{"id":56739,"date":"2008-06-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-06-29T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008"},"modified":"2015-09-28T05:20:37","modified_gmt":"2015-09-27T23:50:37","slug":"dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008","title":{"rendered":"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief … on 30 June, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief … on 30 June, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala<\/div>\n
AND ANN-B N'()'i'iP'ICAT!{)N 012' R2, D'r.22.9.2o05  NOT\nAPPLICABLE TO THE PE'.'f'1'!']('}NER SOCIEIPY A:\\u:f>g$ET\nASXDE THE DIi\u20acE(3TiONS 0:? R2, i)T.3O.10.2006\"AfS--VPER\nANN~D.   ._ \n\nTHIS PE'!'l'i'ION comma ON F0_1?:.., fP'RVEL:M.1NAR?:txh\"~.,.\n\u00a5:1EARINGiN'B'GR(3UP,THI'S DAY,~~'\u00a7'.H4E CQUVRT'-.MADiE__\u00a7 TH_E '\n\nFOLLOWING: \n! 3'.:s:_n.E R 2 V\n\nThe petitioner-;_Dat1apm,:;\u00a71d_ CA0-of)\u00e9:'r.-3.tAiv;;.:\u00a7 Ho11si11g\nSociety Ltd., Ma\ufb02cswafa.;in,.  .. bafom this Court\nunder Article  pf th\u00e9'C?4:ii'\u00a7\ufb01tu\u00a7:ic\u00a73.6f praying for the\n{allowing zjzbkfsz =  ' V \n H  1  pctiticmcr-Society is not a\n1\u00a7u.}31ic  the provisions of the Right to\n-,i:1for4'ii1a_fi0n 7Ac.I'::, 2605 (in short 'the Act), and the\n\nV  \u20ac}0vex:nn2c3g;1{ii(\u00a7f\ufb01\ufb01ca\ufb01on dated 22.9.2005 at A1mexu1t-\n\n3  a  respondent no.2-Registrar of Co~ope1'ati.vc<\/pre>\n
 is not appiicablc to the p\ufb01titiexxcr-Society,<\/p>\n
H 3,33<\/p>\n
(ii) to issrue 3 w\ufb01i of ccriiorari for quashing the
\ndinactions issued by Respondent No.2 in tha icttsr
\ndated 30.10.2006 brsaring No.ADMN\/MPH\/97\/ 2006—-<\/p>\n
G’? at Alnzcxuxt-‘D.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2. The brief fads of the case leaciing \u00a30 the  the<\/p>\n
Writ petition may be stated as under:\n<\/p>\n
Ii is the case of the Society that in  recei\ufb02ii   <\/p>\n
Februaxy 1970, the society was “”‘1egisteret_1i.u <\/p>\n
Karnataka C’-D~–{)p\u20acI’dU.VC Societies    ._<\/p>\n
gevemed by bye–1aW$ appmved,Lb13rV_thei.\u00a3e\u00a7po1i\u00a7ie:1t..iie.\u00a33.”:It is ” V<\/p>\n
eo\ufb02tended that the  haseiot  — .a;1}f..if1na13eia}
\nassistance fmm the  . end therefore the
\nSeeiety cannot  23  i1i:.he scope of the<\/p>\n
Act. But; the   ;:o.2;’.Re\u00a7e{fer of Co-o;}erative<\/p>\n
Socie\ufb01ee i”‘i’1:a.;,:iV:. _% isi\u00a7igie.*:3.:i:”\u00bb;V3:;’ n.:{*u\ufb01\u00a2aeon dated 22.9.2005
\n(A:mex1.i:ie\u00a5’B1V  all Cewopczrative Societies in<\/p>\n
the State  pubiie eii\ufb01i\u00e9iii\ufb01es. The petitioner-Society has<\/p>\n
 v  no\u00a3’:W4ieeei:sre;_l 1hei'”neti\ufb01eation or intimation. When certain<\/p>\n
 ‘nzember$i’se-m\u00a7\ufb011:_ for infommation, the other members of the<\/p>\n
seeievty o,5;..is.+.ie d.:’wu1\u00a7’11g informatie-2n pertaining to them.<\/p>\n
 Thefefpie, {tie Society rejected their request to furnish the<\/p>\n
i V’ \ufb01ifiinnaiion on both counts. when the appeal was prefened<\/p>\n
—    Chaintnan of the Society, he wrote a Ietter (a1mexure-<\/p>\n
”  to respondent no.2 poin\ufb01xig out the provisions of the Act.<\/p>\n
The Respondent No-2 by his reply dated 39.10.2006<\/p>\n
{Annexuxwe-D) intimated the Chaiiman of the Society mating
\nthat under Section :2{h}(t3) of the Act all Co~opeI’at1’ve<\/p>\n
Societies are public anthottities. The rc$p_<;u1\u20aci\u00a2;1:t __:' <\/p>\n
fKan1ataka information Commission, on '  Qf xth\ufb01 <\/p>\n
noti\ufb01cation dated 22.9.2005, by :\u00a7'rdeb1'f dai\u00e9g3 <\/p>\n
Annr:x'111'::~E'.\u00ab) :.iirc-ctcd \u00a3116 R\u00a2g,i_st1'af'%3f'\u20ac?o-0p<\u00a7:*;~:t\u20aci\u00e9?e\u00ab' s\u00a2;::i'\u00a2~z:\u00a2sv,<\/p>\n
to seek infoncxiaiion from tht:    \ufb02theVV$ame to<\/p>\n
thus applicant. The  b\u00e9f”x\u00a5i:;,  <\/p>\n
3. Thai   has___ f’\ufb011c;d statcmtmt <31"\n<\/p>\n
(}\u00a53jt:(:ti<):1.*:,lf@{;33;t:ii1.;;:i\u00a7:1%f:;:;;%.1 "o};:je.x':i:;;c\u00a7txsVV–zIEnymg the gnuncis urged
\nin the; pct:iti{)} 1.. that as per the pmvisions
\nsof tht:  "$.r';:ict:ies Act, respondent 110.2\/the<\/p>\n
 has.' $u.p\u00a2_;j.firsion and controi over the society. It is<\/p>\n
\u00bbA 1333;;  that as pm: Section 12'?A the Co-opcrativc:<\/p>\n
 ~.S{$cicfi&\u00e9;"_';%ci~:;e\u00a7'cry o\ufb01iccr bearer, Member and cxnpioyce of<\/p>\n
c\ufb013upc1\u00a7\u00a7\ufb01s*\u00e9 institrutions is a 'public sexvant'. Further, as<\/p>\n
  np;\u00a2:;* <:}z\u00a71'r;\u00a7c (tr) of sub-section 12 of scction 2 and cxplaxm\ufb01on<\/p>\n
'\ufb02\ufb02ii-i*'\u00a2'.3{Q in t.I:;1e- Kamataka Lokayukta Act, 1985, the amen<\/p>\n
 'V V. heamxx ofco-opcrative society are 'public servants' and there<\/p>\n
is no iiixsgaiity or infirmity in the imjpugnm<\/p>\n
noti\ufb01cation \/ ccmmunication.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
4. S23′ S.(}.8i1at, lcamcd counsel appearing fag’ the<\/p>\n
pct\ufb01ioncr submits that the pctit;ioncr–So<::icty has <\/p>\n
any \ufb01nancial assistanct fmm the State  *
\nFurt;ht:r, the supcIvisoIy' cumin} _by __the  f31e_:  '
\nsocittty over 111:: petii:i.o11cr'–Socict:y' '\u00bbr.:an;\u00a310t:Vb\u00a3*g\u00a7 u<\/p>\n
to hold the petiiionc1"\/ s<)cictj,  a   '<\/p>\n
the dtzfanzliion 9:" Section 2(h)(d)   support<\/p>\n
of his contcmzioxi, i\u00a7:.':31'.{1Vts.'."~;'C:l..V:':":'-{)'tl;'\\_'V.};5t;'.V"\u00a7~ _th6'p_c"t1'ti<mcr has cited<\/p>\n
the following decisions:    'V<\/p>\n
A\u00a3_R   25?? (w"2:\u00a2:sv?re1e Films Ltd. and<\/p>\n
1:  others) on the point<\/p>\n
\u00a3113:  Control for Cricket in India is<\/p>\n
 got.'  or adzainistrativcly<\/p>\n
\ufb01le. Govt.\n<\/p>\n
\u00abAIR i933″‘Kera1a 75 (mm Bench) (P.Bhz-mkazan<\/p>\n
 .,J4gi:x1{3\u00bb”_:\u00a7>t1mrs V. Additional Secretary, Agricultural<\/p>\n
{\u00a7:(;–o})c1’ation) Dczpaxtmcnt and others) cm the<\/p>\n
point that the C.’o–opcIat;ive Socictic:-.5 are not
\ncmatcd by the Co-operative. Societies Act and
\nthey am not statutcsry bedics. They are only
\nfunctioning in accordance with the provisions of
\nthe Act. Thcsc institutions would have legal<\/p>\n
existence, wen if the Co-opcrativt: Societies Act<\/p>\n
was not in force. Moreover, the Gov\ufb01rg\ufb01mcnt
\nhave no shares in the Co-operative
\nThere is no amp and
\nThe management of    ” .<\/p>\n
\n\nthe Government 01' \n\nGavelnmcnt  ._'I'hc\"  is ~\ufb01\ufb02(\u00a7Cf L'\nthe a\ufb01tctiyc    by\nthe mcmbagi;  L   T114: statutery\nregulzvatioili 0--r-    'fixnctioning of the\n   Siatt: under Article\nVI    lie against a C30-\n: 1   .*.\u00e9\u00a7(;;\u00a5cIncd by the Kerala Co\u00bb-\n\n\" Vopcr\ufb01i\ufb01\u00e9c S02-ggi\u00e9ti\u00e9s Act.\n\n<\/pre>\n
  T56 < )'.f {he RTI Act is to secun': access to<\/p>\n
 "   public authvzitias in order to yromotc<\/p>\n
 U1;-sgslzz\u00e9iaagiugb\u00e9nd accotlntab\ufb02iiy in the working of cvcxy<\/p>\n
;;\u00a7u\u00a3_)]1'cv_ so as to curtail (?0I"3f'11ptiOILl and to hold the<\/p>\n
 AG0vci'2m:1c11t anti thsir izlsu\ufb02imcntaiity are accountable.<\/p>\n
' 6. \u00a31 is uscfui to mfer to Clause (h) of Section (2) of the<\/p>\n
' VV "  Act, wI1i<:h reads as W1":\n<\/p>\n
Section 2(h):”1;mbi1’c authoxity” means any  or
\nbody or institution of self-government  <\/p>\n
<:o:1st1't11t\u20acd-\n<\/p>\n
a) by or under the Q9QS\ufb01t\ufb01i3,\u00a2i3′;\n<\/p>\n
b) by any 0th.s:r law  by th\u00e9\n<\/p>\n
c) by any oth\u00a7\u00a71=~..\u00a3aw
\n{I} by 11oS;:i\ufb01<:a'{:'i<$1:'    made by the
\n   ir\ufb01clizdcs any-\n<\/p>\n
   ”  or substantially
\n “”””\n<\/p>\n
” (ii)  organisation
\n  2  fmanccd, directly or
\n A’  \u00ab______;’u:di1’ecfiy by funds provided by the<\/p>\n
appmpriate Govcrnmcnt;\n<\/p>\n
  subwlause id) of Clause (11) of Stzcrtion 2 of<\/p>\n
\u00a5th:\u00a7..RT\u00a3 “Act, the: appmpriate government can include an<\/p>\n
  i3;1.\u00a7iit{:1i021 Within the seeps of pubiic axzthnrity, provided it is<\/p>\n
  cczntzm\ufb02cd or Substantialiy \ufb01nanccd, dimctly or<\/p>\n
Jlmiixrsc\ufb01y {u11dt::;i by thc appmpriatc Government. in the<\/p>\n
irzstant C-RS431′ p4:=t.ii;ioncr\/ society is ncithar owned nor funded<\/p>\n
120:’ cozxiroiicni by the State. It. is; not ‘$11.6 case of the State<\/p>\n
‘\u00a7<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
8<\/span>
\nthat the noti\ufb01<rat1'<m dated 22.9.2095 (AJ3ncxurc~B) has been
\nissued zmcier Sccfiolz '2(h)(d) ef the RTI Act.  on the
\nbasis of S11p\u20acI'UiSi{)I1 and control by {"116 Rcgist;fgJf $\u00ab'):{\u00a7i\u00a2ti\u00a2$;<\/p>\n
and the de\ufb01nitioxx of 'pubiic Servant'  <\/p>\n
societies and in the Kaxnataka Lokayxikfa    <\/p>\n
camxoi. be tanned as 'Pubiic   tg\ufb01  a  'A<\/p>\n
society wi\ufb011i11 the  \ufb01T1C i':.':'.fI1}  Lit
\nshouid ful\ufb01ll \ufb02u: C\u00a7)naii1i\u00a3):\u00a31$_VV$\u00a3ip1:latc\u20ac"\u00a3  i:1..$11?;%.;\u00a7c:lausxe (<3) of
\nciausc (11) of S(:Cfi0V1i"Z?V' ':.7}f 131:3'?-}1_c dccisions cited by<\/p>\n
the lcamcd <t::3 11I1sc:1A"fm% }2;'I1\u00a3:"p\u00a3:,tii'i\u00a7}11tfff.vS\u00a7.)ciety fully support<\/p>\n
the"    J'};Z'ti: ti\ufb01:{3rI1\u00a2?:1'.'.'..V'1;'\u00a7{'1V(\u00a3' pct;it.ione1'~socicty does not<\/p>\n
 {$16 1r:;3;i,I.{1.\u00e9Iif.f:'T'<;g}i1siii,io\u00a71s laid down in sub-clause (d) of<\/p>\n
clausff  crf \u00e9.::_<:rf_i.:;i:'<.:Z;2 of the Act. '{'}1n:mfo1'e, the petitioner<\/p>\n
ss\u00a7:}cjz;i?3.* is ;::m\u00a7t"'a.fp.u.b\ufb01c authority' under the provisions of the<\/p>\n
'   Hence, the niimciions issucd by the Registrar<\/p>\n
*  so  –.p\u00a7::=1Vii:ionsr\/sucicty, by his communication dated<\/p>\n
 by the 1*4:.<.ap0z1dent no.2 at Annt:xurc- 'D' are not<\/p>\n
V " *  on the petifiolmrf sucittty.\n<\/p>\n
8′ For the reasons statcd supra, the petition is allowed
\nholding that thc: p\u20actii:\u00a7011\u20ac:r*SO{?it3{}’ is not a public authority<\/p>\n
tmdcr 111$ pmv;i$:i.-um; of the R’I’i Act, 2095. F’l,II’Th\u20ac1′”, the<\/p>\n
dirw\ufb01cms issucd by respondent 110.12 by cxymlzzuxzicatieai<\/p>\n
dated 30. 102006 at Annexuxxs-D is quashed.<\/p>\n
No costs.\n<\/p>\n
Learned Govt. Plcadcr is granted  <\/p>\n
fie his meme ofappcazance for rcspo\ufb01detgiit No.2.’    I<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief … on 30 June, 2008 Author: Dr.K.Bhakthavatsala AND ANN-B N'()’i’iP’ICAT!{)N 012′ R2, D’r.22.9.2o05 NOT APPLICABLE TO THE PE’.’f’1′!’](‘}NER SOCIEIPY A:\\u:f>g$ET ASXDE THE DIi\u20acE(3TiONS 0:? R2, i)T.3O.10.2006″AfS–VPER ANN~D. ._ THIS PE’!’l’i’ION comma ON F0_1?:.., fP’RVEL:M.1NAR?:txh”~.,. \u00a5:1EARINGiN’B’GR(3UP,THI’S DAY,~~’\u00a7’.H4E CQUVRT’-.MADiE__\u00a7 TH_E ‘ FOLLOWING: ! 3’.:s:_n.E R 2 V The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56739","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nDattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-09-27T23:50:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief … on 30 June, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-27T23:50:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1211,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008\",\"name\":\"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-09-27T23:50:37+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief … on 30 June, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-09-27T23:50:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief … on 30 June, 2008","datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-27T23:50:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008"},"wordCount":1211,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008","name":"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief ... on 30 June, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-06-29T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-09-27T23:50:37+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/dattaprasad-co-operative-vs-karnataka-state-chief-on-30-june-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Dattaprasad Co-Operative vs Karnataka State Chief … on 30 June, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56739","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56739"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56739\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56739"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56739"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56739"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}