{"id":56510,"date":"2011-01-19T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-01-18T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011"},"modified":"2018-01-25T06:18:51","modified_gmt":"2018-01-25T00:48:51","slug":"mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011","title":{"rendered":"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission<\/div>\n
Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011<\/div>\n
                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                       at\n                                                 New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                          File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001789\n                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001793\n                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001796\n                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001794\n                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001795\n\nDate\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a019,\u00a02011\n\nDate\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a019,\u00a02011\n\n\nParties:\n\n           Applicant\n\n           Shri\u00a0Nachiketa\n           R\/o\u00a0Gehloton\u00a0Ka\u00a0Baas\n           Magra\u00a0-\u00a0Poonjala\n           Jodhpur\n           Rajasthan\n\n           The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing.\n\n           Respondents\n\n           Northern\u00a0Railway\n           Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager's\u00a0Office\n           Jodhpur\u00a0Division\n           Jodhpur\n\n           Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.Mehta,\u00a0APIO,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Basant\u00a0Singh,\u00a0APO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0K.C.Bairwa,\u00a0Sr.DSTE\u00a0at\u00a0\n           NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Jodhpur\n\nInformation\u00a0Commissioner     :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit\n___________________________________________________________________\n\n\n                                                 Decision\u00a0Notice\n\n\nAs\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decisions\n                       In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0\n                                                            at\n                                                    New\u00a0Delhi\n\n                                                                                         File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001789\n                                                                                                  CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001793\n                                                                                                   CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001796\n                                                                                                   CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001794\n                                                                                                   CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001795\n\n\n                                                         ORDER\n<\/pre>\n
Background<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001789<\/p>\n
1.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.25.4.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Jodhpur.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0under\u00a0whose\u00a0directions\u00a0the\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0arrears\u00a0was\u00a0made\u00a0before\u00a0<\/p>\n
       fixation\u00a0of\u00a0pay\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0that\u00a0order\u00a0by\u00a0which\u00a0payment\u00a0was\u00a0mad.\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a017.5.10\u00a0<\/p>\n
       enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0letter\u00a0dt.3.2.09\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway\u00a0HQ\u00a0directing\u00a0them\u00a0to\u00a0pay\u00a0the\u00a0arrears\u00a0<\/p>\n
       before\u00a015.3.10.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.12.6.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0even\u00a0<\/p>\n
       though\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0dt.3.2.09\u00a0directs\u00a0that\u00a0payment\u00a0be\u00a0made\u00a0before\u00a015.3.10\u00a0\u00a0he\u00a0\u00a0was\u00a0paid\u00a015\u00a0days\u00a0later\u00a0<\/p>\n
       and\u00a0reiterated\u00a0his\u00a0request\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0information.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0G.N.Sharma,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a030.7.10\u00a0on\u00a0behalf\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0reply\u00a0dt.27.7.10\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0the\u00a0concerned\u00a0officer\u00a0who\u00a0stated\u00a0<\/p>\n
       that\u00a0payment\u00a0of\u00a0arrears\u00a0was\u00a0made\u00a0earlier\u00a0due\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0need\u00a0to\u00a0calculate\u00a0IT\u00a0returns\u00a0before\u00a031.3.10.\u00a0Not\u00a0<\/p>\n
       satisfied\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0his\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.9.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001793<\/p>\n
2.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.26.4.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Jodhpur.\u00a0 \u00a0He\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0under\u00a0whose\u00a0orders\u00a0a\u00a0sum\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.84\/\u00ad\u00a0was\u00a0deducted\u00a0from\u00a0his\u00a0salary\u00a0<\/p>\n
       even\u00a0though\u00a0he\u00a0had\u00a0worked\u00a0on\u00a015.8.09.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a011.5.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0reply\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Sr.DSTE \u00a0 who \u00a0 vide \u00a0 his \u00a0 note \u00a0 dt.11.5.10 \u00a0 stated \u00a0 that \u00a0 though \u00a0 the \u00a0 amount \u00a0 was \u00a0 not \u00a0 paid \u00a0 due \u00a0 to \u00a0 an\u00a0<\/p>\n
       inadvertent\u00a0error\u00a0,\u00a0it\u00a0was\u00a0subsequently\u00a0paid\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0next\u00a0month.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.9.6.10\u00a0<\/p>\n
       with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0seeking\u00a0the\u00a0name\u00a0and\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officer\u00a0who\u00a0was\u00a0responsible\u00a0for\u00a0
\n        the\u00a0error\u00a0 \u00a0along\u00a0with\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0for\u00a0deduction\u00a0of\u00a0Rs.84\/\u00ad.\u00a0 \u00a0Shri\u00a0G.N.sharma,\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
       15.6.10 \u00a0 on \u00a0 behalf \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 enclosing \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 dt.13.7.10 \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 by\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Sr.DSTE\u00a0who\u00a0gave\u00a0only\u00a0the\u00a0designation\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0official.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0<\/p>\n
       filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.9.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n
\nCIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001796<\/p>\n
3.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.26.4.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Jodhpur.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0how\u00a0many\u00a0people\u00a0were\u00a0employed\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0cadre\u00a0of\u00a0ESM(SM)\u00a0I,\u00a0II,\u00a0III\u00a0in\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0test\u00a0room.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a013.5.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0dt.13.5.10\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0Sr.DSTE\u00a0<\/p>\n
       stating\u00a0that\u00a0nobody\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0cadre\u00a0of\u00a0ESM\u00a0(SM)\u00a0I\u00a0II\u00a0and\u00a0III\u00a0is\u00a0entitled\u00a0to\u00a0work\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0test\u00a0room\u00a0and\u00a0for\u00a0<\/p>\n
       administrative\u00a0reasons,\u00a0two\u00a0people\u00a0whose\u00a0names\u00a0were\u00a0also\u00a0provided\u00a0were\u00a0working\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0test\u00a0room.\u00a0<\/p>\n
       The\u00a0Sr.DPO\u00a0also\u00a0provided\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0on\u00a07.5.10.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.9.6.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0is\u00a0incomplete.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a0<\/p>\n
       16.7.10\u00a0providing\u00a0further\u00a0clarification.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0<\/p>\n
       appeal\u00a0dt.26.9.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.\n<\/p>\n
\nCIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001794<\/p>\n
4.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.30.1.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Jodhpur.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0how\u00a0many\u00a0people\u00a0were\u00a0employed\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0cadre\u00a0of\u00a0ESM(SM)\u00a0I,\u00a0II,\u00a0III\u00a0and\u00a0<\/p>\n
       MSM\u00a0(SM)\u00a0I,\u00a0II\u00a0and\u00a0III\u00a0and\u00a0Helper\u00a0Khalasi,\u00a0Head\u00a0Trolleyman\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0name,\u00a0designation\u00a0and\u00a0place\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
       posting.\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0Kailash\u00a0Panwar,\u00a0Sr.DPO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a04.3.10.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.4.4.10\u00a0with\u00a0<\/p>\n
       the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0provided\u00a0is\u00a0incomplete\u00a0since\u00a0no\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0<\/p>\n
       received \u00a0 from \u00a0 Sr.Section \u00a0 Engineer\/Telecom\/East. \u00a0 \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 G.N.Sharma, \u00a0 PIO \u00a0 replied \u00a0 on \u00a0 12.7.10 \u00a0 on\u00a0<\/p>\n
       behalf \u00a0 of \u00a0 the \u00a0 Appellate \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 enclosing \u00a0 the \u00a0 information \u00a0 dt.30.6.10 \u00a0 furnished \u00a0 by \u00a0 Shri \u00a0 Kailash\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Panwar,\u00a0Sr.DPO\u00a0who\u00a0invited\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0for\u00a0inspection\u00a0of\u00a0records\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0Personnel\u00a0branch\u00a0<\/p>\n
       and\u00a0with\u00a0regard\u00a0to\u00a0Sr.DSTE,\u00a0he\u00a0informed\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0may\u00a0be\u00a0sought\u00a0from\u00a0<\/p>\n
       them.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.9.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n
CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001795<\/p>\n
5.     The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0dt.26.4.10\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0PIO,\u00a0DRM\u00a0Office,\u00a0North\u00a0Western\u00a0Railway,\u00a0<\/p>\n
       Jodhpur.\u00a0\u00a0He\u00a0wanted\u00a0to\u00a0know\u00a0under\u00a0whose\u00a0orders,\u00a0he\u00a0was\u00a0transferred\u00a0in\u00a0Raika\u00a0Bagh\u00a0and\u00a0he\u00a0wanted\u00a0
\n                  the\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0that\u00a0order.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0PIO\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a01.6.10\u00a0enclosing\u00a0the\u00a0information\u00a0furnished\u00a0by\u00a0Sr.DSTE\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 who\u00a0vide\u00a0his\u00a0note\u00a0dt.31.5.10\u00a0enclosed\u00a0a\u00a0copy\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0order.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0an\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.12.6.10\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 with\u00a0the\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0stating\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0is\u00a0incomplete\u00a0and\u00a0only\u00a0the\u00a0order\u00a0from\u00a0the\u00a0Personnel\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 Branch\u00a0is\u00a0required.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority\u00a0replied\u00a0on\u00a016.7.10\u00a0providing\u00a0further\u00a0clarifications.\u00a0\u00a0Being\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 aggrieved\u00a0with\u00a0the\u00a0reply,\u00a0the\u00a0Applicant\u00a0filed\u00a0a\u00a0second\u00a0appeal\u00a0dt.26.9.10\u00a0before\u00a0CIC.<\/p>\n
      Decision<\/p>\n
      CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001789<\/p>\n
      6.         The\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0is\u00a0not\u00a0clear\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0what\u00a0further\u00a0information\u00a0is\u00a0required\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 by\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0\u00a0is\u00a0\u00a0therefore,\u00a0under\u00a0\u00a0no\u00a0obligation\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0\u00a0any\u00a0further\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 information\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0.\u00a0 \u00a0The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0dismissed\u00a0 \u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0closed\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 end.\n<\/p>\n
\n      CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001793<\/p>\n
      7.         The\u00a0Commission\u00a0on\u00a0perusal\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0documents\u00a0directs\u00a0the\u00a0PIO\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0the\u00a0name\u00a0of\u00a0the\u00a0officer\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 responsible\u00a0for\u00a0deducting\u00a0inadvertently\u00a0Rs.84\/\u00ad\u00a0\u00a0(as\u00a0designation\u00a0had\u00a0already\u00a0been\u00a0provided)\u00a0so\u00a0as\u00a0to\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 reach\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0by\u00a020.2..11\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0to\u00a0submit\u00a0a\u00a0compliance\u00a0report\u00a0\u00a0to\u00a0the\u00a0Commission\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 by\u00a026.2.11.\n<\/p>\n
\n      CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001796<\/p>\n
      8.         During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0cadre\u00a0list\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0entire\u00a0division\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 to\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0\u00a0containing\u00a0complete\u00a0information.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
      9.         The\u00a0Commission\u00a0\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0\u00a0further\u00a0obligation\u00a0on\u00a0the\u00a0Public\u00a0Authority\u00a0to\u00a0provide\u00a0further\u00a0<\/p>\n
                 clarification.\u00a0\u00a0The\u00a0appeal\u00a0is\u00a0dismissed\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0closed\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0end.<\/p>\n
      CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001794<\/p>\n
10.              During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0information\u00a0was\u00a0provided\u00a0already\u00a0in\u00a0respect\u00a0of\u00a0<\/p>\n
      another\u00a0RTI\u00a0application\u00a0\u00a0corresponding\u00a0to\u00a0Case\u00a0No.CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001796.\u00a0The\u00a0Commission\u00a0therefore\u00a0\u00a0holds\u00a0<\/p>\n
      that \u00a0 the \u00a0 Public \u00a0 Authority \u00a0 is \u00a0 therefore, \u00a0 under \u00a0 no \u00a0 obligation\u00a0 to \u00a0 provide \u00a0 further\u00a0 clarification. \u00a0 \u00a0 The \u00a0 appeal\u00a0 is\u00a0<\/p>\n
      dismissed\u00a0and\u00a0the\u00a0case\u00a0closed\u00a0at\u00a0the\u00a0Commission’s\u00a0end.
\n CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001795<\/p>\n
11.      During\u00a0the\u00a0hearing,\u00a0the\u00a0Respondents\u00a0submitted\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Appellant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0transferred\u00a0but\u00a0was\u00a0only\u00a0<\/p>\n
         shifted\u00a0from\u00a0night\u00a0duty\u00a0to\u00a0day\u00a0duty\u00a0and\u00a0that\u00a0the\u00a0Sr.DSTE\u00a0has\u00a0the\u00a0discretionary\u00a0power\u00a0to\u00a0issue\u00a0such\u00a0<\/p>\n
         orders\u00a0and\u00a0since\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0transfer,\u00a0there\u00a0is\u00a0no\u00a0role\u00a0for\u00a0the\u00a0\u00a0Personnel\u00a0Branch\u00a0to\u00a0play\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0shifting\u00a0<\/p>\n
         as\u00a0\u00a0the\u00a0Appellant\u00a0is\u00a0working\u00a0under\u00a0Sr.DSTE.\n<\/p>\n
12.      The\u00a0Commission\u00a0holds\u00a0that\u00a0complete\u00a0information\u00a0has\u00a0been\u00a0provided\u00a0and\u00a0accordingly\u00a0dismisses\u00a0the\u00a0<\/p>\n
         appeal.\u00a0\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
13.      The\u00a0appeals\u00a0are\u00a0disposed\u00a0of\u00a0accordingly.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
                                                                                              \u00a0(Annapurna\u00a0Dixit)
\n                                                                                      Information\u00a0Commissioner
\nAuthenticated\u00a0true\u00a0copy\u00a0<\/p>\n
(G.Subramanian)
\nDeputy\u00a0Registrar<\/p>\n
Cc:\n<\/p>\n
1.       Shri\u00a0Nachiketa
\n         R\/o\u00a0Gehloton\u00a0Ka\u00a0Baas
\n         Magra\u00a0–\u00a0Poonjala
\n         Jodhpur
\n         Rajasthan<\/p>\n
2.       The\u00a0Public\u00a0Information\u00a0Officer
\n         Northern\u00a0Railway
\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n         Jodhpur\u00a0Division
\n         Jodhpur<\/p>\n
3.       The\u00a0Appellate\u00a0Authority
\n         Northern\u00a0Railway
\n         Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office
\n         Jodhpur\u00a0Division
\n         Jodhpur\n<\/p>\n
 4.   Officer\u00a0Incharge,\u00a0NIC\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Central Information Commission Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011 In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001789 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001793 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001796 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001794 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001795 Date\u00a0\u00a0of\u00a0Hearing :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a019,\u00a02011 Date\u00a0of\u00a0Decision :\u00a0\u00a0January\u00a019,\u00a02011 Parties: Applicant Shri\u00a0Nachiketa R\/o\u00a0Gehloton\u00a0Ka\u00a0Baas Magra\u00a0–\u00a0Poonjala Jodhpur Rajasthan The\u00a0Applicant\u00a0was\u00a0not\u00a0present\u00a0during\u00a0the\u00a0hearing. Respondents Northern\u00a0Railway Divisional\u00a0Railway\u00a0Manager’s\u00a0Office Jodhpur\u00a0Division Jodhpur Represented\u00a0by\u00a0:\u00a0\u00a0Shri\u00a0A.K.Mehta,\u00a0APIO,\u00a0Shri\u00a0Basant\u00a0Singh,\u00a0APO\u00a0and\u00a0Shri\u00a0K.C.Bairwa,\u00a0Sr.DSTE\u00a0at\u00a0 NIC\u00a0Studio,\u00a0Jodhpur Information\u00a0Commissioner :\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0Mrs.\u00a0Annapurna\u00a0Dixit ___________________________________________________________________ Decision\u00a0Notice As\u00a0given\u00a0in\u00a0the\u00a0decisions In\u00a0the\u00a0Central\u00a0Information\u00a0Commission\u00a0 at New\u00a0Delhi File\u00a0No:\u00a0CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001789 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001793 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001796 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001794 CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001795 ORDER Background CIC\/AD\/A\/2010\/001789 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[39,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56510","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-central-information-commission","category-judgements"],"yoast_head":"\nMr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-01-25T00:48:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-25T00:48:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011\"},\"wordCount\":1093,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Central Information Commission\",\"Judgements\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011\",\"name\":\"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-01-25T00:48:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-01-25T00:48:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011","datePublished":"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-25T00:48:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011"},"wordCount":1093,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Central Information Commission","Judgements"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011","name":"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-01-18T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-01-25T00:48:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/mr-nachiketa-vs-ministry-of-railways-on-19-january-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Mr.Nachiketa vs Ministry Of Railways on 19 January, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56510","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56510"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56510\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56510"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56510"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56510"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}