{"id":58100,"date":"2009-01-13T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2009-01-12T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009"},"modified":"2015-08-09T21:16:47","modified_gmt":"2015-08-09T15:46:47","slug":"ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009","title":{"rendered":"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"docsource_main\">Punjab-Haryana High Court<\/div>\n<div class=\"doc_title\">Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009<\/div>\n<pre>Civil Revision No.56 of 2009 (O&amp;M)                                     -1-\n\n           IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT\n                          CHANDIGARH\n\n                                  Civil Revision No.56 of 2009 (O&amp;M)\n                                  Date of decision: 13.01.2009\n\nRamesh Chand                                             .............. Petitioner\n\n                                      Vs.\n\nJanta Pustkalya                                          .............Respondent<\/pre>\n<p>Present:   Mr.Adarsh Jain, Advocate<br \/>\n           for the petitioner.\n<\/p>\n<p>CORAM: HON&#8217;BLE MR. JUSTICE K. KANNAN<\/p>\n<p>1.         Whether Reporters of local papers may be allowed to see the<br \/>\n           judgment ? Yes\n<\/p>\n<p>2.         To be referred to the Reporters or not ? Yes\n<\/p>\n<p>3.         Whether the judgment should be reported in the Digest ? Yes\n<\/p>\n<p>                                 -.-\n<\/p>\n<p>K.KANNAN, J<\/p>\n<p>1.         The landlord which was a society applied for eviction of the<\/p>\n<p>premises on the ground of requirement of the tenanted property for further<\/p>\n<p>accommodation of the library needs. The Rent Controller and the Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority upheld the claim of the landlord and the tenant is in revision<\/p>\n<p>petition before this Court.\n<\/p>\n<p>2.          The first contention of the tenant was that the resolution that<\/p>\n<p>authorized the filing of the petition was only to file a petition for ejectment<\/p>\n<p>on the ground of recovery of rent and the need spelt out in the petition was<\/p>\n<p>not brought out in the resolution. This objection, in my view, cannot be<\/p>\n<p>sustained. It is wholly an internal matter on how the trustees viewed the<\/p>\n<p>issue for authorising a particular person to represent the Trust. So long as<\/p>\n<p>there was a valid resolution empowering one of the members in the Trust to<\/p>\n<p>institute an action for eviction, it is wholly necessary that the resolution must<\/p>\n<p>also spell out the grounds of eviction correctly.<\/p>\n<p>3.         The other contention of the tenant is that the landlord had not<\/p>\n<p>brought out clearly that he had other portions of the property available and<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Revision No.56 of 2009 (O&amp;M)                                 -2-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>that such other portions were not sufficient for the requirement. In the<\/p>\n<p>absence of pleadings, the landlord was not entitled to lead evidence in that<\/p>\n<p>regard and the consideration of the same by Rent Controller and the<\/p>\n<p>Appellate Authority permitting the landlord to give evidence was vitiated.<\/p>\n<p>He relies on the decision of this Court in Joginder Singh Sawhney Vs.<\/p>\n<p>Harbans Lal 2003 (2) PLR 242 that the landlord if he failed to plead the<\/p>\n<p>basic ingredients of Section 13(3)(a)(i) of the Act making averments in the<\/p>\n<p>application that he was not occupying another residential building in the<\/p>\n<p>concerned urban area and has not vacated such residential building, the<\/p>\n<p>petition deserved dismissal.      The requirement of pleading must be<\/p>\n<p>understood in the context of what the statute spells out. The statute requires<\/p>\n<p>that the landlord cannot obtain eviction for his own requirement, if he had<\/p>\n<p>any other property available. So long as there is evidence and there is<\/p>\n<p>pleading of one or the other parties in that regard and parties had joined<\/p>\n<p>issues on that aspect, in my view, a petition cannot fail by the only fact that<\/p>\n<p>the landlord had not spelt out in his petition that there were other properties<\/p>\n<p>available. In this case, there is no definite evidence that the other portions<\/p>\n<p>of building which the landlord had in his occupation was sufficient. The<\/p>\n<p>Appellate Authority has particularly referred to the evidence of AW-2<\/p>\n<p>Mahabir Parsad and AW1 Hardawari Lal to say that the existing building<\/p>\n<p>was not sufficient to accommodate the readers visiting the library and they<\/p>\n<p>required the premises for expanding the reading room.          The Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority has also adopted a reasoning consistent with law that the tenant<\/p>\n<p>himself was pleading that there was a scope for expansion of the space for<\/p>\n<p>the reading room in some other fashion than expanding it by increasing the<\/p>\n<p>property that had been demised in favour of the tenant.        The Appellate<\/p>\n<p>Authority had referred to a decision in M\/s British Motor Car Company<\/p>\n<p>Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Sewak Sabha Charitable Trust 2003(2) RCR 606 where this<br \/>\n<span class=\"hidden_text\"> Civil Revision No.56 of 2009 (O&amp;M)                                -3-<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Court laid down that where an ejectment petition had been filed by the Trust<\/p>\n<p>in its own name and not by the trustees, then there was no illegality and also<\/p>\n<p>several other decisions of this Court and the Hon&#8217;ble Supreme Court which<\/p>\n<p>spelt out the fundamental proposition and that if the landlord had explained<\/p>\n<p>the reasons for the suitability of the premises for his bona fide requirement<\/p>\n<p>then the tenant was liable to be ejected. There is nothing amiss in the<\/p>\n<p>reasoning of the Rent Controller and the Appellate Authority which calls for<\/p>\n<p>an interference in revision petition before me. The revision petition is<\/p>\n<p>accordingly dismissed.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n<p>                                                       (K. KANNAN)<br \/>\n                                                            JUDGE<br \/>\nJanuary 13, 2009<br \/>\nPankaj*\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Punjab-Haryana High Court Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009 Civil Revision No.56 of 2009 (O&amp;M) -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Civil Revision No.56 of 2009 (O&amp;M) Date of decision: 13.01.2009 Ramesh Chand &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.. Petitioner Vs. Janta Pustkalya &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.Respondent Present: Mr.Adarsh Jain, Advocate for the petitioner. CORAM: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,28],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-punjab-haryana-high-court"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.3 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2015-08-09T15:46:47+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009\",\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-09T15:46:47+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009\"},\"wordCount\":732,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Punjab-Haryana High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009\",\"name\":\"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2015-08-09T15:46:47+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2015-08-09T15:46:47+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009","datePublished":"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-09T15:46:47+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009"},"wordCount":732,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Punjab-Haryana High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009","name":"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court &amp; High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2009-01-12T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2015-08-09T15:46:47+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/ramesh-chand-vs-janta-pustkalya-on-13-january-2009#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Ramesh Chand vs Janta Pustkalya on 13 January, 2009"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58100"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58100\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}