{"id":57648,"date":"2011-04-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2011-04-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011"},"modified":"2017-09-25T19:25:51","modified_gmt":"2017-09-25T13:55:51","slug":"ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011","title":{"rendered":"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Patna High Court &#8211; Orders<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011<\/div>\n<pre>                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA\n                               MJC No.823 of 2010\n1. RAMESH CHANDRA PANDEY S\/O LATE SHYAMA PANDEY R\/O MOHANPUR, P.S.- LAXMIPUR,\nDISTT.- JAMUI\n                                     Versus\n1. THE STATE OF BIHAR\n2. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPTT. OF HUMAN RESOURCES, GOVT. OF\nBIHAR, PATNA\n3. K.K. PATHAK, SECRETARY HUMAN RESOURCES ( HIGHER EDUCATION ),BIHAR, PATNA\n4. SHYAM NARAYAN KUNWAR, DIRECTOR HUMAN RESOURCES, BIHAR, PATNA\n5. RAM BUJHAWAN SINGH, DIRECTOR BIHAR RASTRIYA BHASHA PARISHAD, SAIDPUR, PATNA\n                                  -----------\n<\/pre>\n<p>4\/    13\/04\/2011               Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and for<\/p>\n<p>                     the opposite parties.\n<\/p>\n<p>                               A supplementary show cause has been filed on<\/p>\n<p>                     behalf of the Director, Bihar Rashtrabhasha Parishad and<\/p>\n<p>                     on behalf of Special Secretary, Department of H.R.D.<\/p>\n<p>                               The petitioner came to this Court in C.W.J.C.<\/p>\n<p>                     No.11959\/99 with a claim to be considered for promotion.<\/p>\n<p>                     He was directed to represent. On his representation<\/p>\n<p>                     followed termination in violation of law,     set aside in<\/p>\n<p>                     C.W.J.C. No. 1060\/08. The order of the Court is stated to<\/p>\n<p>                     have been served on the respondents on 11.1.2010,<\/p>\n<p>                     wrongly typed as 11.1.2009). The present application was<\/p>\n<p>                     then filed on 25.2.2010. On 19.1.2011 four weeks time<\/p>\n<p>                     was granted to the opposite parties to file show cause<\/p>\n<p>                     indicating that further adjournment may only be granted<\/p>\n<p>                     upon imposition of costs. That failed to deter the opposite<\/p>\n<p>                     parties by assisting the Court in timely dispensation of<\/p>\n<p>                     justice. On 9.3.2011 the Court granted further time<\/p>\n<p>                     subject to payment of costs of Rs.1000\/- regarding an<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                   2<\/span><\/p>\n<p>explanation in the show cause for the delay in filing of the<\/p>\n<p>reply, fixing liability and recovering the cost from the<\/p>\n<p>delinquent concerned.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The show cause by the Special Secretary does<\/p>\n<p>not deny the assertion of the petitioner that he submitted<\/p>\n<p>a copy of the order of the Court on 11.1.2010, but<\/p>\n<p>acknowledges only the reminder given by the petitioner on<\/p>\n<p>1.2.2010. It then states that several letters and reminders<\/p>\n<p>were given to the Opposite Party No.5, the Director, Bihar<\/p>\n<p>Rashtrabhasha Parishad by the Department of H.R.D.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, Opposite Party No.5 informed that he has<\/p>\n<p>deposited the costs and joining of the petitioner has been<\/p>\n<p>accepted on 4.4.2011.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The show cause on behalf of Opposite Party No.5<\/p>\n<p>states that after the petitioner represented with a copy of<\/p>\n<p>the order of the Court, he recommended the same to the<\/p>\n<p>Department of H.R.D. for necessary action and approval.<\/p>\n<p>The Department of H.R.D. advised him to file an L.P.A.<\/p>\n<p>There is no statement what happened thereafter. The<\/p>\n<p>Department of H.R.D. never informed him of the filing of<\/p>\n<p>any contempt application but he was informed of the<\/p>\n<p>same for the first time on 3.3.2011. He then revoked the<\/p>\n<p>termination of the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The Special Secretary and the Director quite<\/p>\n<p>obviously are at loggerheads with each other in a<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                   3<\/span><\/p>\n<p>desperate attempt not to invite the wrath of the Court on<\/p>\n<p>whom responsibility be fixed for the delay in filing of the<\/p>\n<p>show cause.\n<\/p>\n<p>          Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that<\/p>\n<p>the joining given on 11.1.2010 has been accepted in the<\/p>\n<p>aforesaid manner only on 4.4.2011. The Court fails to<\/p>\n<p>understand what approval was Opposite Party No.5<\/p>\n<p>granting to the joining of the petitioner. It was an order of<\/p>\n<p>the Court. There was no occasion for Opposite Party No.5<\/p>\n<p>to sit over the order of the Court as a superior authority to<\/p>\n<p>accept or not to accept the joining of the petitioner. He<\/p>\n<p>was required to do so on 11.1.2010 itself, the day the<\/p>\n<p>order of the Court was brought to his attention by the<\/p>\n<p>petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The   Court   was   satisfied   that   the   Special<\/p>\n<p>Secretary and the Director both were liable for imposition<\/p>\n<p>of heavy costs not only for wasting the time of the Court,<\/p>\n<p>but harassing a citizen in the background of the<\/p>\n<p>controversy and even after the orders of the Court. The<\/p>\n<p>Court, however, refrains from doing so.<\/p>\n<p>          The Court however does consider it proper and<\/p>\n<p>necessary to notice the manner in which the officials of<\/p>\n<p>the State who are reposed power in trust by the State to<\/p>\n<p>act in the best interest of the State fritter away the<\/p>\n<p>resources of the State in frivolous litigations which is<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\">                    4<\/span><\/p>\n<p>virtually defenceless. The power does not inhere in the<\/p>\n<p>Officer. It inheres in the chair.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The present is a classic case how officials of the<\/p>\n<p>State resort to every nook and corner of the legal arena to<\/p>\n<p>deny justice to a citizen. Frivolous actions ensure that<\/p>\n<p>timely justice is denied which virtually amounts to<\/p>\n<p>denying justice under the old adage &#8220;justice delayed is<\/p>\n<p>justice denied&#8221;.\n<\/p>\n<p>          The Court put a question to the counsel for the<\/p>\n<p>Special Secretary and the Director as to why in the<\/p>\n<p>peculiar facts and circumstances of the case the petitioner<\/p>\n<p>should not be directed payment of salary from 11.1.2010<\/p>\n<p>to 3.4.2011 not from the coffers of the State, but from<\/p>\n<p>their salary. The joint submission was for time to seek<\/p>\n<p>instructions.\n<\/p>\n<p>          This Court directs the Principal Secretary, in<\/p>\n<p>light of the present discussion contained in the order to<\/p>\n<p>grant a personal hearing to the Special Secretary and the<\/p>\n<p>Director in a joint sitting with them and then fix and<\/p>\n<p>determine liability on both or either of them as the case<\/p>\n<p>may be for the salary of the petitioner from the period<\/p>\n<p>dated 11.1.2010 to 3.4.2011, to be complied with within a<\/p>\n<p>maximum period of three months from the date of<\/p>\n<p>receipt\/production of a copy of this order before the<\/p>\n<p>Principal Secretary.\n<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"hidden_text\">                       5<\/span><\/p>\n<p>              The petitioner, if so advised, may represent for<\/p>\n<p>     the original relief of promotion for which he had earlier<\/p>\n<p>     approached the Court, but ended up with termination.<\/p>\n<p>              The contempt proceedings stand disposed.<\/p>\n<pre>KC                        ( Navin Sinha, J.)\n <\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Patna High Court &#8211; Orders Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.823 of 2010 1. RAMESH CHANDRA PANDEY S\/O LATE SHYAMA PANDEY R\/O MOHANPUR, P.S.- LAXMIPUR, DISTT.- JAMUI Versus 1. THE STATE OF BIHAR 2. ANJANI KUMAR SINGH, PRINCIPAL [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,27],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57648","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-patna-high-court-orders"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-09-25T13:55:51+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011\",\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-25T13:55:51+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011\"},\"wordCount\":880,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Patna High Court - Orders\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011\",\"name\":\"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2011-04-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-09-25T13:55:51+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2011-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-09-25T13:55:51+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011","datePublished":"2011-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-25T13:55:51+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011"},"wordCount":880,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Patna High Court - Orders"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011","name":"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2011-04-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2017-09-25T13:55:51+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chandra-pandey-vs-state-of-bihar-amp-ors-on-13-april-2011#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramesh Chandra Pandey vs State Of Bihar &amp;Amp; Ors. on 13 April, 2011"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57648","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57648"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57648\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57648"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57648"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57648"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}