{"id":56853,"date":"2010-11-18T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-11-17T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010"},"modified":"2016-10-13T14:48:00","modified_gmt":"2016-10-13T09:18:00","slug":"e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010","title":{"rendered":"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: Subhash B.Adi<\/div>\n<pre>1\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE\nDATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 20.1_ Gu '~. _\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MILJUSTIOEi$DBHAsHB\u00a7jjAD'xf  u \n\nR F A 310.554\/206.5 [M0153    '\n\nBETWEEN\n\nELOKESHWARAPPA, _ \nS\/O. LATE C.K. ESHWA'R.A'P\u00abPA.7_\n\nAGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.  'A '\n\nOCOADVOCATE,   V\nNO.215,VINAYAKANAGAR,  _  - \nT{}MKUR--5722'103;,.-'   ~ \n\n(BY SR1.     \n\nAND\n\n1. THE PUNgIAB'NATIQN'AL BANK.\nTUMKUR BF _ ',T.CH_. \n;=3.H..ROAD.~ \n\n. .  ' ..... .. \"\n'  REP.,BY\"I.'._E'S BRANCH MANAGER.\n\n2: .  (3.3. jD1;1Arj\\a\"ANJAYA.\n1 3\/0. B.f'jSHIVAMURTPIAPPA,\n\nR\/O... CHIKKAYAGA'I'I'I,\n* A T HOSADURGA ROAD POST,\n' HOSADURGA TLAUK.\n\nV'  (LHETIRADURGA DIST.  RESPONDENTS\".<\/pre>\n<p>    _{_B._&#8217;\u00a7r SR1. H.C. SHIVARAMU. ADV. FOR R1)<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R\/W O XL} R I<br \/>\nCPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED:<br \/>\n25.1.2005 PASSED IN OS.NO. I32\/1998 ON THE FILED}? <\/p>\n<p>ADDLCIVIL JUDGE {SR.DN.), TUMKUR, DECREEIANICH} idire;<\/p>\n<p>SUIT FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY.\n<\/p>\n<p>THIS RFA COMING ON FOR ORDERS,  .ijfi&amp;f,.\u00a7&#8217;Ii&#8217;E<br \/>\nCOURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:   .    &#8221; &#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>Though the matter is   the<br \/>\neonsent Of the Counsel  it is taken up<br \/>\nfor \ufb01nal disposal, as  to 2005 and is<\/p>\n<p>pending for     T . O<\/p>\n<p>2&#8242;:   rdevfefired to as per their rank<\/p>\n<p>before     <\/p>\n<p>T  This &#8216;is:s_e_e_Ond defendants appeal questioning<\/p>\n<p>__ and decree dated 25&#8211;1&#8211;2005 in<\/p>\n<p>  on the file of Addl. Civil Judge, [Sr.Dn.),<\/p>\n<p>&#8212; vTum1&#8242;{u if.  . &#8216;V T <\/p>\n<p>E  The first respondent Bank filed a suit for<\/p>\n<p> of a sum of Rs.1,06,850\/&#8211; with interest at the<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>rate of 14% p.a. The case of the plaintiff is that the first<br \/>\nplaintiff approached the plaintiff Bank for credit facility in<br \/>\nconnection with business for installing Xerox vnilachine<br \/>\nwith accessories and the second H<br \/>\nguarantor. The plaintiff Bank sanctioned_RsfSw3,:ti&#8211;7f5..\/ .V<br \/>\n20-ll~1996. The loan documents<br \/>\nfirst defendant. The second .defenda&#8217;nt&#8221;exec1.itlegi.<br \/>\nguarantee on 25&#8211;l~l99&#8217;7.    defendant<br \/>\ncommitted default, as isstied to first<\/p>\n<p>defendant as well as V.2=r1jdefend_as.tv_  four occasions.<\/p>\n<p>However; dlltliejfig  ret.iirned_'&#8221;&#8216;uriserved. Thereafter, the<br \/>\nBank filed the  Both the defendants were<\/p>\n<p>duly servedfwith.suitA&#8217;s1ir1in1ons. However. Defendant No.1<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;did  achose tofappear and he was placed exparte. The<\/p>\n<p> present appellant appeared and \ufb01led<\/p>\n<p>his wlrittenisgtatement denying the claim of the plaintiff in<\/p>\n<p>3&#8243;\u00bb-&#8216;\u00ab\u00ab.__V&#8217;toto and: also denied that he is unaware of the loan<\/p>\n<p>A  :&#8221;tran_s:action. The Trial Court framed the following issues:<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4\/0<\/span><br \/>\n9% .\/.51<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;1. Whether the plaintiff proves that<br \/>\na loan of Rs.93,575\/&#8211; was borrowed by the<br \/>\n1st defendant on the guarantee of 2nd<br \/>\ndefendant and executed term loan agreement,<br \/>\nand 2110&#8242; defendant has executed agreenfient<br \/>\nof guarantee dated 25-1437 ? it<\/p>\n<p>2. Whether the p1aint:ffc&#8217;%:s 3\u00bb:n+,i&#8217;tied<br \/>\nfor the suit claim ? 4&#8242;  l &#8216;  &#8216;<\/p>\n<p>3. To what deere&#8217;eV:Vor order   A\n<\/p>\n<p>5. To prove the ease ._p1aintiff,&#8221;&#8216;PW. 1 was<\/p>\n<p>examined and Exs.P.1 to E0 were n&#8211;tarke_d__in his evidence.<\/p>\n<p>Thoughjthe was given chance, he<br \/>\ndid not choseto lead&#8217;a\u00bb:r1y..l:evldence. The Trial Court relying<\/p>\n<p>on the oral &#8216;and docnmentary evidence has decreed the<\/p>\n<p> A&#8217;s&#8217;uitvl&#8221;Et  against  said judgment and decree, the 2nd<\/p>\n<p> this appeal.\n<\/p>\n<p>  ..  6. &#8220;liearned counsel for the appellant submits that,<\/p>\n<p> defendant had no opportunity before the Trial<\/p>\n<p>T  Court and also submits that the loan transaction is also<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>denied. He also relied on the deed of guarantee and<br \/>\nsubmitted that the date of signature of the witness is<br \/>\ntaken on 22.11.1996 as such. the evidence produced by<\/p>\n<p>the plaintiff Bank is not sufficient to decree the..~s:l1&#8217;1t:l: &#8221; <\/p>\n<p>7. In the light off the<br \/>\nappellant, the point that arises<br \/>\nappeal is: l V H <\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Whether  ~.t decree &#8220;of<br \/>\nthe Trial Court  this<\/p>\n<p>Court?&#8221;  w<\/p>\n<p> The lolatif between the plaintiff Bank<\/p>\n<p>and Deferlldant.  disputed as Defendant No.1<\/p>\n<p> Aphasjnoti appearedAa_.1&#8242;.1.d&#8217; contested the matter. In so far as<\/p>\n<p> is concerned, he has \ufb01led the Written<\/p>\n<p>stateinent  stating that he is unaware of the loan<\/p>\n<p>  lat_ransactio;n and he does not know even Defendant No.1.<\/p>\n<p>it  H To prove the case. the plaintiff Bank examined<\/p>\n<p>llwwho has produced EX.P.1 the loan application given<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">3<\/span><br \/>\nr$\\*&#8217;\u00a3&#8221;\/.\n<\/p>\n<p> cieilieddn <\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">6<\/span><\/p>\n<p>of Defendant No.1 for Rs.89,000\/&#8211; for the purpose of<br \/>\ninstalling xerox machine. Ex.P.2 is the interview form by<br \/>\nthe plaintiff Bank with Defendant No.1. Ex.P.3 is the&#8211;term<\/p>\n<p>loan agreement executed by Defendant No.1 <\/p>\n<p>admitting having borrowed Rs.93.575\/&#8211;.  <\/p>\n<p>document, first defendant had &#8216;1<\/p>\n<p>loan alongwith interest at 914%  No] <\/p>\n<p>Ex.P.3 clearly stipulates that  hasbeen sanctioned<br \/>\nto Defendant No.1 undia-..PM&#8217;Rv Defendant No.2<br \/>\nhas executed a deed of_giiaran_teie l.&#8221;*3x.P.4 and it is<\/p>\n<p>dated   of guarantee ciearly<br \/>\nindicatespthat  had undertaken to repay<\/p>\n<p>the loan of  Vin the event of the first defendant<\/p>\n<p> tie, repay &#8216;the&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;i&#8217;oan. This document has not been<\/p>\n<p>;EvetTerr.dant&#8217; No.2 by entering into the Witness<\/p>\n<p>box.\u00bb._44:lt isno-tiffnthe case of Defendant No.2 that he was<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;unaWare__f*of the proceedings. He was served with suit<br \/>\nA   and he had appeared before the Trial Court and<\/p>\n<p>   was examined. Thereafter, the matter was posted<\/p>\n<p>r\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>,\\&#8217;7..\n<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;7<br \/>\nfor defendants evidence and Defendant No.2 did not<br \/>\nappear on that day. It is in these circumstances. the Trial<\/p>\n<p>Court posted the matter for argument and relyingjon the<\/p>\n<p>evidence of PW.1 and the documentary evideri&#8217;4cAe&#8217;:&#8217;__&#8217;i&#8217;ound<\/p>\n<p>that there is nothing to disbelieve these  <\/p>\n<p>decreed the suit. Defendant No.1 <\/p>\n<p>contest the matter and though \u00ab&#8217;Defendar:1tii\\Zo.2&#8242;:&#8217;; <\/p>\n<p>written statement, does not crosstdexamine. 1 and there<br \/>\nis no evidence led by  _\n<\/p>\n<p>9. In these circumstances, I&#8221;.&#8217;doV&#8217;iiiot&#8217;V&#8221;find that there<\/p>\n<p>is any the Trial Court in decreeing the<\/p>\n<p>suit of theiplaindtiffaf :1 do not find it necessary to<\/p>\n<p> issue; &#8216;fresh notice &#8216;to the unserved respondents.<\/p>\n<p>  appeal fails and the same is dismissed.<\/p>\n<p>Sdl\ufb01<\/p>\n<p>Iu&#8221;d\u00a7&#8217;5<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010 Author: Subhash B.Adi 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 20.1_ Gu &#8216;~. _ BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MILJUSTIOEi$DBHAsHB\u00a7jjAD&#8217;xf u R F A 310.554\/206.5 [M0153 &#8216; BETWEEN ELOKESHWARAPPA, _ S\/O. LATE C.K. ESHWA&#8217;R.A&#8217;P\u00abPA.7_ [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56853","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-10-13T09:18:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-13T09:18:00+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010\"},\"wordCount\":864,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010\",\"name\":\"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-10-13T09:18:00+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-10-13T09:18:00+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010","datePublished":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-13T09:18:00+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010"},"wordCount":864,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010","name":"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-11-17T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-10-13T09:18:00+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/e-lokeshwarappa-vs-the-punjab-national-bank-on-18-november-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"E Lokeshwarappa vs The Punjab National Bank on 18 November, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56853","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56853"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56853\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56853"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56853"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56853"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}