{"id":58708,"date":"2008-08-26T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-08-25T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008"},"modified":"2016-01-10T14:23:27","modified_gmt":"2016-01-10T08:53:27","slug":"sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008","title":{"rendered":"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008"},"content":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court<\/div>\n
Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008<\/div>\n
Author: B.V.Nagarathna<\/div>\n
..1..\n\nIN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH\nAT DHARWAD  \n\nDATED THIS THE 26\"' DAY 01:' AUGUS'I';\"zf\"0(}\u00a3.\u00a7__:  \" \n\nBEFORE\n\nTHE HON'BLE MRS. Jusrx-;;E $;v.1:\u00abAg3AI{A?1*;a;~:g& '  \nM.F.A.NQ.2433;--2<\u00a7a? % " 'V  \nM.F.A.NOS.2432\/07;'-QA431\/O7'"B32-#30\/6:?\n\nm MFA.N0.2433[20i:}?..'_ \n\nl_3;!;P_W!1;;1-SE2 T\nSRITIPPANNA  _ \nSINCE ..B'EC'EASED_.BY H4:S'~LF:V,sMT.NAGAwwA\n\nW\/O_'F--1PP;\u00a7N_!%A BA'}1DIHAL:VAGE"S5 YEARS\n0CC:AGRICUL'IfURA--EA"'*-  " A\n\n{R\/ 6  *tQ. mL13I31%eGA\n '\u00a7\u00a7;C{2UIs1*r10N OFFICER\n\n A.  'EXECUTIVE ENGINEER\n\nC;-UM--1.V.Ass'r.coMMIssIoNER\nKOPPAL\n\n. NO. I. TUNGABHAQRA WATER DIVISION\nMUNIRABAD\n'1' Q DIST KOPPAL\n\n RESF'ON{)ENTS\n\n \n\n\n\n. 3-\n\n(By Sri; D.N.KULKARNI, HCGP FOR R1-2)\n\nTHIS MFA FILED U\/S.54{1) OF \nACT AGAINEI' THE JUDGMENT EEAAWARI) I)A'P!T%}D S\/111-99 2. =\nPASSED IN LAC No.27\/99 ONIITHE 'EILE -ioI\u00abi_'I*I:IE QIVIL I\n\nJUDGE 85 ADDL cam, KOPPAL; PAIRFLY 1ALLQWING,'AI*HE\n\nREFERENCE PETITION FOR ENHANCED ccIMPENs;aTIIoIx\ufb01\n35 SEEKING FUR'rIIEi~2_ E-NHANCEMEIIT.  OI?'\n\nCOMPENSATION.\n\nIN MF'A.ll0.2432[2(!3}_~'g \nBE'l'WEE!l:   _ \n\n1 SR! BASAPPA    \nSINCE ..EiE_CEASED_. BY H.IS=1;jRS NIIIGAPPA\nS\/O BLASAIPPAJIEER   \nAGE'M.\u00a5\u20acE3O~R;'.._OCf;:AGRICULTURE\nR] 0 ..ARA;~;:ERI TQ YELB'UEGg.A\n\n  \n\n2 SHARANEPPA .   \ns\/0 BASAPPA JEER '  '-\nAGE MAJORVV, . ._\noCc:AI;EIcUL\"IU,REV =\n_ . E\/0 EIIAKEEI TQ 'I*EL_3IJ.EGA\n D\u00a3SF\"KOPPAL'* \n\n. . .APPELLANTS\n\n .(Ey\u00bbsrI: Abv.)\n\n, ' .\n\n1%\n\n   HAf)QUISI'I'I-ON OFFICER\n\n _{3UM\"AsSr.c0MMIssIoNER\n  VKOPPAL\n\n 5 I I 2. ,  \" ' 'EXECUTIVE ENGINEER\n\n\" 'NO. 1. TUNGABHADRA WATER DIVISION\n\n\n\n..,, WM\n\nMUNIRABAD\nTQ DIST' KOPPAL\n\n  3  \"  \n\n(By Sari: D.l\\\u00a5.KULKARNI, HCGP Fc:{1\u00e9R 1}231,  * = %\n\nTHIS MFA FILED U] s.54{ 1)~-Q? LA;-nib ACQlii'\u00a7SYF\u00a70N ACT' V T'\n\nAGAINST THE JUDGMENT '&gV'\ufb01.WARD~._DA'f'ED';4 5\/11\/99\nPASSED IN LAC No.28\/99 {)N\"\u00bbTH\u00a3; FILEOF fms CIVIL\nJUDGE as ADDL CJM,'~..KOPPAL,FAR':TLY ALLOWING THE\nREFERENCE PETYFIOR F\u20ac}R_   EvNHAP!CEEe.. COMI-\"ENSA'I'iON\n85 SEEKING F'Ul?i.'HER'\"  _-ENI{AD_\u20ac(3EMENT OF\nCOMPENSATION.  -_  AV '\n\n31-:1'w1r.rsn:.._ ._     \n\nasm HA\u00a3ei--1MAmA.cE\u00a3AI2 ;\n\nS10 RAGHAVENDRACHAR ASE-IRIT\n32 Y G{3C'~;AG_Ri\u00ab--.Ri\u20ac) ARAKERI\nYELBURGA,  K(;': PPAL\n\n. . . APPELLANT\n\n A gay'  V-'.9 GATVMQGALI, ADV.)\n\n---um-mun... 'A-\n\n \"\u00e9scqursrrrom OFFICER\n'mm ASST comwssxomsn KOPPAL\n\n%  EXECUTIVE ENGINEER\n\n NO 1 TUNGABHADRA WATER DIVISION\nMUNIRABAD,KOPPAL\n\n... RESPONDENTS<\/pre>\n
-4-<\/span><\/p>\n
(By Sri: D.N.KULKARNI, HCGP FOR R1-2)<\/p>\n
THIS MFA FILED U\/354(1) or LAN’)?—…A=CiQE}ISiTiQN*.,_
\nAcr AGAINST THE JUDGMENT;-an Awmen Damn 5A,t11\/99}.
\nPASSED IN LAC N0.26[99 0:4\u00bb: ‘rH2;,F1LE;’ OF’.’i’HE _CIVIL’~.._<\/p>\n
JUDGE 85 ADDL CJM, KOPPAL, 1?AR;rLY~.ALLOw\u00bbmG’-THE
\nREFERENCE PETITION FDR ENHANCED ,c:0NIPErsi–sA*r1G.N
\nas SEEKING FURTHER A’v-ENHANCEMENT: 0?
\nCOMPENSATION.     <\/p>\n
\n\nIN Mm.No.243o(2\u20ac:97\nmzrrwr.mr:   _ \n\nSR'lMA.L_LAYYA~w--    w\n<\/pre>\n
S\/O sH;v’AY&CA MAf1\ufb01ApA*i*fH1_ A ‘ ”
\nAGE:MA;JoR _GCC._AGR_I  A
\nFt;-\u00ab’A’F’ARA;i{‘EI2i’-Ti’Q”YELBL\u00a5R(}A
\nD1w’KG*.–PPAL   ._  <\/p>\n
V _ V _ % _ _ …APPELLAN’l’
\n(By 31;’; ‘PG ‘M:(){i\u00a7A.L;I;—ADV.)<\/p>\n
—.-Jun.-nan-.~n<\/p>\n
 LAND Ac\u00e9\ufb01ismom OFFICER
\n _ , caM~AkA_ssT. COMMISSIONER
\n> AAAAAWPAL<\/p>\n
”   ENGINEER
\n  ANGL 1 TUNGABHADRA WATER DIVISION
\n~ _ MUNIRABAD TQ ms? KOPPAL<\/p>\n
 RESPONDENTS<\/p>\n
   (By Sri: D.N.KULKARNI, HCGP FOR R1-2)<\/p>\n
THIS MFA FILED U\/S.54(1) 01:’ LAND ACQWSFFION ACT’
\nAGAINST THE JUDGMENT as AWARD msrmn 5\/1 1\/99<\/p>\n
-5-<\/span>
\nPASSED IN LAC No.30\/99 ON THE FILE’ GF THE CIVIL
\nJUDGE 65 ADDL CJM, KOPPAL, PARTLY ALLOWING THE
\nREFERENCE PETITIGN FOR ENHANCED COMPENSATION
\n& SEEKING FURTHER ENHANCEMENT-\u00ab_  OF
\nCOMPENSATION.  . g  R-  A ”\n<\/p>\n
These MFAS coming on for ORDERSIGR.  %a\u00a2y, <\/p>\n
court delivered the following:   <\/p>\n
JuDGkg\u00a7;R’ ‘%v
\nThese appeals  hf. {ha
\nenhancement of   Judgment
\nand Awards    at Koppel in<\/p>\n
LAC.Nos.27\/99.   respectively dated<\/p>\n
2. The appellaxgt\u00e9 in  2007 is the owner of<\/p>\n
  No.2n2’F,!VEv_m\u00a7asu1ing 3 acres 5 guntas. The<\/p>\n
 P;\u00a2Ii?{\\vn;I%?(\u00a7.2432\/2007 am the owners of land<\/p>\n
  11 acres 23 guntas (17 gumzas<\/p>\n
  D3  measuring 12 acres. The appellam in<\/p>\n
   “%ne:i\u00a7*A;Ro.24;31;2t>o7 is the owner of land bearing Sy.N’o.256<\/p>\n
 acre 6 guntas and the appellant in<\/p>\n
  ‘M.FA;No.}2430\/2007 is the owner of land bearm g<\/p>\n
 E measuring 5 acres 33 guntas. Ail these lands<\/p>\n
\u00ab6-\n<\/p>\n
am situated at Arakere village, Yelburga Ta11;l'(; ‘K9ppal
\nDisuict. By a prcliminaxy noti\ufb01cation  ‘Vvligisder<\/p>\n
Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition   <\/p>\n
the said lands along with ot11t’~:r::.issV1:b’3.:.’-.31′ wegje   <\/p>\n
purpose of Himhalla Pmjec;t_ a1:).<:i4"p<}gsessi<:;'1i.A   'Von
\n12.1.1994. The Land.\n<\/p>\n
\ufb01xing the market vahze of the ~ per acre
\n(Kharab Rs.4oo per sa<.':r#e)'.'   with the said
\nawards,     scfemenoc before the
\nCivii Judge  M,__ iigfgpal seeking enhancement of
\n   were clubbed with other<\/p>\n
cascsand  were led.\n<\/p>\n
 ‘V 011  appellants one Sri.Ma1iaiah was<\/p>\n
 j  ..m;-J5;  PW.1 and Exs.P1 to P5 were colic-ct1ve’ ly<\/p>\n
 ._  of the respondent Ex.D1 being the award<\/p>\n
 its  were marked in evidence. The Reference<\/p>\n
 A. (,’9u1’t oi1 the basis of the material on record, enhanced the<\/p>\n
 of Rs.50,()G()\/– per acre alongwith all<\/p>\n
 = ..–{statutory bene\ufb01ts i.e., solatium on the market value and<\/p>\n
*”\/<\/p>\n
-7-<\/span><\/p>\n
additional market vaiue at 12%, interest at 994: \ufb01om date<\/p>\n
of taking possession of the had on <\/p>\n
one year and thereafter 15% from  <\/p>\n
full and \ufb01nal payment of the  eitgoiknt  <\/p>\n
aheady deposited by the Land A\u00a2quis:;tion  * 1\u00a7\u00a7t’b\u00a7ing<\/p>\n
satis\ufb01ed with the said’ Juamgm and As;\u00a7a~rsj.g,  Qua’ 1111′ anis<\/p>\n
j have preferred these ‘appea\ufb01sf ” Q’; <\/p>\n
4. 1 bags  isx;P;e.M5gg1g V  counsel for the
\nappe\ufb02axzi\ufb01\u00e9   learned Government<\/p>\n
Advocate  fi.;:t:sf).5;1dc1\u00a7{S; ‘  ‘<\/p>\n
5.   behalf of the appellants that the<\/p>\n
  que\u00e9’\u00a3’\u00a7m_.’_1___h\u00a3ing irrigated land, the Reference Court<\/p>\n
‘   Rs.50,000\/- per acre and despite the material<\/p>\n
H ‘T012:  Jmeager compensation had to be awarded. He<\/p>\n
\ufb02ag   upon a decision of the Division. Bench of this<\/p>\n
  in MFA.No.6127\/2001 disposed of on 17.3.2005<\/p>\n
 ‘\ufb01iixere\u00e9n the compensation in mspect of the adjacent lands<\/p>\n
has been enhanced to a sum of Rs.l,O0,00{)\/— per acre with<\/p>\n
.. 3..\n<\/p>\n
alllstatutory bene\ufb01ts and therefore, he requests  to<\/p>\n
pass similar orders in these appeals also.<\/p>\n
6. Per conha, on behalf of th\u00e9”:.ms\u00a7\u00a7o\ufb01d\u00e9nt it  <\/p>\n
by the learned Government’  er    L’<\/p>\n
was justi\ufb01ed in awamgng Rs.5%;(}QU}_\u00a7pcf that these
\nappeals do not cail   He however, fairly
\nsubmits that this   arising out the
\nsame   Rs. 130,000] –\n<\/p>\n
per acmi   b\u00e9n\u00e9\ufb01ts. He has further
\nsu1n\u00a7 itte_:i’_’ ”    interest on solatium is
\nooncef\ufb01egd; it   from the date of decisinn of the<\/p>\n
Horgfblg:  Sundafs case and not \ufb01om the<\/p>\n
 \u00e9dat\u00e9 sf  noti\ufb01cation as held in the case of<\/p>\n
    Vs.Um’:an of India reported in 2005(2) LACC<\/p>\n
50,1.\n<\/p>\n
 H I have perused the Judgtncnt of the  Bench of<\/p>\n
  ibis court in MFA.No.6127\/2001 dated 17.3.2005. In the<\/p>\n
said judgment also it is observed that the preliminary<\/p>\n
-9.\n<\/p>\n
noti\ufb01cation in the said case was dated 24. <\/p>\n
of the very same purpose namely for the <\/p>\n
mergcmzt: of Himhalla Project aItdmth_c 1a31iis”]A <\/p>\n
situated at Arakem Viliagc, Yclbtnx-ga1″i’aj”Lul\u00a7t\u00bbc’>’f <\/p>\n
was the subject matter at
\nBeach by tbllowing  gariie\ufb01 t_ ae\u00a2asions in
\nMF’A.No.5554f2OO1V    of on
\n92.2005, wmgh also t.V~\u00a3_ttie land situated in
\nthe very  o1i_1t”;ot’. appeals arise and
\nacquired?   of construction of
\n   the previous Judgment
\n 1\/2001 and other conncactw<\/p>\n
case’ us ” ta_:’ltm’  s of the fact that the pre31mmaIy’ ‘<\/p>\n
  wttS’6i:t’V24.11.1994, \ufb01xed the market value: at<\/p>\n
V    acre.\n<\/p>\n
3. ~ In so far as the mtemst is ooncetned it is held that the<\/p>\n
”  \u00e9ipgm\ufb02ant in the said case was entitled for interest and other<\/p>\n
 st\ufb01zutoxy bene\ufb01ts as admissible under the provisions of Land<\/p>\n
H Acquisition Act but not from the date of dis-possession till<\/p>\n
A<\/p>\n
\/<\/p>\n
\u00ab-10-\n<\/p>\n
the date of issuance of Section 4(1) n<3ti\ufb01catio;1'; .. not
\ndisputed by both sides that in the instant
\nin question are situated at Arakgnz
\nfor the same purpose un\ufb01ct
\n15.12.1994 and therefore,   of
\nDivision Bench of this  referred
\nto above, oompensz:;i%if)*nAi%;1  is enhanced to
\nRs.1,00,000]-__pcr   bene\ufb01ts.\n<\/p>\n
9.  is\u00e9fcned to the decision of
\nGuruprcet   \ufb01ne interest has to be
\npaid only   case and not \ufb01om the
\ndate of pmc;:hmJna:v’ ”   or a perusal of the said
\n‘t:hc’~– it is noticed that at para 44
\nme’.  Court has luck! that if the claim for
\n .i;;tcre.\u00e9.t,__jbAI1  is made and the same had been
\neit\u00e9icgr \u00e9xpzcssly or by nwessaxy implication by the
\n_ V_  (iacme of the reference court or of tha appeiiatc
\n  court has ncocssat11y’ to mjoct the claim<\/p>\n
 “-..Af<$'rV\ufb011tcrest on solatium based on Sundafs case on the<\/p>\n
'\u00a7'\/<\/p>\n
-11-<\/span><\/p>\n
gmumi that the execution court gannot go <\/p>\n
But, if the award of thc refettmm ctmrt or _<\/p>\n
appellate court does not specifically refer bf, _A<\/p>\n
interest on solatium or in cases  <\/p>\n
\ufb01ade and rejected eitherV.\u00e93xpres;\u00e91ig’ or  <\/p>\n
refertmce 001111: or thc    on
\nthe compensation is would’  Htnrpen to the
\nexecution court to apply  and hold that
\ntbs    u and in such
\nevent  be directed to be
\ndepofgiiz\u00e9ii \ufb02jnot and that inmrcst on
\n   pending executions and not<\/p>\n
in closed \u00e9;+:ecu1:io’;19A.A execution court win be entitled<\/p>\n
   itsa  fznm the date of judmcnt in<\/p>\n
 L’ :\u00e9ase(19.9.2001) and not for any period.<\/p>\n
10; O.  “‘ 4% . , in the izmstant case the Division Bench in<\/p>\n
” ~  127\/2001 has mtzgorically hcid that the appe\ufb02ant<\/p>\n
  said case was entitled for iilterest for ot}:u::z’ statutory<\/p>\n
 bene\ufb01ts as admissilrk under the pmvisions of Land<\/p>\n
5\/<\/p>\n
– 13.\n<\/p>\n
Acquisitions Act and the appellant was not ‘any<\/p>\n
interest from the date of dis-possession till the  <\/p>\n
of Section 4(1) noti\ufb01cation. H\u20ac110E,\ufb0218    , <\/p>\n
has to be deposited in  :’i_11′”  2<\/p>\n
Judgment of the I-Ion’bk:     L’<\/p>\n
1 1. At this stage it'”is:  HOG? that
\nthe claim is only to  per acre and
\nthat the  ‘fee   paid. Learned
\ncounsel   to my notice applications
\n l1″7″‘cf’ seeking amendment of
\n   of appeal whereby the claim has
\nbeen  -\u00bb per acre along with all statutory<\/p>\n
 15\u00a2 that the said application may be<\/p>\n
\u00bbA __that he would pay the balance court fee.<\/p>\n
 ~.Al’l-.\u20aceepi:1ll,V’,jr;”_it1  the that that in similar appeals in respect of<\/p>\n
 dated 5.8.1998 the compensation had been<\/p>\n
 AA  to Rs.95,000\/~ per acre along with an statutory<\/p>\n
l  and the appellants had been permitted to pay the<\/p>\n
 balance court fee and in these appeals oonsidezing the fact<\/p>\n
that the noti\ufb01cation is dated 15.12.1994 and following the<\/p>\n
&.\n<\/p>\n<\/p>\n
– 13..\n<\/p>\n
decisions of the Division Bench of this court in
\nMFA.No.6127[20(}1 dated 17.3.2005, the oompcnsiiiion has<\/p>\n
been enhanced to RS.1,00,000\/- per acre,  is<\/p>\n
made in these appeals also by aiiawing  <\/p>\n
amendment and directing the       <\/p>\n
withm’ a pt-nod’ of ten wccks :’\u00a7t$a 1    ‘A ‘<\/p>\n
payment. O\ufb01oe is    La’ 1″: deck
\naccordingly. In the \u00a7vent .c:~f  \u00e9ippeal\ufb01 ‘net d\u00e9posi\ufb01ng the<\/p>\n
baiance court fees    weeks from today,<\/p>\n
these <\/p>\n
12. Thc\u00a7e.   in the above iacrms.<\/p>\n
‘1
\nSad?\n<\/p>\n
Mn}<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Karnataka High Court Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008 Author: B.V.Nagarathna ..1.. IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26″‘ DAY 01:’ AUGUS’I’;”zf”0(}\u00a3.\u00a7__: ” BEFORE THE HON’BLE MRS. Jusrx-;;E $;v.1:\u00abAg3AI{A?1*;a;~:g& ‘ M.F.A.NQ.2433;–2<\u00a7a? % " 'V M.F.A.NOS.2432\/07;'-QA431\/O7'"B32-#30\/6:? m MFA.N0.2433[20i:}?..'_ l_3;!;P_W!1;;1-SE2 T SRITIPPANNA _ SINCE ..B'EC'EASED_.BY H4:S'~LF:V,sMT.NAGAwwA […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,20],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58708","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-karnataka-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nSri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-01-10T08:53:27+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"9 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008\",\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-10T08:53:27+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008\"},\"wordCount\":1449,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Karnataka High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008\",\"name\":\"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-01-10T08:53:27+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-01-10T08:53:27+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"9 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008","datePublished":"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-10T08:53:27+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008"},"wordCount":1449,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Karnataka High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008","name":"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-08-25T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2016-01-10T08:53:27+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/sri-tippanna-vs-land-acquisition-officer-on-26-august-2008#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Sri Tippanna vs Land Acquisition Officer on 26 August, 2008"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58708"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58708\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58708"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58708"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58708"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}