{"id":57444,"date":"2010-09-02T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-09-01T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010"},"modified":"2016-07-20T05:40:01","modified_gmt":"2016-07-20T00:10:01","slug":"sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010","title":{"rendered":"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development &#8230; on 2 September, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development &#8230; on 2 September, 2010<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_author\">Author: H N Das<\/div>\n<pre>iNTEE}HGHCOURTOFKARNATAKAATBANGALORE\n\nDATED THIS THE 2\"\" DAY OF SEPTEMBER, zomfj\n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. _NAGAMi)P\u00a3'A}\u00a7T_'D}XS    E \n\nWRIT 1'_,E,.,.,._'l'IT10N Nos.1393.139*IL\u00ab'=E? Ag9'EE[LB~F4$.i  \n\nBETWEEN:\n\n93\n\n. Sri NARASEGOWDA @_1\u00a7ARAES'_AijAH~~.,i\" 1' \n\nAGED 65 YEARS  % \nS\/O LATE TI\u00a7'IB\/i3'iiE{;QwDfx\"\n\nS:-i CH_iKKNfH}MMEGOWDA A\n\nAGED70 YEARS\u00bb  \n\ns\/0 LATE m{M'M_EGovQ'DAV\n\ns:{1LAEsEMANA\"' DDDDD S' \"-\nAGED 3: YEARS\n\n  \"'.~:,_;.O' :\\.g\u00a7g\u00bbvCHE'LUVEGOwDA\n\nES;;EC.NVAGSARDAJA\nAGED\"--.33 YEARS\n\n S\/0 LATE CHELUVEGOWDA\n\nNF~\n\nJ.\n\n\n\n5. Smt LAKSI-IMAMMA\n\nAGED 32 YEARS\n\nS\/O LATE NARASEGOWDA\nALL FROM SL.N0.I TO 5 ARE\nR\/O LALITHADRIPURA\nINDIRANAGAR POST,\nVARUNA HOBLI, MYSORE TALUK,~~~ \nMYSORE DESTRICT. \n\n(By Sri. S.N.ASHWATHANARAYA}\u00a7I, AD\"v._.)\"'--\n\n1. MYSORE URBAN.DEvE\u00a3.O1\u00e91\\'..zE1:g;~;\u00a7A' \u00bb \nAUTHORITY    \nMYSORE, REP.BY XTS (:O;x4zv11S-s.1ONER. AV  S'\n\n2. KARNATAKA  ROUSE\nBUILDTNG. S(..}:'(V3'1EV'FY (REGD)\nNETH'AJIN'AGAR;~-AL ANAHALLI, TNARASIPUR\nROAD,'-MY-SOREV \u00a5}._Q.RE,B.B.Y--'ITS SECRETARY.\n\n3. STATE OF4'i{A_RN.A'TAKA\"'\nRER.BY.ITs SECRETARYTO GOVERNMENT\n\n '  .. UR.1?;A;\u00bb\ufb01DEVELOP1vIENT DEPARTMENT\n\n w___V(By Sri.P..S__\u00a7VIANJ'UNATH, ADV., FOR R-1\n\n. D;.A1VIBED.KAR ROAD, BANGALORE \u00a31.\n\n4}.\" ~TEE~T'A:3i.sIL2jAR\nMYSOR.ETALU1&lt;, MYSORE.\n&#039;  A  RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n<p>, &#8216;Srti. AMAR KUMAR T.S., ADV., FOR M\/S LAWYERS INC<br \/>\n \u00ab .A1_3;vs., FOR R&#8211;2<br \/>\n R-3 &amp; 4 ARE SERVED)<\/p>\n<p>Ui&#8221;&#8216;&#8221;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p> ;:.\u00b0 PE&#8217;TIi&#8217;I.Q[=Ei3l5gS\u00ab .\n<\/p>\n<p>THESE WRIT FETITIONS ARE FILED UNTHDER<\/p>\n<p>ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF.&#8217;IN:D.IAVV<br \/>\nWITH A PRAYER TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED A.I.,.&#8221;<br \/>\nLETTER DT.17.07.()7 AS AT ANNEXUREWG OF R3 AND ETC&#8221;. 1 *<\/p>\n<p>THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON Fokttiiiieiiin {No  &#8220;V 2<\/p>\n<p>THIS DAY, THE COURT PASSED THEVAFOLLOVWIN-G;  v .<br \/>\nORDEE I I A A<br \/>\nin this writ petition the petitioiiers\u00bb have   in<\/p>\n<p>the nature of certiorari to qt:\u00a3:1sh\u00a2_the_\u00aborder passed by<\/p>\n<p>the third respondent as per Aniiextfirefx   sale deed dated&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>29.2.2008 as per ;Ann;e\u00a7:ure&#8211;:I, and&#8221;Ior&#8221;taA:iw:iit .ofpfi;nandarnus to hand<br \/>\nover 6 Acres 8 I to the petitioners.\n<\/p>\n<p>2. i&#8221;i?etitione5siit1re&#8221;the owners of 6 Acres 8 Guntas in<\/p>\n<p> Sy.N0iL5p:8i\/1i&#8217;situated&#8221;at Iialitvadiipura village, Varuna Hobli, Mysore<\/p>\n<p>  The\u00ab.pres:pondents acquired the land in question and other<\/p>\n<p>leindsi.uiider&#8217;t;&#8221;_preIpiiriina1&#8217;y notification dated 15.7.1997 and the final<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Vnotifici:\u00a71tioii.\u00abVd.ated ft8.1.2002 under the provisions of Karnataka<\/p>\n<p>I 2&#8217; :Urhari-Deveiopment Act. The possession of the land was taken over<\/p>\n<p>i<\/p>\n<p>on 22.7.2005. Petitioners have withdrawn the award _<\/p>\n<p>have agitated for higher compensation.\n<\/p>\n<p>3. The Government by its order dated..v_ <\/p>\n<p>Annexure~C denotified to an extent of l237Acres in several s&#8217;urv&#8217;ey'&lt;<\/p>\n<p>numbers situated at Lalitadri Vi1lage&quot;&#039;acT\u00a7&#039;uired &quot;under<br \/>\nUrban Development Authorities an veittent of 99<br \/>\nAcres was allotted in favour of 2second:&#039;refsboxtdetit.}ffS.ociety. Second<br \/>\nrespondent &#8212; Socievty&quot;::noEticeci_ that and 68\/1<br \/>\nmeasuring 8  .vvithinviithe&quot;&#039;area allotted to them.<br \/>\nThereforegtheu&#039;second  regqiueisted to allot these lands in<br \/>\ntheir favor.   under the impugned order<\/p>\n<p>dated 17t7._2007gaveV app:rova.1  transfer of sy.no.5-4 and 68\/1 in<\/p>\n<p>favour second respon&#039;dent &#8212; Society. Consequently, the first<\/p>\n<p>re:-po&quot;ngd_ent e&#039;xecuted_a_j.sale deed in favour of the second respondent<\/p>\n<p>2 if &quot;  as per &#039;iirkggrieved by this the petitioners are before this<\/p>\n<p>-.  ~ .. ucourt.\n<\/p>\n<p>aw<\/p>\n<p>_. under: , .\n<\/p>\n<p>4. Admittedly, on 15.7.1997 sy.no.68\/I was noti\ufb01ed in<\/p>\n<p>the preliminary notification as per Annexure~\u00abA. The final<\/p>\n<p>noti\ufb01cation was issued on 18.&#8217;l.2002 as per Annexure&#8211;B.f&#8221;It&#8217;fis&#8221;&#8216;p_<\/p>\n<p>further admitted that under a notification dated 2o.i0.2.eo5 alslherl  ~<\/p>\n<p>Annexure&#8211;O, the possession of the lands had been .&#8211;Fj.1rtl;e&#8217;r;_ <\/p>\n<p>the petitioners admit that they have received  if<\/p>\n<p>are agitating for higher compensation: this stage, the<br \/>\npetition is filed contending thatthere &#8216;is-dilylersion_of  l\u00a3&#8217;.nd..!.&#8217;lS6 and<br \/>\nthe first respondent has enrichedhy   identical issue<br \/>\ncame up for cons.ideratioji&#8221;  u  Court in<\/p>\n<p>NORTHERS _:(3l,A&#8217;;i3\u00e9'&#8221;=INI)USTRIES VS. JASWANT<\/p>\n<p>SINGH Arno  335 wherein it is held as<br \/>\n&#8220;;..9i.:L0olcing to the facts of the present case and<br \/>\n ._ ._Re;s,oondents 1~5, the High Court was not at<br \/>\njiistitieiilllin ignoring the delay and laches and granting<br \/>\n&#8221; re-lief them. As already noticed, Respondents 1&#8211;5<\/p>\n<p> apiaroached the High Court by \ufb01ling writ petition almost<\/p>\n<p>6&#8243;&#8221;\n<\/p>\n<p>after a period of 17 years after \ufb01nalization of the<\/p>\n<p>acquisition proceedings. They accepted <\/p>\n<p>compensation amount as per the award and sought for &#8211;1~<\/p>\n<p>enhancement of the compensation&#8217; amount&#8221;&#8221;&#8216;wit_h0iitt <\/p>\n<p>challenging the notification issued tinder&#8217; cSections&#8221;4_:anii  <\/p>\n<p>6. Having sought for enhancenfient of compensation  <\/p>\n<p>they filed writ petition even three llyearseafter the appeals<br \/>\nwere disposed of by tire &#8216;the matter of<br \/>\nenhancement of-compe;1satio:n. ifhfere is ntfexplanation<br \/>\nwhatsoever for  inordinate delay inmfiling the writ<br \/>\npetitions.&#8217; Merelyilhecausei*&#8211;full&#8217; enhanced compensation<\/p>\n<p>amount&#8217;*&#8211;w_a;s&#8217; no;-\ufb02,&#8217;;d \u00a3&#8217;0V&#8221;l&#8217;tT?\u20ac respondents, that itself was<\/p>\n<p> g.roundl&#8217;toV._.condoqne the delay and laches in \ufb01ling the<\/p>\n<p>. W.writgpetit:&#8217;on;&#8211;t In our view, the High Court was also not<\/p>\n<p>H 2 i&#8217;rig&#8217;ht&#8217;Vinlfordering restoration of land to the respondents<\/p>\n<p>on theqgroiund that the land acquired was not used for<\/p>\n<p>&#8221; &#8216;whichlit had been acquired. It is a well&#8211;settled position in<\/p>\n<p> law that after passing the award and taking possession<\/p>\n<p>under Section 16 ofthe Act, the acquired land vests <\/p>\n<p>the Government free from on encumbrances. Even;&#8221;ij&#8221;&#8216;the_* &#8211;. &#8216; .;. <\/p>\n<p>land is not used for the purpose for which it  4.<\/p>\n<p>the landowner does not get any right to-ask:foir=,reves{irtgV  Ah<\/p>\n<p>the land in him and to forV&#8221;;~estitntionV:&#8221;&#8216;l&#8221;Qf<br \/>\npossession&#8230;&#8221;. V l l\n<\/p>\n<p>5. In view of las7vNdeelarec\u00a7:_b~}\u00a7$,~..ghve:Supreme Court the<br \/>\npetitioners are not .3Il[it1CC1_v&#8217;i,G:..q?i1C&#8217;\u00a7~{i\u00a7Il    order at<br \/>\nAnnexure-G    the Writ<br \/>\npetitions are_liabwle toV  \u00ab.     V V l\n<\/p>\n<p>6.  the petitioners relying on a<\/p>\n<p>judgment of the l-Su&#8217;pi&#8217;e1vne.:Coiit-=t.:in.JBONDU RAMASWAMY AND<\/p>\n<p>_ oTH1\u00a7tg&#8217;s&#8217; Vs. VB&#8217;;stt\u00a7G&#8217;ALCoRE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY<\/p>\n<p> AND&#8217;ViC)T1:\u00a7Ii\u00a3\u00a7&#8221;,R.\u00a7:\u00a7&#8217;;'(20E0) 7 sec: 129 contend that the petitioners are<\/p>\n<p>eittit1&#8217;eti%\u00abfor= e&#8217;_ertain&#8221;benefits for allotment of certain plots. If that is<\/p>\n<p>_ so, thuepetivtiotters are at liberty to approach the respondents seeking<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;A ll *  tb:enef.i._t ofvvallotrnent of certain sites as per the law laid down by the<\/p>\n<p>CM<\/p>\n<p>Supreme Court in Bondu Ramaswamy&#8217;s case. If <\/p>\n<p>representation is given, then the respondents to consider\u00e9he&#8217;   _<\/p>\n<p>accordance with the iaw declared by the Supfeme Court\u00bb if.  <\/p>\n<p>With the above observation, &#8216;the wfit._ pctitionsd&#8217; \u00e9n&#8217;e..V_Vherebyd<\/p>\n<p>dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<p>LRS\/0309,2Q.I.0r&#8217;Vx&#8221;T <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Karnataka High Court Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development &#8230; on 2 September, 2010 Author: H N Das iNTEE}HGHCOURTOFKARNATAKAATBANGALORE DATED THIS THE 2&#8243;&#8221; DAY OF SEPTEMBER, zomfj BEFORE THE HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE H.N. _NAGAMi)P\u00a3&#8217;A}\u00a7T_&#8217;D}XS E WRIT 1&#8217;_,E,.,.,._&#8217;l&#8217;IT10N Nos.1393.139*IL\u00ab&#8217;=E? Ag9&#8217;EE[LB~F4$.i BETWEEN: 93 . Sri NARASEGOWDA @_1\u00a7ARAES&#8217;_AijAH~~.,i&#8221; 1&#8242; AGED 65 YEARS % S\/O LATE TI\u00a7&#8217;IB\/i3&#8217;iiE{;QwDfx&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57444","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development ... on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development ... on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-07-20T00:10:01+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development &#8230; on 2 September, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-20T00:10:01+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010\"},\"wordCount\":894,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010\",\"name\":\"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development ... on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-07-20T00:10:01+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development &#8230; on 2 September, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development ... on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development ... on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-07-20T00:10:01+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development &#8230; on 2 September, 2010","datePublished":"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-20T00:10:01+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010"},"wordCount":894,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010","name":"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development ... on 2 September, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-09-01T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-07-20T00:10:01+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-narasegowda-narasaiah-vs-mysore-urban-development-on-2-september-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Narasegowda @ Narasaiah vs Mysore Urban Development &#8230; on 2 September, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57444","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57444"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57444\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57444"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57444"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57444"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}