{"id":56338,"date":"2010-08-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-08-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-28T19:41:55","modified_gmt":"2016-10-28T14:11:55","slug":"kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010","title":{"rendered":"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Ravi Malimath<\/div>\n<pre>.. 1 ..\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAEQRE\nDATED THIS THE 30\"' DAY OF AuGusT...2'OEi':0\"\u00a7'1; V.\nBEFORE \"  '\n\nTHE HOWBLE MR.3UST1CI:mRA\\\/1  \n\nREGULAR SECOND~'APP1EAlQN.C5.662VC:'FC.'2:O0f? :3. V\n\nBETWEEN:\n\nSri Kate Gowda\n\nS\/0 late D_O'c!da\"ahan'n.e'---f3owd\"a\u00bb,- \nAged at)o_uf*S;7.years,u%  '\nR\/0 Neiamane'\\f:'l.l.age,\u00b0\u00bb._ \"\nK.She't'ti_halJi Hub:-:.._,=  ._ \n\nSrirangapatrna Taluk,' \n\nMandya Dist.ri'Ct;\" ' ...APPELLANT\n\n'   31.5 R\u00e9,.G0p\u00e9vi\u00e9\u00a7vvamy, Advocate)\n\nH '--  AN'Dx:  \n\n S\u00e9*'eV\":'t..C4'f.1annamma\nVV\/:5 late Dodda Channe Gowda,\n\nAA '*-.__S\u00a3nc:e dead by her LRS\n\n 2. Sri Deve Gowda\n\nS\/0 iate Dodda Channe Gowda,\nAged about 52 years.\n\n\n\n3. Sri Nagaraju\nS\/o fate Dodda Channe Gowda,\nSince dead by his LRS\n\n3(a) Smt.Kempamma\nW\/0 iate Nagaraju\nAged about 47 years.\n\n3(b) Sri Naveen\nS\/0 Eate Nagaraju,\nAged about 19 years.   \n\n3(c) Nandeesha\nS\/o late Nagaraju _ _\nAged about 17 years.___V\"'-...V_\n\n3(a) Darianj:.ay_a V _ ._\n 'S\/0, _E ate Niaga r'aj&gt;u-.\n Aged3b\u00b01:'\"~15\"Y\u20ac3_F3~ J\n\n3(b) t o,3(dy) a:e't.ad%rm\u00a7r~\u00a7t:;%\"'\u00ab \nrepresenteci by theiaf raatural\nguiardjan\/n\ufb01other'i.e;, 3(a)\n\n '  SvrVi\"i&lt;aEve&quot;g&#039;owda @ Raja\n\n._ AA&#039;S,\/.o\u00abV..E.VatefDodda Channe Gowda\n Aged-&quot;about 34 years.\n\n5.&quot; Srr:_Papanna\nSfo iate Dodda Channe Gowda,\n\nA ;&quot;&#039;\u00ab-._Aged about 30 years.\n\n  Smt.Thayai&lt;ka\n\nD\/o tate Dodda Channe Gowda,\n\nAged about 49 years. \n\n\n\nRespondents No.1 to 8<\/pre>\n<p>Are R\/o Neiamane Viilage,<\/p>\n<p>K.ShettyhaIi\u00e9 Hobli,<\/p>\n<p>Srir angapatna Taluk,<\/p>\n<p>Mandya District.\n<\/p>\n<p>7. Smt.Devarnma<br \/>\nD\/o iate Dodda ChanneVGowda__<br \/>\nDead by her LR * &#8216; v<br \/>\nSri Venkatappa<br \/>\nS\/o Ananthaiah, Major V<br \/>\nR\/0 Kodimuddanahpaili Vi&#8217;|&#8217;i&#8217;age;\n<\/p>\n<p>Hebbur Hobli,  _<br \/>\nTumkur District.  &#8216;   ;._.RESPO|\\EDE|\\ETS<\/p>\n<p>(By Sri K.V_&#8230;E\\ia.fajsirnijang,&#8217;A\u00abdvoc&#8217;ateVVfor&#8221;\u00a7R2 to 6,\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;R7&#8211;abated)_  .0  = &#8216; <\/p>\n<p> &gt;i:&gt;i&lt;\u00e9i&lt;_V H&#039;<\/p>\n<p>&#039;Tvhi\u00b0s_RSiAtfi&#039;ied_&quot;-under section 100 cpc against the<br \/>\nJudgment and-_ D_ecte&#039;e dated 18.3.2004 passed in<br \/>\nR.;A;!\\igo.8\/2000&quot;on the file of the District Judge, Mandya,<br \/>\naitowingg the&#039;ap.p_e_a!v and setting aside the Judgment and<\/p>\n<p>3  _d&#039;ecre&#039;3e dtated 13.3.2000 passed in O.S.No.2\/1991 on the<br \/>\n&#039;  &#039;fiieg  Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Srirangapatna.<\/p>\n<p>t&#039;:&#039;uh&#039;is coming on for hearing this day, the court<\/p>\n<p>d..e|iv_e&#039;red..&#039;.=the foiiowing : \u00ab<\/p>\n<p>3UDGMENT<\/p>\n<p>Aggrieved by the Judgment 8: decree of the first<br \/>\nappeilate Court dated 18~3&#8211;~2004 passed in R.A.No.8\/2000<\/p>\n<p>by the iearned District Judge, Mandya, aiiowing the appeal<\/p>\n<p>&#039;W&#039;<\/p>\n<p>..4..\n<\/p>\n<p>and Consequently dismissing the suit of the plaintiffs, the<\/p>\n<p>plaintiff No.1 has filed the present appeal.<\/p>\n<p>2. The parties would be referred  <\/p>\n<p>rank before the trial Court. _   <\/p>\n<p>The plaintiffs fiied a suit<\/p>\n<p>possession. They cohteh~d_% tha__t&#8217;._1t\u00bb-heii&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;die&#8217;E:ease::il<\/p>\n<p>Doddachannegowda ,.died, l.ea\\l}iLn.q&#8221;~~.behind&#8217;him\/itwo wives<\/p>\n<p>namelvvDiiex\ufb01arniiaa. a-nVd&#8212;-.VCha&#8217;nna~.&#8217;hma. The first wife pre-<br \/>\ndeceiased her  had one son and one daughter.<br \/>\nThe piaVVi&#8217;n&#8211;.t,_iVlff&#8217;vs sV&#8217;e_con_d &#8216;Wife Channarnrna died after the fiiing<\/p>\n<p> soit, li&#8221;eaV.i.U\u20ac,1\u00bb behind four sons and one daughter.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216; ;VV&#8217;DuVring&#8217;~.t:he&#8221;&#8221;vlifetime of Doddachannegowda the plaintiffs<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;qa&#8217;nd tVhe&#8221;.&#8221;tdeffendants were living together jointly. A ciaim<\/p>\n<p>was Vsethiop for their share and the same having been<\/p>\n<p>if if denied the suit was filed seeking for partition and separate<\/p>\n<p> possession.\n<\/p>\n<p>PA\u00bb&#8211;~<\/p>\n<p>_5_<\/p>\n<p>3. The defendants claim that theVV.de:Ce_ased<\/p>\n<p>Doddachannegowda had oniy one <\/p>\n<p>Channamrna and not Devamrna as alie.gve.du_j&#8217;:&#8217;aVnd-l\ufb02that <\/p>\n<p>pfalntlffs are not at all the i;_hild.renj. wolf'{4th&#8217;e4dec_ea.sed. &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>Consequently they contend&#8217; that thev.ai!otme&#8217;nit&#8221;nfvant}; <\/p>\n<p>does not arise for conslderatlV6in_.i&#8217; _<\/p>\n<p>4. The trial _(_:Q:l&#8217;urt  i_fra&#8217;rn.in\u00a7gf_-6&#8243; Issues came to<br \/>\nthe conclusi_bn}:;h.at the p;_la&#8217;int&#8217;i_&#8217;rrs:&#8217; liaveenmade out a case and<br \/>\nacco.rdlngh\/&#8217;li:g3a_rt:l3y&#8217;A djetreed the suit. It held that the<br \/>\nplaintiffs &#8220;toget.h\u00aber.&#8217;A&#8217;ar\u00e9._Aj_e&#8221;r:t&#8217;l.tled for 1\/4&#8243;&#8216; share in the suit<\/p>\n<p>Iteimsul td Band 6.&#8221;&#8216;toT9. The claim for suit Etems 4 &amp; S<\/p>\n<p>.  _v\u00a7;&#8217;as Erejeltted. Vn\u00e9wg\u00e9rieved by the same, the defendants<\/p>\n<p>  Va&#8221;n:&#8217;.appea\u00a3 wherein by the Judgment &amp; decree<\/p>\n<p>d-atedd.-1$Vl\u00a54i3\u00a5l2O04 the appeal was allowed and the suit of<\/p>\n<p> n the &#8220;plaintiffs was dismissed. Hence, the present appeai.<\/p>\n<p>?_%\/&#8212;-\/<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;&#8230;&#8217;]&#8230;..\n<\/p>\n<p>decree. He contends that the substantial question of law<br \/>\nrequires to be answered in their favour by hoidinVg7&#8242;.t:ha_t the<\/p>\n<p>reappreciation of evidence by the first app_e&#8217;i&#8217;ia&#8217;te.s&#8217;_~Cjourt&#8221;is<\/p>\n<p>just and reasonable and there is no error. =c&#8211;or\ufb01mitted\u00ab_by_&#8217;tii\u00abe\u00bb&#8217;\u00b0&#8211;._<\/p>\n<p>first appeilate Court while doing so&#8230;eAi%Iveu&#8217;c\u00bbo&#8221;:ntend&#8217;s&#8221;that:the &#8221;<\/p>\n<p>evidence on record wouid.__ disciosfe the&#8221;&#8216;i&#8217;c!ai_m ]_3f&#8221;th&#8217;e;<\/p>\n<p>plaintiffs with regard to theft&#8217;ivrelatyionsh-inf&#8217;:of the deceased<br \/>\nand as to whether..4_._&#8221;they-ifareVl&#8221;t.he:&#8221;&#8216;re_ai children of the<br \/>\ndeceased or not.   A<\/p>\n<p> 8._ &#8212; Aif&#8217;lite-aideico&#8217;uris,e|s and examined the records.<br \/>\n .  &#8220;&#8221;fi&#8217;rst&#8221;&#8221;&#8211;._aijiaeilate Court considering the<\/p>\n<p>Jugdghoentlf &amp;__de&#8217;creVe and by examining all the material<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab.ye&#8221;vid\u00e9.?i\u00a2cei&#8221;&#8216;\u00aboh record came to the conclusion that the<\/p>\n<p> &#8216;.ip_:afint4iffsl&#8217;_ iia_ve&#8217; failed to make out a case entitiing them for<\/p>\n<p>at de_;ire-er&#8221; for partition. The first appeliate Court having<\/p>\n<p>.. Vuframeifi 5 issues for its determination came to the<\/p>\n<p>\u00ab&#8217;1_V&#8221;conclusion that the suit of the plaintiffs requires to: be<\/p>\n<p>if rejected.\n<\/p>\n<p>We<\/p>\n<p>..g_<\/p>\n<p>10. A perusal of the Judgment of the first appellate<br \/>\nCourt would indicate that there is no reference made by<\/p>\n<p>the Court with regard to the impugned <\/p>\n<p>before it. There is no reference by the firs_t:ap.pei,il:at&#8217;e Cotiff <\/p>\n<p>as to the reasons as to why it;.&#8217;dis&#8217;a&#8217;g&#8217;i-g\u00e9gg withi &#8216;Eh-\u20acv:g&#8217;f\u00e9&#8217;VFi_dgi:ng 7.<\/p>\n<p>recorded by the trial Court._ The&#8217;-first appei&#8217;.i.ate Court'&lt;was<\/p>\n<p>in tangent in reappreciatingi&#039;i\u00bb.othie entire &#039;ma-iterial evidence<br \/>\non record without re&#039;:fe.ren(:&#039;e to iitihegnvfindings iir&quot;me reasons<\/p>\n<p>of the trial Court. It&#039;fivth&#039;er\u00e9f\u00a7zr\u00a7_&#039;..aPDegr that the<\/p>\n<p>JudgmentJ&#039;\u00a7&#039;\u00a7i._-igdygecriee.;:of___the first appellate Court has no<br \/>\nreference at &#039;allA&#039;to&#039;A&#039;the&#8212;._i&#039;rr.&#039;;3&#039;ugned Judgment &amp; decree under<\/p>\n<p>appeal. i&#039;VheJud&#039;gin&quot;erit 8: decree of the first appellate Court<\/p>\n<p> _ V&#039;b&#039;eing&quot;iirindependentwof the Judgment of the trial Court would<\/p>\n<p>V.ithel&#039;eVfo..re  unsustainable and hence cails for<\/p>\n<p>i&#8211;n_terferen~ce.\n<\/p>\n<p>11. The first appeliate Court while considering the<\/p>\n<p>Judgment &amp; decree is duty bound. to consider the<\/p>\n<p>reasoning given by the trial Court to interfere with the<\/p>\n<p>rrr<\/p>\n<p>.. lg ..\n<\/p>\n<p>In view of the aforesaid reasons, the appeat is<\/p>\n<p>a!Eowed and the matter stands remitted<\/p>\n<p>appellate Court to hear both the partie:svjV&#8217;aVnd&#8221;h<\/p>\n<p>appropriate orders in accordanceiwwith law; .V:In._rjvo&#8217;Eng So, 7.<\/p>\n<p>the first appellate Court shall Vnot\ufb01he in.f\u00a7_ue&#8217;ricedn<\/p>\n<p>manner whatsoever by the&#8221;&#8216;}4udigment&#8211;of&#8217;the Vappeiiate<br \/>\nCourt.\n<\/p>\n<p>In view of the  o_.f:.ifthAfe.V&#8217;s&#8217;;git since the year<\/p>\n<p>199:, it V3so:\u00a7r1:,ddI&#8217;~beJirstfia&#8217;nd~.i&#8221;.i?e.@_\u00a7\u00a7fh3We to direct the<\/p>\n<p>appeiiate:xCfo_urt_:nto  and dispose of the same by the<\/p>\n<p>end of  <\/p>\n<p> I__fOffice&#8217;is*di.r.eCted to return the records forthwith.<\/p>\n<p> -v._V4Bo:th&#8221;&#8221;the parties are directed to appear before the<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;&#8211; .rrrs&#8217;t ap\ufb01ejis\u00e9rt\u00e9 Court on 13-9-2010.<\/p>\n<p>Swal-\n<\/p>\n<p>Judge<\/p>\n<p>Rsk\/&#8211;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010 Author: Ravi Malimath .. 1 .. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGAEQRE DATED THIS THE 30&#8243;&#8216; DAY OF AuGusT&#8230;2&#8217;OEi&#8217;:0&#8243;\u00a7&#8217;1; V. BEFORE &#8221; &#8216; THE HOWBLE MR.3UST1CI:mRA\\\/1 REGULAR SECOND~&#8217;APP1EAlQN.C5.662VC:&#8217;FC.&#8217;2:O0f? :3. V BETWEEN: Sri Kate Gowda S\/0 late D_O&#8217;c!da&#8221;ahan&#8217;n.e&#8217;&#8212;f3owd&#8221;a\u00bb,- Aged at)o_uf*S;7.years,u% &#8216; R\/0 Neiamane&#8217;\\f:&#8217;l.l.age,\u00b0\u00bb._ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56338","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-28T14:11:55+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-28T14:11:55+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1024,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010\",\"name\":\"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-28T14:11:55+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-28T14:11:55+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010","datePublished":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-28T14:11:55+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010"},"wordCount":1024,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010","name":"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-08-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-28T14:11:55+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/kale-gowda-vs-channamma-on-30-august-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Kale Gowda vs Channamma on 30 August, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56338","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56338"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56338\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56338"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56338"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56338"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}