{"id":56439,"date":"2009-03-04T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-03-03T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009"},"modified":"2018-01-04T20:32:11","modified_gmt":"2018-01-04T15:02:11","slug":"mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009","title":{"rendered":"Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh<\/div>\n<pre>IN THE HIGi~i COURT 01? KARNA'l'A\u00a5{A_  I   \n\nCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARwA;)..__ _j '  F.\n\nDated this the 04*\" ciay    *  \"\n\nB\ufb01fcrt\n\nma HOIWBLE MR JUSTICE' UVADI. _  \n\nCRL P NG.'?'08iZ;'~Q_9 &amp;.&lt;C&#039;R&#039;L Tf-j\u00e9 1\u00a703?033]09&quot;&quot;&#039;\n\nBetwszcnz   1   \n V cRL,AP&#039;m&#039;,?08&#039;2..i&#039;09~_ .V  &quot;\n\nA(}.E}Q:2\u00a7j{E}iRS =:,__ V\n\nOCC B:JsIN&#039;ES;s  _  _\n\nR\/0 Yf;Si1&#039;~\u00a7 ENG&#039;m~EER;1&#039;~:G-WGRKS\n\nNEAR AMBEDKAR~0:.RTc.L\u00a7:- \n\nBIJAPUR ROAD  &quot; Q .  &#039;\n\nJAMKHANIH\u00bb &quot; _     PETITIONER\n\nMUSTAQ sjo s.s}v\u00a7i\u00a7:3AHjE\u00a7gv;AD--.iiA$*EL1&#039;\n\n &#039;~  _(By..&#039;:\u00a7:i E. S pA:1?1&#039;L; ,a..\u00a7*\"\"  RESPONDENT\n\n(By Sn};  _- SPF)\n'?HES.I%:_ QR:}.II%$,\"1'fI'I'I.\u00a7i'I\\Is FILED 11\/8 482 OF CR.P.C.\n\nPRzg$I;f;'NgI.TIIA'I* T8718 IIOIWBLE COURT MAT BE PLEASE!)\n\n V'  -TO \"QiIAs.II THE pI\u00e9\u20ac3\u00e9:EEDII~II3s ANS THE OREER DATED\n :23L--II77::::&lt;I\u00a7Iai,&#039;I&#039;IV\u00a7\u00e9AssED BY THE F&#039;RL.C..J. (JR.DN.) AND\n;I~MI*{i:;  \u00ab ;}A.IvI\u00a7i&#039;I?IAI~4;)I IN C.C.NO.169\/2908 Am)\n\n&lt;::.C;4NG.,.I&#039;63j\u00a7&#039;2Q03I\n\n V  ~  T\u00a7\u00a7ESE CRIMINAL PEFITEGNS ARE CQMING ON FOR\n._  _&quot;;gI;IIsIIssI0N THIS BAY, THE COURT MAD}; THE;\n FIILLGWING: \n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n<p>These two petitiozxs have been \ufb01led seeking tcru<\/p>\n<p>the preceedings before the JMFC,   V&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>C.C.Nos.}_69 am: 168 of 2008 datedv2&#8217;1&#8242;-?.&lt;30C\u00a74i\u00a7.&quot;   i<\/p>\n<p>2. The petitioner is the o\\\u00a7:xei~&#8230;ef<br \/>\nEugmee\ufb01ng workshop  \ufb011eAV_nV\u00e9\u00a71ne&#8221;Vand .&#8217;s;if,r1e&#8217;A  Yasin<br \/>\nEngineering Works. The&#8221;~I:h$peet\u00e9r:,{eehave visited the<\/p>\n<p>shop on 3{)~8&#8211;2(}{3&#8211;7_   noted the<\/p>\n<p>vio}atioViVzs&#8221;efA  the Karnataka Shpps<br \/>\nand   Act, 1961 and the Rules,<\/p>\n<p>1963,&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>  V&#8217;     \ufb02ied, the learneci Iviagistxtate has<\/p>\n<p>  of the offence on 21~07~2()08. Hence,<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;etizese petitions seeking to quash the eroceedings.<\/p>\n<p> 4% H Heard the learned counsei for the rctspeetive parties.<\/p>\n<p>W<\/p>\n<p>3. According t0 the iearneai counsel for the pe&#8217;\u00a7.i,*;i$3.\u00a7&#8217;r,:&#8221; K<\/p>\n<p>the erdetr slmet it is mentioned that the  <\/p>\n<p>has proceeded tea take: cognizance i7ii$::A\u00bbVi:}i4e&#8217;Qfi%:;nce  The<\/p>\n<p>Minimum Wages Act, 1948.\n<\/p>\n<p>6, The learned G0v\u00e91~&#8217;;;rne:1&#8242;{&#8220;&#8216;P1\u00e9\u00a7a:iEi1*._.sub\u00a3\ufb01ii\u00a5&lt;:d&#039; that by<\/p>\n<p>eversight it is mcxztione\ufb01 as   Act by the<\/p>\n<p>-clerk, but it .  (me   Shop$ and<\/p>\n<p>Commercial&#8221;E&#8217;\u00e9;ta$1i\u00e93;j$n\u00e9;;t\u00a7&#8221;~~_A\u00a2&#8217;\u20ac&#8217;,  In that View of the<br \/>\nmatiar; &#8221; ii;  &#8216;0f&#8230;\ufb02\u00a7e ieained Govemmcni<br \/>\nPZead\u00e9i&#8217;._th;it   be recti\ufb01ed by the learned<\/p>\n<p>Magistx&#8217;atV%:% iii: vieiations one under the<\/p>\n<p> \u00ab_  Sfi\u00e9psVV___g3;;ri Commemial Establishments Act,<\/p>\n<p>\u00bb:\u00a7\u00a71h 2 &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;E&#8217;.    as limitatioza is concerned, the iearned caunsel<\/p>\n<p>  &#8220;f03fp\u20actifiC#I}\u20ac:i&#8217; submitted that cegxsjzance of the e\ufb01encc<\/p>\n<p> to have been taken within six months, but it 13 taken<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; V&#8217; &#8221; \ufb01eyond six months. As suc}:1,_tl1e proceedings am liable: to<\/p>\n<p>95&#8242;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>be quashed. According to him, the Inspe-&#8216;strtmj    _<\/p>\n<p>shop on 3o&#8211;08-2007 but the aiicgcati date of_fher $5&#8243;  <\/p>\n<p>on 21-02-2008 and the Iearned_  M;\u00a7gigtra:\u00e9&#8217;AA.&#8217;11;;s&#8211;..M:&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>cog}:1izaI1&lt;:\u00e9: on 21-$2008.   accqzfgi\ufb01sg zto <\/p>\n<p>petitioner, the complaint is i&quot;1&#039;1&#039;V&lt;&quot;=;zfiT:\u00a7&#039;.:r:3&#039;oz1o;V1&quot;   ;)f six<br \/>\nmonths. in this }:ttgar\u00a7:1&#039;,~~..\u00a2_thc:\u00ab&quot; Plcader<br \/>\nsubmitted that taking    30&quot;&quot; August<br \/>\n200? wherc:a\u00a7:  &#039;V 21-2~2008, the<br \/>\ncamplaint is&quot;    However, on<br \/>\nreading   Shops and Commercial<br \/>\n See}: that no court shall take<\/p>\n<p>Cogn\ufb01zazic\ufb01 wf1y (:;t&#039;1&quot;\u20ac::1&lt;&quot;:::. ii31der this Act or any car\u00e9er made<\/p>\n<p> themiglzxder, un1&amp;\u00a323V&#039;_p\u00a7xmp1ai11t thereof is made Within six<\/p>\n<p> \ufb01.&#039;QII},j f}}.f__3 day on which the o\ufb01iexzce is alleged to have<\/p>\n<p>&quot;&#039;t:t:%\u00e9\u00e921_c&lt;)V&#039;n1:%_:.\u00a7v&amp;&#8211;t_t1&#039;:{1V; J<\/p>\n<p>V.    Ii:&#039;&quot;\ufb02:1e instant case, the learned Magistrate Shawn to<\/p>\n<p>  }-:;\u00e91v\u00a7:&quot;iakeB. cognizance on the complaini said to have bean<\/p>\n<p>  -~vf1i\u20acd cm 21~2-2608. However, the leame\ufb01 Magistrate has<\/p>\n<p>EV<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009 Author: Huluvadi G.Ramesh IN THE HIGi~i COURT 01? KARNA&#8217;l&#8217;A\u00a5{A_ I CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARwA;)..__ _j &#8216; F. Dated this the 04*&#8221; ciay * &#8221; B\ufb01fcrt ma HOIWBLE MR JUSTICE&#8217; UVADI. _ CRL P NG.&#8217;?&#8217;08iZ;&#8217;~Q_9 &amp;.&lt;C&#039;R&#039;L Tf-j\u00e9 1\u00a703?033]09&quot;&quot;&#039; Betwszcnz 1 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56439","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-04T15:02:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mustaq S\\\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-04T15:02:11+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009\"},\"wordCount\":462,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009\",\"name\":\"Mustaq S\\\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-04T15:02:11+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mustaq S\\\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-04T15:02:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009","datePublished":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-04T15:02:11+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009"},"wordCount":462,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009","name":"Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-03-03T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-04T15:02:11+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mustaq-so-sayedahemad-haveli-vs-the-state-of-karnataka-on-4-march-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mustaq S\/O Sayedahemad Haveli vs The State Of Karnataka on 4 March, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56439"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56439\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}