n
in status gr 1;;-st .p1ainiivft7–Vi\u00a7i_ t%t197q,tt%t5e ‘v\ufb01lain\ufb01\ufb01 beuemcs<\/p>\n
tenants     fkrliclc 110 is not applicable
\nbut A.r!icAi’t:_65_is’utii;t\u00e9:V’atjpIi\u00a73bic in which event also unless the<\/p>\n
dcfcn\u00a3;ia3:tA.pl\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7d’-.va;id”‘prt5’vcadverse posstsssiun the first piaintiff<\/p>\n
   ct\u00e9iaigd the share and the trial court ought to have<\/p>\n
  and granted decree for partition on the plea uf<\/p>\n
V .  df-tfexiitant himself and faiium to consider the 531113<\/p>\n
” ” v .   judgmcnt unsustainable.\n<\/p>\n
 b’ This proposition is 313:: rarrvnmousiy pressed into service.<\/p>\n
 distinction ought to be made: (sf  of a cu-pawtzncry<\/p>\n
3’9<\/p>\n
enjoying properly jointly and that of cu-wnc:rs in  of<\/p>\n
whom alone: the cunccpt uf advcrsc possession maynb\ufb01\u00bb <\/p>\n
Hence, the contention 1ha1A:\u00a3icl\u00a2: 65 ought lu   <\/p>\n
a? Firm Srim’wa.s Ram Kumar vs.   <\/p>\n
.4112 1951 Supreme Caurt177: \u00b0  =
\nIn support of the   ;;ran1o<! on
\nthe case :3? defendant   piaintiif.\n<\/p>\n
Though the’ ..i1:V.fi:2\u00a5v’nnu1 be said that it<\/p>\n
can be  in  hand.\n<\/p>\n
5:) }t@.   Kulita mm’ Others, (2004) I<\/p>\n
~  3};-.  and\/inother, (1993) 1 SCC 614<\/p>\n
 In suy\u00e9pnrl of the contention that no gfmrtiliun of suii<\/p>\n
 fzrupcrlics has lakcn place by males and bounds and w<\/p>\n
H   _1fu.: suit ought lo have been decreed in the absence of plea<\/p>\n
3<\/span><\/p>\n
21<\/span><\/p>\n
other cxrparccncrs. However, in the cast: on hazztgnit<\/p>\n
piaintiffs own assesrtion that ht: was c;:gg:l\u00bb;1dod_- st’ \u00bb <\/p>\n
share in the joint family property, the stititivist <\/p>\n
limitation. Hence, there is  tho   the’ V<\/p>\n
trial court in having dismissed vthe:\u00a7oit'”L\u00bb_t’ the Atpiaintiff as being<\/p>\n
barred by limitation.\n<\/p>\n
Insotlar     the trial court\nhaving fuogjct      in the year 1976\n\nitself,  said  'a;1I'irxi1od.\n\n<\/pre>\n
Howcvof,  porttttg with the case-., it is to be seen that<\/p>\n
   of  and the defendants, have died<\/p>\n
 of the proceedings and that they have<\/p>\n
 _l’t7\u00a33t3i\u00a7*”‘3(.t ;:;a’:”\u00e9.);2w.-j.-“i*ty in the course of partition as bctwccn the:<\/p>\n
4′ , \u00e9igrmdanogna the ram father of the ptatnms.<\/p>\n
By virtue of the provisions of the Hindu Succession Act,<\/p>\n
  \u00bb 4956 and in the absence: of any testamentary disposition having<\/p>\n
g<\/p>\n
22<\/span>
\nbeen established in the course: of prucctsdings, the plai11\ufb01II’s”–__wuuId<\/p>\n
be entitled alungwith the dcfundanis and their sislcr\u00a7j9″”<\/p>\n
the pmperiy Id’! behind by the: parents. 11 is meg-gaggg apmme <\/p>\n
[11:11 the plaintiffs and lhc defendant;   <\/p>\n
apportioned their ncspcc\ufb01vc shaV1iv..-34.91′ iliTc._;\u00bb\u00a7i0pcr1ig.\u00a7S–M.  *’<\/p>\n
their parents in appropriate \ufb01nal   <\/p>\n
In the reach, the app\u00a3:\u00a31i is a}3′(\u00a7x\u00e9Ic;'{A:ir: terms as about<\/p>\n
and the judgmeg1i’\ufb01;\u00a7;i_’  Z:  hccurdingly.<\/p>\n
3d\/5.-.\u00a7
\nIud\u00e9\u00e9<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009 Author: Anand Byrareddy IN THE HIGH COURT OF A’: DATED THIS THE 943? % THE HON’BLE M1\u00a7.”‘Ji}ST}ZQIi, BYRA1\u00a7.E1)DY REG:;1.;;ARF1I:sT 1993 BETWEEN’ % ‘ 1. Sri H.’L’\u00a7Srir\u00a7iivas\u00a3\u00a3fi\ufb01~u;5\u00a3-4 Aged ahGutV53.y\u00a7\u00bb\u00e9rs — . SI’ 0.M.\u00abLalLsh1nip:i_i_i1i :3*\u00bb.’.\u00bb_{“l’ 3+,’ ‘ Merch3nI_s,%A Res\ufb01dchts >5)?’ ‘ Hiriyur T\u00e9iwvja, Ckilr-adnijga District […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55002","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nH.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-04-02T03:38:32+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-02T03:38:32+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009\"},\"wordCount\":1459,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009\",\"name\":\"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-04-02T03:38:32+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-04-02T03:38:32+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009","datePublished":"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-02T03:38:32+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009"},"wordCount":1459,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009","name":"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-06-30T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-04-02T03:38:32+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/h-l-srinivasa-gupta-vs-h-l-sridhara-gupta-on-1-july-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"H.L.Srinivasa Gupta vs H.L.Sridhara Gupta on 1 July, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55002","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55002"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55002\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55002"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55002"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55002"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}