{"id":59028,"date":"1951-09-10T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1951-09-09T18:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951"},"modified":"2014-12-22T04:26:16","modified_gmt":"2014-12-21T22:56:16","slug":"gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951","title":{"rendered":"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951"},"content":{"rendered":"
Madras High Court<\/div>\n
Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951<\/div>\n
Equivalent citations: AIR 1953 Mad 208, (1952) 1 MLJ 156<\/div>\n
Author: S Rao<\/div>\n
Bench: S Rao<\/div>\n<\/p>\n
<\/pre>\n
ORDER<\/p>\n
 Subba Rao, J. <\/p>\n
 1. This is an application for issuing a writ of certiorari to quash the order of the Additional Subordinate Judge of Guntur made in an appeal filed against the order of the Rent Controller of Guntur.\n<\/p>\n
 The first respondent is the owner of a three-fifths share in the house and premises bearing door No. 7411 in Guntur Municipality. The petitioner is a tenant in respect of that share. It is not necessary to notice the previous litigation between the first respondent and others whereunder the first respondent’s right to three-fifths share in the suit premises was recognized and declared) as the title of the first respondent to that share is not now disputed before me. The first respondent filed H.R.C. No. 13 of 1949 under Section 7 (2) (1) of the Madras Act 25 of 1949 for evicting the petitioner. It was alleged in that petition that the house required urgent repairs and also that the petitioner made a default in payment of the rent. That application was filed on 2nd February 1949. On 12th April I949, the petitioner filed another application for amendment of the petition by adding the following clause to paragraph 7. It reads: “as the petitioner’s lease to occupy the premises which he has been occupying has expired by 1st February 1949 and the petitioner has vacated the same and as the petitioner does not own any other non-residential “Building in Guntur town for the purpose of carrying his business and as there is no other non-residential building in Guntur to the possession of which it is entitled for carrying on its business.”\n<\/p>\n
 There is  some argument before me on the question whether this amendment was actually ordered by the Rent Controller of Guntur.    A counter affidavit was filed to the application for amendment   on   18th   April   1949.    The   Rent Controller noticed the argument based upon the amendment.    He   practically,   though   not   definitely, accepted all the grounds alleged in the petition and those added by the amendment and ordered eviction.    The respondent preferred an appeal  (C. M. A. No. 54 of 1949)  to the Subordinate Judge of Guntur.    In that appeal the points formulated for decision were as follows:\n<\/p>\n
 ”    1. Whether the rent fixed by the Rent Controller is fair and  reasonable; if not, what is   the   fair   rent   due   for   the   building   in question?\n<\/p>\n
 2. Whether the appellant was in arrears of rent and was liable to be evicted?”\n<\/p>\n
 The appellate judgment also disclosed that the advocate who appeared for the respondent at that stage gave up his other two contentions, namely, that the appellant caused damage to the buildings and that, subsequent to the filing of the petition for eviction, the respondent wanted the building for carrying on his own business. The learned Subordinate Judge held against the petitioner on the points formulated and allowed the appeal. From the aforesaid facts, it is manifest that the amendment must have been allowed. Otherwise, the Rent Controller would not have decided the point raised by the amendment. Nor would the appellate Judge have recorded the fact that the point raised by the amendment was not pressed before him. Indeed, the learned Subordinate Judge who disposed of the present appeal observed in his judgment that the amendment must presumably have been allowed. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent before him it is not stated either expressly or by necessary implication that the amendment was not made. Indeed, throughout the proceedings the case was argued on the basis that the amendment was allowed. It may therefore be accepted for the purpose of this application that the amendment was allowed. The result of the previous litigation would then be that the petitioner applied for eviction on four grounds and that he gave up two grounds, and, in respect of the other two grounds, the learned Subordinate Judge found against him. The respondent filed the present application for eviction against the petitioner, the main ground being that the petitioner required the premises for his own occupation. The Rent Controller ordered eviction. The appeal filed against that order was also dismissed. The petitioner questions that order on the ground that the learned Subordinate Judge erred in holding that the order in the previous application did not preclude the respondent from filing the present application under Section 10 of the Madras Act 25 of 1949. Section 10 reads as follows:\n<\/p>\n
  “The Controller   shall   summarily  reject   any application under Sub-section   (2)  or under Sub-section (3) of Section 7, which raises between the same parties or between the parties under whom they or any of them claim, substantially the same issues as have been finally decided, or as purport to have been finally decided in former proceedings.”\n<\/p>\n
 The only question  therefore  is  whether  the
\nlearned Judge in C. M. A. No. 54 of 1949 finally
\ndecided   or   purports   to   have   finally decided
\nthe  question,  namely,  whether  the  respondent
\nrequired the premises for his own occupation.\n<\/p>\n
From  the  narration  of  the   aforesaid   facts  it
\nwill be seen that the learned Subordinate Judge
\ndismissed the application of the respondent as
\nho did not press  the present contention before
\nhim   and   as  he  found   against   him   on   other
\ncontention raised.   Ordinarily, a decision arrived
\nat by  a   court  of  law  in  those  circumstance,
\nwould operate as a bar of res judicata under Section  11, Civil P. C.    But Mr.  Rajah Aiyar contended that the wording of Section 10 of Madras Act
\n25 of 1949   is   different   and   that   unless   the
\nquestion   was   finally  decided  in   the   previous
\napplication, Section  10 would not operate as a bar
\nfor the maintainability of a  fresh application.<\/p>\n
\nIn  support of his  argument,  he  relied  on the\ndecision of Rajamannar C. J. and Raghava Rao\nJ. in -- 'Miss Revathi v. Venkataraman', 1949-2\nMLJ 594.    There, the previous application was\ndismissed  for default.    When  a  second  application was filed, the learned Judges held that a\ndismissal for default would not be a final decision within the meaning of  Section 10.   I respectfully\nagree  with   the   view   expressed   therein.    But\nthat decision has no bearing on the question to\nbe decided in the present case, where an application   is   dismissed   not   for   default,   but   on\nmerits.    It is also not necessary to consider the\nquestion  whether the principle of constructive\nres judicata applies to this case, for the question\nwas specifically raised and not pressed.    I hold\nthat when an application with specific grounds\nis  filed  and  if  some  of  the  grounds   are not\npressed, the order of the court dismissing the\napplication on that basis is a final adjudication\non the question raised but not pressed.   In that\nview;  the order made in C.  M.  A.  No.  54  of\n1949 is a bar to the maintainability of the present  application.     In  the  result,  the  order  of\nthe    learned    Subordinate    Judge    is    hereby\nquashed and the petitioner will have his costs. \n \n\n<\/pre>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Madras High Court Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951 Equivalent citations: AIR 1953 Mad 208, (1952) 1 MLJ 156 Author: S Rao Bench: S Rao ORDER Subba Rao, J. 1. This is an application for issuing a writ of certiorari to quash the order of the Additional […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_lmt_disableupdate":"","_lmt_disable":"","_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[8,13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59028","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-high-court","category-madras-high-court"],"yoast_head":"\nGudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"1951-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2014-12-21T22:56:16+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"512\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@legaliadmin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@Legal_india\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Legal India Admin\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\"},\"headline\":\"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951\",\"datePublished\":\"1951-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-21T22:56:16+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951\"},\"wordCount\":955,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"articleSection\":[\"High Court\",\"Madras High Court\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951\",\"name\":\"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"1951-09-09T18:30:00+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2014-12-21T22:56:16+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"name\":\"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"description\":\"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\"},\"alternateName\":\"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\",\"alternateName\":\"Legal India\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/5\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/legal-india-icon.jpg\",\"width\":512,\"height\":512,\"caption\":\"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/LegalindiaCom\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/Legal_india\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea\",\"name\":\"Legal India Admin\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Legal India Admin\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\",\"https:\\\/\\\/x.com\\\/legaliadmin\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.legalindia.com\\\/judgments\\\/author\\\/legal-india-admin\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","og_url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951","og_site_name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","article_published_time":"1951-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2014-12-21T22:56:16+00:00","og_image":[{"width":512,"height":512,"url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg?fit=512%2C512&ssl=1","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Legal India Admin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@legaliadmin","twitter_site":"@Legal_india","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Legal India Admin","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951"},"author":{"name":"Legal India Admin","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea"},"headline":"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951","datePublished":"1951-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-21T22:56:16+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951"},"wordCount":955,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"articleSection":["High Court","Madras High Court"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951","name":"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951 - Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website"},"datePublished":"1951-09-09T18:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2014-12-21T22:56:16+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/gudivada-jagannadham-vs-a-s-krishna-and-co-ltd-and-anr-on-10-september-1951#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Gudivada Jagannadham vs A.S. Krishna And Co., Ltd. And Anr. on 10 September, 1951"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","name":"Free Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","description":"Search and read the latest judgements, orders, and rulings from the Supreme Court of India and all High Courts. A comprehensive database for lawyers, advocates, and law students.","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization"},"alternateName":"Free judgements of Supreme Court & High Court of India | Legal India","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#organization","name":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India","alternateName":"Legal India","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/5\/2025\/09\/legal-india-icon.jpg","width":512,"height":512,"caption":"Judgements of Supreme Court & High Court | Legal India"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/LegalindiaCom\/","https:\/\/x.com\/Legal_india"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/#\/schema\/person\/0bfdffe9059fb8bb24a86d094609c5ea","name":"Legal India Admin","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/4faa9d728ed1af3b73d52225c7f12901ac726fe6f7ea0a3348a1d51f3a930987?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Legal India Admin"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.legalindia.com","https:\/\/x.com\/legaliadmin"],"url":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/author\/legal-india-admin"}]}},"modified_by":null,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59028","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59028"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59028\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.legalindia.com\/judgments\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}