{"id":57906,"date":"2010-10-05T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2010-10-04T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010"},"modified":"2016-06-27T01:28:26","modified_gmt":"2016-06-26T19:58:26","slug":"ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010","title":{"rendered":"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science … vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science … vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010<\/div>\n
Author: S.Abdul Nazeer<\/div>\n
 \n\n \n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT \n\nDATED nus THE 5\"\" DAY 0? OCTOBER ;>.Q_I.-fit...' ' gt  * \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRJUSTICE 5. A3DtJi:.jvAzEE1\u00a7'   \n\nWRIT PETITION N0.26895\/guio (EnAf.REG;.:5) B    \n\nBetween:\n\nGanga Kaveri Institute of Science  Mia.r;\u00e9tgemen--t\u00a7_' C _\n{A Group Institution of_Venkata}ak_shmamma'Siubbaiah\nShetty Education & Chari'table[Trus\u00a7',fRegd~.v)'_7V~,. , h C\n\nNo. 1699, (43\/1), of, Raji<u_rrxar"Road,      \n\n3"' Stage, Rajajin3gaif;----B\ufb01nga1ore,j;=_56Q 02L}  A\n\nReptd. By TrustCVha\u00a3~rn:i,;1n   ~  \n\nSri S. Jaggzinath .,   ..\nS\/o late B. Subbaiah Shettyj,' ._  " \nAged about 52 ye;1r_~; V' "\n\nR\/0 Bangaiore.  Petitioner.\n\nx(\u00a7'y.Sri"i\\\/f:\u00e91di1'usudhan R.N\u00e91'ik, Sr. Adv. for M\/s Naik & Naik Law\n \u00bb FV1'r.m, Advfi,  __\n\nAntiu \n\n  1 V Uniyefvsityv of Bangalore,\n\n\u00bb Jnana.Bharathi (City Campus),\n,  AA Cent1'al College, Bangalore ---- 9,\nA'  *Re_ptd. By its Registrar.\n\n\n\nORDER\n<\/pre>\n
The petitioner is an educational institution v_u’~i;npar’ting 0<\/p>\n
education in different disciplines such as i{3.Sc._’in \u00abBio-“Fechno1.ogy,i.,__Tf<\/p>\n
Biochemistry, Microbiology, Ge:n_etics,i’– pComputer~i1TScience, 3<\/p>\n
}ourna1ism, Business Management,  several giaduate
\ncourses in different discipiinejsflt is Jtiie petitioner that it
\nhad made an application to  for grant of
\naffiliation to two  ipcoiirpsesp,   International
\nBusiness  Abcounting (MFA) and
\nfor renewa\u00a3_Aof_ accordance with Section 59 of<\/p>\n
the Karnataka’St_ate_Uniye1’s.ities”_;Act, 2000 (for short ‘the Act’). It<\/p>\n
_ is conteiipdedstmat the”a..pplication was placed before the Syndicate,<\/p>\n
Win .accordance,%w,ith. sub–c}ause (6) of Section 59, which in turn<\/p>\n
  to be made by the Local Enquiry<\/p>\n
Committee (i’,or’short ‘LIC’). In furtherance thereof, the LlC carried<\/p>\n
  “the,_inspection and submitted its report to the Academic<\/p>\n
.C.oui.;’.cil.”‘l’aking note of the LIC report and the opinion of the other<\/p>\n
e.\n<\/p>\n
autho1’it.ies of the University, the State Government proceeded to<\/p>\n
make recommendation for grant of affiliation by an order Vdatedpu<\/p>\n
18.3.2010 (Annexure–B) to the two courses of M18 and    _<\/p>\n
an intake of 60 in each of the discip1.ines. On receipt-\u00bbo.f:t.he”~e:ai<d<\/p>\n
order from the Government, the petitioneriawaitgd for  time for ;y A<\/p>\n
the University to grant affiliation, but, -,i._1_i the fabgieiice of
\ncommunication in terms of sub–sectiorfi'('l.x2:)   itvfimade
\na representation on ~–Unfi'yer\u00a7ity to grant an
\norder of affiliation. Since  ivyrefepond to the
\nsaid request, it hag    ma\ufb01damus directing
\nthe Univereity .\/to grant:':the'formal order of affiliation in<\/p>\n
accordance Wi"th_   of Section 59 by taking into<\/p>\n
_Vconside,ra5:tiont'~the directions issued by the State Government under<\/p>\n
its .con1mun_ica1:f1on"'a.t__Annexure 'B' and to include the petitioner-<\/p>\n
institutione' neiyj–Qot;r$;es of MIB and MFA in the 'seat matrix' and<\/p>\n
counsel  adinihsaiion for the Academic Year ZOIO-I I.<\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
e"\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2. The first respondent–University} ha$.,.fiiled”‘.i{s’:’_obj_ec*tio.ni$i__0 f<\/p>\n
contending that the college had i.an_bmitted._ its applicaptivoni for 0<\/p>\n
renewal of affiliation along with  for new
\ncourses including MFA for   though the
\nUniversity had not issued a   for the
\nnew courses for    inspected the
\ncollege on   recommending for
\nthe 1*enewal.ii courses, but had not<\/p>\n
recommended for MFA.  the academic year 2005-06, the<\/p>\n
college sjubmittediits: haipplicavtion for renewal of affiliation and for<\/p>\n
 MFA. The LIC had visited the college on<\/p>\n
1\u00a25L’?.i2’0’05p0A  its report rejecting the application for<\/p>\n
0  affili.ati”on for {he\u00ab:MFA course. For the academic year 2006-07, the<\/p>\n
0′  .had noltrrecommended for affiliation to the new courses. As<\/p>\n
i’\u00a7u’ctzt._ the~’Academic Council and the Syndicate did not recommend<\/p>\n
‘%n,:\u00ab;-~”””~w\u00bb<\/p>\n
for the said course. However, the State Government on the basis of<\/p>\n
a letter addressed by the Chairman of the  <\/p>\n
recommended for affiliation to the course by its the<\/p>\n
order dated 4.10.2007 (Annexure   <\/p>\n
correspondence, the State Governinentby its”l.ette.r datedi-3}  .0<\/p>\n
suggested the University to reject thiei’tvteq11est  ‘college for
\naffiliation of new courses  course for the
\nacademic year 2009-2010  academic
\nyears 2007\u00bb~08. 20Qa;c\u00a7.i:ana.v2–Q09;to,  not apply for
\ngrant of att’itiatio:a  inlaid  Ltc while considering<\/p>\n
the applica’:i0n._of theCi:-I1egel’or:irenewal of affiliation for 200940<\/p>\n
without there being  clairn~t lj’ol;ihe said courses has surprisingly<\/p>\n
vrecomineinded. for the ..affiliat%.0n of the new course including the<\/p>\n
  Academic Council and the Syndicate have<\/p>\n
resolve’d._not”toi’_”gran;t’affiliation to the courses not applied for and<\/p>\n
the said” decision was corninunicated to the Government on<\/p>\n
 “hie Government by its letter dated 22.9.2009 has once<\/p>\n
 agairt-recommended for grant of affiliation to the said course. The<\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
{<\/p>\n
University sent a letter to the Government dated 9.2.2009<\/p>\n
informing its inability to comply with the same. When <\/p>\n
stood thus, the Government has recommended to grant”stffilia’tion <\/p>\n
gm_<\/p>\n
for M113 and MFA courses for the acadeinicyear 20_t0\u00a5’l$I’.’: <\/p>\n
3. Sri Madusudhan R. Naikt iearned’
\nappearing for the petitioner wouid  that  iiietijtioner had
\nmade application for extensiognfof existinigicourses
\nand for grant of affiliation to.  Master of<\/p>\n
International ‘(It\/IVL3) hand 4_4Master””‘of Finance and<\/p>\n
Accounting 59 of the Act for the academic
\nyear 2009-10. _The ” “gaiaced before the Syndicate in<\/p>\n
accordance. with’su;5;’section.”(6)”of Section 59 of the Act, which in<\/p>\n
 trim Adi’rected*the..Iocal  to be made by the LEC. The LIC<\/p>\n
carrie.:i_e.oiu’t ..the.i.i’nspec.tion and submitted the report for renewal of<\/p>\n
it  affi1.iati’0.n for thdexisting and also for grant of affiiiation for the<\/p>\n
” \u00abiifjgfiadditioynal iicoiirses sought for the academic year 2009-10. After<\/p>\n
“corisiidering the report of the LIC, the Academic Councii and the<\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
Syndicate recorded their opinion. The Registrar of the Univ,ersi_ty.e_<\/p>\n
submitted the application, the report of the MC, the proce\u00e9din.gs..oii .1. ‘<\/p>\n
the Academic Council. and the Syndicate to the State..,Cii:(rvei’iirire_nt<\/p>\n
for taking a decision thereon. The State:”Goveriime.i_1t -dire_cte:d_the <\/p>\n
University to accord affiliation to the tvvo t’vlIB <\/p>\n
MFA with an intake of 60 each as p-‘e._r’:–he order at Ann’e;XnV:ev\u00ab*vBV7V.
\nthe light of the said order, the Univers_i_ty’\u00bbh_ass.no other option but to
\nissue a formal order of ElffiiiEt[i0′;1’uI’ldCii:_SlJ5*vS\u00e9\u20actiCv~!1b (12) of Section<\/p>\n
59. Learned Senior Coiinsel’_ zhasy ifurtherii.’s:ii)mitted that
\n‘Government R.C_… C0_ll”_ege’ \u00a7alor2e_5.ivas.einei_uded fin the seat matrix<\/p>\n
for the  courses ‘i’ts;1’is.t_heiacademic’ year 2009-10. However, many<\/p>\n
other coliegeshatve beeni”i.ncluded in the seat matrix for academic<\/p>\n
 year 201 Olri. Therefore, the University ought to have included the<\/p>\n
 peiti’t\u00a7o_,ner  vtheiseat matrix for the academic year 2010} 1.<\/p>\n
  hand, Sri M..Keshava Reddy, learned<\/p>\n
0 it ‘Counsel aPi)car’irig for the University submits that the petitioner is<\/p>\n
0    entitledtor grant of affiliation to the courses in question for the<\/p>\n
academic year 20l0-1l. It  argued that for the atraclernic <\/p>\n
2004-05. the petitioner had applied for grant of affiliation~~t.o_jhll_lf’;\u00a71 if <\/p>\n
course though the University has not issued a notificatv_ion inyiting<\/p>\n
the application for the new courses. l;Th\u20ac_”UIlvl’\\l\u20ac:I’Sil’y<\/p>\n
recommend for grant of affiliation to {he new icottrsesfor. the said <\/p>\n
year. For the academic year 2005–0d;>.t::.l_ie college-.haci’appliedHfor
\ngrant of affiliation to
\nsubmitted a report rejecting  ltiliiigvgvipetitioner. The
\nreport was  the Syndicate.\n<\/p>\n
For the acadernic  \u00e9ooaroa and 2009-10,
\nthe petitioner grant of affiliation to the new<\/p>\n
courses. Howeyer, for iithe~’academ.ic year 2006-07, the State<\/p>\n
_ Govern.t_neintzon theibasis of the letter addressed by the Chairman of<\/p>\n
in  college; l:at1yreco_mm.ended for affiliation to MFA Course by its<\/p>\n
orderfidateid  After some correspondence, the State<\/p>\n
–Governifnen’tiAsent:a letter dated 3.1.8.2009 suggesting the University<\/p>\n
 itoxreject. the request of the college for grant of affiliation to new<\/p>\n
“for the academic year 2009-10. While considering the<\/p>\n
E
\nat<\/p>\n
10<\/span><\/p>\n
application of the college for renewal of affiliation for 2009-l_0,tlieii~.._<\/p>\n
LIC has surprisingly recommended for affiliation of new:_c()’urs.eQ’s,\u00ab *’<\/p>\n
which was not at all applied for by the college. The’<\/p>\n
Council and the Syndicate have resolved not tcrgrant’a.ffi’lia”tion  76′<\/p>\n
the course not applied for and the said’decision-
\nto the Government on 29.6.2Q09.   the
\nGovernment has reviewed  vviddatef3.1.8.2009 and
\nrecommended for grantof afl’i:li’ati’on:’1fovr’the_lvllB  ll.\/[FA courses
\nby its order dated.   2010-11 even
\nthough the  He prays for<\/p>\n
dismissal ofthe. writ pvctiitiom <\/p>\n
5. Havin_gi1=egard to” \u00a3115: ueontentioiis urged, the question for<\/p>\n
co11siderajtionr..is whe:h_erVthe petitioner is entitled for grant of an<\/p>\n
 a.ff;iliatEfoi1…_for M113 and MFA courses for the academic<\/p>\n
my  K”\n<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
6. It is evident from the materials on record_.–t_halt”‘ –1- <\/p>\n
petitioner had sought for grant of at’t’iliationytoV MFA eoi1’r’:-;el’_:”or”t.he* _ <\/p>\n
academic year 2004-05. The application  r\u00a2t;j’eict’ed’eeby’-tlhe  5: ‘A<\/p>\n
the Academic Council and the Syndicate. Forthe acaGe.mi.ci-years<\/p>\n
2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, and  college’ apply
\nfor grant of affiliation to MIB  on the
\nbasis of a letter ofst.he-   the State
\nGovernment granytecl    an intake of
\n60, which * when the University
\nbrought toll’-.the\u00ab  Government that it is not<\/p>\n
permissible in lavvlfor granltof aliit.%’l.iatjon, the State Government by<\/p>\n
 ordeiiatiA’Anneitu1\u00b0e._fR’20’ dated 31.8.2010 suggested the<\/p>\n
l”Lin’ivers;i.ty to ‘re_i’eC,t”‘tl’_i_e application for the academic year 2009-\u00a30.<\/p>\n
The said’-order .is”rjatsE:1nder:\n<\/p>\n
%  \ufb01e  %%=%?%\u00e9f\u20ac:23m
\n :’2$~\/0—v mozg\u00e9 \u00a335<\/p>\n
12<\/span>
\n” –2:1:sxa\/5&4 f\u00e9\u00e9ad
\n\u00a7o 32$ \/4.6\/,L.C;x:i.k>i3;f);.o’2.z:”r ;<\/p>\n
%<\/p>\n
\u00a7mzr’;:g\u20ac% s$\u00a2arcr’:::{ \u00a7i>:\u00a7::;e>c>:’o,
\n,1 ‘1–“J’t’7:>::..:~;.,2e;\u00bbe;\u00a3\u00bb\/”ng 532,g,A=i,\n<\/p>\n
9.<:%'"s<\/'xL3.,ci2, :'SEs;3)c:\u00bb5: ;5VjI'Q8.51ogC)_
\n\ufb01\ufb01f\ufb01d 5)0m;n::::52",<\/p>\n
 i%?2:;a\u00a7 CW'\u00a7z3*\u00a7\u00a7;,a3")J
\ns}v-<'H;;g\u00a7\u00a7,,<g\u00a7\\,\u00bb~5_t"5000!.\n<\/p>\n
QSM:\n<\/p>\n
5i3e)\u00a79\u00a7~:’\u00a5’5b:\n<\/p>\n
\u00a7\\%}g{\\gJ1(\u00a7-J I555\u00a7”%\u00a3\u00a7Q>”Oaj}’
\n‘);5;6’kgw\\Ci’U’ ‘$0 055.\n<\/p>\n
_g5g3’1,z);\u00a7,a; \u00a7oc>’Mo;:S’e s2:5}e9,\u00bb? e(*3\u00a7,_\u20ac?,”$2.  :nem_\u00bbv–%8};:\u20acg.\u00a3> \u20ac9,<\u00a7%wLi%(&f 3&9
\n5533 Cw\u00e9 ~"~'-0 '.\u00a71C-7'rg5\u00a7*13'\u00a7~=\u00a7'\u20ac'\u20ac.. v%}7\u00a2':"~.\u00e9J'\u00a2'5.\u00a7v3_?\u00a75'V\u00a7"$ \u00b0;5;o<::3nc.1–3:i3.,
\nQ.\/\\7=1(;"jj;2;’ 6;,,%;;e;3e;,VV\/;2aga;xa, \u00a33570 sf cg :7: 4 019 me.<\/p>\n
D ‘1\u00a7\u00b0\ufb01E\/>9\u00ab’~\u00bb’ ‘?’9..?i>’4%%._%3″.:\u00a7\u20acf:\\””   \u00a35253, Coon’ S%\u00bb..\u00a7<.1z'\u00a3ise'{%;s:~s’::;\\1\u00a7.,t;;:*ou” 9.r.:.\u00a3\u00bb:?:’\u00a7 s:’:o_\u00a7;D ae.zg\u00a7.a-
\nSim \ufb01gff \u20ac355 “:’_55 3″#’:h; ‘  ~fEE1d\u20ac_\u00a2bJz”F\u00bbg,?i\u00bbo4 960$ ESEJJ q\u00a3oo_-‘.i\u00bb~<=22\u00a3m?\\
\n\u00a2%2g_,s%\u00a7) @:2\u00a3:~a:s;~:\u00e9;_,5V_  .?is9'3f.C9';5%%@o:2\u00a7 .’:3’3\u00ab’3\u00e9’ g\ufb01\ufb01md
\n(;,);\u00a7\u00ab%aA\u00bb&,%;\u00bb,\u00bbg,;=A,gV%\u00a3*_[\u00a7\u00bb,;(;:}%4;\u00bb;;;:g ;$}”\ufb01’3m;5_:f;’j5;?J;}7$ \u20accga\u20ac)d.:5::\\\u00a3_ szsmmja, a\ufb02eagnaa Yio\ufb01j\u00bb
\n  535~Ir)\u00a5(\u00a2’5t”‘f.:’i)\u00a7_s’.’-S,;$ Lfpt”33_;zg.’f>,:9’cax’\u00a7u;12X’
\nk\u00ab3i\u20acT$;&e%%aw\u00a7o\u00e9 %%a&:g\\)X .s9g;v\u00a7$e,w ,9\u00a3ze\u00absg,:me,.g,
\n  Q<\/p>\n
,5) 3}’?-\u00abg’-t-j:\\.)’) Z3\u20achCb.?3\u00bb*Z5\u00abr)g’;\u00e9\u00a7c’ ,@’jf$ \u00a72o;\u00a3c\u00e9’–11\u20ace\u20acp\ufb01e;\u20ac ws\ufb01\ufb01\u00e9<\/p>\n
%i:5;F)’\ufb01  @7\u20ac30$L\u00a7’c\u00bb?\u20ac <\/p>\n
my\/..\n<\/p>\n
‘ fcsgf-.,z,m.s>_ eoggg”)
\n?’5’~5)e’2’!1: 39902:? (;9:gi3m35e9a1Mg2>,”\n<\/p>\n
31%<\/p>\n
13<\/span><\/p>\n
7. While considering t.he application of the petiti_o’:ner–\u00abit_orj:F :_. ‘
\nrenewal of affiliation for the academic year 2009-l0_wi*thot;t thereh<\/p>\n
being any claim for M18 and MFA courses;.1’the_-LIAC  ;, at<\/p>\n
for affiliation to the courses as per
\nof 60 in each of the courses. Howeveritheifacadeniic and
\nthe Syndicate did not recom1nend.”l’or’l.sgra;n’t:;io’l”atliiliation to the said
\ncourses which is clear. fromithevihreport  ‘R22’. The
\nState Governmenthy  18.3.2010 has
\ndirected   the aforesaid two
\ncourses  the   1. it is clear from the<\/p>\n
notification lSSl;i\u20acj_dby the  under Section 59(2) of the Act<\/p>\n
4_ .. dated l,7\u00a7i{9i.u2009 (Ari’n’e2<inre\u00abI'{:l) that it has not invited applications<\/p>\n
"for grant of a\ufb01ilyiation to the aforesaid course for the academic<\/p>\n
 'fhough the learned Senior Counsei for the<\/p>\n
gietitioner contends that petitioner has made an application for grant<\/p>\n
 oj9.,afi'i1i-ationiiifor the academic year 2009-E0, the original records<\/p>\n
  by the University wgid clearly show that no such<\/p>\n
\ufb01g<\/p>\n
14<\/span><\/p>\n
application was filed by the college nor has it depositedr.._the_V<\/p>\n
affiliation fee.\n<\/p>\n
8. As directed by me, learned HCGP apgfaeariiigy the if
\nsecond respondent has produced the file trelatindgy to’gra’1i1i:\u00bb.,,c,9l’tV:.it.d<\/p>\n
affiliation to the aforesaid two courses. Th’e._file cor\u00bb.\u00a3ai1aVsVya_ letter i<\/p>\n
dated 5.9.2009 sent by the Cltairmaifoi’ the col’lcgeto the then
\nMinister for Higher Educati–onfreq’\u00a7ies:_in.g”him to _ grant affiliation
\nfor the academic year 2OO9–Alt(}.dYVet a–nothe’rd”ietterC_was sent by the
\nChairman requesting tithe. then Secreta.-fyforul\ufb01gher Education for
\ngrant of :aft’iliyation “tt:”the’raforesaiyd’courses w.e.f. 2010-ll instead<\/p>\n
of 2009~lOt “Et4_’isl thus  order of affiliation has been<\/p>\n
 granteofgxyithcout Vany ._applica’;ion for the academic year 2010-11. In<\/p>\n
in    year 2009-10 is concerned, it is clear that the
\n  any application nor has it deposited the<\/p>\n
if _ aiftliattonffhe State Government had already rejected the
\nH  of\u00b0the petitioner for grant of affiliation as per the order<\/p>\n
  3l..8.2009 for the said academic year. In order to clarify the<\/p>\n
E
\ngilt<\/p>\n
4.<\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
position, this Court sought for an explanation in this regard.<\/p>\n
the present Secretary for Higher Education. He ha_s:”fileCi <\/p>\n
affidavit dated 20.9.2010 stating that he <\/p>\n
irregularities in issuing the order and that heAAvyi.ll”recons-ide’r :;i__1_e=:;s<\/p>\n
matter strictly in accordance with law andxvill take” fnec_essai’y 0<\/p>\n
corrective measures. The affidavit is as “under:<\/p>\n
“I, 1\\\u00e9..Mad*1n***  I’i..}\u00a7:,S0.-:\u00a7””Q” ‘\u00e9\/o Sri
\nVenkatachari,i’paged about;  ‘working as
\nPrincipal\u00e9il  0tof\ufb01iovtdiEdiication Department
\n lVl.S.0’B’il(1g;;,,,5’angalore, do hereby<\/p>\n
solemnly affivrrn-“o.n’oath as follows:\n<\/p>\n
  am presently working as
\n_P’rine.ipal Secretary to Govt, Education Department
\nE\u00e9ducativohj, as such, I am fully conversant
\nV ”   of the case and I am swearing to this<\/p>\n
0 “‘ai’f’idavift;\n<\/p>\n
 2.40.01 submit that, after thorough verification of<\/p>\n
0 as  therecords pertaining to this case, it has been noticed<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
16<\/span><\/p>\n
that there are some irregularities in passing thewlt<\/p>\n
impugned order. I submit that the matter will V<\/p>\n
reconsidered once again strictly under the provisions  <\/p>\n
of Section 59 of the Karnataka Universities i\u00ab;c’i;’2’otio ”
\nand necessary corrective measureslyvillt-Abeitaken and
\nthe matter will be set right in compliance wiptnh\ufb01the l’<\/p>\n
provisions of Section 59 in acccsrdanc-e with..law.,_ <\/p>\n
What is statedizibove isi’trti’et.:to the best of”r’r1’y
\nknowledge, info1’rnationl”ahd-beli_eVl\u20ac.’fv V l l\n<\/p>\n
9. A University– is a corporation .o’f_teac_hers’.v or assemblage<\/p>\n
of learnedlnien”oAr:9v?gvolll\u00a7:ges  higher branches of
\nlearning.  established to hold the<\/p>\n
exarnination, gr”ztnt_lanVc”1*. confer degrees, diplomas and other<\/p>\n
 d’ivs.tinc’ti.olns&_\\’..tandup also l{o””adrnit educational institutions, not<\/p>\n
rr.ain’tainet<lVh}{ it totvt.i_ts_.;)rivileges as affiliated colleges. The various<\/p>\n
powers._of the University are enumerated in section 4 of the Act.<\/p>\n
 -‘\u00ab._Affi1iation oflithe college is essential for the purpose of attaching an<\/p>\n
etiticatioiial institution to such University within jurisdiction as<\/p>\n
\\\u00bb<\/p>\n
\u00a2<\/p>\n
17<\/span><\/p>\n
directed by law. I_t is generally sought for from the Universi\u00bbt__y’1_<\/p>\n
before it starts functioning. The expression ‘affiliation’  , i’<\/p>\n
been defined in the Act. Sub–section (1)(a) of Section l2}_A of-the<\/p>\n
University Grants Commission Act, 1956_.de\u00a7ines <\/p>\n
‘affiliation’ as under:\n<\/p>\n
” ‘affiliation’, together with itsA,gra._nivma’t–ical var.iation.s,’:
\nincludes in relation to.col1ege;{_’reeogiiitioh of such
\ncollege by, association ofsuch e_ollege”‘~by’,’association<\/p>\n
of such co11ege’wii_”t–h, and  college to<\/p>\n
99 3 ‘i<\/p>\n
the privileges ‘Q niV*eir5_i’t3:,<\/p>\n
l0. :Chapter.X”iof’-the  for affiliation of colleges<\/p>\n
and recognitio’n,__of Vvinistitiitiioiisii\ufb01-The relevant provisions for the
\n,pnrpose\u00ab.lj)fithis case’ai’e,si_2_h-\u00abSections (1), (2), (4), (5), (6), (9), (10)<\/p>\n
fraynd it?) vOf.i_S6Clit):rl”59, which are as under:
\n .._rSec.59:.,.vAffi~!iation of Colleges: (1) Colleges within
\n” the Universitly area shall on satisfying the conditions<\/p>\n
sfjeciifiediin this Section be affiliated to the University<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
financially viable to run the Colleges without the aid <\/p>\n
the State Government.\n<\/p>\n
(5) The application shall further conta.in””~._:z1n’
\nundertaking that after the college vis””af–fi.Eiateud,
\nshall not be any transfer of managernent’_’orfch\u00e9nge~    <\/p>\n
name and style of the college,’ without .pri’or appr(w;aIV’_<\/p>\n
of the State Government and the”UuniversityL”   <\/p>\n
(6) On receipt of applicati_on L’-:;n_bo–ise.ction
\nshall be placed before the Syndicfite’ for ‘c.onsideration.
\nThe Syndicate_r’0_n co’ns\u00a7i’d’e’rfa!ion..’:’e. of C’ of the<\/p>\n
applications for :%:1ffit\u00a7i:1Vti’0n 1: shell direct’ CV21″ ‘local inquiry<\/p>\n
to be made  iocal\u00e9 irrqviiiry committee:\n<\/p>\n
7Pro–vided_bE’i1erLocal Inquiry Committee
\nshall con$lsts’vof a.tlea,st”ene person belonging to the<\/p>\n
Scheduled Cnsteeor the Scheduled Tribes.\n<\/p>\n
A (7) 2,;-exxxxx “”x’xxxx xxxxx
\n‘n{8) _ X.X.’~(4XX._V xxxxx xxxxx<\/p>\n
  Tine”‘v’vS_yni;’Iic.ate shall consider the report of the<\/p>\n
\u20ac.omnzitteei’.vand the resoluiih\ufb01 of the Academic Council<\/p>\n
20<\/span><\/p>\n
and shall further record its opinion on the questiorig. T<\/p>\n
whether the request shall be granted either in whole;”or\u00ab.[j~.._i’  \u00bb l<\/p>\n
in part or rejected. after making such further enquilryuas  i”<\/p>\n
may be deemed necessary.\n<\/p>\n
(10) The Registrar shall submit the aptp1:ie_atit)n  its. \u00ab.
\nenclosures, Annexures, the ret5o_r’t’-.<)V_f'thelocal_ir1t;t1iry""*
\nCommittee, the Academic Ct)unic'i'i.;:artr1' the lsyzhdiczitefi
\nand after such enquiryvajs may   t:oi'be necessary
\nmake their recornmendaitieon it-to?' :the__:  to
\naffiiiate or rejeet' ;t_i'fi1i2;.tio'ii' the  ifrtay\ufb01 or any<\/p>\n
part thereof_7\u00a7r1ci;ading.vthe yariationfinlltliel 'ifitake.<\/p>\n
(11):   — f xxxxx<\/p>\n
(12) The.tJ1iiversity"E:ha.l]. "or; receipt of the directions of
\nthe .. State" GrivV'ern.menTt, issue formal order<\/p>\n
 " \u00ab ….. .. Q<\/p>\n
" A   provisions would clearly indicate that the<\/p>\n
 Collegesxwithin the University area shall be affiliated to the<\/p>\n
 'U.r1i\u00bbversii't_y' as affiliated colleges oi'\\\u00a71e University on satisfying the<\/p>\n
21<\/span><\/p>\n
conditions mentioned in Section 59 of the Act. Sulysection (2) of
\nSection 59 states that the Registrar shall notify atieast
\nleading newspapers one in English and one in  ‘V’ V
\napplications for affiliation of new courses in .the__exis_*.in”g’
\ncolleges, new subjects in the affiliated colle.ges1’_anti aili”s:)1i”i<\/p>\n
in the sanctioned intake fixing t1ie_v'”ia.st date for <\/p>\n
applications. The colleges have to s_e.nd”~.thex,_Vappiica\u00abtion  the
\nRegistrar within the time iirnitigsipecifiecf. iinithel advertisement
\nfurnishing the informati_on  i1nde_r s’ubgseiction (3) of
\nSection 59 of the\u00ab’Act,_ .Si_i.b1_-sectioni’ (.6) of Section 59 states that on
\nreceipt of the appiicatioryit’placed before the Syndicate for<\/p>\n
consideration. The Vsyindicatet’  consideration of each of the<\/p>\n
 ..gpplicatie1niv for affililati-on__shali direct the iocai inquiry to be tnade<\/p>\n
Sis.-y  LIC…Tl:e ‘A;c’avd_e1nic Council after receipt of the report of the<\/p>\n
LI.C,’*t;o’ns’ider’  finding of the committee envisaged in the report<\/p>\n
and make such thurther enquiry  may appear it to be necessary and
\n I 1’ecord’ii’t\u00abs opinion on such request and transmit it to the Syndicate.<\/p>\n
“w~..p_”‘i”*hefeafter, the Syndicate has to consider the report of the<\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
\\<\/p>\n
22<\/span><\/p>\n
committee and resolution of the Academic Council and record its<\/p>\n
opinion on the question whether the request shall be granted either<\/p>\n
in whole or in part or rejected. The Registrar has to subrrlit<\/p>\n
application and its enclosures, Annexures, the report of LlCeVa’nd” r  ii<\/p>\n
the proceedings of the Academic Councilv-andthe S~yndti.cate’ytoiithe’lv<\/p>\n
State Government for takin a decision thereon iEaefore’3il”*i
\ng _ _ _ _<\/p>\n
of the ensuing year. The language ernployed  sub;s.\u00a2;ct’io\ufb01’.{:l0)”of
\nSection 59 makes it clear that the State’Go<.Ier11ment shall consider
\nsuch applications in the light of the irecori1mendat.ior:s of the LIC,<\/p>\n
the Academic Counciliand the Synd.ica.te"a\u00b0n–d_ afte'r such enquiry as<\/p>\n
may appear it to he "inec-eAss3ry';.niake their recommendation to the<\/p>\n
University to atfilitate or_reject  affiliation as the case may be or<\/p>\n
_ any part inclu'di.ng the variation in the intake. On receipt of<\/p>\n
7the, directions~.ot7.tih'e,State Government, the University has to issue<\/p>\n
theiforma! orde_r<. accordingly.\n<\/p>\n
29$”\n<\/p>\n
23<\/span><\/p>\n
12. It is thus clear that the institutions concerned.\u00a7h”aVew.lto–.: -1- i<\/p>\n
apply for grant of affiliation in response to theb’notifi.eatio–n:13}\/il’th\u00a2’–_<\/p>\n
Re istrar of t.he Universit under submsectioen  Section”’59”?i’\u00a7.._
\nE Y i 1 _ _ _ _<\/p>\n
the Act. After compliance of theilptocedure-.. i;i1escrihed..;vunders<\/p>\n
various sub–sect.ions of Section 59,  hasto  the
\nreport to the State Governrneiitdor   before 315′
\nMarch of the ensuing. year :arid:..the A   has t.o
\nconsider only   liithieirecommendations
\nof the authorities clveiarlifrom the scheme of
\nthe Act thait\ufb02if an   of affiliation is made for the<\/p>\n
academic session “2009′-_l(l)l,: tl”:eli”_State Government cannot grant<\/p>\n
_.fresh affiliation for the..next academic year. Needless to say that<\/p>\n
‘without 2 n;.atk1’ng*\u00ab.Vati. application for grant of affiliation for a<\/p>\n
particular’yearll–‘Vthe”SVtate Government cannot direct the University<\/p>\n
to grant 5 forrnalorder of affiliation.\n<\/p>\n
ll<\/p>\n
25<\/span><\/p>\n
of course nor is it a formality. Admission to the privileges of a<\/p>\n
University is a power to be exercised with great care keeping —in<\/p>\n
view the interest of the students. When the law <\/p>\n
procedure for grant of affiliation, it must he done only iin-thafl <\/p>\n
manner. Statutes have been made by th-e”‘U1iiversity_:.regij.lating? in<\/p>\n
grant of affiliation. The guidelines issued  thezUnive;isity\u00bb.staties if<\/p>\n
that the exercise of affiliation shall  atleast .nin.e_”gn1oi<3thsiiiin
\nadvance and get completed atleast two"rr1onths–.before'admissions
\nare made in the college. The object ofvtiie local .A7enciu~jry is to find<\/p>\n
out if the coliegepossesses\ufb01 req11ired-..Vin'frastriicture to start the<\/p>\n
course. Affi_liat.ion .car,n:e.t_ibe  on the basis of the letters of<\/p>\n
the Chairman the c'olle'ge" tofthe concerned Minister and the<\/p>\n
Secretary: i'or'~Higher "EdiuVcatir)n, without inaking an application to<\/p>\n
"the Unive1s.ity\u00ab.iti\u00abaccordance with iaw. The Act has not conferred<\/p>\n
upon'~thc–.State Govegrninent inherent powers to direct the University<\/p>\n
to issue ofafifiliation to the colleges. It has to function within<\/p>\n
 powers and duties assigned to it under the Act. In the<\/p>\n
 'eia*cu'ii1stances, the Principal Secretary to the Government,<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
I.\n<\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
Education Department (Higher Education), is right in stating that<\/p>\n
he has noticed irregularities in passing the impugned order. in  <\/p>\n
background, the University has taken a correct  <\/p>\n
petitioner is not entitled for grant of an ord_er..of__afi’ili–ation’.–.l . l’<\/p>\n
14. The other submission of the learned_HS’enior Cowasei, ifollr\ufb02g g <\/p>\n
the petitioner that though the _U_nivers’i.gyl’*..has gneasvilnvited 3<\/p>\n
applications for grant of affiliation fofthe’courses~inl’qaestion, the
\nUniversity has included SCV6r%1l”vQ{lle.t’lliI1$tiE’E.l.{_l(?Itl’S’-1l.I1 seat matrix for
\nthe academic year 2010- ll and ..,ti1a_t ithe=”~peti~ltion5er has been<\/p>\n
discriminated i_s’\\v,ithVotIt._a’ny ‘meri’t.. ‘For the academic year 2009\u00bb<\/p>\n
10, Governme’nt__RtC_College, ‘Bai_tgalore, was granted affiliation for<\/p>\n
_ the af’oresaid.two courses, which is clear from the seat matrix of<\/p>\n
 I~Iowever,~–several other institutions have been included in<\/p>\n
the  though the University has not invited<\/p>\n
applicatioti for grant of affi1.iation. It is Well established that if the<\/p>\n
 lljaivei’s–i.t&y has granted affiliation to some other educational<\/p>\n
  illegally for the academic year 20l0–lI, this Court<\/p>\n
t
\nit<\/p>\n
27<\/span><\/p>\n
cannot direct the University to grant affiliation to the petitio11er;ti._lt’\u00bbr.<\/p>\n
is settled that a party cannot claim that since some thing   _,_ A’ \u00bb<\/p>\n
been done in another case, direction should be given. doing<\/p>\n
another wrong. No one has a right to cvlaiin-perlforniance. offan  f<\/p>\n
unlawful or illegal act. The jurisdiction under
\nintended to perpetuate illegalities but at  1
\nOF INDIA & ANOTHERV   TieaD1NG
\nC0. & ANOTHER ..g(2o03):a5–s.cc& 43i2,ctom has held
\nthat two wro11g.s4..cio    claim that
\nsince another case; direction
\nshould beigiven’ .wrong. In such matters, there is<\/p>\n
no discrimination’ invo’l.vedt Tloieconcept of equal treatment on the<\/p>\n
._logic  Article i’4’~.of the Constitution cannot be pressed into<\/p>\n
i’x_serViee_ in suc.h”~cases. What the concept of equal treatment<\/p>\n
presupposes’ ii’9>”t6V)\u00a7:i\u00a7ilt\u20ac11C\u20ac of similar legal foothold. it does not<\/p>\n
‘ocouiitenance repetition of a wrong action to bring both wrongs on a<\/p>\n
ifpar. ‘Even  hypothetically it is accepted that a wrong has been<\/p>\n
“\u00ab~’coi’amitted in some other cases by introducing a concept of<\/p>\n
F\u00bb<\/p>\n
‘ !
\n3<\/span><\/p>\n
tylg’<\/p>\n
28<\/span><\/p>\n
negative equality, the respondents cannot strengthen their c;;1s:_:_.”‘*,<\/p>\n
They have to establish the strength of their case on soraf1’e”‘other:  <\/p>\n
basis and not by claiming negative equality.<\/p>\n
15. The Registrar of the University’;\n<\/p>\n
dated 24.9.2010 stating that affiliation cannot’-.be to
\npetitioner as it has not applied for al’filiation to the”sai’dA
\nthe academic year 2009-l0 arid~~.the  oifered
\nfor the academic year 2010–lli  that it has<\/p>\n
come to the notice*’o’f’\u00aby:.the Un.iver’eity “that-i_cer_taifn colleges were<\/p>\n
given affiliation f:)ritl’\u00a3e, saiidicoa._rsevs__for-the academic year 201041,<\/p>\n
and that the ‘*;l}nivers’ity”‘.\u00a7vi..Jth’eXamine each and every case<\/p>\n
_Vindividually and actionuvvill be initiated against such colleges in<\/p>\n
A’accordance_vvi.tn,law, if the grant of affiliation is not in conformity<\/p>\n
with\/theyproviisi_o;1g~1;jf’.Section 59 of the Act. The stand taken by<\/p>\n
the Univ”ersi’ty isjust and fair.\n<\/p>\n
K3″\n<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
29<\/span><\/p>\n
16. There is no merit in this writ petition. It is accordirig’.yi._V<\/p>\n
dismissed. No costs.\n<\/p>\n
  S i<\/p>\n
BMM \/-<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science … vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010 Author: S.Abdul Nazeer IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT DATED nus THE 5″” DAY 0? OCTOBER ;>.Q_I.-fit…’ ‘ gt * BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRJUSTICE 5. A3DtJi:.jvAzEE1\u00a7’ WRIT PETITION N0.26895\/guio (EnAf.REG;.:5) B Between: Ganga Kaveri Institute of Science […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-57906","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGanga Kaveri Institute Of Science ... vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science ... vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-06-26T19:58:26+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"21 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science … vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010\",\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-26T19:58:26+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010\"},\"wordCount\":4188,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010\",\"name\":\"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science ... vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-06-26T19:58:26+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science … vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science ... vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science ... vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-06-26T19:58:26+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"21 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science … vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010","datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-26T19:58:26+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010"},"wordCount":4188,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010","name":"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science ... vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2010-10-04T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-06-26T19:58:26+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ganga-kaveri-institute-of-science-vs-university-of-bangalore-on-5-october-2010#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ganga Kaveri Institute Of Science … vs University Of Bangalore on 5 October, 2010"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57906","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=57906"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/57906\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=57906"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=57906"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=57906"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}