{"id":56298,"date":"2008-06-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008"},"modified":"2019-02-12T08:27:10","modified_gmt":"2019-02-12T02:57:10","slug":"apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Apex Infrastructural Solutions … vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Apex Infrastructural Solutions … vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: N.Kumar<\/div>\n
 1% \u00ab  * tofl\u00e9amataka\n\n The Deputy  ' '\n\nDmnd this the 26*  fol' H0\u00bb-:\u00a7\\ x f     V\nBEF0RE    \nms Hozrnm mm.  A \"R---Ki3\ufb02AR.  A J   V\n\nmy Petition Na\u00a7_1_\u00a715?  g M; 'gm %\nEgmr\ufb01g\ufb01z   I  \nApex In\ufb01astructux\ufb01l.__Sol1jfi\u00a7iz$ Fvi.\"i\u00a7tt1., 7  \n\nRepresented by: its  f}ite\u00e9t4_>r\"* ' \" \n\nGround   \nNearB11sSt\u00a3m6.;'   '  \n    \" \n\n Sri  Senior Counsel for\n\n \"  secmtmy\n  Industries Dcparment\n; \"v'n:nam; manna\n-~.Banga_Io:~\u00a2 ~-- 560 001\n\nA Managing Director\n. ' ' =-Karnataka Udyog Mitra\nx _ Kjluanija Bhavan (South Wing)\n' No.49, Race ('mime Road\nBangalcarc - 360 001\n\nUttara Kmnaad.a District \n\n\n\n' 'Pub1i<$ Works Department\nNmpathunga Road\nBangalore--560001 \n\n5 The Regonal mzecmar "\n\nKajubag, Katwar\nUttaxa Kmnada District\n\n6 AdaniEnterpr=i%=sh'mziteri W  . \u00ab\nA Public mind      \nHavi\ufb02\ufb02ita Regiseexed  i =   .. \nAt*AdamHr:;1m'  " 1 .V \nNear Mithakhai\ufb02i Ci-mi: \u00bb " %\nNava1'a12spuri\u20act'%%%' ~ [2 \n\nRepresented iigy  \n   _ Eeapondenin\n(By  cw, for R1 to R5;\n Sri K 'G R    ' Senior counsel in\nM\/Ls-\u00ab.V M Chambexa, Advocuie R11' R6)\n\n  P\u00e9titian. is \ufb01led under Al\ufb01clua 226 and 227 of\n\n  f.'t:\u00bb:,VCot1a;tii11ti\u00ab.*~1t1 of Indza' , pmym' g to quash the orders of &e\n the project under ahcyance, Vida letter\n\ndam}  Axmuxuze-G.\nA  Fe\ufb01tion coming on for preliminary  this\n\n V -day, tl"3e.-2.. made the following: I\n\n "Tia: petitioner has _pn:&;r_mcd um Writ Pati\ufb02on sccldng a\n\n'V  of  quashing  *G and H by which\n9' " U  Udgog  the socond respondent, has informed<\/pre>\n
the petitioner that the SLSWCC aqapzmal   4′
\npe\ufb01\ufb01oner in respect of  _~ ‘  ‘ .\n<\/p>\n
project of 2 Kins by-pass road   <\/p>\n
opinian\/cxplma\u00e9tion from   project
\nproposal at the earliest’    placed before the
\nSLSWCC for taidng_ma1  pmopoaa].\n<\/p>\n
2-  company
\non the   Buiklers. Developcm.\n<\/p>\n
They   of  iron ore, mazes:\n<\/p>\n
and   foreign countries through the<\/p>\n
  Belclceri ‘Port   District of Kamamlm state.
\n   much the Belekc:n’ Port to N.H.I7. Loam’<\/p>\n
 rg  will have to pass through Belekczi<\/p>\n
A   _Vi1Iag”\u00a2:.. Roaghjy about 700 lorries pass through the ma
\n‘ ”   The village is thickly populated. Therefore, the
\n%    of vehicles is causmg lot of inmnvenienoe to the
\nV’ .   as well as exporters and port users which has resulted
\n  Lin detention oflorxiea for several days by the agitated villagers.\n<\/p>\n
Consequently, the exporters are incuning loss. In onier to<\/p>\n
XL\/’<\/p>\n
  informed the Deputy Comm1ssio’ net,
\n*  steps for oonshuc\ufb01acn 91′ a bypass<\/p>\n
  \ufb01nmation ofthc mad md hood om the some In<\/p>\n
7    In thc meauwhik M\/o om Logistics
\n  (India) Limited. Mia.  ‘ sum mvaoe
\n  M\/5. Adam’ Expom  oaeo showed their someee<\/p>\n
 [to develop the proposed wed. in view ofthc xeoommenaaooo<\/p>\n
Qeputy Commiasicner, third respondent,
\nof conversion of agricultural land
\nas per Amzuzxum-F. At this junctoixe
\nsent a oomxmmica\ufb01on as
\npetitioner that the approval of
\nSecondly, the petitiancr  hm opinion
\noorooo the    decioioo. The
\npetitioner has     action, to all the
\nmspondcnmf    preferred this Writ
\nPetition  H.\n<\/p>\n
4.  * heave \ufb01bd their counter. The
\nDimct4(ffr,’v Porto water ‘I’ransport Department iao. his<\/p>\n
mad”   ‘Pant xoqueoting hhn m acquire zm\ufb01ic1cn’ t<\/p>\n
 bi\u00a2i.c’i\u00a2;-..1″9″Ar the successful bidder to make payment
\n   .,;:….cx. M\/3. iDeCK xm eomplctnd pxcpam\ufb01tm of<\/p>\n
 Ak   ‘_’\u00a7’.+.1::_’..\u00ab.: Several o\ufb01cial mustangs’ wm condueind to \ufb01na\ufb01zc
\n   The  thm also talwn a decziaiutn in this
\n  An  \ufb01n’ bids showing the calcndm ofevcnm<\/p>\n
of the Deputy  and in View
\nEmfrastructurc po\ufb01cy of the  t\u00e9 pf  ‘
\nWerks Dcpaxtment decided to
\n(Build Gpcxate — Trmsfegj   s\ufb01am-%
\nGovcrnmcnt Orwnisa\ufb01cyn  of
\ninfrastructure project:   a detmled
\nproject report vidg: the  A \u00ab..:. ::  13.10.2006.
\nAn agmm.-,n<.{  iDeCK. The
\ncstimamd    \ufb01rm Ra.13.60 Lakha for
\nPhase I    Plane :2 services. Thus,
\nthe total   to Mix. iDcC-K was Rs.24.00
\nLakhs.   meet this expenditure from their<\/p>\n
1.\/. .\n<\/p>\n
is also ready for publication. In the iiicanwhik:\n<\/p>\n
Sing}: Window Ck-zarance C’-onmaittcc in    <\/p>\n
23.3.2007 approved a proposal of  ‘\u00a39
\n:i11frastru<::tu:re project of 2     *'
\nAs soon as the matter came to  (if   DC;
\nKarwar, the matter wasviijiscn  If   ant. It 1'\u00bb
\nsubmitted that the  such as Public
\nWorks, Ports   DCpaI'tE11\u00a25:Il1B are
\nresponsible   far public
\n  a process to oonsiruct
\na by    Port way back in 2005.\n<\/p>\n
The mad new a. guh\ufb01ic item, individual] private parties<\/p>\n
 , A_can:_mi:. bgjaiigwedh .\u00a3;QI}fstI1JCf\/DWH it exclusively. Coiistruction<\/p>\n
 ofiimaidganowed as an infmsiiucture project withizi the<\/p>\n
  poiiey. FWD is not responsible for any<\/p>\n
-V ag*eiiizaf3:1EitV\u00e9iiicred by the: pcziitioncr with the landovmcrs for<\/p>\n
i ii V  of land. Prior pcrxznission fiom the concerned<\/p>\n
.’aZdi1iiiiistrativ:: dezpartmcnt, public works, ports and inland<\/p>\n
T  V’ water \ufb01ansport and other rcitzvant department is 1301: taken. By<\/p>\n
V direc\ufb02y appmaching the second respondent the approvai is<\/p>\n
 \u00bb.___. Thu\u00a7;  the appmval is obtained. It is she
\n second mapandent had no pum:etm’ ‘ ‘ Go<\/p>\n
 A’   which they have granted. As the
\n   xral pmjeet mm within the de\ufb01nitiee ear puh\ufb01c
\n  01!’ pmcurement of service we de\ufb01ed under<\/p>\n
 my and (1) aswcli mcxmetmctionworlm anaemia; 1\/ %<\/p>\n
a consortium under a company to be 4′
\nname and style of ‘Apex
\nLimited’ and an M00 was
\nsaid fact has been supp1e3s({i_'<!)_y
\nCourt. Claadeetinely the   second
\nzeapandent   the major part
\noperators are invoked'…    by and
\nmm     in me:\n<\/p>\n
though the  entered mm a MOU
\ntheir part   the said MOI} came in m
\nend on  same, on 3.3.2007 when we<\/p>\n
  also would be a pat of tl\ufb01 pmject.\n<\/p>\n
  Act, 1996. In fact. the peunonm”
\n    stand in the writ petition to the mo: \ufb02aat
\n% \u00e9   \u00e9mnpgehed the mad mpondem \ufb01r mpxmmmaon of
\n ea:  project of2 Km. by-pass mad \ufb01om Bclclnexi<\/p>\n
  ‘  A   1   National High Way.\n<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
the said problem. the peti\ufb01tmcr proposed   \ufb02
\neonsmxc\ufb01on of altmnative brpms  pf   V’ ‘
\nport from the National Hi\ufb01way NH-I-347.\n<\/p>\n
into an wecmeznt with thc     ”\n<\/p>\n
road. Itisthezeafterhehag
\nthe Compmy is to  and port
\nusers of     \ufb01mn  They
\nhave planned   ofabo\ufb01t 2 Km to
\nthe port.     cmm. nmeime.\n<\/p>\n
they have  the infxastmctnre pmject of
\nconstxuctiqn  %  of Bclekcri port and for<\/p>\n
ii1aaa\u00a7iiing of and ma Section 109 of the<\/p>\n
concerned. if the dcpartlncntal   \ufb02<\/p>\n
clearances within the s\ufb01pulatnd  ‘ T <\/p>\n
sha\ufb02 be deemed to have been    <\/p>\n
the aforesaid Act there is   <\/p>\n
pmject. It only deals with %
\nengaged in  both. But still, the
\nsecond of the petitioner
\nwho wanted   f\u00e9’;f pwjcct and have<\/p>\n
granted the    <\/p>\n
  pmgosaz 5; the petitioner to
\nestabhis\ufb01a  of “2 kms by-pass
\nmad for__    an invmirnent of
\nRs\u00a7.2?’._60  in  Kazrmda District<\/p>\n
..   gppetig.\n<\/p>\n
  the company to purchase 32 acres 15<\/p>\n
  various Sy.Nos. in Belckeri Village, Ankola<\/p>\n
” ;i{a;nnada District for the project and mcommcnd<\/p>\n
   Kannada District permission to purchase the<\/p>\n
  said land under Section 109 of the KLR Act for<\/p>\n
 c\u00e9nvcmion of the land to industrial purpose. The petitioner<\/p>\n
” Waa \u00absailed upon to obtain NOCI CR2} cicarance from Kamamka<\/p>\n
 ‘~  PGlit3T~'”””a’S wall as pmvisiens canfaizlcd in<\/p>\n
 (Fac::\ufb02itaiioI1} Act, 2992, if 53131}? after such<\/p>\n
 ‘ ‘Qpan ‘ii: \u00abip\u00e9titionar to chaiiange the said action.\n<\/p>\n
%  .:’:_:::__\u00a7\u00a7iaiutQ1y przjvisians cantaimsd thsrezin, wh\u00a2:rr.~:, in ignorance<\/p>\n
   1.43%” the procaedizxgs \ufb01\ufb01\ufb01atad by the G-avcmmeni for ciaveiopmcnt<\/p>\n
respmzdent the action taken by them much   A’
\nproposal submiticrd by the p\u20acf;i”i2iO11f\u00a73XT,. the  ‘ j.
\nwas justi\ufb01ed in krszepiug the appr\ufb01itak  :71;
\nfact, to be fair tn the p<:tii:i{:1i:::3t,V. 'f'_h\u00a3Vi';ji'..#V\u00a7.".3\u20ac}'
\npaiifioney to placrs; their View in  0% T_ taken by
\nPWI}, DC and othars,   by this ixnpuged
\ncommunicatloxx is' \ufb01hat \ufb02aggzigitt\u00e9\ufb01w%1;q1iir\u00a7;S&'\u00bb'\u00a79t:::;\u00a35n3idara\ufb01on. As
\nthe authoiitiss  i:;:;*1;as involvsd in this
\ncase, ii: is n-2:9; to pmnounce one way
\n{yr the   authoztities concerned in
\nthis dev\u00e9\u00a7\u00e9p\u00a7..e\ufb01t–  ="iI1frastmct:1Ie pmjcci to take<\/p>\n
appmpziats LE1! : the Eight of the Kmnataka<\/p>\n
de\u00e9i\u00e9si\u00e9zs is i.;*'\u00a7.K_'*3I::1, if the pafi\ufb010;z3ar'3 interest is a\ufb01ected, it is<\/p>\n
  * is. Themfvra iu the; faets of this. case and in the light of<\/p>\n
{Ff read, the sszzzand za\ufb01pgn\u00e9snt has aceax\ufb01ad appmval to the<\/p>\n
pa\ufb01\ufb01sner and 23%;; {heat tizey want in\u00bb rsccmsid$';::t':*~–[it".'<\/p>\n
cazmct be saiti that {hazy have act;:d…i}1:ga\u00a7i}Mnm "   a<\/p>\n
rasgtgaa\ufb01ant a1:'\u00a7h9riiy has fth\u00e9 paw\u00e9r iii:\n<\/p>\n
prsposai ma\ufb01a by the paiitia:1z:if,’\u00a7Fa?.V  it is for
\n‘\u00a3313 authoi\u00e9\ufb01ea to take  1’11 ihai: View of the
\nmaitar, this Writ  open all the
\ncantgrz\ufb01ons   ‘ to be agitated,
\nif wz\u00e9 whami    petition is rajected.
\nThiz   raspendeni, shaii take
\n {EE\u00a3is1’a \ufb01:;\ufb01   V13;i\u00a75:i”?;ih:*jy”631d {ism mmzz\ufb01xa 3931 the date<\/p>\n
2:3″ mmm1::;r2:’c\u00a7\u00a7ii3\ufb01 af .iE2.iS;ai’iiier.\n<\/p>\n
sdlg,<\/p>\n
: _V Lr:’:1f\u00a71f’}is:1;S.. .,   -Wage<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Apex Infrastructural Solutions … vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008 Author: N.Kumar 1% \u00ab * tofl\u00e9amataka The Deputy ‘ ‘ Dmnd this the 26* fol’ H0\u00bb-:\u00a7\\ x f V BEF0RE ms Hozrnm mm. A “R—Ki3\ufb02AR. A J V my Petition Na\u00a7_1_\u00a715? g M; ‘gm % Egmr\ufb01g\ufb01z I Apex In\ufb01astructux\ufb01l.__Sol1jfi\u00a7iz$ Fvi.”i\u00a7tt1., […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56298","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nApex Infrastructural Solutions ... vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Apex Infrastructural Solutions ... vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2019-02-12T02:57:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Apex Infrastructural Solutions … vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T02:57:10+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1186,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Apex Infrastructural Solutions ... vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2019-02-12T02:57:10+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Apex Infrastructural Solutions … vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Apex Infrastructural Solutions ... vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Apex Infrastructural Solutions ... vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2019-02-12T02:57:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Apex Infrastructural Solutions … vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T02:57:10+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008"},"wordCount":1186,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008","name":"Apex Infrastructural Solutions ... vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2019-02-12T02:57:10+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/apex-infrastructural-solutions-vs-government-of-karnataka-on-26-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Apex Infrastructural Solutions … vs Government Of Karnataka on 26 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56298","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56298"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56298\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56298"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56298"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56298"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}