{"id":58008,"date":"2008-04-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-04-10T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008"},"modified":"2015-05-05T02:32:27","modified_gmt":"2015-05-04T21:02:27","slug":"residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008","title":{"rendered":"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur … vs District Registrar Bangalore … on 11 April, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Residents Of Shri Chitrapur … vs District Registrar Bangalore … on 11 April, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: A.S.Bopanna<\/div>\n
IN THE HIGH coum' ow KARNATAKA AT A \nDATED THIS THE ;11'rH owe?   K  \nBEFORE\"- _  X   A'   %_\nTHE Homam MR. \u00a7F!.J: \"S'!\u00a7lCEA-A-    \n\n\\.l!=_P=!\\!e= 142.:.+1,I.a.<.1r.15&~_e,I-.-.r  \u00e9;Liri\u00ab,;=se*;$9?;o4,\n19385\/04, 23474\/o4,'a3759'\/04;mass\/05 85214464\/O5\n\n"(Gr-.as-aware)  j   %\n\n3 3 U\nco-ovimm\u00e9m: Hcmsxwcs  V\nsocir\ufb01-"r' Limimb.  63053 %\nMALLESWARAM' . 3 v _   % ~\nBAi\\I'GAi.-ORE-3 M   J\n1 M K mu:-;r)irIYA:sio LATE K v KOUNDINY\n   AGED ABOUT vssrmans\n~  RIAT FLAT'NQ__812,SH'RI cnrrnapun .\nH-ousz\ufb01e C0--OPERA'l'IVE socrmw LTD. (scans)\n- . W No.53, isfru cnoss, MALLESHWARAM _\n' TV BANGALORE-55\n\n2 A A unms mo\n wxoc N smo\nAGED so mans\nP..fA'I' mvr NO 202, soc:-Is\n\n\u00e9 "  BAN<3ALoRE~55 %\n  K-SREEDHAR\n\nSIG LATEX SRI'N_IVA_SA ACHARYA\nAGED 70 \n\nR\/AT FLAT NO .708, SOC-H3\nBA_NQ_A.!.-ORE\u00bb--5-5\n\nis\n\n \n\n\n\n4 SUDHA SHARATH\nW10 S!-{ABATE !{'-J!-'EAR\nAGED ABOUT 55 YEARS   '\nRIAT FIAT NO 109, SOC!-IS I\n\nBANGALORE--55\n5 K J RAO s\/o LATE .1 .1 1::Ao.__\n\nAGED AB UT 62 EA T S  \nR\/AT FLAT N0 210, SCCHS  .\nBt'\\NGt'\\LORFr-55    _ ._\n\nSU1'viAii'v'Ei.FA1'\\iUR' 'A  =   1\nWm ASHOK VELPANUR 5 ' M\nAGED A'I30i.r"I' 49   1 .V V\nR\/AT I-'m's-..g~;_o 702, scczna.  .1  ..\n\nO'!\n\nBANGAE,CJR\u00a73\u00a5S\u00a75 . 2 \n\n'Nil\n\nr)ii.iF..\u00a7aAV:=fniifURvEJ'~.L_' ._ \n\nwe 9 12. Mwlukatkvm '\n,AoED'53YEARs ,  M\n\n'R\/M' FLAT 'no; 30"9.,_SGCHS, B_ANGALORE--55_\nREP av GPA' HOLDER\u00bb? G.-R MAVINKURVE\n\na   'rARA~MAm;tKA1~: \n; "AGED 56 YEARS\n~  W\/'Q MOHAN.M_.MANKlKAR\nrziyr FIAT no 707, scans\n.B\ufb01sNGALQRE-55\n\n' S5\/.0 LLKFE K MANGESH RA\n R\/ATFLAT N0 506, SCCHS\n~. BANCEALORE-55\n\n,.  G_H!D.A_N_A.1\\!D\n5 SIC) LATE B NARAYANA RAD\nAGED ABOUT '.79 YEARS\n\nR\/AT FIAT N0 406, SCOHS\nBANQALQRE-55\n\n.' I--L\nI._'''_}\n\nI\n\u00abE\n    .\n<\/pre>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
1,55 ‘<\/p>\n
ax   <\/p>\n
M KRISHNA KUMAR<\/p>\n
I In , DAIX
\nSIG an’ ::E M Rn’:’u”‘un’ nnv<\/p>\n
AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS   .\n<\/p>\n
mar F”u\\”1″ so 111, swag<\/p>\n
BANGALORE-55<\/p>\n
SUD]-IA M KODIKAL
\nt’\\CiE\ufb01 7’6 TEARS
\nW I 0 M S KODIKAL<\/p>\n
R\/’AT FLAT No 5:215,  –.\n<\/p>\n
BANGALORE-55′   ,<\/p>\n
Y JAYANTH mo
\nAGED 61 YEARS   — . ‘<\/p>\n
s\/o LAfrEc}cxPAu.RI:;o.i1*ELLb\u00a7e5e .   % t
\nR\/A1ir\u00ab~wnj’TNo 6.11,SC.CH_\u00a7\u00a7 :1 A<\/p>\n
L%RAr\u00a7imIIR’i%z%;I.AN%M.%}  t
\n25\/0 _LA’T’E R I’-\u00abM353-. . ‘
\naogazn ABGUT 74 vzcms %<\/p>\n
raga’? Fun’ my .510, swans
\nBANQALORE-55 — _ <\/p>\n
% ” VIJAYAS. BURDE
\nA  EW\/Q sun\ufb01amz BURDE<\/p>\n
AOEDABOUT 53 means<\/p>\n
\u00bb Ermine’ A-1. VIJAY MANOR\n<\/p>\n
– . 93-5.) 13; 1’15!  ROAD<\/p>\n
MALLESWARAM
\n1.3.-a..n:’r;w_x312E\u00bb:_a<\/p>\n
” GANESH RAG
\n‘5\/o um: G SMHARAM RAO<\/p>\n
AGED 35 ‘IF.-.l.!’-ES<\/p>\n
R\/AT FLAT N0 502, scans
\nnnumrosm.-5-5<\/p>\n
H’ ‘I-VWJI III<\/p>\n
BAR R PAD!.\u20acI!’u’l<\/p>\n
AGED 70 YEARS
\n\u00a5v’;’O L:’nTE G N BASRI.-‘..<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
‘1\u00bb<\/p>\n
it
\n<2\u00bb<\/p>\n
19<\/span><\/p>\n
21%’<\/p>\n
R\/AT mu’ N0 705, socns
\ni3Ar~iGaLo’.2E-ss<\/p>\n
summ <\/p>\n
W0 A K KELKAR<\/p>\n
AGED 60 YEARS .\n<\/p>\n
R\/AT FIAT No 711, scans.\n<\/p>\n
BANGALOFE55
\nB V PRASAD RAG  <\/p>\n
s\/0 ALTE B <3 P VARMA  :  M A <\/p>\n
AGE!) 63 vmns _
\nR\/A'I'F1.A'l'VN0273,_V_ '  V
\n11TH CROSS, 4'mM1\u00a7mj
\nMaaamxsaml IAYQLVF
\nBAN(1AK..oEeE–\u00a76~. 4\u00ab <\/p>\n
BHwAN?E3H ri'1Jw.j}\u00a7L \u00ab.  "<\/p>\n
~W_i'0-.PRDF mg L MUNJAL "
\nammo 57M%vw:zs   % ;\n<\/p>\n
‘Rmr C_3\ufb01l’R’D’-10,\u00bb]1SC:__  &<\/p>\n
B3NGAL03_E”19* V’
\nsumm !<ui~MB::.E'  <\/p>\n
" 12,10 _l_.ATE_ K mama mo<\/p>\n
A AGED ABOU'F–5e6' mans<\/p>\n
R].-%,T"F_L-AT N0 609, S-CCIHS<\/p>\n
 –  s\u00e9gaanazriix smpmu<\/p>\n
‘l’l_;’,lQ  gnunarrg<\/p>\n
IJIIIVII III<\/p>\n
AGE}: 52 YEARS<\/p>\n
” Rf\u00ab’:-‘:.’I’ F1.-.’%.’!’ N0 602, EGG!-\u00a33<\/p>\n
‘BANGALORE-55<\/p>\n
K PRABI-IA<\/p>\n
we {ATE K K N SI-!ANB..AG
\nAGED 54 YEARS<\/p>\n
R\/AT FLAT Ni) 410., SCCHS<\/p>\n
BANGALORE–55<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\n\u00a33<\/p>\n
24<\/span><\/p>\n
25<\/span><\/p>\n
26<\/span><\/p>\n
27<\/span><\/p>\n
28<\/span><\/p>\n
SUDHAKAR KUMBLE<\/p>\n
3,10 L-ATE K. ANANPH 111.0<\/p>\n
AGED 53 YEARS
\n12,1:-.’r FL-AT no 119, sagas : ‘
\nBANGALORE-55<\/p>\n
K RAJALAKSHMI
\nwe 13 R c. 5.3!-!.A.!’\u00ab.’M.A.<\/p>\n
AGED 49 YEARS  %
\nR,’A’I’ 131.9,? no 499., ‘*…m1-ss.– _ ” –<\/p>\n
BANGALORE-55’ .% I V
\nY HARISHCHANDRA new   <\/p>\n
cs 1 I Arnm \u00ab.1 I3) vm|:;.ma.;r’*~,
\nD] l.4l’\\!l.!t-D Ii Il.’4:I.”\\lIl\ufb0114_
\nAGED ‘P_’..1\u00ab”‘!.EI’xRS  ‘  V V  u
\nrs .I III’! PM AnI,,’L\u00bbI”r\\ 1-so-‘.\\ n’xr-1_ngI-I-1-I ‘
\nKf\ufb02l     V
\nBANMLQRE-55    V _ V A
\n  ”\n<\/p>\n
 3,-‘0  %I’tT<f'\\i'zi'Jf'*Ei'i\\Ii:'\\ PRABE-i"
\nM350 SSYEARST
\nRJAT  \ufb01e. 701., <\/p>\n
BAN GALORE–;55 _  %<\/p>\n
% % Q PRAMD_D" 3\/b%*{3 ii' CHANDRAGIRI
\n AGED 48 YEARS;\n<\/p>\n
E’lAT’.N0 98, PANDURANGASHRAM<\/p>\n
hs’rH–m1N. MALLESWARAM-WEST
\nu VVBQNGALQRE-55<\/p>\n
Al’R “\u20ac;.1_M.i)Vl?E B s HATANGADI
\n 72 YEARS<\/p>\n
,. 9,20 LATE s K HATANGADI
\n= ‘A T RIAT FLAT N0 303. sccus
\n‘ BANGALORE-55<\/p>\n
RADHA G RAO<\/p>\n
W\/0 LATE B GURUNATH RAO
\nAGED 69 YEARS<\/p>\n
R\/AT FLAT NO 108, SOC!-IS
\nBANGALORE-55<\/p>\n
I’:\n<\/p>\n
31 S SURESH RAO<\/p>\n
(3 If’! ‘1″\n<\/p>\n
D; u IA: E %RIP:’xDA RAG<\/p>\n
AGED 65 YEARS   .\n<\/p>\n
RIAT FLAT NO 310, S%HS 1
\nBANGALORE-55<\/p>\n
32 MANJULA NARAYANAN =
\nwio K hi iv’.-‘\\RA”r’\ufb01\ufb01:’\\N ‘
\nAGED 70 YEARS
\nR\/’A’i”  No 205. “‘””\u00b0i:E’$’ –. ‘-<\/p>\n
BANGALORE-55′  <\/p>\n
as MURLISALETORE _
\nAGED 64 ?EAl’i’S
\ns\/0 LA’}’E’SA–SAL_ETQRE  *
\nR\/A’mLA’r;No 101. scans ;,
\nBANGALORE45$     * ”\n<\/p>\n
34 ,~J”‘i”O’FHigL HNETANGADI
\naw\/0 C:-!<;_.HA'iTVANQADI –
\nAeazn 59 YEARS\u00bb   ' –\n<\/p>\n
R\/A’? FLAT NO 306, scans
\nBAHGALoR~E-55 . V <\/p>\n
as  ” eaoana 3 ULPE
\n  wjo, R A ULPE… .%
\nmrst; .54 YEARS
\n  \u00bbRiA*E’..F1.~A_T no 509, scans\n<\/p>\n
— _If3A__N’GALQRE-55<\/p>\n
‘ 1:. N\ufb01tsyisn mo
\n AGEIJ so YEARS
\n~ 3,40 LATE pxnamm mo<\/p>\n
“l’~\u20ac]A’l’ FIAT N0 212. scans
\nmgxxzc-.A.1.x.)12:r;.5:5<\/p>\n
MA _A glam<\/p>\n
ltllli trio<\/p>\n
AGEI5 53 YEARS
\nlg ’19 3 gunwpaunmu<\/p>\n
IIIIIIONDIVIIIIGIIU<\/p>\n
R\/AT FLAT N0 610, SOC!-IS<\/p>\n
BAa”\u20ac””‘ ‘ ” F-.=55<\/p>\n
\\Jl’| IJLI
\nJ2
\n‘H<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
.4:\n<\/p>\n
CV’<\/p>\n
39<\/span><\/p>\n
J:\n<\/p>\n
C}<\/p>\n
41<\/span><\/p>\n
42 <\/span><\/p>\n
R GPAI<\/p>\n
HID l,A’I”I’n_’, IEAHADATUI DA’!
\nhr; V uslsu ‘5-uuuu rnalu 3 ns<\/p>\n
AGED ’72 YEARS   <\/p>\n
DIAH’ Ii}! A51′ lLl’l’\\ I11 I \u00a2.I”‘|(“il..l’\u00a3l
\n|\\;nz I unl lI\\J Ill. 1, Dvvllv<\/p>\n
BANGALORE-55<\/p>\n
R G NAYAK s\/o LATE RN mv:Ak%-. <\/p>\n
l’\\(‘.’iEl.’) 69 ‘x’EAR’:-.’s  ,
\nR\/AT FLAT NO 508 SOC}-IS  <\/p>\n
I’l”\\L I’ IKYHIQI<\/p>\n
B\ufb01ivunuums-55  _ ..\n<\/p>\n
s\/0 1.A’IE=’r.tRAMA RAG _ 5
\nAGEB 73 make   *<\/p>\n
R\/AT FI_.a’3\\No 3017, S_(.”-C’.HS.. ‘*  .. ,” ”<\/p>\n
BA\ufb01G5540R1E#$5.. a <\/p>\n
 ,1  ‘
\n.Wi0.AK’DUR’GANAND._<\/p>\n
;AGED’6i-i.YEARS _  .\n<\/p>\n
“R[A’I’ FIAT no 15- 1′; Dana –<\/p>\n
Iom. MAaN.”MA.LLEsm.:2AM
\nBA\ufb02QALORE–3 , ..\n<\/p>\n
M R GAHGOLH <\/p>\n
”  S\/’O LATE “G Q..SU’NDER RAO<\/p>\n
A’GEl3~69 YEARS<\/p>\n
-Rf’A’i’.FAL-‘IT NO 801, SCCHS<\/p>\n
V  — ,BAnG.A;:._QaE-55<\/p>\n
v1.J;?s?A i2 BAINDUR
\nav\/0 LATE B RAMDAS<\/p>\n
~. AGED 56 YEARS<\/p>\n
F!-\/AT FLAT no 201. socns<\/p>\n
” ‘  BA.h!f.2-.A.L.f.)!R!F..-55<\/p>\n
‘JD-Ito
\nOm<\/p>\n
” ‘” ‘c3″%d:\u00a7, socus
\n. 5<\/p>\n
;\n<\/p>\n
nun<\/p>\n
5331;\n<\/p>\n
E 3
\n‘-2
\n“\u00a7
\n5<\/span><\/p>\n
:5″;\n<\/p>\n
1:12<\/p>\n
45<\/span><\/p>\n
46<\/span><\/p>\n
47<\/span><\/p>\n
(By St}: \u00abS’ (3 BVH-A’fI’;’.'{*{_\u00a7l3_’\\?’-‘3–~  ~ \u00ab
\nAND’  V  <\/p>\n
KANCHAN BANNERJEE<\/p>\n
‘v’&’;’O MOLOY K 3ANh7F.RJEE<\/p>\n
AGED 57 YEARS
\nRiki’ FLAT NO 31 $”~.’.’.CI-ES I<\/p>\n
BANGALORE-55<\/p>\n
D RANGANATHAN<\/p>\n
sic  B GUh’B\u00a2”1P”:’\\
\nAGED 31 YEARS
\nR.i\\’i” F”‘u’1″i” N0 102;,.sccHs** . –
\nBANGALORE65′  \u00abD 5<\/p>\n
NANDHINI KAPDI _<\/p>\n
AGED so YEARS   ~ <\/p>\n
mo YEDWAMH KAPDI.’   ;\n<\/p>\n
REP BY–D.GP;gDD’;:D:.DER;D D V <\/p>\n
RAT 89,_’GURUKRUP.A,”‘WEST ‘PARK ROAD
\nMALLESH\u00a5IJ.ARAM\u00ab_  ..\n<\/p>\n
 PETYTTON-EH8<\/p>\n
‘ 2D’iST’RIC’I’ R\u00e9di\u00e9man
\nA –vBRNG_ALORE URBAN DISTRICT\n<\/p>\n
— Duo so;–1,_12-n AND arm FLOOR<\/p>\n
CHURGH STREET
\nE!-AN\u20ac\u00a7ALORE-01<\/p>\n
D. 63:39 CONTROLLER or REVENUE AND
\n% COMMISSIONER OF STAMPS IN KARNATAKA<\/p>\n
W5 FL-ODE, GAUVERY BHAVAN<\/p>\n
BWSSB WING
\nBA!~.’GAI.-ORF.–9<\/p>\n
bx \u00a7__a—-9<\/p>\n
k<\/p>\n
(By Sri B.V. ACHARYA. ADVOCATE GENERAL F0!’~3.. i’
\nare  R-..e..-.’.,”..:R.-.’rR, sea;
\nT\ufb01i\ufb01 wR:’r :”~’E’E’I’i’IO.”\u20ac :3 Ran:-R.) Lf.#;=i:2R..R= 225} Q?
\nTHE CONSTITUTI-ON ow mom, PRAYING T0; “‘QUASHRA._,A’t’HRE
\nORDERS oz-= R-1 Ream: aaaxwsr Rana 0:2 ms. ‘\u00a5–‘\u00a3’R–“. <\/p>\n
31-3-2005 VIDE ANN.H TO -1145; ‘-DECLARE .11′:-m’ THE w
\ni=Ro’v1si0Rs OF saczmor\u00e9s  6.: 39 R9 -Rmicasxeo OF’ ‘
\nSCHEDULE ARE NOT APPLICABLE-Xl’O.uTHE ‘MEMBERS AND TO
\n DOC:Uiu’Eiv’i”S OF .ms$Essi\ufb01R “-\u00bb_CER’:”i’:’-“iGA’FE. SHARE
\nCERTIFICATE AND 1.oRR”~s’rocK:_cRR%_nR’rc,ATR m FAVOUR on
\nMEMBERS.   ‘v_  s   <\/p>\n
BE’I’WEEN=i’:    ‘<\/p>\n
1  DIGAM&%R walm
\n.’nmD:\u00ab.uwAu WAR’l’Y’ ~<\/p>\n
AGED ABOUT’ ‘~’.|7′!EFuRE5
\nR_\/’O,F”LA’I’?~IO;C-I~5;”DA’!’I’APRASAD APARTMENT<\/p>\n
2′  ” we CDRG R MULKY
\n  is\/0,,MAmURA.’rH MULKY
\n,  “AOED__ABOU’I’ 31 YEARS
\n* ., \u00bb Rio’  NO.A-III-1, DATTAPRASAD APARTMENT<\/p>\n
R.  R S’\u00bbKA’.’_.YANPUR
\nR R Rgo,;mR K sum RAO
\n ‘AGED ABOUT 71 mums
\nRR Rgo mgr NQJL-113-2, mmmpnasao APAR’I’MENT<\/p>\n
K DURG.ANA.ND<\/p>\n
S\/0.I.A’l’E K GANESH RAO<\/p>\n
AGED ABQLPP 69 YEARS<\/p>\n
R\/O FLAT NO.X-1, DATTAPRASAD APARTMENT<\/p>\n
5 B RAVISHANKAR<\/p>\n
Sf0.LA’I’E B GURJ..-.””‘M R90<\/p>\n
In IIII I<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
6<\/span><\/p>\n
A.\n<\/p>\n
    ADV. 5<\/p>\n
10<\/span>
\nAGED ABOUT 67 YEARS  .\n<\/p>\n
nan uni ma nan (‘1HDI’I’l”\\A’IV’l’A tun BL!) I3*f~.A’l”~. ‘
\n‘I-‘III “W III’ ‘III L’ \\\ufb02\\’I’\\lI-‘”1 II’! M”  ‘I-\ufb02’-‘_’l’&’V\\VI  ‘<\/p>\n
N0.C-[I-1, DATTAPRASAD APARTMENT .<\/p>\n
I’ ‘I’ ADI? l.l’l’.,’hll)I3’l’.’l\u00a2’-. (‘ID l”|L’IVI’\u00a3.D’DA\ufb02A”.”?n
\nIJIJ C’|l\\I-I -IVII-JIVI-IJI-‘lI\\|-F \\JI’ llrll IKWLI I\\-CUIJIT-I-If’<\/p>\n
C0-OP HOUSING SOCWETY 36  _<\/p>\n
MALLESHWARAM, BANGALQRE-03..  V<\/p>\n
6 K RAMAMANI<\/p>\n
‘v’Ii;’0.R.’i”.K’u’IviAR  _<\/p>\n
AGED.5Q mans’  ..  V V %
\n1-‘<io.No.i9s,
\nam MAlN.MALLESHWARAM'  % "
\nBANGALO.T:Eg-G3  % * "\n<\/p>\n
\nW\/0;sUI;HI’R-s__KARKAL. _ 1
\nAGED-.,_4E”&..T\u20acF3ARS GPA~HOLTJEK’gF’Ol?
\nsmTsm=_RAmsH moon; *R._!.0;A–9
\n:ANAND.a;:3HRi:;u, CANARA UNION co-or
\nHSG.SQCiE’\u00a7”!’.,a’M10I\u00b0’HTMAW, MALLESHWARAM
\nBANGALORE-n(__J3_   <\/p>\n
“-ll<\/p>\n
3 KUMUDA R IA-JMI ”\n<\/p>\n
; ‘ “z’~’.(;’uED ABQUT 60 “YEARS
\n”  130.2601 19.; \u00ab1.m’__H MAIN ROAD
\nMALLESWARAM. BANGALORE
\n= –   PE’1’1’I’IONERS<\/p>\n
AND :\n<\/p>\n
 p1sT.R1i::*REG:sTRAR
\n% BANGALORE DISTRICT<\/p>\n
‘L A. 1~1’o%.’:s2, JAMUHA compmx<\/p>\n
  5TH.-MAIN. GANDHINAGAR
\nBANGALORE-09<\/p>\n
 RESPONDENT<\/p>\n
(By Sri B.V. ACHARYA. ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR
\n~_.ri  .|!.A..h!-.lU!~!;A.T!-!, HCQA)<\/p>\n
was ‘..”.=e1’1* PETFFEON 1% 1111.39   D
\nTHE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA. PRAYINGDTO: QuA..;H ORDER
\nor RES”‘rGh’BEN'{‘ MADE .-431-.11~.-gr 1:Ac1-1 oz: ’13…=.1′ . De’:-11011312
\nVIDE ANNEXURE–A DATED 24.1.2O0″5.A[1’DDATED 127.1
\nDATED 2-1.1.2005. As DATED 24.1.2011 “A4 DATED<\/p>\n
A5 DATED 27.1.2005, A6 DAED  1.2005, ‘A7 D:11’E.D<\/p>\n
i.\u00a7o?o5,’*A-\n<\/p>\n
.2 \u00ab<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\nfl<\/p>\n
DECLARE THE TRARSPOR  AFED V”CG.1.SEQ1}..-NT ‘<\/p>\n
POSSESSION oar RESPECTIVE.” APARPMENFS Frro THE
\nPE”1″i’T’i0i\\iERS PRiO1’~E #10 s11s~.:1u~e1 _ BID  REQUR-RE
\nREGlS’I’RA’l’lON AND’ PAYNIEBIT  1D? STAMP DUTY As
\nCONVEYANCE or ”i’i”1”LE * 111′  as PR <\/p>\n
BETWEEN    A 1  A  <\/p>\n
1 =,KU-SUM B’!-ET A
\nW\/0 MANICKBHAT ‘-\n<\/p>\n
70—1rEARs*  .. V <\/p>\n
_ R\/o”:~1o”5;5′,–_c1:INMAYA MISSION<\/p>\n
: ” HOSPITAL ROAD. INDIRANAGAR.<\/p>\n
 s’1fAGE,BA1I.<3ALoRE as<\/p>\n
A A .VP1S1%_NTH PANDIT\n<\/p>\n
– 11.1310 DRS~.R 1=ANDrI’\n<\/p>\n
70.”_’!EAS’
\n111-1, DA1*rAr=RAsAD
\n‘=–C0’–0PERA’I’IVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD
\n~  1111111, MALLESWARAM
\n1 ‘BANGALORE 3<\/p>\n
=  SUMAN s DAMLE<\/p>\n
111,10  DAMLE<\/p>\n
70 YEARS
\nR,-‘0 A I 4 L”..’!”!’.A.PR.\ufb01.SAD<\/p>\n
C0–OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.,
\n12<\/span><\/p>\n
=2′.}{}5,* — A<\/p>\n
.9;\n<\/p>\n
can     <\/p>\n
10″ MAIN. MALLESWARAM<\/p>\n
B:”:NGa’-‘aLOR v 3<\/p>\n
‘v’ S \u00a5ui’u’L\u00a5E
\nS\/O SHIVAM D MULYE<\/p>\n
Ill ‘IIIRIPH<\/p>\n
OD Iranns T.\n<\/p>\n
R\/0 NO 12,AS}-IOKVAN”  _<\/p>\n
GOKUL ROAD. HUBLE <\/p>\n
W\/O LATE RAMANA’THA.’RAQ ” ~  <\/p>\n
81 YEARS   W_  }<\/p>\n
C-1-6, DATTAPRASAD _ . .   _
\nCO-0I”FJ\u00a7!l’TTVE H3″U’\u20acaiNG “”‘.”‘5.l_’3″l”=.,_GAN.H;a.R OAK
\n‘av-2 YEARS
\nV ~.13~:s+\u00ab.-5_,*m.1*rAPRAsAn\n<\/p>\n
– ,.C’.–Q-‘0FERATIVE HOUSING socurnr L’I’D.,<\/p>\n
‘1o?PH MAIN MALLESWARAM<\/p>\n
BANQLALORE 3<\/p>\n
~  \\;\u00ab’;!L>?A_ NAGARAKATH
\n“D\/0 R.s. NAGRAKATPI<\/p>\n
53 YEARS<\/p>\n
FIAT NO 5 ANANDMAY EE<\/p>\n
ANANDNEKETAN G0-Q-PERATNE HOUSING
\nSOCIETY. KARNNAGKL PUNE 411 029<\/p>\n
RSSAVUR<\/p>\n
$,’0 S.R. SHAl'”{..5.”-.’ 940<\/p>\n
‘I I GVGI<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
J.’-\n<\/p>\n
01<\/span><\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
‘ Vifis’
\n ~.fl3AN’GALORE3<\/p>\n
 V {E.\u00a7,rSri: 9<\/p>\n
13<\/span>
\n70 YEARS<\/p>\n
Rio No 2, F1..A.m..c.\u00a5ro1~1 . !’\u00ab_=R12A.c_.
\ncwvme VILLAGE, !.I.1:-.z~:o…A.I.r4.=I.’
\nPUNE 411 040
\nGAUTHAM ULLAL<\/p>\n
sic RR. ULLAL<\/p>\n
94 YEARS<\/p>\n
NO mm. a”E’r.r’\\?viE-‘:’sEA<\/p>\n
11’l’H MAIN A BLOC-‘K<\/p>\n
ii E-‘I’i’\ufb01GE.  _  ;\n<\/p>\n
BANGALORE 10 –   ‘<\/p>\n
SATYA aas\ufb01iiml <\/p>\n
we
\nw\/ca V.M–:H”-SQWNDA time  V
\n33 mans      ‘- V<\/p>\n
%V:ao% 16’ %ERo’r%9:aso%Rs:Vuu PL.Ex\u00bbi2uARrERs
\n Innxanor scam-sacs
\n‘=..Bn31’aALcRj3_12_     ~<\/p>\n
ma HKLI\u00a7l”i5UR %
\nATMARAM 53. wawuanb TE?\n<\/p>\n
CIES<\/p>\n
4 ‘ ” ‘!’ARDEO. ROAD ‘
\n‘  E MUMBAI 4on._o_a4<\/p>\n
%\u00a2NA%K\u00e9;ARnE
\n‘  H0 “:3-*3_’33_. DNITAPRASAD<\/p>\n
‘cQu.oPERATwE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD
\n10 THMAIN MALLESWARAM<\/p>\n
 PETFFIONERS<\/p>\n
no -an -__<\/p>\n
BB ‘1’: ADV.)<\/p>\n
DlS’I’RIC’l’ REGISTRAR
\nBANGALORE URBAN D!S’I’!2IG’I’<\/p>\n
N0 50\/ 1, 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR<\/p>\n
CLII IDHLI Q’l’Dli”Ii”l’<\/p>\n
II\\II\\\\uFII III IVI-‘0″!-W78<\/p>\n
BANGALOREI  u W \u00a2  A
\n(By Sri B.V. ACHARYA. Anvocxrs GENERAL Fog”   % A V’<\/p>\n
.  LI’ II III’! II’III’A’l\\ I’_I’.f'(‘\\’1’|,|
\n\\ \ufb01ll I’IulVI- IVIIIIVUUIVIII  <\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETI’!'[Ci!5l IS FlI.ED\u00ab._UN’DER ARTICLE 226 on
\nTHE x’.’sv.”\ufb01w’S’i’i’i”u”i’iO:’\\i GE-“”E’\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01g__F?TRiiYIi\u20acG{PC-:_ QUASH oanaas
\nMADE BY RESPONDENT” D1: 2o.:9..2oM~.%% 24.9.2004 AND
\ni6. 10.2604 ‘visa #5:\u00bb  :~aos.s’r-P amena-
\no4. DR! 83,91v,3’5,7’_9.84=-,81,?8;70;74,'(6,72,f?5 AND 90\/2004-05;
\nD-F:CLA’Ri-3.   or  Aii\ufb01 GONSEQUENT
\nPOSSESSION _’=OF-“”3′.__REaF’ECTIVE”?_ APAR’I’MEN’I’s TO THE
\nFE’T’I’T’IOiTEf2’S,’i… E\u00e9feioi-*3  ..31;3.2c;101 Dif) NOT’ REQUWE
\nREGISTRATION Mo ‘-_.PAYMENT.v” on swamp DUTY as
\nCON\\\u00a3’EYANC’:3.*OF ‘l”1’4I’LE’-4 DEED IN IMMOVABLE PROPERTY, ETC.<\/p>\n
Bmfswmjn : L’ ~
\n  . [OIDHRWA  %%%%%
\n  ..65~YR_S;vS\/O 0 SUNDARESIAYA<\/p>\n
V’  1\\.l4I'{ \u00a7{_E’li’;.NDITH
\n :51 ‘ms. w\/0 ANIL KUMAR D PANDITI-I<\/p>\n
~. RJO B –ul– 9
\n  f\u00a7AYANTHARA <3 UBAYKAR
\na X 59 was. we GURUDUTT UBAYKAR
\n12,10 c -1- 2<\/p>\n
' 4  mguaazn<\/p>\n
60 YRS. w\/0 GA ANAN U KUBER
\n52,10 c -11- 2
\n1<\/span><\/p>\n
.% I<\/p>\n
5 TARA s HEMMADY   _
\n71 ms, 1;,\/o SHIVASHANKAR L HEMMADY
\nR\/O B -11- s    r  = > ‘<\/p>\n
6 HSHALINIBAISUMIT!-IRA RAG,
\n111,10L-ATEHALDIPURSUN2~1THRARA0. . ‘ ‘
\nR\/OA—ll-6   ”\n<\/p>\n
7 MEENA JAYAPRAKASI-I .\n<\/p>\n
44. YRS. we -.!AYAPR9.K..A,\u00a7H_”=._
\nR\/0 c —11-7 ‘  ‘ <\/p>\n
a HATPANGAD1GURU%PRA\u00a73Af)<\/p>\n
 1m;AI_)1
\nW0 3-,!\u00bb 3 1 ‘<\/p>\n
ALL\u20acARs:\u00abAMEMBERs.A_o    DATFAPRASAD COOPERATIVE
\nHousing  *0
\n_  ‘MAEN,’MA!aLES*HWARAMA<\/p>\n
: .–    -A PETITIONERS<\/p>\n
(By an! S (}BH’\ufb01~’I’A.V \u00e9$D’.i.)*A\u00ab–A.:”‘A <\/p>\n
Aseig :V <\/p>\n
–   \u00a3$_lSTl\u00a7i\u00a3\u00a7T:vS\u00a7E::(}iS’PRAR BANGALORE DISTRICT
\n. NO 32*, JAM UNA coumix<\/p>\n
5 MAIN..C5:\u00a3NDHiNAGAR
\nBANGALORE
\n.   RESPONDENT<\/p>\n
\u00bb A’ (By s:~iB.v. ACHARYA. ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR
\n*  Sri H.M. MANJUNATH, HCGA}<\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 296 OF<\/p>\n
THE CONS’i’I’l’UTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO: QUASH ORDERS<\/p>\n
 114.2004 BEARING NUMBERS STP-3\/2003-04, DR! 82, 83, .<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
J
\nI<\/p>\n
84, 85.86.87, 88 AND 90\/2003-04 AS PER  <\/p>\n
-.1<\/p>\n
POSSESSION ore RESPECTIVE  APA ‘1EuTsT’-v’4ToA–.i’.THE ‘<\/p>\n
PETITIONERS, PR!0R To 31.3.2001  trio;
\nREGISTRATION AND PAYMENT on ‘~S’I’Als!P’ . As<\/p>\n
ETC.\n<\/p>\n
1 A ….h’.ACHA.’\u20acDR:%’EHTi’–{;”FA”  % ” ; A
\ns\/0. LATEA GOPAL BHAT;\u00ab.70’YfEA_l\u00a7$f
\n:~ao.:-2.353, nATTA?ieAsAn APAFTMENT<\/p>\n
M’! lint<\/p>\n
IO<\/p>\n
 Q. _ GOKARAN;–52 YEARS
\nR1′ 0 :’?dE.–.’;’\u00bb,_  APARTMENT<\/p>\n
SQTH ARE-3  .0? DATTAPRASAD CO-OPERATIVE
\nHOUSING socmm we\/o D.C.H. comm
\nin-TH  –  L.E}SP\u00a3WARAM, BANGALORE-03<\/p>\n
”   ….. N’ .  PETITIONERS<\/p>\n
DIS’uI’R{C1’\u00a7’TVREC%lSTRAR BANGALORE DISTRICT<\/p>\n
  ‘ 32, JAMUNA COMPLEX
\nA ‘ V5TH..MA:N. GANDHINAGAR
\n EAMALORE 550 mg<\/p>\n
 RESPONDENT<\/p>\n
”  “:\u00e9.y Sri B.V. ACHARYA. ADVOCATE GENERAL FOR<\/p>\n
Sri I-LM. MANJUNATH, HCGA2<\/p>\n
Z<\/p>\n
3–\n<\/p>\n
% A3- A
\nDECLARE THAT TRANSFER or SHARES .~<\/p>\n
CONVEYAIECE OF ‘!’I’!’1.E DEEDS i:’v3WiA1’vi’i’*.:i(‘)’\\f:’\\I'[‘:?,a.LE A <\/p>\n
THIS wan’ PE’I’I’l’lON IS FILED UNDER AwmcLE’TL226%*<j5F
\nTHE coreswavmoze 99 u~zn:.n.. P2=:.A.m~:e T0:  -ORDERS M'
\nD1'. 17.4.2004 AS PER ANX. A1 ,'P0…A(2',f DECL-KRE' V'PHFs-'VI' V'<\/p>\n
TRANSFER 0'6' SHARES ANS CONEEEQUEE-YF"\u00abPQSB.ESv$!Q!\u20ac' OF<\/p>\n
RESPECTIVE APARTMENTS TO THE. PE"l'iT\u00a7ONERS,"'PRH:3R TO<\/p>\n
31.3.2601 mo \ufb01e? 'REQUERE R;-';<,=:s'r:=2.A.'!\u00b0a.9:~; .t'.1~1r;s%%1=;n;*:r\u00bb1m1*~i<:s1i'\u00bb_V
\nSTAMP DUTY AS CONVE\u00a5'AH\u00a3}E 0!? TITLE " 1;3.13,ED\u00a7: 1:5 ' .<\/p>\n
iNIMOVi\\BLE PROPEn:"'1""': , ETC. '<\/p>\n
E
\nBETWEEN :\n<\/p>\n
1    ‘
\ns\/ 0i’LA'{‘_E RANi_ RAQMAVINKU avg
\n34 YEARS,;”A:VR[OR:1\u00a5-3 .%  <\/p>\n
2 [0 sun\ufb01mns\u00e9a\ufb01lmsjo ixbkii o ‘UB’BAR\ufb01Evi\ufb01iAH
\n‘~88″YEARS,w.’fR[0_A#!1g-‘i, ‘ –<\/p>\n
3 15 v ‘mam: sis) L\u00e9{‘i’$ \\} M KATRE
\n_ _ 72 mAR\u00e93.,V  Rf-._0 9:1-7.<\/p>\n
  Mgun %RAo_s_.\/. 3 K KOMBRABML
\n=49 mgns. R \/0 341-5.\n<\/p>\n
* :::1’\\?\u00ab.;(3i~iEI;L\u00a2%MANI s_\/o RAMANATHAN
\n43″\u00a5.EARS, R\/0 c-1-8,<\/p>\n
6 v–..iJAPii3A1A NADKARNI
\n~ V we PRADIP P NADKARNI
\n=50 YEARS. 12\/0 A-Ill-5,<\/p>\n
*  mmrm BAINDUR<\/p>\n
‘.51,’ Q GQPINATH. RAD BAINDUR
\n65 YEARS, R\/0 B-Ill-3,<\/p>\n
8 PADMA SAVUR W\/O G R SAVUR<\/p>\n
1″} YEARS, RIO 14″-\n<\/p>\n
nn Dun w-\n<\/p>\n
4<\/span>
\n“Ir<\/p>\n
GD<\/p>\n
11<\/span><\/p>\n
12<\/span><\/p>\n
15<\/span><\/p>\n
\ufb01lm’ v:svEV
\nW\/Q VASANTH RAO MAVINKURVE _ ‘
\n64 era.-*-..=es, Rgo 3+2,    ‘<\/p>\n
K\ufb01ivi\ufb01i\ufb01\ufb01i :’u’A{r-‘uP\u00a3~.LL’.’ we  ALJOHAROAA
\neewnmns, R\/0 Bgtm, \u00ab   O V <\/p>\n
SHANTA KELKAR<\/p>\n
.’.El’.\\lV!IAVk’3<\/p>\n
 0  ‘%Ti3H”‘l\\1=.:!..yru1n _  .<\/p>\n
56YEARS’5,.f\u00a7,,?0 \u00a3;_-ll-fl,_ ,’ V _ V _
\nA $L:iKU1i–D}x-v’u\u00a7”..:O*S*ANANPH;$1NAPAYAN<\/p>\n
Car I-In u-53;’<\/p>\n
 N   ago}: sm\u00e9\ufb01”-amm
\n ‘YEARS,  ‘ ‘<\/p>\n
K sumrmp. w’;4’O\u00aba?A1ii\u00bb4ANABHA<\/p>\n
_ 62 YEARS,’ -3\/O EM-1,<\/p>\n
A _\u00a3flLLvARE”MEMBERS OF’ DA’1’1′:’\\F’RASAE’2
\n“CO-OPERATNE nousme SOCIETY<\/p>\n
  .OOMPLEx, 10’l’H MAIN. MELLr.~:”‘wm’\u00ab-Aivi\n<\/p>\n
— 4._BANGA_lv.V(;.%RE-3<\/p>\n
(By mi 3 9 O I31-IAT. \ufb01mv.)
\n x “D  ,
\n* nisrnlcr REGISTRAR BANGALORE URABN ms?<\/p>\n
 N0 50; 1; 214.9 AND 3RD FLOOR
\n CHURCH ‘STREET, BANGALORE-1<\/p>\n
 RESPONDENT<\/p>\n
9}<\/p>\n
(By’$I’i B.” :’\\’C:’H:’\\R’r’A. ABVOCATE GENEJRAL  V. __
\nSri H. ‘<\/p>\n
V-\n<\/p>\n
M.MANJUNA’I’H,HCGA)  % H %  _
\nTHIS wan’ PETITION IS FILED. UNDER isR’PI(5LE\u00a7”&–5 <\/p>\n
 C’-0N3T'[T’U”‘i”i0N OF i\ufb01\ufb01i\ufb01, P’r%\ufb01.’:'{\u00a7*~5{a’ QUASHI
\nORDERS DT. 22.7.9004 VIDE \u00a3+;NFi!EX.D!’-TO D5;1DE\u20acf-LARE_.’\u00a7I’HA’f’.V 1<\/p>\n
TRANSFER CVF’ SHARES A\ufb01\ufb01 GORSEQUEEW ‘ECLSSESSION 09’ ‘<\/p>\n
RESPECTIVE APARTMENTS TO THE BETITIDNERS. PRIOR TO
\n31.3.2001 DID NOT’ F2EQiii’RE REGi–\ufb01i*R\ufb01’?iON :’\\?v’G..’r’:’x’i’ EN’? OF
\nSTAMP DUTY AS Cf)NVEY-‘_AN:(3.E’ ~._QF  DEEDS IN
\nIMMOVABLE PROF’EW.     _M   _<\/p>\n
BETWEEN    E ”\n<\/p>\n
RESIDENTEXOF SHR!.CHIT’RAPUR…..
\nco O?ERATIVE_~vHQUSlHG”~\u00ab_
\nSOCIETY ‘LTD. ism cnoss, E
\nMALLESWELRAM , E’A_N’GA!.ORE&03<\/p>\n
1 __SRNAN’D!NI–.\n<\/p>\n
_;f ‘EGED.5a..yEARs
\n ;WiQ.IATE’SMAGEESHWARA<\/p>\n
g;’o,:+aQ. 121, 3120 MAIN,<\/p>\n
– \u00bb ._13T’H_CROSS. MALLESHWARAM
\n‘ .EE\\.!~!c.2_i-.–Ec;\u00bbEE–5t3o 003<\/p>\n
\u00abAGED.59 YEARS
\n~ S;,’Q.L!\u00ab.’!’E Y SLIBBA. RAD<\/p>\n
“R\/O.PLAT NO.411, 4TH FLOOR
\nSH!’-‘:1 currmpun HOUSING. co-opERmvE
\nSOCIETY urn (scans). No.68, 15TH caoss\n<\/p>\n
–M I EEEI.-.r.n DAM, BANGALXJRE-560 055<\/p>\n
lI’ll’| I-llll\ufb02 II II IIVO<\/p>\n
\\..rE1′.;i’3nE-E SLIDHIR RAD<\/p>\n
3 E’v’.’0}-IAN G }’!E.”.\u00a3!’\u00e9’.A’.’.5!<\/p>\n
AGED.69 YEARS
\nS;’O.GOPA’u RAG HEEEEMADI<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
“-‘I<\/p>\n
RIO.N0.85, ROAD NO.14<\/p>\n
“::’u’d”1’Ji’s’Es’A LLS<\/p>\n
HYDERABAD 500 034   <\/p>\n
PRADEEP JOSH]<\/p>\n
ACiED.-52 YEARS _<\/p>\n
S] O. LATE SRINIVAS JOSH}—. _V<\/p>\n
st-;N”i0’R ‘ni’EDi(‘;AL 0’1?-‘:=’ii’;E-5? ”
\nWEST COAST PAPER MILLS “LTD,
\nDANDEH 581    U
\nRAJALAKSHivii  ” ”\n<\/p>\n
AGED.72 YEARS _ Q 1  _
\nW\/O.LA’T’E’? JBG\ufb01NNF’..’T’H\ufb02I1i 1 AV ”
\nR \/ O.F’L.’-&”i”NQ. 104, SHE? CHI’PR_APURf’
\nHOU$.II%!_,G (;\u00a7O–,wOPERAT_WE_ .SCM.fT1iE’.'”f”i”‘L’i’D
\n(SC\u20ac1HS;g’—-N0′;6-3, 15.?-H’CROSE%_,  ‘
\nMALLESH’\u00a7!ARA.M,.BAfJGA’LORE–S50 035<\/p>\n
 K s\ufb01O\u00e9;:AN\u00a7..VRA:)’
\n‘~AGE1:\u00bb.57 ‘iEARs  <\/p>\n
DlO’.K.CHANDRA’  T’%-.\\nft\u00e9~RAo
\nR [0, mvr mo;-409, 2, PARESI-I
\nAPARTMENTS, xv mun ROAD<\/p>\n
‘ ” MALLESWARAM; BANGALORE-03<\/p>\n
% Al\u00a3\ufb02ARNATvI\u00a3”\u00e9\u00abAGED.59 YEARS
\n%  –.\u00a73;’~O;41,A’*!’E suzvaswmv\n<\/p>\n
– ._R.–EPI%E;SE.NTED BY GPA HOLDER<\/p>\n
‘s R ~NANDINl, AGED53 YEARS
\nJCALATE s vmnmsuwma, n_\/o.uo.121<\/p>\n
\u00ab3R1’>’MA1N, 13TH (moss, MALLESWARAM,
\n~   Ei:A.NGA!..QRE–  ooa<\/p>\n
 PETITIONERS<\/p>\n
    Sri : s G BHAT, ADVJ<\/p>\n
DISTRICT REGISTRAR
\nANGALORF. URBAN ‘.I}!STR!C.!T<\/p>\n
1<\/span><\/p>\n
1′!<\/p>\n
21<\/span>
\nNo.50\/1, 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR
\nCHURCH
\nBANGALORE-01   <\/p>\n
2 CHIEF CONTROLLER op’ REVENUE  :”
\ncommzsszozma ore’ ..c:rA:.% .KARNATAK;\ufb01.
\n7TH moon. CAUVERY~.BH–AVAN   <\/p>\n
BWSSB WING, BAP\u20acGALORE’-=39<\/p>\n
{By Sri E.’-.’v’. ;”:CHAF:”:’:’a.  (}E\ufb01”E”‘AL~\u00bbF”R<\/p>\n
Sn’ H.M.MANJuNATH,Hc\u00a72A)’ f ” ”<\/p>\n
THEE f.vM;’211;&+LJki=i,\u00ab:’rz%r;:or~z+ ES Ema UNDER ARTTCLE  or-*
\nTHE CONST:”f_UTi0N_ omwnm, ‘PRAYING 1’0: QUASH THE
\noi”-:’nER$ as :2:   men on me. names. was
\nANN.H,..DT,3i.g3-2395; –\u00bbDECLARE-….’.!’HA’I’ THE paovxsxons or
\n as 39 min !1RT’iC3L.E :20 OF’ scumoum OF THE STAMP
\nACT \ufb01RE .m’r \ufb02P’PLIGAB[,E”*TO THE ALLOTMENP or mvrs TO
\n H.\u00a7M’B’ERS ma ‘PO “THE oocummrrs ore POSSESSION
\nCERTIFICATE. SHARE.. ‘{‘:ER’I’IFICATE AND LOAN srocx
\nCER”I'”1\ufb01CA’T’E m FAVOIJR’ or-* mzmssns.<\/p>\n
‘A  ‘:  ..\n<\/p>\n
.RESiDEN’T:Si.<\u00a7:i~' sum CHITRAPUR<\/p>\n
HOUSIHG G0 OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD
\n15'I'1-5.. CROSS MALLESHWARAM<\/p>\n
 xBANCkP.l.0RE 560 ooa
\n   K SHARADCHARAN<\/p>\n
S\/0 G K UMESH RAO
\nAGED ABOUT 52 YEARS<\/p>\n
R\/O FLAT M131 1. SHRI CHITRAPUR
\nHOUSING. CO-QPERATIVE  I.-TD {SOCKS}<\/p>\n
J.\n<\/p>\n
“-I<\/p>\n
I-‘3<\/p>\n
‘~\u00bb.;r, <\/p>\n
NO.68, 151′!-I CROSS, MALLESHWARAM<\/p>\n
BANGALORE .% 055<\/p>\n
u’:”1′:’:’\\Ew”‘PH R SA’u’!{00l”-3<\/p>\n
AGED 53 YEARS   2 i ‘
\nsio LATE RAGHUHATH Rae sasmeoa
\nR\/O E803–SURYAV1HAR APAR’l’ME’Nr V<\/p>\n
KAFIXSHERA BORDER, G’U–R'(l%.0!’u’<\/p>\n
(HARYANAI 122 016<\/p>\n
ANJALI A RAO Wl._O’~AJl’F s RAo,_ ,
\nR\/0 No.33, AL wmcs-+ _ f A    _
\nNEW Ada:-Fran A’\u00a7iEiV’i–5E,  “O._3i)3-‘
\nPumps: 4,: 41993:;\n<\/p>\n
vmtm TGNSEKER’-..j*\u00ab–._V  _ 3
\nw\/0 –?RM\u00a7.{\\SH TOFSEKEI?<\/p>\n
Vms%p 4,9 vmas  <\/p>\n
 R\/0 E3;.GUL.aAmR, NEW MKRWE <\/p>\n
2.Ml:-‘MBAI -monogo _   ~ .
\nGOHNATH’ Rm aamnun<\/p>\n
SI 0 BAINDURANAND RAO<\/p>\n
” AGED 75 YEARS”\n<\/p>\n
 Rm B-1 1 ‘I\/a,m’1’rAPRAsAn co-opmnmvm
\nHouazno SOCIE’l’Y LTD. 101. 10TH MAIN
\n\u00bb MALLESWARAM, BANGALORE 560 003<\/p>\n
” ‘ASHA ‘i\u00e9nb<\/p>\n
D.,I()-LATE RAMANAND
\ncm:-2:3 51 v-mas<\/p>\n
~ we FLAT 110.412, scans<\/p>\n
“BANGALORE 560 055<\/p>\n
DR R NAGARCENKAR<\/p>\n
AGED 71 YEARS<\/p>\n
s\/0 LATE SADANAND NAGARCENKAR
\n2,10 F1.-AT 1~:o=2ct_z, scans
\nBANGALORE 560 055<\/p>\n
:* b-“”‘<\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
3 SUDHA s RAO w\/0 DR B S SUBBA RAO
\nAGED so YEARS V  ~  ~ .\n<\/p>\n
12\/o No.17, SI-IARADA comm . ‘_  .\u00ab
\n‘rm ‘0’ MAIN, BASAVESWARANAGAR.  —
\nBANGALORE 560 079  <\/p>\n
9 NANDITA MUDBIDRI A
\nW\/O ANIL G MUDBIDRI _ 1
\nAGED 57 YEARS %
\nR\/O “SHANl’I”, N032\/A,”SARA$’.HAT_PUR
\nDHARWAR 580 002  _  A   A <\/p>\n
10     ”\n<\/p>\n
s\/0 LATE JA1’Av.gAN’rHs Y.ER.!3QoR  A
\nAGEDEOYEARS  i  ‘V _
\nR\/o_.m\u00a2r rI1;:>.~;ao5,.’sc\u00ab.’f:14:=.._\u00abA  A
\nBANQALORE 5:59 053 ‘ V —\n<\/p>\n
is\/o MTERAMACHANDRA RAO
\n;A.C-E060   ” _
\nBVVVGPA HOLDER Ci—HARIKRISHNA,
\nAGEQ Aeouw 25 ?_r;.+;aA ago …=ur.-:c:A:.<\/p>\n
. ..LAYOUT_, GKVK mgr, BANGALORE 560 065<\/p>\n
1-:\n<\/p>\n
|_n<\/p>\n
    2  %%%%%  PE’I’l’l’IONERS
\n    ADV.)<\/p>\n
1′ “EDA:   LA ”\n<\/p>\n
  REGISTRAR<\/p>\n
” BEKGALORE URBJKN \ufb01iS’i”RIt’I3″i”
\n No.50\/1. 2ND AND 3RD FLOOR
\n CHURCH ‘S:’i”REE”1″\n<\/p>\n
‘ BANGALORE 560 001
\n 2 CHIEF CONPROLLER OF REVENUE as<\/p>\n
COMWSSEONER OF’ \u00a7”l’\ufb01MT’S iii KAFNATAKA
\n7TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN<\/p>\n
vi)-\n<\/p>\n
l”‘IIll’l_\\(‘If’.I IIIIRI
\nDWDDD nun ,<\/p>\n
BANGALORE560009    _,
\n M T A: 7..\u00a7’eeR%EsPoND[EN.T?1e’&<\/p>\n
(By Sri By. A_c_:HARvA. DvocATs._oE\ufb02ERAL
\n   ‘    <\/p>\n
$1′? i~i.l\\E. Ml7k’l’VlJI.5?1Fu’r1, nu.\u00bb<\/p>\n
THIS WRIT PETFi’.I_ON is F1LE’D._UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF
\nTHE CONfT3’T’i'”\ufb01J”‘i”‘iOi~I’ 0′:-‘” i:=s.’3sa.\u00e9\u00bb ;’.=’aa-‘=fE::G TO: QUASH T!-IE
\nORDERS or R1 MADE AGAl_N\u00a3-3′!’ EAC!jl”G,F. ‘rm: PE’I’l’!’IONERS
\nPRODUCED As~’1..AVNNE:c;H\u00bb.- .BE:*~.R:\u00a7nic: ;r.’Qc.:s*r.=–* 3,”J4=O5 maze
\n187104-05, V1~’JE\u00ab\u00abA_NX. H1 Home 3101-05=’DRl-183\/04~05. ANX.
\nH2 NO.STP’_.3.!04\u00a7-11$ ‘DF\u00e9i–:2′;’\u00a3\u00a7i0_4-\u00a335,’ AER; H3 N0.%’PP 3,r%\u00ab.1-5
\nDR]-199\/O-4-05;-.A\ufb013{..__ H4.i-\\IO;S’_I’P 310$-as DRI 190\/04-05. ANX.
\nH5 NO.SI’P–~..3)’\u00bb04{:05 D121-eiesaejo\u00e9-05;, Atix. H6 ‘\ufb01G.\u20ac-:”i’P 3;+ 5
\nDRI-934104-405, Ar-ax. H7 No.31-*9_a;o4.o5 DR:-224\/04-05, ANX.<\/p>\n
H8 No.31?’ :3io4-cs DR’!-244\/04-O5, mix. H9 Ems-‘1’-I= 3, 4-95 J<\/p>\n
DR!-2’17_I04–05.’\u00a3NK; .H’10_ ‘i<:o'.sTP 3\/04-05 DRI-248\/04-05,-ALL
\n0'1'. 31;a,2no5.'EfI'1'\u00bb;jV'V_   <\/p>\n
V. _ These   an: hav1n' g been" reserved for
\n9-HM'-u  9:; for pronouncement this day, the Court<\/p>\n
;IL:na-.-.u,~<\/p>\n
 V'  .  the <\/p>\n
.f\\I'\u00a7I"\\'Cn'D<\/p>\n
._ _.d._ g…\n<\/p>\n
 common questions of inw and facts at’<\/p>\n
3..\n<\/p>\n
III<\/p>\n
 .. Vtl__1eez1ev~’1′:5etitions, they an: considered and disposed’ of ‘by <\/p>\n
‘  ‘ecihmon older.\n<\/p>\n
BI <\/p>\n
5<\/span>
\nE:\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
2. The petitionem in w.P.Nos.14231\/c\u00bb5;
\nand 16838105 are residents of the-ilumaof  K V’
\noperative Housing Society Ltd.,  <\/p>\n
 me petitioners in  <\/p>\n
33?59,’% 59.-=.97,Io4  1A1f._i’.7:8,,!_(_5E\u00a7_, an  of the<\/p>\n
flats of Dattaprasad   %.c’L-..*.3,’ L-\ufb01n<\/p>\n
Malleswaram,  –      q””%-=–
\nthe order   for Stamps
\nand   an ,,…m..n Mme
\n by  Housing Society in favour of each
\nof the    as a conveyance and has
\n    and penalty in respect of the flats<\/p>\n
 It m Lrtatanpntion of the petitioners. The<\/p>\n
   that %” m :19. .La.h.|e tr.\u00bb nmr  name<\/p>\n
:9 — ..-…___I…’_…- -i-‘In-_ tunnel-nun<\/p>\n
 ae’ such have sought in’ umuuug uni mu\u00bb…<\/p>\n
3. Theeaseputforthbythepe\ufb01tioneraiathatthe<\/p>\n
.;\u00a7Soaietywhiehhaagiventhemthepoaaeaeim1ofthe\ufb02ataiaa<\/p>\n
tenant C-o-pmtnership Society. Insofar as the Chitmpur<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
‘In<\/p>\n
Society, ithaa taken theland on
\nbuilt the \ufb02ats. in the case o\u00a3,nampm’ead”e’
\nSoon’ ty purchased the land in its   to  e gee <\/p>\n
the  The omh~eede  ocsinm  A d<\/p>\n
Ba’u.ta’pi’asad’.  has 55 P…-=-9.-s=.;~.<\/p>\n
If 4  that the<\/p>\n
society and eeeh  the \ufb01at on the
\nbasis of      shock subscribed
\nby     hold the property
\nthrough  t-h_e– case of chihapur Society, it its
\nstated  tho  by the society would revert
\nbdeglt”io the    of the lease period. The said<\/p>\n
  =1: ….._Lr.! to h._m.rc. _.g1Zhf.r_mhd iI_1  and 1970<\/p>\n
 . i’t*-;:’apon”:f;i”v-:;i3r,..d”a.t\ufb01t’:er the i.’l’l”\ufb01’v’iaIL:.u=I u. usu !{e=-.r:-.a*\ufb02-….n..”- f’……n–<\/p>\n
lull guru-u_a-Q<\/p>\n
 Act, 1″”?! {me lib?) isct’ for sho\ufb01i. It is<\/p>\n
 x  that Section 38 of the K08 Act provides\n<\/p>\n
 –..V”e.’:\u00a2:\u00a7Ax’np\ufb01on from compulsory mgiatm\ufb01on of instalments<\/p>\n
stated therein under Section 17(1)(a] and (b) of the Indian<\/p>\n
Registration Act. No doubt, by introduction of a pmviao, the<\/p>\n
$1<\/p>\n
1!<\/p>\n
said cxcmptison in respect of Home Bu1ldin’     _V
\ngm gamma w.n.-\n<\/p>\n
of the petitioners is that in   Tttt.’t <\/p>\n
hanaibr of title and only  to <\/p>\n
iv-nu. –ur~—–nun<\/p>\n
t-…z-.:.a.n.t,l cl.-9.-‘-..’ss end.  ctr.-.13-*lVV:fL’:=r.\u00a5:r;:,t.m-..~n.._lt.r;I”  *5″ ‘”=*””‘
\ncerti\ufb01cate, thccaxuc does’\u00bbnct  and in any
\nevent.   ttltt\u00e9ftllitha  Act pmvsded for
\n  ;   payment of
\natamjg dug}  respect of  prim’ to
\n   have not derived any title and
\nas’ ; inch _   cannot be classi\ufb01ed’ as<\/p>\n
.  .,   stamp duty in tonne of Article 20(2) of<\/p>\n
 -nAn’\ufb011tr-In Thai<\/p>\n
 II In -I’ 3111″.’ lU|nfI- W’ THVWU IIIHCI9<\/p>\n
L -__ .l _.._…-.._….’I…..’I. -….__’l.._..<\/p>\n
A – _. __ j.’I.’.._ __.!.:I _-n___..____.. .__…-I..I ___.;.1.. __ _
\n $3;  SICK! (llllulll\ufb02lll (Klan! [- “U n\ufb02wul\ufb02\ufb02l I-IIIIGI<\/p>\n
 AA  norcoultl  duty and penalty be  under
\n  39 of the Stamp Act. In any event, thctrannactions
\n‘   _  beyond the period as contcmplatcd under Section 46-A of<\/p>\n
the Stamp Act and as such the amount is not recoverable.<\/p>\n
Q.\n<\/p>\n
C?\n<\/p>\n
LK<\/p>\n
Therefore, aceoniing to the petitioners, the    <\/p>\n
in these petitions are not sustainable; \u00ab .<\/p>\n
parhaership Housing  he  the peunonera””\n<\/p>\n
i not     the K08 Act.\n<\/p>\n
When the   no mention of the
\n society at: per their bye
\nlaw.  to-the bye-laws is in vinhtion of
\nRule 5 of    the amendment being opposed
\nto gittthlin  ueeeetmnehae. The discriminatory bye-
\n  \u00a2 …..J:-.g I.-.’\u00a3tl-.d:~.-;-.-.7:-.. The he.-2-.he.ve of he<\/p>\n
-um.–on –ennui…-an an-‘pl Juneau: I-nth<\/p>\n
‘\ufb01uauu cunt \\.n..vu1.In”‘uf.r”i’.: P:<\/p>\n
u_’-._ ‘…._’1..:… __\u00bb .._._………<\/p>\n
  e.”#e’*= G .v E
\ncie\ufb01neqi’  2[‘4’7)(v)(v:|’j of the income Tax Act, 196i<\/p>\n
 _(‘Vthezi*!.’–A:Ac:’t’ in’ short) and Article 20(2) of the Stamp Act –<\/p>\n
 paid the full cost of construction. Some of the _<\/p>\n
  _ fpetitionere have aequized their apamnenta in subsequent re-
\nsale\/tranafer from the \ufb01rst allottee members on paying the .\\<\/p>\n
J:\n<\/p>\n
71<\/span><\/p>\n
agreed consideration amount, but have
\nof stamp duty. The tmnsfers l:Jave~-been:  “am, by
\npossession certi\ufb01cates and   <\/p>\n
oubotitute for deed of   B11.’-” V it<\/p>\n
 the de.t:’-.c;en,..t    ml; 9:’
\nSection 3 of the  E.-f_–“‘f’\u00b0*nuV’i–“..’a’. have aaa.-.=
\nstated with  to  registmtion.\n<\/p>\n
notices    \ufb01led by the
\npeuuonegs   this Oourt to hold
\n 67 and 67-13 of the Stamp
\nAct and    permit impounding. Orisinal
\n  and as such the examination<\/p>\n
  _i…dicnt_1_=d  they were not duly stamped.<\/p>\n
LII’! 1.1….\n<\/p>\n
III! LIE<\/p>\n
exemptionfof   was r\ufb01”””‘-‘la<\/p>\n
 n with c-\ufb02eet from 1.4.2001, the same was with
\n  to only certain documents and not for the instant<\/p>\n
  idocumenta. Since the same was being mieinterpxeted, the<\/p>\n
amendment made is only by way of clari\ufb01cation. Even<\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
3)<\/p>\n
assuming that registration was exempted, the
\nexempt the payment of stamp dl\u00a7?.’y””E!).d  it K V’
\nwas not registered, it does not  <\/p>\n
act nnun I  The    . L’<\/p>\n
*’uai1sfer ‘hi terms of     of
\nFnoperty Act “i”.P. Act’ duty Ls my,-ahle.
\nThe documents :inv__ques\ufb01on   is %*.\u00a3t.’-F-..s
\n2(a) and uyteinetw  and as such
\nthe ot\ufb02er   are justi\ufb01ed and the<\/p>\n
sameldoes nothrslj\u00e9t fiat? <\/p>\n
 5..   ritual contentions, I have heard Sri<\/p>\n
 ..tt.–; :i{.’.;+ ‘is-n1’nI”.*\ufb02 mnnnsel for the petitionels and Sri B.V.<\/p>\n
1JI\\J\u00a2I–J1.n1LIv, aha.’-n-on’.—- .. _._<\/p>\n
 .  Advocate C’.-es-.er.:-.1 .9. th… 1e_pondents and<\/p>\n
6. Though several contentions have been lugeci, the<\/p>\n
 crux of the matter is to determine the following questions:<\/p>\n
What is the scope and ambit of   <\/p>\n
contemplated under  agar  ‘ ‘e M’<\/p>\n
even prior to the    <\/p>\n
Kamataka Act  of 2 <\/p>\n
1.4.2001 end ‘such ~ was<\/p>\n
s.v:i\u00a2h1e    were in the<\/p>\n
it   and circumstances
\n_ 1  conveyance documents so
\n4’ has  duty and require registration
\n‘ steaks: t\u00e9hether the documents in the present<\/p>\n
 ..Acasetv”ireV1e designedly adapted, without a<\/p>\n
 p\ufb01onven\ufb01onm title document so as to avoid<\/p>\n
stamp duty is payahie in terms of  $2} of
\nthe Stamp Act ?\n<\/p>\n
Whether the impugned orders are justified ?<\/p>\n
‘| <\/p>\n
__ I_ .L’I__ ..’I__… …….._l-.3.-mu.-u Md I’ll  K’  2
\n…………. ….-:y_.% giggly <\/p>\n
‘E’h6ugnxnc%qu Lmsaze<\/p>\n
understand the scope of in    * V. <\/p>\n
are not answered independnntly   <\/p>\n
facts invulved and legal aapegts   %<\/p>\n
overlap each other. V’ tizfey  <\/p>\n
‘.7, Tl_1e_:” as\ufb01\u00e9act  to the nature<\/p>\n
Act piior  fr: ..j-”” the _  by was: sf aim.-:.-=3.-r-….–…t
\nwith ef\ufb01act. mm  it is contcnn’ ‘ed ma” t stem’ ‘p<\/p>\n
duty for  isilot payable. It would be useful to<\/p>\n
   Exemption from uomplllory
\n._ ‘;’%.s.i:\u00a7 |ntratton of Instrument.-
\n Nothing in czausea (“hi and (0) of sub-<\/p>\n
f %%\ufb01 17 \ufb02” the
\n!n is:__  Act, 1903<\/p>\n
(Central Act xv: of 1903), shall
\napply to –\n<\/p>\n
\u00abH<\/p>\n
9) any instrument relatin\ufb02 to sham!  ‘t   A<\/p>\n
9<\/span><\/p>\n
 _ V
\nb] any debentures  by
\nsociety antl’~~not
\namalgam’ ‘ 8-   “I1
\n  ‘hvokier to the\n<\/p>\n
 ——–    Iegistored
\n‘ L %i;1:;\u00a2ga;;ne.n-mataemeby the society has
\n‘- -~ or otherwise
\n  whole or part of its<\/p>\n
‘9<\/p>\n
O  I
\nrrnan-I11
\n.-.t.”..*:-1:-.v.’:’.:l.\u00e9’ *- ‘ M’ an}; 1:-………-..,<\/p>\n
‘ I”””k”””” “-7 “”\n<\/p>\n
V  ~ trustees upon trust for
\n bene\ufb01t of the holders of such
\nu  or<\/p>\n
any endorsement upon or transfer of<\/p>\n
.3.\n<\/p>\n
any” other debentum issued by any<\/p>\n
However, noticing the misinterpretation of the said<\/p>\n
exemption to their advantage “by certain Housing _<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
‘Ein View of the order dated 17.11.’<\/p>\n
Go-operative Some’ lies, a pmvmo’ was hse\ufb02edgfbyv   ‘
\n6\/2001 with effect from 1.4.2001V-making  an ”
\nmen:ts_’ ter the instruments which    <\/p>\n
-.:.*’.*’-=.4.’:t !1n_n_a.fer the     V L’<\/p>\n
jraperty a-..c-.:t..-J. by Jar in  ‘at’ Hen;-e.,_t3ttj3ding Go-<\/p>\n
opemtive Societies Whi\u00e9i”n’rr3e’a’is i\u00a7\ufb01’I:.:u:.|i.;vmz>:.l’ <\/p>\n
 Q   A apply to<\/p>\n
 “””   to
\nI _ —  __ effect transfers the
\nA * h inteztst in immovable<\/p>\n
..  by or in favour of<\/p>\n
“–~—:-   Bui’.di’:.g r\u00bb—m–m<\/p>\n
I-PI! ‘fl:-I-7’-In-I.-v <\/p>\n
   under the Act.”\n<\/p>\n
Ag}: compulsory mgiatration with effect from<\/p>\n
 aw as I-L’.-11$ Eui1d.’_.g C43-gpemtive Societies<\/p>\n
V’ V.dci-._s not caii for detailed dis:-:”s-‘u-rs aiim this ‘.9 cc:-.911:-:1.$<\/p>\n
nuns<\/p>\n
“”‘ jiEaaeu'”” in<\/p>\n
W.A.No.3883[2003 (CS) accepting the memo \ufb01led by the<\/p>\n
2.<\/p>\n
35<\/span><\/p>\n
part1es’ and \ufb01n” the transaction aiter the said    ”
\nscope for interpretation of Section:38’c\u00a3’. the  K V’
\nbetween the parties. Therefore.    _<\/p>\n
:9 ex. r–rind uric-r to  consider. y&het1;er;,~ih the-L’<\/p>\n
tn:-‘o–x— l—–u— —<\/p>\n
the KCS Act  of   possession was<\/p>\n
I hansfennd   of P0ssession<\/p>\n
  the portion of the property
\nover   and right was created even
\nthe st:’ecession.._   V”\n<\/p>\n
X ._iVn.it}.i*’s u-re\ufb01t. ‘cefcm analysi:-.g %*’..t.-z-. a… ..<\/p>\n
____’I<\/p>\n
K638 Act, 3a perusai of Section 17 iii’ anu (oi of the<\/p>\n
V n Registzation Act, 1908 is necessary which reads as foiiows:<\/p>\n
“Section 17.\n<\/p>\n
a) yeoccoaooot
\nother 31GP.*’.’..’3\u00b0*9″””‘–“* W<\/p>\n
LI
\n“J<\/p>\n
mstnunents which p _ or<\/p>\n
_\\\\’\u00a7-&–n<\/p>\n
 and sub-section (bi provides that  iss–ea<\/p>\n
operate In create, declare, aaaignjg” V
\nlimit or exfmguiah, whguner veste\u00e9}   <\/p>\n
or contingent, of thel\u00bb ‘<\/p>\n
v_1_:_. -1-. .-._- ,
\nhundred page a..d. 14.’-1.z;1’_’_.<\/p>\n
in immovable <\/p>\n
c) non~tcstgmentn13?:_: ”
\nWi  ‘fir.-7.-“–  er’
\npa_\\,r.rne11.t 91′.   on
\n the
\n  or extinction
\n   or interest;\n<\/p>\n
. iii .   t<\/p>\n
t  ijn vrew” eftvtiietvcompulaory nature of rests’ nation as<\/p>\n
t   exemption as contained in Section 38 of<\/p>\n
  is provided. Sub-Section (:1) provides that<\/p>\n
V’ ,notwithstanding’ that the assets 4 u: w..-….., .=. ……………h;-.,<\/p>\n
among other things not creating title or interest to an<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\nJ2<\/p>\n
.\n<\/p>\n
‘E<\/p>\n
H.)
\n‘–l<\/p>\n
iinmovabie property ate exempt from  ‘   _<\/p>\n
instant cases. the share oerti\ufb01oatee >ieuexi”‘i\u00e9.:]’a:  2 <\/p>\n
which would no doubt fall under stain-s;\u00b0.ctiiJIi <\/p>\n
stock certi\ufb01cate which is in=thex”ofV   ,<\/p>\n
\ufb02ail under sutrsection (ti).   be in
\nView of the  “issued aha physical<\/p>\n
pea:-_u.-..,,L_1_1 J’ a flat    belonging to<\/p>\n
$6 …\u00abr-‘~,..1…ty  ‘V-.’.eli;r\u00a2.!;:_;i”\u00e9 tti  ” whether the<\/p>\n
immovahie    the asset of the <\/p>\n
woulizi     asset of the soar.-‘ietry or
\nwhether’   a men: interest for a<\/p>\n
  on the member so as to be,<\/p>\n
   ‘3:-A . to bc  t as in the natme contemplated in
\nt  KCS Act. Though it is contended on behalf<\/p>\n
 that the Co-operative society is a body<\/p>\n
 ill. term Qf Section 9 of the K03 Act and it would<\/p>\n
”  the pom-r to heh’. p:’epert_-,’ 9.:-.d mt-..-2′ i!!!’.l…’| eohhaete etc<\/p>\n
  in case of Joint stock oorn\ufb01y and the 3113:.”-………–H-\ufb01t<\/p>\n
relating to shares shouid he  as exempted ii\ufb01l’-it”:i”<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\n1.3\u00bb<\/p>\n
Section 17(2) of the Registration Act, even
\nwhat is to he noticed is the  .~..nh.~,
\nthe manner of right or interest   <\/p>\n
zI.1.-\u00abml.-e_r= For this purpose,    to” V it<\/p>\n
he “”u-st} m \ufb01xed cut. ‘.-.*..;et..er t.4.–.– d;.._.-.i.m..–n._  of<\/p>\n
exempted category is   as a “–‘-can…-“‘-=-w<\/p>\n
though the tran her in fact  creating title or<\/p>\n
interest.\n<\/p>\n
 .In the scope of exam. ption, I
\nwould    consider illustrative instances
\ni,e..gA’\ufb01or.   at co-operative society was formed with<\/p>\n
gm.—–… . … __<\/p>\n
the  of e*..=;-.:”1..’.t-.g a  thactnry  if the<\/p>\n
L…\n<\/p>\n
 .  the e and % mt.-‘ibn.1….s 9….-<\/p>\n
niade   stock of the society by way of ant’: by siieh<\/p>\n
 .A  and other \ufb01nance, ‘ if immovable assets are
\n  by the society and tsowaitls the shaves subscribed
\ngiand loan advanced, if the shale certi\ufb01cate and loans stock<\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cate in the nature of debentures are issued, such<\/p>\n
‘F
\n3’ gb-A…-\n<\/p>\n
documents would not require  ‘V   <\/p>\n
instrument is exempted under   Ash 2<\/p>\n
though relating to the immovable ssssssfg<\/p>\n
society since the societyiivitjitaid sssehupseousshpehsmt the-it<\/p>\n
 Pmrna-1’hr an -iI_’_s__;  Rh? on} with the<\/p>\n
-:3-ma…’ .9… – 1, –~-.——-J.._A—–Vg ——— ~——-<\/p>\n
‘i”aiE.ti”;:_’:  and ‘un::”’ i’igu””t ‘f<\/p>\n
 for the ‘oerne\ufb01t the
\nmember     and ioan
\nstock with-ssh  of a portion of the
\n   the other hand, if the
\n  pmperty in a similar fashion
\nand sssssssg  and if each unit is put<\/p>\n
a of a iinnemher, though without a deed of<\/p>\n
 ”  _nly with 1.2; possesion  coupled<\/p>\n
“” in<\/p>\n
‘5″: ”  >’  ‘ _a o u | . n u
\n. th  SW35″ es.”-=*’*'””‘-s mu-who r.*.t’.’.c.’==.’.1ag a de\ufb01nite and :’.–*”–‘-t<\/p>\n
  iiinnovabie property’, tiie i’u1st’.rum””ents put<\/p>\n
 pp  cannot be treated on par with the documents as in.<\/p>\n
  of the \ufb01rst illuttation to get the exemption as<\/p>\n
it foontemplated under Section 38 of the [(08 Act even prior to<\/p>\n
insertion of the proviso. The pmviso introduced only clari\ufb01es<\/p>\n
I<\/p>\n
J!<\/p>\n
7′:\n<\/p>\n
the position since the section as it existed
\ninterpretation and even the Houatng (‘Q-operap’  Ejli\ufb01a nu<\/p>\n
were also tak:|n’ g advantage of  <\/p>\n
2-.rmbe1.n.gden__I .. ..<\/p>\n
_,-\n<\/p>\n
11. Having  dd<\/p>\n
 the
\ncase on hand  since it is the
\ncontention   petitioners that the
\n   tenant oo-partnership
\n and  is oniy a tenant member and that
\nthe metnberdoee   over the flat and therefore, it is<\/p>\n
diggiigicta \ufb01on1″‘mf_vfnemhip.\ufb01ats and when no right and title is<\/p>\n
   question of pa-‘ment of stamp duty not
\n   _ ‘* also cxmmtuend-ed that in the m….- -1′ _
\nchiuapurd   the society itee}f’s a “1-Li\ufb01 of t
\n .A the  and the building is constructed by the loan stock
\n the loans advanced by HUDC-O and alter the lease<\/p>\n
 period, the property would revert. The learned Advocate<\/p>\n
General would however Iefer to the original bye-laws of the<\/p>\n
i<\/p>\n
f’.\n<\/p>\n
society to contend that it is not registered <\/p>\n
partnership and in any event, therecia. no  of it ”<\/p>\n
society pmv1d’ ed under the Act.  er,  <\/p>\n
would indicate that a   <\/p>\n
%-“1.-.%t. of the \u00a319.. and tl_1ie_:  the that
\nthat the ii:e:Ti’ouTa  d%e am’. the
\nappreciated  of     of east’:
\noccupant   is charged’ ‘ by the
\nsociety,  are in the nature of<\/p>\n
 ” 1.2.  itie noticed that the societies in<\/p>\n
   petition: are registered as Co-operative<\/p>\n
,  I  I1-A nun-n I-hgnah In if!!! . t  ia<\/p>\n
Is \u00bb .\n<\/p>\n
 I45!-I’ I-iv’!-Inns I-In Iiifri -v!uu———_l——–<\/p>\n
  aczrrie woiitd rrt us relevaat. ….. .w-19.’.-:1″.<\/p>\n
 AA  the objects and also a tenant member is de\ufb01ned. it
\n “ie  those terms, the members have paid the shame capitai<\/p>\n
it  certi\ufb01cates are issued and loan stock certi\ufb01cate ia<\/p>\n
iasuedtowmdstheloanstaockamount. thatineffcctiathe<\/p>\n
iz<\/p>\n
value of the flat. In the instance of   <\/p>\n
K.Kound1n’ ya, i.e.. the documente;an.I14eJneei\u00a2  M  uh’<\/p>\n
which was taken as the lead case. “hm;   <\/p>\n
dated 17.12.1930, while thelenn  matte\u00bb<\/p>\n
1.”.’.193’2′. On t..-  day, eanczesegzsion  is also<\/p>\n
drawn and eiierrted  mferiel to  xeI.l.#_-….. an- loan nine<\/p>\n
K’<\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cates and  fact  and it states<\/p>\n
allotnientl’ ii”    ‘though the possession
\n  dated 1.7.1937, a ple
\nof the   by the petitioners would
\nnot     relationship of tenant and landlord<\/p>\n
it ‘A \u00ab   and the society, except that tenning it as<\/p>\n
 . ._\u00e9’-gte\u00e9ment. The \u00ab.21.:-1*.n.1n..n.t.s_a_1’ie_:_s: referred to by the<\/p>\n
  for the -peti_tioner reg;-.rdi.’1g t..–1.r-.t.a.nt Go-<\/p>\n
 _ paximi-amp Housing Societies wouki indicate that th’ s…..-\u00ab-
\n  ”  to n de\ufb01nite pattern of payment of rent etc which is<\/p>\n
 not found in the present case. The learned counsel for the<\/p>\n
petitioners has also relied on the decision of the Full Bench<\/p>\n
3.\u00bb.\n<\/p>\n
Iii<\/p>\n
 AA mquinzinent of  _an  award and *'” am.<\/p>\n
of Gujarat High Court in the case of  <\/p>\n
KUNVERJI GOR vs JUVANSINHJI.smvomimVJ\u00e9;.o\ufb01JA%e’_(A1:\u00a7% ” ” A<\/p>\n
1930 Gujarat 62 (man and of the <\/p>\n
case of usrm ARVIND DON(}l\u00a7E~.}I’S.” suks:suee R;aoHuHA’rHe[e u<\/p>\n
.r{m’1.n.r.A.1e (1991 oe-e,e.o.549;\u00a2ue’Aojeenuee;;a  tn the
\nconcept -‘f ‘u-:–:-aant    In L_- _o,__: of
\nthe above cases,.’– the   Ce-:3… 33….
\nnoticed     1iil’iii’:}_’y’
\n Tenant Ownership
\nSoci\u00e9ty’ tho learned District Judge. on
\nfacts,   in question to be a tenant co-<\/p>\n
   in its conclusion, but then: is<\/p>\n
– . _……__ .I……’l.3..— –undo’
\n_  “U UTPIIIIIIE VIII}: 8 uuwuauuuuna<\/p>\n
  while noticing the nature of right that the deceased<\/p>\n
__\u00a7pcmonhadinthc\ufb02at,tl1c(1ourthacloonaidered Rule loot’<\/p>\n
the Maharashtra Co-ope-mtive Suotrictiea Rules, 1961 which<\/p>\n
I
\n12<\/span><\/p>\n
‘.\n<\/p>\n
-u<\/p>\n
it<\/p>\n
described vane’ us types of co-operative some”  ‘
\ncontext, the categorie were 2  it<\/p>\n
-..eci-..t.i-..ss an- Le s eh    <\/p>\n
instant case. the i{ar\ufb01:i*”‘f” i’-3.-i-st?-6-i-i” :’.% act ,.n:!.~’.’i-‘1..e<\/p>\n
for or 1ecognise_:’su__ch    as see}: the
\nsocieties   wouiti have to
\nbe   seeiety and as such the
\nsaid __ of assistance to accept the
\n   of which petitioners are<\/p>\n
  society. even if they<\/p>\n
,’   m.,_c.’~.e cff_h…Lr  is similar since the law<\/p>\n
 .  th’-“ght it \ufb01t. ta  the same <\/p>\n
 bene\ufb01ts in such of these sccieties even “‘ it-…-y<\/p>\n
 .. irherefoxe, the societies calling themselves as
\nii  society of the members calling themselves as<\/p>\n
 tenant member cannot change the complexion until the law<\/p>\n
recognises the same by way of statutory provisions or Rules.<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\nE?\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
13. Hence, in this context. the mm” ,,.,- ,9  *
\nas a Housing O0-operative  in nu
\nwinch’ the transactions have      <\/p>\n
cumming. As ahead? n\u00a2ti\u00a2\u00e9e1.%  <\/p>\n
%m-6.’.-.t, it is ‘..”l’.”‘..d\u00a2_. fc  hy he  stock
\npossession.  and as to
\nwhether   duty, the relevant
\n of Act is to be noticed.\n<\/p>\n
   and it includes every<\/p>\n
“nlstrumld onto’ hy—  whether movable or v<\/p>\n
ixnniovahle  eslnte is transferred to, or vested in, any<\/p>\n
‘A   -A-‘~’_’?-“my-, and t.I.rl1._1’r_=l1. is not otherwise speci\ufb01cally<\/p>\n
i’ .;Q..- the sch\ufb01uk. $1..-…-11. ‘izI…… .I___.n=t’ included in<\/p>\n
the de\ufb01nition ‘ccmveyance’ is de\ufb01ned in 3.-:c**..c.r. 25} ac<\/p>\n
 AA  every document (and record created or mam’ mined
\n   by an electronic storage and retrieval device or media)<\/p>\n
by which any right or liability is, or purports to be created,<\/p>\n
transfened, limited, extended, extinguished or recorded.
\nI<\/p>\n
9:\n<\/p>\n
Further Section 2(47)tvt) of Income Tax
\ntransaction whether by    K ‘V
\nshares in a co-operative society.  <\/p>\n
any arrangement or in any    \u00abwe\ufb02cct of V . L’<\/p>\n
….n-..ferri.ng -1′ en;-_l_>;ing  VV:A’enjc_s;;nent”‘ of jinmcvable<\/p>\n
14. _   provisions, if the
\nttocuatta the tact that then: is a
\n atx cannot be in doubt, since
\napart  bang the \ufb02at is put ‘at possession<\/p>\n
of     of possession certi\ufb01cate and the<\/p>\n
. s A holding and enjoying the property is<\/p>\n
_..____.___.. .. J<\/p>\n
K  T’  the bye–.l9.1I.1e and the an c.u.I;Let_l tcnancv<\/p>\n
agt__een_’te*nt.jl=  far the saint’; ticct.i1″uen’ts ac ecna…..:te<\/p>\n
  ‘i”m,_.tI11mA em’ as de\ufb01ned in Section  of the Stamp Act,
\n  right or liability created or purported to be cmatcd by
\n.   fsuch docnment is to be further examined. The loan stock<\/p>\n
certi\ufb01cate indicates the value of such property to which the<\/p>\n
1<\/span>
\n12<\/span><\/p>\n
4’7<\/p>\n
member is titled and oommensumte to the
\nis put in possession. The possession  it it
\nentitlement of the member, successors: V  ”   it i.<\/p>\n
and hem_h_1eee. Though the  counsel  I h<\/p>\n
ea-inarede the-..t .._}r the  d….V;tI.I..,iV.:’_-1I._t_’-*_*’–,–~..t1lt.l.n:-..   by
\nthe member and    .\u00a7.”‘-.’ci-ety, %
\nland is a   hat the
\nmember    be entitled to
\n member, who would
\nin pay  market value of the flat as on the
\ndate or  said appreciated market value<\/p>\n
does “not    corpus or become the pro\ufb01t of the<\/p>\n
 ,_tl=..e …..,.L..1.3,r only charges a fee for permitting the<\/p>\n
…\u00a3l.’_.nd-5<\/p>\n
 .  Ezra’; leuung the ‘.13-..e.*’:-.r of slime and the<\/p>\n
 market value is the eo’:isi’ierz’i’rior.  by<\/p>\n
 _  ioutgomt’ ‘ g member’, which indicates that the member is
\n   in possession merely as a tenant member but had a<\/p>\n
 greater interest in the property including the right of<\/p>\n
disposition. Though as per the bye-laws, the society had the
\nI<\/p>\n
L<\/p>\n
“c<\/p>\n
right to accept or not, the incoming memhcr,~:fthe
\nregarding the sale, transfer and  in   it it
\nsuch transfer was with the in.<\/p>\n
nothing s_:_l1o1’t of     the . 0′<\/p>\n
Chitrapnr neg,’ is 9.. k% of .CJ:;in13}1gui’  egiemsal of<\/p>\n
the indentum of lease   1:\u00e9ao..n”uao”u”st .he’.”..e..e…….
\nitselfwould indicate that  had
\nthe aiumegmeaum sell the \ufb02at and
\nin auch_eve’ut;:’ the right for a portion
\nof  fee  by the society-lessee in
\nrespectof doubt, prior to the insertion’ ‘ of<\/p>\n
 to   oi’ KC-S Act, no document was being<\/p>\n
A  _…\u00a7.:…_t..e ..-..QoL..g _em..he1′ to the incoming member<\/p>\n
 .  fi’o;*-  of p.’:yei.cal p-‘..-..-.eeeeit..~n and. \u00a2.i.c;-cInn__t<\/p>\n
E?\n<\/p>\n
  in respect of hnnsact-ions ache.-.1-……–ht<\/p>\n
 _ 0′ t dated 1.4.2001, the transfer deeds have been
\n  and registered, one such deed being dated
\n 10.06.2004 between Smt. Anuradha Gokarn and Sri Vinny<\/p>\n
P. Nadkarni and the aaine indicates that the transfer of<\/p>\n
J:\n<\/p>\n
‘3<\/p>\n
shares is made for a consideration. The
\nthe petitisonels, no doubt, contends    K x
\ntmnsactzb ns of subsequent    <\/p>\n
‘.-.*…-2.. is not to he seenVis_Vp4’th_e   <\/p>\n
though some originai   and
\nthough it is  to the property
\nunder the\u00a7.so\u00a7’1d   transfers made by
\nsome       transactions have
\n it is dealt with by the society
\nas nodced:   be a pointer to determine the<\/p>\n
:I.,t’_;A1i_i\ufb01eaaof  by the documents executed by the<\/p>\n
uni-. u-Inlaf<\/p>\n
 . have  or exercised Sun.-u us… t..’.:s ….*.’ r.:a..:=…t<\/p>\n
E’<\/p>\n
dctenui\ufb02ethe nature of the document Since the loan s”‘ux:-n.<\/p>\n
 ..  coupled with possession certi\ufb01cate created the
\ndb  of disposition for consideration namely the market
\n value of the property, they are documents which purport to<\/p>\n
czeate right and as such is an ‘intrument’ as de\ufb01ned, _-<\/p>\n
I
\n1%<\/p>\n
consequently it is to be treated as conveyance\u00bb?
\nthis v1ew’ , the decis1o11′ of the Hon-“ble*–Supr’7e1nei
\non by the learned Advocate Generaiin +neocae <\/p>\n
VITAMIN FOODS PVT. LTD.;@N.p 0THERSVf-%{e;’:..STATi\u00a7} onto<\/p>\n
Tl!.E\u00a7v. (2000  2554}<\/p>\n
wouid he afaposite. The   in a”‘l.i3’v’v’c’:i’ to
\nthe question   a co~opeIative
\nsociety is    of the View that
\n in fact ‘conveyance’.\n<\/p>\n
The   petitioner however eontends that
\nthe    apply since the same was
\n    the earlier judgment of the I-ion’ble
\ni     case of VEENA HASMUKH JAIN 85<\/p>\n
 ‘.%Nn”\ufb01Ev’ V-‘ire mm E op’ .n.\u00bbs.A.I~M.PA-4″‘ . e ems-as {Am<\/p>\n
1999  567) wherein the said question   in the<\/p>\n
 AA context to!’ considering an agreement executed in terms of
\n ‘Meiimaaha Ownership Flats (Regulation of the Promotion,<\/p>\n
   \ufb01conauuction, Sale, Management and Transfer) Act 1963.<\/p>\n
But the facts in HANUMAN VITAMIN FOOD’e case does not<\/p>\n
J\n<\/p>\n
-\u00e9<\/p>\n
indicate under which of the Acts, the Hon’ble
\nwas considering, but the decision  5 V’.V’VE&;N-A V ”
\nHASMUKH’s case is noticed and hits  <\/p>\n
transfer of shares would  ~  aaei<\/p>\n
ahemy notic-ad, oin_oe t_1=n_Mt   is
\n………-.a….i $.. :. +1.4. 3;”n-‘Ir-ruacanl-1?”,’\\>’|I:-:’ ‘AV.-7’-V.’A haaggbr in the<\/p>\n
instant case is  _”‘\u00e9 of ‘”mc”\u00b0 “‘-..u–‘*<\/p>\n
opemtive       a Housing
\nCo-opeintive,  being in the nature of
\n __ above and being a transfer of
\nshale of Society along with the right<\/p>\n
to gieeupy    a housing unit. and as such it<\/p>\n
  theweiimacter of a conveyance and to that<\/p>\n
1    laid down would apply.\n<\/p>\n
A T x  The next oonteniion of the ieameti oounaei for the ‘
\n  is that when no ugh’ t was clanned’ under the said’ ‘<\/p>\n
 ‘\ufb01documentn and when it was not ielied on before any<\/p>\n
authority, the same could not have been impounded under<\/p>\n
Section 33 of the Stamp Act and could not
\nunder Section 39 of the Act and    K V’
\npassed by tlis Court in WP
\ncontended that in any _phetmenpy_\n<\/p>\n
1.:-.u.-.n_ Lupgmgg.    however<\/p>\n
Ca’1i’:”If:i’ii’m”‘\ufb01 that pa”-veer \ufb01x?\u00bb   S.-Jews 33 9!’ *…..h-T<\/p>\n
Stamp Act i aysiishie  h5?Vsh\ufb01”f>7-B ef the sairi
\nAct.   of the Stamp Act
\n on the copy. in this
\n  thenotice was issued
\nby the\ufb02hief  Authority and the same
\n‘ were ‘questieneVc,1V_V’ WP.flh.3992l]O1 which was disposed of
\nh  A    treated as notice and to furnish all<\/p>\n
,  WI’ 1- an nnrvunndinan has harm   1.11.3.3<\/p>\n
IJ_nII.r 1-I’-II-r1a’I.n.rI-J-in-mun-or an-nu-r navwn-awn<\/p>\n
  \u00abif Stamps and \ufb02iah\ufb01t R~”ul;.a-war’
\n AA Sections 67 and 6’7-IT! of the Slam” 1) Act also’ in view’ of
\n  ‘the:-cons\ufb01tu\ufb01on of special squads. The decision relied on by<\/p>\n
h   ___5the learned counsel for the petitioner in the ease of DR.<\/p>\n
USHA MOI-IAN DAS -vs- THE DWISIONAL COMMISSIONER.<\/p>\n
is<\/p>\n
53<\/span><\/p>\n
BANGALORE DIVISION, BANGALORE AND  ~
\n(3) Kb! 463) would also be of no ae5’mt_auce.’_”amoeh’H   7 vitae  ‘ ‘
\ncase where the Sub-Registrar, <\/p>\n
even before mgistra\ufb01on,  it” a_raa     <\/p>\n
:eg,.1’…*..ra.L..zI. a_d the  VA  Deputy<\/p>\n
war-v .._.V-y<\/p>\n
Cnm\ufb01issioner am} it:  C-9a.rt f k th_ view
\nthat a document eariaotf  “nukes it is<\/p>\n
regiate:ed.__s;r,.  the  , as nouoeu” ‘, the<\/p>\n
‘V:i\u00a7_   67-13 of the Stamp<\/p>\n
Act j Commissioner is empowered
\nunder the  u1en-tioned therein to impound<\/p>\n
 _Sectxion    stamp duty. For the same<\/p>\n
% ‘  the case of GOVERNMENT or UTTAR<\/p>\n
‘   i.!;:3\u00a7.\u00a7?!\\.-JA 1|.-!…H.A…-.M_A..I) AMER. AHMAD KHAN (AIR<\/p>\n
1961 Love?) reiied on by the karnw re-angel as me<\/p>\n
 _ petitioruers also cannot be of any assistau . Further. eveu I
\n  the order impugned refers to the earlier writ petition,<\/p>\n
 since the authority ha exercised power available under the<\/p>\n
Act, the same cannot be faulted. That apart, one other<\/p>\n
I}<\/p>\n
1|<\/p>\n
decision cited by the learned counse1’for the   K
\nthe case of JUPUDI KESAVA l?A0′–\u00bb ‘ ht
\nVENKATA SUBBA RAD 85 QTHElt3f et(AIi\u00a7 i9’?1~itcsc
\n_.it_h._.r to ___n_tI_-.nr_l mt an   of ” V<\/p>\n
the dmament cr that  -=-put.–‘~—=f-=r=r’-t.. ‘min-’ems -rm -1<\/p>\n
also not be of  where the
\nHon’ble   copy was
\nas a docuznent   2  instant case, the
\nauthoti\ufb01eeihatie  copies in determine
\nthe ngtuzex  and collect the duty while
\nexemisiiag Section 67 and 67-3 of the
\nStnanp Act. ‘V in  xegetd, explanation to Section 3 would<\/p>\n
\u00ab’I’\\’I’H’| ‘
\nIfl I-I’ \ufb02v\\u’\\t<\/p>\n
 the order to the extent of the Beputy
\n ..Ccmtn\ufb01tlsioner coming to the conclusion to impound the
\n is sustainable. However, the further proceeding
\nU  contemplated under Section 39(l)(b) in so far as requiring<\/p>\n
payment of proper duty and penalty, the order impugned<\/p>\n
g
\n‘u<\/p>\n
K<\/p>\n
V’ .CtJi:tui.nI:I’i iii r.1uuu1.r ; -ru-<\/p>\n
55<\/span><\/p>\n
does not  application of  There <\/p>\n
to the period of transaction, the  value’    <\/p>\n
the manner in which it is coznputexli \u00abthe-.  of<\/p>\n
discretion with regard to  etc}    ><\/p>\n
instead disclose just a   ‘ tnatflgcet value
\nwithout any reference    the case may be of
\nthe sum- _ ,;,g   similar amount<\/p>\n
as p..-Pelt.-,*.   ” onl_,v m’hit_ts_r_\\,r but<\/p>\n
without   of the order there\ufb01m
\ncsnnothe   is liable to ‘be quashed so
\nas to   concerned to redo the same in
\nacoezti\ufb01llo\u00e9witia ‘ <\/p>\n
  s.  ;4(h:1:e’_:pther contention which requires to be noticed<\/p>\n
 counsel for the petitioner contends that<\/p>\n
the :~=:-t..:c:*.’e.v}r uould he b-__rn.-1.1 __I,r i_i__ in  of the provision<\/p>\n
_”_.\u00a2_.-_.._ – n….;.:….. A\u00a3_A
\nTI<\/p>\n
{Advocate General would dispute the sour and “‘i’unuu mm.<\/p>\n
the some would arise only when the recovery is resorted to in<\/p>\n
I
\n*3<\/p>\n
up _<\/p>\n
1L<\/p>\n
‘ 1%): this ‘IV_g\ufb02.$’.J’L’ .-<\/p>\n
the manner provided under the said
\notherwise. As rightly contcndcdV.by..me .1.’ ‘  0′<\/p>\n
General, in the instant case, the  A’  ..AA’3’V*%Ei  ‘ 0′<\/p>\n
I.I_n__
\ntherem the i.’nwu:’.dli\u00a3’.g  ‘:!_L1A1.r_lt_-.1? ” 33 and
\ncieierminaiion and   u ……. WA.
\namount is notpaid,  ‘under Sieciion 46
\nand. as su.c1i..     into operation,
\n __i_a_   and the question of
\nlimit\u00e9atioli be cc’:-nsideied only if the power is<\/p>\n
……………. …..:……..,……;……..<\/p>\n
.9. \u00abI- ha! Ire l- as _nnn\ufb02n- t<\/p>\n
 Plllllv ‘ IJ-II-I J-uh-run:-any-4. ——– }’–…—.-.–.._– –_<\/p>\n
iicatiisg’ the instruments i1″1voi”ed -in the pie\ufb01t ‘–as as<\/p>\n
 AA eonireyiince and impounding the same under Section 33 of
\n   Act for the purpose of recovering the stamp duty vide
\n the cams dated 17.4.2004, 22.7.2004, 20.9.2004,<\/p>\n
24.9.2004. 16.10.2004 24.1.2005. 27.1.2005 and 31.3.2005<\/p>\n
I
\nJag<\/p>\n
..r Seetionas 67 and <\/p>\n
‘K<\/p>\n
respectively but the method of determination  the
\nvalue, stamp duty and the penaltyfurt\ufb01 not   $9 <\/p>\n
that extmlf. the same wilutine   , IV    ‘<\/p>\n
V  niantabsa
\nii The mapei3’t_ive i:npug1’1ed..’\u00a7JI:ie Is   in
\nH46  exlnea-A to A7 in<\/p>\n
Wf_P;Hq.’::1~i’f;?8V)ib3.D{V):Sx{ ~  tn D13<\/p>\n
5′ 5′<\/p>\n
__ Annexures-Al to A8
\nw.P{No.  Annexurea-Al 65 A2<\/p>\n
 Annexure-D1 to D15<\/p>\n
5′ E’ 5′<\/p>\n
 ii(.P\u00a7”Hg.337S\u00e9jQoo4, Annexums-H to H6<\/p>\n
 i1I:;P;.rs;i\u00ab;~;.1%se=.:z2.~.’2.ss,Iorrns= n Anne. – e- :9 mo<\/p>\n
\ufb02uifdi-I<\/p>\n
E
\ni
\n2<\/span>
\nI5′<\/p>\n
 ‘Iii u.I uiut 1 u nu. \ufb02 I-ll
\nZ siecumenta in question as conveyance and. ‘ impounding
\n the same under Section 33 of the Karnataka Stamp<\/p>\n
Act are a\ufb02irmed.\n<\/p>\n
J4<\/p>\n
iv)<\/p>\n
The ncspcctive impugned orders to    A
\ndetermining the market valur:,”‘siamp    x
\nunder Section 39 (1) (b)   ‘\ufb01njy <\/p>\n
-I——..___-.\n<\/p>\n
extant 39.6. f – matt:2r_VL:”‘ig <\/p>\n
reap-andent m   Eh!  .-.=…r_l
\nm-\ufb02ctemine the”    _]Tn’:\ufb01a1’\u00a7r, if ‘-‘”‘
\npayable.  _ H V .\n<\/p>\n
 th\u00e9.-_: g_1lmyvc–._<w'\u00a7fit pge\ufb01\ufb02ons are allowed in<\/p>\n
 %   that extent.\n<\/p>\n
    5 costs.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Residents Of Shri Chitrapur … vs District Registrar Bangalore … on 11 April, 2008 Author: A.S.Bopanna IN THE HIGH coum’ ow KARNATAKA AT A DATED THIS THE ;11’rH owe? K BEFORE”- _ X A’ %_ THE Homam MR. \u00a7F!.J: “S’!\u00a7lCEA-A- \\.l!=_P=!\\!e= 142.:.+1,I.a.<.1r.15&~_e,I-.-.r \u00e9;Liri\u00ab,;=se*;$9?;o4, 19385\/04, 23474\/o4,'a3759'\/04;mass\/05 85214464\/O5 "(Gr-.as-aware) j % 3 3 U […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58008","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nResidents Of Shri Chitrapur ... vs District Registrar Bangalore ... on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur ... vs District Registrar Bangalore ... on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-05-04T21:02:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"44 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur … vs District Registrar Bangalore … on 11 April, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-04T21:02:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008\"},\"wordCount\":8419,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008\",\"name\":\"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur ... vs District Registrar Bangalore ... on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-05-04T21:02:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur … vs District Registrar Bangalore … on 11 April, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur ... vs District Registrar Bangalore ... on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur ... vs District Registrar Bangalore ... on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-05-04T21:02:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"44 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur … vs District Registrar Bangalore … on 11 April, 2008","datePublished":"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-04T21:02:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008"},"wordCount":8419,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008","name":"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur ... vs District Registrar Bangalore ... on 11 April, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-04-10T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-05-04T21:02:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/residents-of-shri-chitrapur-vs-district-registrar-bangalore-on-11-april-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Residents Of Shri Chitrapur … vs District Registrar Bangalore … on 11 April, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58008","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58008"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58008\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58008"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58008"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58008"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}