{"id":57050,"date":"2008-07-29T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-07-28T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008"},"modified":"2018-10-08T09:28:18","modified_gmt":"2018-10-08T03:58:18","slug":"r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008","title":{"rendered":"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: K.L.Manjunath & B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
 \".BRNGA\u00a3QREylO \"\"\" '\"\n\n- 1 H\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNRTAKR AT BRNGALGRE\n\nDATED THIS THE 29\"1nAY ow JULY 2oQ8 V_\n\nPRESENT\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K L MANjUxA?g._  \"\n\nEND 1\n\nyua HON'BLE MRs.Jus::cE a v'Nas\u00e9gai\ufb01m\u00e9g\"*\n\nMFA N0.35\u00e9f\u00e9b04{M?1 :\"'\n\nBETWEEN\n\nR AnINARAYANA*NA:K,\"x=\nRG33 ABOUT 32 YmaRs}\nNo.352\/2;*\u00a7\"VMAIN \"\nMANJUN\ufb02?HANA\u00a7AR\n\n'\"r\u00e9i;s\u00e9iKaQ\ufb01\"\u00e9HAw, ADV.,)\n\n'\"\u00bbi'\u00a7. R RAJENSRA, MAJQR\n\nA's\/0 RAMALINGAPPA\nUJJANEPURA, PAPER TOWN\nBHADRAVATHI\nSHIMGQA DISTRICT\n\nouc-\n\nA?PELLRNT\n\n\n\n_ 2 I\n\n2 UNITED INDIA INSURANCE\nCOMPRNY LIMITED\nSHRNKRRRNRRAXANEIBUILDING\nM.G.ROAD, BRNGALQRE~l\nREP BY ITS REGIONAL MRNAGER\n\n(BY SR1 Y 9 VENKATA?RTHZ, ADv., ye: \u00a742;I\nR--l -- NOTICE GISPENSED wiry} ' ' \"-- *\n\n... RE$\u00a70N\u00a7E$?\u00e9ffF\n\nTHIS MFR 13 ETaaa,u\/s i?3a1) Q\u00a7_\ufb01;v.AdT'\n\nAGAINST THE EUDGMERT ANL,AwAR5'DATEQL21;B;23o3\nPASSED IN MVC NO.37i6f200@ SN THE.FI\u00a7E'QF THE\nVII ABDITIONAL JUSGE e; EEQBER, MAC?:3,*c0uRT\n0? SMALL CAUSES, BRN\u20acALGRE_{SC\ufb02\ufb01gNG.3), PARTLY\nALLOWING THE cLAIM'PE?i\u00a7:QN'r\u00a2R\"CoM9ENsaTI0N\nAND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT_QE CQMPENSAEION.\n\nTH:3_\"AP?E\u00a7LI=\u00a20$iNG ON FORT ORDERS THIS\n\u00a7AY, NAGARaTHgAI.J DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:\n\nI\"*.gWu D G M E N 3\n\nI.'\"ThIsI:\u00e9\u00a7peai is filed by the claimant\n\n'Ibei\ufb01\u00a7.I\u00a7Q@{ieved by the judgment and award\n\nA'fp\u00a7\ufb01\u00e9ed by MACT, Bangalore, in MVC No.3?l5\/2880\n\n'IfuII'dated 21.8.2803. \/i9L4r\n\n\n\n2. The relevant facts of th\u00a2*,caSe' 3xe_'a\n\nthat the claimantt whdt waS;t,Q\ufb01r%imgJ  it\n\nM.S.Communication{Phd}*and \ufb01n&artakin\u00a7\"p:i\u00a7at\u00e9;L\n\ntuitiora, on 8.9.2900 a\u00a3'=;\ufb01:;c;ut\"'e..i'3--'-Zh\u00e9sgr\u00e9, was'\n\ngoing on a motor \u00e9ygl\ufb01 \u00a7\u00e9\u00e9\u00a7t\ufb01gNogCK\u00a7;4899 as\na pillien ri\ufb01er n\u00a7at,\ufb01\ufb01it\u00a7sw\u00a7\ufb01\u00a7\ufb01 Circle when a\nbus beati\ufb01\ufb01t\ufb01\ufb01t\ufb01gaq\ufb01g63\u00a7\u00a77<@\ufb01\u00e9 (M1 the wreng\nside 0futh\u00a7;t\u00e9\u00e9dE$\ufb01$tdt\u00a7\u00a7\u00a7d against the meter\nCYCi$ ,a\u00e9tt\u00a2ar\u00a3\u00a7s\ufb011t .QEW which, the claimant\n\nsustained fr\u00e9\u00a2tufet of left feat and crush\n\nidj\ufb01ry Wht\u00e9h, 're$ulted in amputatien. at\n\n.'=metata:\u00e9&1 and dis~articu}ation sf digits of\n\nRaxthe"ttQQt}"'Contending that he had suffered\n\n\ufb01erma\ufb01\u00e9\ufb01t disability, tha claimant had filed\n\n' the Claim petitien before the tribunal seeking\n\nmf\ufb01mpensatisn on various heads. ;\u00e9%\u00a3\/\/\n\n\n\n3. On receipt of ,summons "fgom\ufb02nthei\n\ntribunal, respondent <\/pre>\n
was placed ex~parte,Vvniie \ufb01eepon&ent”Nef2 –“e<\/p>\n
insurance company. appee\u00a7edg_an\u00a7.,fi;%d its
\nwritten statement oenyind \ufb01ne efepments of the
\nclaim getition’aed\u00b0cente$ting;tne Hatter by
\nraising the piee oi oontrientote negligence of<\/p>\n
the \u00a7ridefiTof etneiamotor cycle and seeking<\/p>\n
dismis\u00e9ai,of=tne”eIaimJpetition.\n<\/p>\n
4. iwBaeede on= the above pleadings, the<\/p>\n
*<_ triounel framed the following issues;<\/p>\n
\u00abi"\u00ab_i,iifRnether the petitioner proves that
\n..\u00bbi_b\u00a7i sustained in\u00e9uries due to the
\n'oeocident which took place on
\nMalleewaranx circle, Bangalore at<\/p>\n
0.15 hours on 8.9.2008 due to rash<\/p>\n
&<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
and negligent driving Qf”kiri\u00a7e:;Vof”‘<\/p>\n
Bus bearing No.KAg05gs39\u00a7?7i=’<\/p>\n
2. Whether the \u00bbpetitiQner i$t”enti\ufb011ea\u00bbu<\/p>\n
to c\u00a9mpensation?; If 30; wh\ufb01t\u00b0ambunt\u00b0<\/p>\n
and from whom?  ”\n<\/p>\n
3. what ogdaf? {<\/p>\n
5. i\ufb01 \u00a7upp\u00a7ttt\u00a7f \ufb01igtdas\u00e9, the claimant
\nexamined t’fhim\u00e9\u00e9lfitj;\u00e9$fV\u00a7V?.W.1 and one
\nDr.T;R.Na@\u00e9faj as f:W.2 and another witneas as
\nP.W.3’and,gbtV\ufb01a\ufb01K&\u00a7”Ex.P.l to 9.1? while the<\/p>\n
respondent Qid not Read any evidence in the<\/p>\n
Vimgtt\u00e9ti\u00e9n\ufb01 copy of Ex.R.l “insurance palicy<\/p>\n
“\ufb02w\u00e9g mafked with censent.\n<\/p>\n
b\ufb01 On. a consideratian of the evidence<\/p>\n
\ufb01sh record, the tribunal awarded compansation<\/p>\n
E”~bf Rs.l,25,GOG\/– with intarest @a% p.a. from<\/p>\n
the date 0f petition till payment.<\/p>\n
\ufb02\/j\/\u00a2<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span><\/p>\n
7. Being aggrieved by the Said judgment u<\/p>\n
and award, the claimant hag fii\u00e9duthi\u00e9\u00ab\ufb01\u00a7p\u00a7\u00e9l.<\/p>\n
seeking enhancement in \u00e9umpehsatie\ufb01, *”*<\/p>\n
8. We have \u00b0H\u00e9afd_\u00a7fh\u00e9ufl\u00e9ar\ufb01ed aounsel
\nfor the aypeilant \u00e9hd tug le\u00e9ru\u00e9\ufb01 c0un$el for
\nthe 2″;ras@g\ufb01\u00a7\u00a7ht?&\u00a7h\u00a7u:auce,\u00a75mpany.<\/p>\n
\u00e9, :’:t’=i\u00e9tp$u\u00a7m:’ted on behalf of the
\nappella\ufb01t thut the tribunal failed to netice<\/p>\n
that’ the V\u00e9ppgllant had sustained a crush<\/p>\n
\u00bbinjury on the left foot and amputation at the<\/p>\n
matatar\ufb01alf bones and therefore, there wag<\/p>\n
d1$a\u00a7i;it\u00a7 which Came in the way of his<\/p>\n
tugdisghatging his duties as a teacher and that<\/p>\n
as }a result, theta its loss <3f future income<\/p>\n
uw\u00e9nd that the tribunal has met granted adequate<\/p>\n
compensation. on thig head. It is further<\/p>\n
A4
\n\/4<\/p>\n
….7_<\/p>\n
submitted that 'the award f compensatidn en<\/p>\n
the other heads are also meager and tggx\u00e9\u00e9\u00e9r\u00e9,<\/p>\n
a fresh assessment of compensation dught \ufb01e be l<\/p>\n
made by this Court.\n<\/p>\n
10. on the other mag,   <\/p>\n
by the learned ceuneel fa; tee 3″<\/p>\n
insurance company that t\ufb01e,t{ibueal_h\u00a7e taken<\/p>\n
into coneideratieng thee \ufb01aiieus heads of<\/p>\n
eempeneetie\ufb01c%lan6wl*a ‘3reasonable and just
\ncompensation hee\u00bb\ufb01eeh awarded which does not<\/p>\n
call fer aeyelnterference in t\ufb01is appeal.
\nV ‘ Elf The e\ufb01ly point that arises for our<\/p>\n
elee\ufb01ei\ufb01eretiea is as to whether the<\/p>\n
“V2” a rewaeseesment? ;f;\/,<\/p>\n
eempeneetien awarded by the Tribunal requires<\/p>\n
\u00a7<\/p>\n
_tespendeht –u’<\/p>\n
‘erPe1hjahdheeffering \u00a30,800<\/p>\n
.Dhe.Medie\u00e9i,cenveyance
\n‘g *\u00a7”ettendant ohargee 35,600<\/p>\n
-3…\n<\/p>\n
12. On a perusal of the p1eedings  and
\nthe evidence see record, we find. thet;hteeV a
\nresult. of the crush injury, *f\u00a7nge\u00e9r”i\u00a7\u00a7g’.
\namputation at the metatarsal ‘ie\ufb01ei\ufb01rethelefth
\nfoot and there has been eereeneht”eisahiletyL
\ncaused to the eppeliaet; hewever; the eeie
\ndisability is not euch thee he cehhot continue<\/p>\n
of his profeeeien as a teacher! ;On the other<\/p>\n
hand, the award 5% eemeeneation on the heads
\nof less of ineQmevdtrinq.treatment and loss of
\nemenitieer are emu the lower side. We,<\/p>\n
therefore, award the follewing compensation on<\/p>\n
Cmveri0\ufb01e.heads in lieu of what has been awarded<\/p>\n
Vby the tribuhel:\n<\/p>\n
-9-<\/span><\/p>\n
Loss of income during .W_~_ ,.
\ntreatment period _,m__ i4G;OQO”<\/p>\n
Loss of amenities ah ii”; ?\u00a2;\u00e9\u00a23ffx'””
\n i\n<\/p>\n
13. The en\ufb01ange\ufb01\ufb02iado\ufb01p\u00e9\ufb01\u00e9\u00e9p\u00e9og shall
\ncarry’ intereat ” @6% \u00a7;\ufb01;\ufb01;1 Vibe enhanced
\ncompensatig\ufb01,alg\ufb01\ufb01w\ufb01ii\ufb01i\ufb01gg\ufb01o\ufb01ii\u00e9nate interest<\/p>\n
shall be rgiea\ufb01\u00e9d \u00a7Q.i\ufb01e appellant.<\/p>\n
1i4i,’iiz:gppe”\u00e93. allewed in part in the<\/p>\n
abQve~terms,A V<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Iudge<\/p>\n
Sd\/-\n<\/p>\n
Judge<\/p>\n
bkv<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008 Author: K.L.Manjunath & B.V.Nagarathna “.BRNGA\u00a3QREylO “”” ‘” – 1 H IN THE HIGH COURT 0? KARNRTAKR AT BRNGALGRE DATED THIS THE 29″1nAY ow JULY 2oQ8 V_ PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K L MANjUxA?g._ ” END 1 yua HON’BLE MRs.Jus::cE a v’Nas\u00e9gai\ufb01m\u00e9g”* MFA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57050","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nR Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2018-10-08T03:58:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-08T03:58:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008\"},\"wordCount\":686,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008\",\"name\":\"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2018-10-08T03:58:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2018-10-08T03:58:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008","datePublished":"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-08T03:58:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008"},"wordCount":686,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008","name":"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-07-28T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2018-10-08T03:58:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/r-adinarayana-naik-vs-r-rajendra-on-29-july-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"R Adinarayana Naik vs R Rajendra on 29 July, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57050","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57050"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57050\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57050"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57050"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57050"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}