{"id":56017,"date":"2011-08-03T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-08-02T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011"},"modified":"2017-04-14T09:37:34","modified_gmt":"2017-04-14T04:07:34","slug":"nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011","title":{"rendered":"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court<\/div>\n
Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011<\/div>\n
Author: V. K. Jain<\/div>\n
         THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI\n\n%                   Judgment Pronounced on: 03.08.2011\n\n+ CS(OS) 765\/2010\n\nNRIPENDRA KUMAR AGGARWAL                ..... Plaintiff\n             Through :                Mr. K.R.Chawla, Adv.\n\n                             versus\n\nS.L. AGGARWAL & OTHERS            ..... Defendants\n               Through :         Mr. Rajat Aneja, Adv. for D-\n                                 14 to 17.\n                                 Ms. Jaya Tomar and Ms.\n                                 Babli Kaur, Advs. for D-9 to\n                                 13.\n                                 Mr. Rishabh Jain, proxy for\n                                 D-14 to 17.\n                                 Mr. S.S.Parashar, Adv. for\n                                 D-1.\n                                 Defendant No.5 in person.\nCORAM:-\nHON'BLE MR JUSTICE V.K. JAIN\n\n1. Whether Reporters of local papers may\n   be allowed to see the judgment?                         No.\n\n2. To be referred to the Reporter or not?                  No.\n\n3. Whether the judgment should be reported                 No.\n   in Digest?\n\nV.K. JAIN, J. (ORAL)\n<\/pre>\n
IAs 7266\/2011 (for review of orders dated 23.02.2011) &
\n7292\/2011(u\/S.5 of Limitation Act) & RP No.366\/2011<\/p>\n
1.          Vide these applications, defendant No.1 is seeking<\/p>\n
review of the order dated 23.02.2011 whereby defendant<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                    Page 1 of 10<\/span>
\n No.1 was allowed to continue in possession of the suit<\/p>\n
property bearing No.61\/30, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh<\/p>\n
(towards house No.61\/29, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh), New<\/p>\n
Delhi, subject to his giving undertaking to the Court that in<\/p>\n
the event of the Court ultimately deciding that his<\/p>\n
possession to the exclusion of other co-owners of the<\/p>\n
property was not lawful, he would pay 5\/6 of the current<\/p>\n
market rent of the aforesaid premises to the other co-owners<\/p>\n
of the property, he will maintain status quo with respect to<\/p>\n
the aforesaid possession, will not part with its possession in<\/p>\n
favour of any other person, will not create any third party<\/p>\n
interest therein and will not carry out        any addition,<\/p>\n
alteration, renovation or any repair whatsoever therein<\/p>\n
without prior permission of the Court. He was also required<\/p>\n
to ensure that the above-referred portion was properly<\/p>\n
maintained and does not get damaged in any manner. The<\/p>\n
undertaking was directed to be filed within one week.<\/p>\n
2.          The learned counsel for the applicant states that<\/p>\n
only the first and second floor of property No. 61\/30,<\/p>\n
Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh (towards house No.61\/29, Ramjas<\/p>\n
Road, Karol Bagh), New Delhi, is the subject matter of this<\/p>\n
suit and, therefore, the undertaking should be confined to<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                   Page 2 of 10<\/span>
\n only those two floors of the property and should not cover<\/p>\n
the ground floor which is the exclusive property of<\/p>\n
defendant No.1. A bare perusal of the order would clearly<\/p>\n
show that the undertaking sought from defendant No.1 is<\/p>\n
confined to property which is subject matter of the suit. It<\/p>\n
is, in any case, clarified that the undertaking to be<\/p>\n
furnished by defendant No.1 in terms of the order of this<\/p>\n
Court dated 23.02.2011 would be confined to the first and<\/p>\n
second floor of property No.61\/30, Ramjas Road, Karol<\/p>\n
Bagh (towards house No.61\/29, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh),<\/p>\n
New Delhi.\n<\/p>\n
3.          The learned counsel for the applicant\/defendant<\/p>\n
No.1 states that there is no justification for requiring him to<\/p>\n
give undertaking to pay 5\/6 of the current market rent of<\/p>\n
the aforesaid premises to the other co-owners since the<\/p>\n
applicant\/defendant No.1 is not actually occupying the<\/p>\n
aforesaid portion of the property and is holding only the<\/p>\n
keys of those premises.     Since it is defendant No.1 alone<\/p>\n
who continues to hold the keys of the aforesaid portions, it<\/p>\n
is he who is deemed to be in possession of the aforesaid<\/p>\n
portions and there is no reason why he alone should<\/p>\n
continue to enjoy the possession of the aforesaid joint<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                    Page 3 of 10<\/span>
\n property.\n<\/p>\n
            At this stage, the learned counsel appearing for<\/p>\n
defendant No.1 states that defendant No.1 is ready to<\/p>\n
deposit the keys of the first and second floor of the property,<\/p>\n
during pendency of       the   suit.   The learned counsel<\/p>\n
representing other parties state that they would not insist<\/p>\n
on an undertaking for payment of 5\/6 of the current market<\/p>\n
rent of the aforesaid premises to the other co-owners of the<\/p>\n
property in case the keys of the first and second floor,<\/p>\n
including the staircase leading to the first and second floor<\/p>\n
of the suit property No.61\/30, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh<\/p>\n
(towards house No.61\/29, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh), New<\/p>\n
Delhi, are deposited by defendant No.1 in the Court. Hence,<\/p>\n
a consent order is passed directing defendant No.1 to<\/p>\n
deposit the keys of the first and second floor and the<\/p>\n
staircase of property No.61\/30, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh<\/p>\n
(towards house No.61\/29, Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh), New<\/p>\n
Delhi, in the Court within a week. The undertaking to be<\/p>\n
furnished by defendant No.1 will not include an obligation<\/p>\n
to pay 5\/6 of the current market rent of the aforesaid<\/p>\n
premises to the other co-owners of the property.                    If<\/p>\n
defendant No.1 wants the keys of the staircase temporarily<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                    Page 4 of 10<\/span>
\n for the purpose of cleaning it, he will be entitled to apply to<\/p>\n
the Court for this purpose.\n<\/p>\n
            These applications stand disposed of in terms of<\/p>\n
this order.\n<\/p>\n
IA 11089\/2011(O.12 R.6 CPC)<\/p>\n
4.             Vide this application, defendant No.1 is seeking<\/p>\n
permission to file written statement.             This is a suit for<\/p>\n
partition and, the plaintiff as well as defendants No.1 & 5<\/p>\n
are practising Advocates. When this matter was taken up<\/p>\n
by    Hon’ble       Mr.   Justice    J.R.Midha,    on   20.05.2010,<\/p>\n
defendants No.1 & 5 were present in the Court along with<\/p>\n
their counsel and they admitted that Smt. Kailash Wati was<\/p>\n
the owner of suit property bearing No. No.61\/30, Ramjas<\/p>\n
Road, Karol Bagh (towards house No.61\/29, Ramjas Road,<\/p>\n
Karol Bagh), New Delhi.             It was also admitted that the<\/p>\n
plaintiff has one-sixth share in the suit property.                The<\/p>\n
shares of the parties as mentioned in para 10 of the plaint<\/p>\n
were also admitted. It was also submitted that defendants<\/p>\n
No.1 & 5 had no objection to the preliminary decree being<\/p>\n
passed in terms of the order made in the plaint. It was also<\/p>\n
submitted to the Court that a Local Commissioner be<\/p>\n
appointed for examining whether the suit property can be<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                          Page 5 of 10<\/span>
\n partitioned by metes and bounds.           When this matter was<\/p>\n
taken up by the Hon’ble Judge on 31.05.2010, defendant<\/p>\n
No.1     sought      to   withdraw   the   admissions    made       on<\/p>\n
20.05.2010 and submitted that he wanted to contest the<\/p>\n
suit.    Defendant No.5, however, stuck to her statement<\/p>\n
made before the Court on 20.05.2010. The Court was of the<\/p>\n
view that this was a fit case for exercising power under<\/p>\n
Order 12 Rule 6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in view of<\/p>\n
the unequivocal statements made by defendants No.1 & 5<\/p>\n
before the Court on 20.05.2010 and passed a preliminary<\/p>\n
decree declaring that the plaintiff has one-sixth share,<\/p>\n
defendant No.1 has one-sixth share and defendant No.5 has<\/p>\n
1\/42nd share in the suit property.           Defendant No.2 had<\/p>\n
already filed written statement by that time.           Defendants<\/p>\n
No.3, 4, 6 to 18 were granted thirty days time to file the<\/p>\n
written statement.        An appeal was preferred by defendant<\/p>\n
No.1 against the order dated 31.05.2010.           The appellant<\/p>\n
stated before the Division Bench that he proposed to file an<\/p>\n
application before this Court praying for leave to file written<\/p>\n
statement.          The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn.<\/p>\n
Pursuant to the statement made before the Division Bench<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                         Page 6 of 10<\/span>
\n on 27.05.2011, defendant No.1 has now filed the application<\/p>\n
seeking leave to file the written statement.<\/p>\n
5.          Since a preliminary decree for partition has already<\/p>\n
been passed against defendant No.1, there is no occasion<\/p>\n
for him to file a written statement at this stage. On passing<\/p>\n
of preliminary decree, the Court needs only to ascertain<\/p>\n
whether the property is capable of partition by metes and<\/p>\n
bounds or not and in case the property is capable of<\/p>\n
partition by metes and bounds, a final decree of partition is<\/p>\n
to be passed, thereby partitioning the properties by metes<\/p>\n
and bounds. In case the property is incapable of metes and<\/p>\n
bounds, the Court is to pass an appropriate order with<\/p>\n
respect to its sale, on the request of one or more of its co-<\/p>\n
owners.\n<\/p>\n
6.          Since a decree based on admission before the<\/p>\n
Court has already been passed by this Court and an appeal<\/p>\n
preferred against that order has also been dismissed, there<\/p>\n
is no question of allowing defendant No.1 to file written<\/p>\n
statement at this stage.         If defendant No.1 has any<\/p>\n
submission to make with respect to passing of final decree,<\/p>\n
he will get an opportunity to make such submissions, as<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                     Page 7 of 10<\/span>
\n and when, the Court takes up the passing of the final<\/p>\n
decree.\n<\/p>\n
            The application being devoid of any merit is hereby<\/p>\n
dismissed.\n<\/p>\n
CS(OS) 765\/2010<\/p>\n
7.          Defendants    No.5,   who   is   an   Advocate     and<\/p>\n
represents defendants No.2 to 4 and 6 to 8, Ms. Jaya<\/p>\n
Tomar, Advocate, who represents defendants No.9 to 13 and<\/p>\n
Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate, who represents defendants No.14<\/p>\n
to 17 admit, on instructions, that property No. 61\/30,<\/p>\n
Ramjas Road, Karol Bagh (towards house No.61\/29, Ramjas<\/p>\n
Road, Karol Bagh), New Delhi, was owned by late Smt.<\/p>\n
Kailash Wati who died on 07.02.1980 leaving behind six<\/p>\n
legal heirs, namely, plaintiff – Shri Nripendra Kumar<\/p>\n
Aggarwal, defendant No.1 – Shri Surinder Lal Aggarwal, late<\/p>\n
Jitender Kumar Aggarwal, late Shri Ravi Aggarwal, late Shri<\/p>\n
B.M.Aggarwal and Mrs. Veena Gupta. They also admit that<\/p>\n
all the six legal heirs of Smt. Kailash Wati referred above<\/p>\n
became entitled to one-sixth share in the suit property, i.e.<\/p>\n
first and second floor of property No. 61\/30, Ramjas Road,<\/p>\n
Karol Bagh (towards house No.61\/29, Ramjas Road, Karol<\/p>\n
Bagh), New Delhi.        They also request that a preliminary<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                      Page 8 of 10<\/span>
\n decree for partition of the suit property be passed in the<\/p>\n
aforesaid ratio. It has also been pointed out that defendant<\/p>\n
No.18 – Mrs. Veena Gupta, has also admitted the aforesaid<\/p>\n
facts in the written statement filed by her.<\/p>\n
8.          In view of the aforesaid statements and the<\/p>\n
admission       made    in   the   WS       of   defendant   No.18,         a<\/p>\n
preliminary decree for partition is hereby passed declaring<\/p>\n
that the parties to the suit have the following share in the<\/p>\n
suit property:-\n<\/p>\n
     Party     to Name                              Share\n     the suit\n     Plaintiff    Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal          1\/6th\n\n     Defendant      Surinder Lal Aggarwal           1\/6th\n     No.1\n     Defendants     Gayatri Devi                    1\/42nd\n     No.2 to 8      Neelam Aggarwal                 each\n                    Deepak Aggarwal\n                    Poonam parashar\n                    Sunita Aggarwal\n                    Manjushree\n                    Anjali Aggarwal\n     Defendants     Usha Aggarwal                   1\/30th\n     No.9 to 13     Kiran Aggarwal                  each\n                    Ritu Singhal\n                    Seema Gupta\n                    Rajeev Aggarwal\n\n     Defendants Manju Aggarwal                      1\/24th\n     No.14   to Sonia Daga                          each\n     17         Ankush Aggarwal\n                Ankur Aggarwal\n     Defendant  Veena Gupta                         1\/6th\n     No.18\n\n\n\n\nCS(OS)No.765\/2010                                            Page 9 of 10<\/span>\n<\/pre>\n
 9.          All the parties present and\/or represented before<\/p>\n
the Court state that the suit property is incapable of<\/p>\n
partition by metes and bounds.       Since the parties admit<\/p>\n
that the property is incapable of partition by metes and<\/p>\n
bounds, the only course of action left for the Court is to sale<\/p>\n
the suit property, as is provided under Section 3 of the<\/p>\n
Partition Act, on the request of one or more co-owners. The<\/p>\n
learned Counsel present before the Court, except defendant<\/p>\n
No.1, do make a request for sale of the suit property.<\/p>\n
            List the matter for hearing on 27th January, 2012,<\/p>\n
to work-out the modalities for the sale of the suit property.<\/p>\n
                                               (V.K. JAIN)
\n                                                 JUDGE
\nAUGUST 03, 2011
\n‘sn’\/vn<\/p>\n
CS(OS)No.765\/2010                                    Page 10 of 10<\/span>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Delhi High Court Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011 Author: V. K. Jain THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: 03.08.2011 + CS(OS) 765\/2010 NRIPENDRA KUMAR AGGARWAL ….. Plaintiff Through : Mr. K.R.Chawla, Adv. versus S.L. AGGARWAL & OTHERS ….. Defendants Through : Mr. Rajat […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[14,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56017","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-delhi-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nNripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-14T04:07:34+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-14T04:07:34+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1657,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Delhi High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011\",\"name\":\"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-14T04:07:34+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-14T04:07:34+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011","datePublished":"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-14T04:07:34+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011"},"wordCount":1657,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Delhi High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011","name":"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-08-02T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-14T04:07:34+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/nripendra-kumar-aggarwal-vs-s-l-aggarwal-ors-on-3-august-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Nripendra Kumar Aggarwal vs S.L.Aggarwal & Ors. on 3 August, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56017","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56017"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56017\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56017"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56017"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56017"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}