{"id":55993,"date":"2010-03-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-03-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010"},"modified":"2015-12-24T14:45:40","modified_gmt":"2015-12-24T09:15:40","slug":"shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010","title":{"rendered":"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & … on 29 March, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & … on 29 March, 2010<\/div>\n
                CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION\n                 Complaint No. - CIC\/LS\/C\/2009\/000676 dated: 28.08.'09\n                     Right to Information Act- Section 18(1) (b)\n\nComplainant:        Shri R. C. Sethi\nRespondent:         Department of Personnel & Training (DoP&T), New Delhi.\n                            Decision Announced: 29.3.'10\nFacts<\/pre>\n
:-\n<\/p>\n
      The Commission has received a complaint from Shri R. C. Sethi of Khan
\nMarket, New Delhi that his request under RTI Act, 2005 submitted to the Central
\nPublic Information Officer, HQ, Central Bureau of Investigation, New Delhi, which
\nwas first sent to the OS (Pers-I)\/CBI\/Head Officer\/New Delhi on 05.06.2009 u\/s
\n5(4) of the Act for seeking assistance by the CPIO and thereafter further
\ntransferred to CPIO, Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi on
\n11.06.2009 u\/s 6(3) of the Act, seeking a copy of the enquiry reports submitted
\nby Inquiry Officers to the disciplinary authorities and the orders passed thereon
\nby disciplinary authorities in respect of CBI ID No. DPAD 5\/2002\/0869\/3\/51\/91
\ndated 20.12.2002 and CBI ID No. DP (Pers.-I)\/2006\/4208\/3\/51\/91pt. dated
\n18.12.2006, has not been responded to, even though the same was duly
\nsubmitted along with the requisite fee dated 02.06.2009. The complainant has
\nfurther alleged that the stipulated time of 30 days in the present case has also
\nexpired in case of CPIO, SP (HQ)\/CBI & CPIO\/CBI\/HO\/New Delhi.\n<\/p>\n
      Admitting the complaint of Shri Sethi under Section 18(1) (b) of RTI Act,
\n2005 the Commission served notice on 22.02.2010 on CPIOs, Central Bureau of
\ninvestigation and Department of Personnel & Training, New Delhi for furnishing
\ncomments on the complaint. In response, both CPIOs have submitted their
\ncomments on 25.02.2010 and 09.03.2010 respectively. CPIO, Shri Ashwani
\nKumar, SP (HQ), CBI has informed the Commission that, as suggested by OS
\n(Pers.I)\/CBI\/Head Officer\/New Delhi on 09.06.2009 the application of Shri Sethi
\nwas transferred to DoP&T as, the enquiry reports in the disciplinary proceedings
\nhad already been sent by the inquiry officer to DoP&T for a decision to be taken
\nat their end. The application of Shri Sethi was transferred to them on 11.06.2009<\/p>\n
                                          1<\/span>
\n u\/s 6(3) of the Act under intimation to the complainant and hence, there is no
\ndelay on the part of the CPIO, CBI in transferring\/ forwarding the application to
\nthe concerned public authority as per that provision of RTI Act.\n<\/p>\n
      On the other hand, CPIO, Shri Chandra Prakash, Under Secretary,
\nDoP&T has informed the Commission of the reason for not responding to the
\nrequest of Shri Sethi stating that the letter dated 11.06.2009 of CPIO, CBI was
\nreceived and was returned to the CBI as per the record maintained in AVD-II
\nSection. The said reference of the CBI again came back to the department and
\nthis was marked to the deemed CPIO, Section Officer, AVD-II Desk on
\n05.08.2009 by the diarist but, as ascertained from the CPIO, the same reference
\nwas not physically received by him. The CPIO has described the disciplinary
\naction taken against those officials\/employees for the paper which was misplaced
\nand has assured the Commission that such incidents will not recur in future. He
\nhas however, stated that the information sought by complainant has been
\nprovided to him separately.\n<\/p>\n
                                    Decision
\n      From a perusal of the comments submitted by both the CPIOs, it is
\napparent that the action taken by the CPIO, CBI on the request of the
\ncomplainant is as per the provision of Section 6(3) of the Act and well within the
\ntime mandated for the same. However, the Commission observes default on the
\npart of the CPIO, AVD-II, Desk, DoP&T while dealing with the application
\nreceived under RTI Act. The Commission views this seriously, but disciplinary
\naction as per Sec 20 (2) having already been taken hereby directs DoPT to
\nexercise greater care in processing such cases in future.\n<\/p>\n
      On the other hand it has been observed that the Complainant Shri Sethi,
\non not being provided with the desired records within the time mandated by law,
\ncould have preferred an appeal through the channel available to him u\/s Section
\n19(1) of the Act, which has not been done. As informed by the CPIO, DoP&T, the
\ndesired documents have now been provided to the complainant separately.
\nNevertheless, if, he finds the response unsatisfactory, complainant may<\/p>\n
                                         2<\/span>
\n approach the 1st appellate authority of DoP&T u\/s 19(1) of the Act, and
\n                                                                         st
\nconsequently if, not satisfied with the information provided on his 1 appeal,
\n                                                 nd
\ncomplainant Shri Sethi will be free to move a 2 appeal before us as per Sec 19
\n(3). The Registry of the Commission is hereby directed to send the copies of
\ncomments submitted by the CPIOs to the complainant together with this decision
\nnotice.\n<\/p>\n
          Announced this twenty ninth day of March 2010. Notice of this decision be
\ngiven free of cost to the parties.\n<\/p>\n
Wajahat Habibullah
\n(Chief Information Commissioner)
\n29.03.2010<\/p>\n
Authenticated true copy, additional copies of order shall be supplied against
\napplication and payment of the charge prescribed under the Act to the CPIO of
\nthis Commission.\n<\/p>\n
Pankaj K. P. Shreyaskar
\nJoint Registrar.\n<\/p>\n
29.03.2010<\/p>\n
                                          3<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & … on 29 March, 2010 CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION Complaint No. – CIC\/LS\/C\/2009\/000676 dated: 28.08.’09 Right to Information Act- Section 18(1) (b) Complainant: Shri R. C. Sethi Respondent: Department of Personnel & Training (DoP&T), New Delhi. Decision Announced: 29.3.’10 Facts :- The Commission has […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-55993","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nShri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-12-24T09:15:40+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & … on 29 March, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-24T09:15:40+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010\"},\"wordCount\":804,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010\",\"name\":\"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-12-24T09:15:40+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & … on 29 March, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-12-24T09:15:40+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & … on 29 March, 2010","datePublished":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-24T09:15:40+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010"},"wordCount":804,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010","name":"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & ... on 29 March, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-03-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-12-24T09:15:40+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/shri-r-c-sethi-vs-department-of-personnel-on-29-march-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Shri R. C. Sethi vs Department Of Personnel & … on 29 March, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55993","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=55993"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/55993\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=55993"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=55993"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=55993"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}