{"id":57435,"date":"2010-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-07-26T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010"},"modified":"2017-04-06T23:10:18","modified_gmt":"2017-04-06T17:40:18","slug":"balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010","title":{"rendered":"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; &#8230; on 27 July, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Allahabad High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; &#8230; on 27 July, 2010<\/div>\n<pre>Court No. - 28\n\nCase :- WRIT - C No. - 54591 of 2007\n\nPetitioner :- Balram Chaudhary\nRespondent :- State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; Others\nPetitioner Counsel :- Atul Kumar\nRespondent Counsel :- C.S.C.\n\nHon'ble Sanjay Misra,J.\n<\/pre>\n<p>       Heard Sri Atul Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The petitioner claims to be a fair price shop dealer in Gram Panchayat<br \/>\nFarendiya, district Basti and is aggrieved by the order dated 21.05.2007 passed<br \/>\nby the Respondent No.4, whereby his fair price shop has been cancelled as also<br \/>\nthe Appellate order dated 28.09.2007 passed by Respondent No.2, the<br \/>\nCommissioner, Basti Division, Basti.\n<\/p>\n<p>       Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the impugned orders<br \/>\nare liable to be set aside because on inspection the stock which was found lying<br \/>\nat his residence was half stock and the other half was lying in his fair price shop<br \/>\nwhich is situated in another house belonging to him. The explanation given by<br \/>\nthe petitioner is that the road leading to the shop was broken therefore he had<br \/>\nstocked the foodgrains at his other house.\n<\/p>\n<p>       The aforesaid explanation of the petitioner has not been accepted by both<br \/>\nthe authorities by holding that when the stocks are required to be stored and<br \/>\ndistributed from the fair price shop and on inspection they were found not<br \/>\nstored in the fair price shop but in the house of his brother Shiv Prakash which<br \/>\nis at a distance from the fair price shop it was clear that he was indulging in<br \/>\nillegal activities with respect to supply of essential commodities. The finding<br \/>\nrecorded by the Respondent No.4 is quoted hereunder which is self explanatory.\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>              &#8220;fodzsrk us fnukad 03-04-2007 dks Li&#8221;Vhdj.k izLrqr fd;kA fodzsrk<br \/>\n       us vius Li&#8221;Vhdj.k esa nqdku dh pkSgnnh okys jkLrs ds [kjkc gksus ds<br \/>\n       dkj.k vk\/kk lkeku lMd fLFkr edku ij vk\/kk lkeku mrkjus ,oa &#8216;ks&#8221;k<br \/>\n       pkSgnnh ij mrkjus rFkk tkap fnol dks [kyhyhckn tkuk crkrs gq;s<br \/>\n       jaft&#8217;ko&#8217;k Qlk;s tkuk dgk gSA fodzsrk }kjk izLrqr Li&#8221;Vhdj.k<br \/>\n       lUrks&#8221;ktud ugh gS D;ksfd dkykcktkjh esa ljdkjh pkoy NksVh cksfj;kW esa<br \/>\n       ljdkjh flykbZZ [kjhnus okys f&#8217;koizdk&#8217;k xqIrk us pkoy cyjke pkS\/kjh dk<br \/>\n       gksuk crk;k FkkA fodzsrk tkucw&gt;dj tkap ds le; edku ls gV x;k vkSj<br \/>\n       pkSgnnh ls gVdj vkVk pDdh okys edku esa dqN [kk\/kkUu j[kdj<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                                      2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>      vuqcU\/k i= dh &#8216;krksZ dk Li&#8221;V mYya\/ku fd;k x;k gSA fodzsrk us<br \/>\n      lk{; esa u rks viuk Lvkd jftLVj izLrqr fd;k u gh dksbZ vfHkys[k<br \/>\n      izLrqr fd;k gSA bl izdkj fodzsrk }kjk izLrqr mRrj lUrks&#8221;ktud<br \/>\n      ugh ik;k x;kA tkap vf\/kdkjh }kjk eq0 v0 la0&amp;723@06 dh tkap<br \/>\n      esa cfyjke pkS\/kjh mDr fodzsrk ij \/kkjk &amp;3@7 bZ0lh0,DV dk vkjksi<br \/>\n      lkfcr Hkh fd;k x;k gSA&#8221;&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>      The Appellate Authority considered the aforesaid reasons given by<br \/>\nthe petitioner and has disbelieved the same and has affirmed the order<br \/>\npassed by the Respondent No.4. The Appellate Authority has given reasons<br \/>\nfor passing such order which is quoted hereunder:-\n<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>             eSuas mHk; i{kksa ds vf\/koDrk ds rdZ dks lquk ,oa i=koyh ij<br \/>\n      miyC\/k lk{;ksa dk voyksdu fd;kA foi{khx.kksa }kjk [kk\/kkUu viuk u<br \/>\n      crkrs gq;s uksfVl okil fy;s tkus dk vuqjks\/k fd;k x;k gS tcfd<br \/>\n      jkT; ljdkj dh vksj ls lgk;d vfHk;kstu vf\/kdkjh dk rdZ gS fd<br \/>\n      cjken mDr [kk\/kkUu ljdkjh forj.k iz.kkyh ds vUrxZr ljdkjh<br \/>\n      ;kstuk dk [kk\/kkUu gS] tks NksVs cksfj;ksa ls cMs cksjksa esa iyVh djrs gq;s<br \/>\n      idMk x;k gSA iwfrZ fujh{kd d`&#8221;.k xksiky ik.Ms; }kjk tkap esa ;g<br \/>\n      ik;k x;k fd mDr pkoy lkoZtfud forj.k iz.kkyh ds vUrxZr vk;k<br \/>\n      ljdkjh pkoy 16 ,l-ch-Vh- cksfj;k out yxHkx 8-00 dqUry ftl<br \/>\n      ij yky jax ds \/kkxs dh flykbZ rFkk dksM u0 03&amp;15&amp;ch&amp;04 c&#8221;kZ<br \/>\n      2005&amp;06 dkeu pkoy&amp;, dk QySi yxk Fkk feyk] blds vfrfjDr<br \/>\n      21 cMs cksjks esa Hkjs pkoy ,d cMs cksjs esa vk\/kk cksjh pkoy o ,d<br \/>\n      vU; NksVh cksjh esa Hkjk pkoy rFkk 36 NksVh [kkyh cksfj;ka cjken gqbZ<br \/>\n      gSA ftlls ;g Li&#8221;V gks tkrk gS fd ljdkjh ;kstuk dk [kk\/kkUu<br \/>\n      dkyk cktkjh gsrq fodz; ,oa dz; fd;k x;k tks NksVh cksfj;ksa ls cMs<br \/>\n      cksjksa esa iYVh djrs gq;s idMk x;k] ftls jke pUnj iq= jke y[ku<br \/>\n      xqIrk lkfdu fxBuh Fkkuk egqyh ds edku ds ,d dejs esa j[k dj<br \/>\n      rkyk yxk dj lqiqnZxh esa lqjf{kr j[kus gsrq fn;k x;k vkSj foi{kh u0<br \/>\n      1 o 2 ds fo:) eq0v0la0 723@06 ?kkjk 3@7 dk vfHk;kstu<br \/>\n      iathd`r gqvkA pwfd mDr cjken pkoy ljdkjh ,l-ch-Vh- cksfj;ksa esa<br \/>\n      ik;k x;k gS rFkk ,l-ch-Vh- cksfj;ksa ls cMs cksjks esa iYVh djrs gq;s<br \/>\n      idMk x;k gS] ftlls ;g Li&#8221;V gS fd cjken mDr pkoy ljdkjh gS<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                                                                             3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>       ijUrq foi{kh u0 1 o 2 nksuksa us mDr pkoy viuk crkus ls budkj<br \/>\n       fd;k gS vkSj fdlh vU; }kjk Hkh pkoy dks viuk gksus dk nkok<br \/>\n       izLrqr ugh fd;k x;k gS blfy;s cjken mDr pkoy jkT; ljdkj ds<br \/>\n       i{k esa tCr fd;k tk;A<br \/>\n             eS mHk; i{kksa ds fo}ku vf\/koDrk ds rdZ dks lquus ,oa i=koyh<br \/>\n     ij miyC\/k lk{;ksa ds vuq&#8217;khyu ds mijkUr bl er dk gwW fd mDr<br \/>\n     cjken pkoy 29-50 dqUry lkoZtfud forj.k iz.kkyh dk ljdkjh<br \/>\n     pkoy gS] ftls jkT; ljdkj ds i{k esa tCr fd;k tkuk fof\/k lEer gS<br \/>\n     D;ksfd foi{kh ;k vU; dksbZ mDr [kk\/kkUu pkoy dks viuk gksus dk<br \/>\n     nkok izLrqr ugh fd;k gSA blfy;s ntZ 3@7 vko&#8217;;d oLrq vf\/kfu;e<br \/>\n     ds vfHk;ksx ij fcuk dksbZ izfrdwy izHkko Mkys cjken 29-50 dqUry<br \/>\n     pkoy ftls jke pUnj iq= jke y[ku xqIrk lkfdu fxBuh Fkkuk egqyh<br \/>\n     ds lqiqnZxh esa fn;k x;k gS jkT; ljdkj ds i{k esa tCr fd;s tkus<br \/>\n     ;ksX; gSA<br \/>\n       The averment made in the writ petition are also quite similar to the<br \/>\ncase taken by the petitioner before both the authorities. In writ jurisdiction<br \/>\nthis Court cannot decide such disputed questions of fact as have been raised<br \/>\nby the petitioner against the finding of fact recorded by the authorities, as<br \/>\nsuch in absence of any evidence to show that the findings of fact are<br \/>\nperverse, no interference is required in the impugned order.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>       For the aforesaid reasons the writ petition has no merits and is,<br \/>\naccordingly, dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>       No order is passed as to costs.\n<\/p>\n<p>Order Date :- 27.7.2010<br \/>\npks\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Allahabad High Court Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; &#8230; on 27 July, 2010 Court No. &#8211; 28 Case :- WRIT &#8211; C No. &#8211; 54591 of 2007 Petitioner :- Balram Chaudhary Respondent :- State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; Others Petitioner Counsel :- Atul Kumar Respondent Counsel :- C.S.C. Hon&#8217;ble Sanjay [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,8],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-allahabad-high-court","category-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; ... on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; ... on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-04-06T17:40:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; &#8230; on 27 July, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-06T17:40:18+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010\"},\"wordCount\":1114,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"Allahabad High Court\",\"High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010\",\"name\":\"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; ... on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-04-06T17:40:18+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; &#8230; on 27 July, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; ... on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; ... on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-04-06T17:40:18+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; &#8230; on 27 July, 2010","datePublished":"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-06T17:40:18+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010"},"wordCount":1114,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["Allahabad High Court","High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010","name":"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; ... on 27 July, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-07-26T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-04-06T17:40:18+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/balram-chaudhary-vs-state-of-u-p-throu-secretary-on-27-july-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Balram Chaudhary vs State Of U.P. Throu Secretary &amp; &#8230; on 27 July, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57435"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57435\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}